Our spoiled, adolescent President threw a temper tantrum yesterday, because, he claimed, Congress is not giving him everything he wants. He charged that anyone who disagrees with his policies is the same as those who sought to appease Hitler and coddle Stalin. But not one of his extremist statements is true.
In a speech to adoring fans at the American Heritage Foundation, Mr. Bush made the following statements:
"Unfortunately, on too many issues, some in Congress are behaving as if America is not at war, . . . This is no time for Congress to weaken the Department of Justice by denying it a strong and effective leader. . . . It's no time for Congress to weaken our ability to intercept information from terrorists about potential attacks on the United States of America. And this is no time for Congress to hold back vital funding for our troops as they fight al-Qaida terrorists and radicals in Afghanistan and Iraq."
Congress didn't weaken the Justice Department. It was George Bush who installed his long-time crony, Alberto Gonzales, as Attorney General under whose corrupt and inept leadership the Department became deeply compromised. Despite repeated Congressional calls that Gonzales resign, it was Mr. Bush who stubbornly supported Gonzales as he and Bush's senior political adviser Karl Rove politicized the US Attorneys, drove out experienced career attorneys and replaced them with party hacks, corrupted the Civil Rights/Voting Rights Sections, and compromised the Office of Legal Counsel. It was Bush and Cheney who insisted on surveillance procedures so unlawful they forced several senior DoJ officials -- all conservative Republicans -- to threaten to resign -- which all of them eventually did.
After Gonzales' corrupt tenure, Congress has a duty to demand that the next Attorney General be independent, honest and courageous enough to restore DoJ's independence and integrity. Unfortunately, it now appears the man Bush nominated for Attorney General has already been compromised trying to obscure torture practices Bush ordered. Bush will not nominate anyone likely to find the President's actions unlawful, and no nominee unwilling to consider these matters honestly should be confirmed as Attorney General. Bush, not Congress, is responsible for that awful dilemma.
Nor has Congress weakened the nation's ability to conduct foreign surveillance. Even before Congress amended it last August, the FISA fully authorized the US to spy on all electronic communications in and out of the US, provided the surveillance occurred under a warrant obtained from the secret FISA court, either before or after the fact if time were short. When the Administration claimed it needed relief from the warrant requirement for purely foreign-to-foreign communications routed through US telecommunication facilities, the Congress gave that power -- and much more. In its zeal (or panic) Congress gave the executive far more authority than it needs or is Constitutional.
The charge that Congress is insufficiently focused on our wars is incomprehensible; they've talked of little else since 2003, particularly the Administration's intelligence deceptions and gross mismanagement.
Mr. Bush also lied when he charged Congress with failing to provide adequate funding for US troops. In six years of war, Congress hasn't denied a single war funding request. Nor are there any plans by Congressional leaders to deny necessary funds in the future, although funding may be authorized in segments.
President Bush simply lied on every point. He's behaving like a spoiled, petulant adolescent, blaming everyone but himself for his own failures and in denial about the wreckage caused by his own policies. Without impeachment, there is little the country can do about such childish behavior.
America is stumbling along with a severely dysfunctional government. We have an incompetent, dishonest, and lawless Administration led by a deeply flawed President and war-crazed VP. We do not always have a working majority of responsible adults in Congress, and there are only scattered individuals within the executive with whom Congress can work on a cooperative basis. The country senses the crisis and is deeply dissatisfied with its government and the direction the country is heading.
Without a veto-proof majority, nothing worthwhile can be accomplished until his Administration is removed from office. Congress has an obligation to try to keep the government working as best it can until this horror of a Presidency ends; they have an obligation to prevent the Administration from starting another war and doing any further harm to the country, its allies and its interests. The current leadership may not be up to this unprecedented task, but it's all we've got for now.
Until 2008, Congress has no reason to accede to any of this President's demands regarding Mukasey or to give in to his petulance, fear-mongering and bullying. On any requests that are not absolutely essential, they should just say no.
UPDATE: Various comments suggest Chuck Schumer might want to hear from us about Mukasey. Here are the numbers to call: (202) 224-6542 or (212) 486-4430. (h/t jayackroyd)
Responses to Bush speech from Speaker Pelosi and Senator Clinton.
Photo: Bush speaks to Heritage Foundation, November 1; AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Good morning, Scarecrow.
-MS
from epu land
Morning all….
I had a long phone conversation with the husband, who is on a stop on his trip back to NZ. He was at the Navy Sere (spelled right?) school in the late 60’s, I believe, and he was waterboarded there. He thinks that, rather than pontificating, the voting Senators and the Attny General nominee should volunteer to have the Navy “simulate” waterboarding them. They can be safe in the knowledge that they will not drown and that it is all supervised properly. There is no doubt in his mind that it is torture and he still has a shudder in his voice in recalling it after almost forty years.
(This is one of many things that he has never discussed much until now. He is filled with disgust that it is even debatable.)
Good morning scarecrow :)
Wonderful post as usual…
Caw, caw! Hey Scarecrow.
Fixed it for you.
SC!
Will GWB be the frist prez to break 20% in the polls?
Morning, Scarecrow.
To George W. Bush:
Blow it out your ass.
If you were really serious about the war on terror, you’d resign and give yourself up to be tried for war crimes.
““Unfortunately, on too many issues, some in Congress are behaving as if America is not at war”
It’s important to keep in mind that America is NOT at war! Wars are declared by Congress - talk about temper tantrums. This one will cost us long and dearly.
-MS
g’morning firedogs and thanx scarecrow for another early post
I haven’t read it yet so I don’t know if this link is in the body but talk about temper tantrums;
they better not cave, this president gets everything he wants and he is the most inept president in history
what’s wrong with those two in the same sentence
“gets everything he wants” and
“the most inept in history”
all he does is damage this country and it’s about time he was put in his place, he is not the country, he is not the boss of congress, congress is the boss of him
Michael in Park Slope @ 8
hear hear!
Anytime Bush speaks, I just hear “Blah Blah Blah….lies…whining about Congress” I totally tune him out and don’t expect him to say anything worthwhile. In fact I am still surprised that people bother to report the things that he says at these press conferences. I cannot think of anything more boring except watching dust gather on the pumpkin on my desk. I assume everyone else here feels similarly
Do you know of anyone who is not on progressive blogs that actually listens and cares about what Bush says? Do people actually listen to his weekly radio address or whatever?
“Unfortunately, on too many issues, some in Congress are behaving as if America is not at war”
Er, actually, Heritage is at war. Along with AEI and the lot of them.
We need to sterilize their interns.
More spoiled, petulant adolescent behavior: Bush: No attorney general if not Mukasey
“That would guarantee that America would have no attorney general during this time of war,” the president said.
NZ Expat, now in KS @ 2
Dear NZ:
Give your hubby a hug from us! And thanks for sharing.
twolf1 @ 13
Wow, so finding AG candidates that think waterboarding is torture is that difficult, George?
Other than the idea that the president can just goto war is the AUMF the only piece of legislation empowering this idiocy?
tw3k @ 10
that’s right, WE are not at war we are at an OCCUPATION
we are doing battle with a country that they knew posed no threat, that they knew would destabalizze the entire planet, that they knew would fuel terrorism
this is his war, they knew these things would happen and they invited them
told we would be opening the gates of hell, and now that he caused the damage he thinks that gives him license to continue to cuase ever MORE damage?
this is just bizzare, every single thing he has done has put us in more danger, congress has GOT to stop letting this guy make decisions
It’s not fair, it’s not fair!
Bush, Defending Justice Nominee, Sees Unfairness
Good morning Scarecrow.
The problem is that this Congress will do nothing to curb the WH bas**rd. Yes he is mentally ill, yes he is petulant, yes he is very, very dangerous, yes he loves the strut of war, yes he has a megalomaniacal VP, yes he has shredded the Constitution, yes he should be impeached and incarcerated but no it aint gonna happen. This Congress is “led” by people in the pay of the defense industry and they are making mucho dollars and they do not give one whig about young Americans being killed or Iraqis being murdered by bush & co.
egregious @ 5
Probably better. Good morning everyone.
There’s a front page lead NYT story this a.m. about Barack Obama, who discusses his proposals for dealing with Iran with reporters Michael Gordon and Jeff Zeleny.
You’ll note that in the letter 30 Dem Senators just sent to Bush saying he has to come back for authorization before attacking Iran, Hillary Clinton is one of the signers, but Obama refused to sign. But he comes right back with his Time’s interview. The ball is now in Hillary’s court.
The letter is part of the context in which Bush was reacting — this notion that he can’t do what he wants without getting permission — that’s something that would set off a spoiled brat.
perris @ 17
he seriously needs the keys taken away!
Those who give Bush what he wants are the same as those who appeased Hitler and coddle Stalin.
twolf1 @ 18
This guy is “applying” for a job that he knows nothing about? What kind of crap is that.
twolf1 @ 13
Yep — another great quote filled with dishonesty. In essence is says: “Unless we refuse to denounce torture, we can’t run the Justice Department.”
YAY!!
You wrote, “Mr. Bush . . . lied . . .”.
Congratulations. I think this is a first-time in print and it’s about time.
A headline on a ‘net newspage yesterday read:
“President accuses congress of being in denial about the war.”
And if anyone was wondering just how rabid-assed-crazy this has gotten, that should define it nicely.
Fairfax @ 25
You must be new here?
realworld @ 22
he is running this government and aquireing power EXACTLY the way hitler did it
the friggin “patriot act” is just about plaguerized from hitler’s “enabling act”
it’s bizzare we are allowing this to happen, we have a historical template on what he is doing and we are apeasing him every single step
There will never ever be another impeachment. If the bar is set so low for high crimes and misdemeanors, it is the end of our Constitution as we have known it.
Tristero has an interesting insight into raisin brain and torture.
With Blackwater taking up posts around the country—Mexican and Canadian borders, CA, and who knows where else, I fear for what is to come next November. Somehow I have little confidence that it will be a sea change election bringing in the good guys to rescue us.
Fairfax @ 25
There are 3,150,000 Google citations for Bush ‘plus’ lie
And Christ-in-a-Humvee, is it too much to ask that Pelosi or one of the democratic candidates take a quickie standup-comedy course so they can call a press conference and rip this bullshit to shreds by simply reciting the litany of bloody-assed lies and distortions that for the past 7 years have been brewed up in the koolaid factory we call the white house?
*$&^%(#^&(**!!!
twolf1 @ 18
More dishonesty. Mukasey wasn’t asked about “a program or techniques of a program.” He was asked about the well known (centuries) practice of waterboarding. What could possibly be unfair about asking whether a technique to extort false confessions that was used by the Spanish Inquisition and every other bloody regime for hundreds of years is “torture.”
And Congress did not make this an issue. Bush did, by condoning it, concealing it, secretly reauthorizing it, defending it, denying it.
Bush knows he’s on trial before the public, and his best defense is, “Mukasey doesn’t know the details of how we do it.”
RevDeb @ 29
I think you meant “the bar is set so HIGH”
-MS
Sorry. Sorta newbie. I’m just not at all used to seeing a lie called a lie in print here in Washington.
Scarecrow @ 27
RevDeb @ 29
I think what the American People need to understand is that WE need to rescue us. Waiting for the next election, when somehow “they” will just “go away” and not bother us anymore is just not going to work.
The good news (it is good only in the sense that when you are falling from the 65th floor it’s good that you are only passing by the 35th floor), is that every time he opens his mouth, support for his position falls even. He paved the way with his ’save social security’ campaign.
I have not had a chance to check any of the Late Night FDL - is there any news on Jane?
Fairfax @ 34
Welcome to Firedoglake, where calling out lies is common. I’m in Boston, and we can say “lie” here. We also dump tea into bays.
AndrewOG @ 11
Unfortunately, yes. A truly sobering fact is that he holds about a 68% approval rating among Repug’s.
Strong employment report up 166,000, double consensus.
August revised up by 4000, September revised down by 14000, so net influence of revisions is modestly negative, more than offset by big # for October.
Analysis: Employment is a lagging idicator, and the big gains were in services. Retail & manufacturing employment declined. Finance industry employment performed better than it will in the future. Employment will weaken in coming months, but good for now.
RevDeb @ 29
what the HELL is up with pelosi?
there is NO WAY she could imagine a president more in need of impeachment then this man
WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?
I fear pelosi is either bought or blackmailed
bought meaning she might have been offered a place in the new order when they suspend elections of blackmailed from the information gathered without warrants
the president is claiming he can super cede any law, by any request, that there is no law that binds him
there is NO WAY they are going to allow a democrat to have that power, no FRIGGIN way they are going to allow hilary to have that power
and make no mistake about it, they KNOW their chances of winning in the next election are almost zero
they have something going on, they either know they will be able to pull off ballot flipping or they know a “catastrophu” will give them a reason to suspend congress, to suspend elections.
follow here;
suppose congress DID initiate articles of impeachment;
do you realize the president says he can just alter that law, that he is not bound by it?
this is a fact, his aids have already testified to that opinion
this has got to get done, we have got to get impeachment initiated
Toby Wollin @ 35
That’s about right.
The Mukasey decision is the true crunch time. If he is turned down (please, please make it so Senator Schumer!)it will be the moral equivalent of impeachment. It will smoke Bush and possibly even Cheney out into the open where they will have to defend waterboarding, and admit they did it. It will send the appropriate signal to government officials that not all orders are executable — in particular, those that violate law and the Constitution.
Defeating this nomination is the sine qua non for the (doubtful) restoration of our Constitutional Republic.
perris @ 41
Charlie Savage, author of Imperial Presidency, was on Washington Journal last week. He is a reporter who lives inside the Beltway. He was absolutely astonished when he went on his book tour to find that the country was talking about impeachment, as there’s absolutely NO talk of it in DC. Talk about bubbles, but that’s where Pelosi lives & works.
perris @ 41 says:
“suppose congress DID initiate articles of impeachment;
do you realize the president says he can just alter that law, that he is not bound by it?
this is a fact, his aids have already testified to that opinion”
Respectfully, I do not believe this. My reason is my faith in the American people, which is to say, America! We would not stand for this - not the most red of the red-staters.
I also have to believe this; to not do so would be to yield to hopelessness. Ask yourself: would YOU stand for it? I doubt it, and I certainly wouldn’t.
What say others?
-MS
RevDeb — don’t worry about impeachment. I’m certain that if Clinton becomes Prez, the crazies will try to impeach her. It serves two purposes: (1) keeps the Dems distracted and (2) discredits impeachment for next time they get in.
When the history of this era is written, I suspect historians will find the decision to take impeachment off the table to be one of the most egregious political blunders of our generation.
We can keep nuking Iran on the table, because (as Glenn G would say) that’s what Serious people do, but impeachment for defending our own Constitution from massive assault is off, for the same reason. Insane priorities.
Re: Perris@41
I used to think impeachment was “off the table” by Pelosi since as Speaker she would become president if Darth and Bush were booted out; it would be easy for the repugs to make the case impeachment was self serving.
I’m not so sure about that being her reasoning anymore.
Toby Wollin @ 37
Word was she is doing good!
tw3k @ 48
Jane has been travelling and may check in later today. She’s well.
Scarecrow @ 46
This just makes me insane. I don’t know what we all can do short of storming the bastille with several million of us all at once.
It’s impossible to understand how rational congress critters continue to let all this criminality go on. The easy answer is that they are dazed by power and don’t want to rock the boat, or are afraid of being destroyed by the powerful inertia of the Beltway conventional wisdom.
There is a lot of denial or cognitive dissonance going on down there. But then there is the MSM which is both a stenographer and a cheerleader for this shit. These critters look around them and must think… this is how it is. You get with the program.
I have lost faith in this government. It has been perverted by the influence of money and worships at the alter of power and access to power. All this has so little to do with the needs of the people of this nation… most of the people. Some of the people are being very well served by this government.
While I don’t think we should give up and stop trying to turn this around, I don’t think pressing the conscience buttons of congress critters is going to get the job down. We ned more intimidation, as in direct action, strikes and so forth, where the people en masse assert their power.
And of course collapse might be the way out of this mess. Let it all come crashing down, lots more pain, but perhaps some sensible people can raise america back up from the ashes. There’s so much that has gone wrong, so much wrong thinking like the “new American century”, globalism… market based solutions and unfettered free market transnational capitalism. People around the world are being hurt by THIS america, and the planet is being trashed in the process. But if you look at the top end, the wealthy sector, they have never had it so good.
Perhaps the death spiral is the only way out of this. If not it looks like it will keep going (as it has) from bad to worse… to worser.
We’re bad, we’re bad, we’re really bad.
Scarecrow @ 49
Good news, thanks!
Headline on rawstory: 30 senators warn Bush has no authority on Iran. He’ll interpret that as indicating that 70 senators say he does have authority.
Michael in Park Slope @ 45
I would have said the same thing before we got to THIS point though, we are in battered wife syndrome
Scarecrow @ 20
that’s an excellent point i hadn’t thought of. do you think that was senator obama’s reason for not signing?
i remember some one - was it justin frank? - warning us that bush could be unintentionally provoked into attacking iran, just to prove that no one could tell him not to.
And our stupid, fearful Dem leadership should be trumpeting this from the rooftops. Wait, what’s that I hear??? Oh, another letter of admonition to Bush about Iran. We know how well the dictator tot responds to those. Sweet Jesus.
selise @ 55
It scares the cr*p out me to realize that I have more faith in the military to stop this than I do in Congress or the rest of the govt. I hope that at least that faith is not misplaced.
Scarecrow @ 49
TRAVELING? The woman has surgery and is traveling?
I’ve got to meet this person and touch her and hopefully get some of “that” - when I have my surgery later this month, I have it all planned out to have myself installed in a recliner and the only moving part is going to be my thumb on the remote *g*.
I know this is supposed to be a marathon and not a sprint. But if the race course is destroyed from under our feet, how are we supposed to run it? (stretching the metaphor a bit far ;-)
Some State Dept officials stood up to these creeps. What we need to do is have citizens from top to bottom, left to right stand up and declare no more of this bull shit.
Are we numb? frightened? despondent? Why are the american people just going along with all this shit? Why are they going to work? To school? To the army? Doesn’t this mean that they accept this?
Do we have to wait for elections and then hope for a better more principled government?
We have a fascist government.
RevDeb @ 57
I never thought I would see the day that I would hope for a military intervention to remove a sitting president. If Pelosi won’t initiate at least an Inquiry of Impeachment, I think that might be the only thing that will stop this madman from setting fire to the ruins of what used to be our country.
Scarecrow @ 32
I do think this is worth a two or three sentence LTE to the NYT, letters@nytimes.com, noting that there is no briefing required to answer a question regarding a method of torture that is well documented since at least the Inquisition.
Also, a note to the public editor, public@nytimes.com asking why Stohlberg did not point this out in her article, would be a good thing to do too.
The latter might refer to today’s columnn by Paul Krugman:
Krugman is talking about Republicans lying about health care issues, but it’s the same thing. Stohlberg could easily have made the simple statement that the questions asked by the committee do not refer to the CIA program. There’d be no requirement to add a snarky “But if the president thinks the shoe fits here….”
And while I’m making suggestions for morning activities, don’t forget to talk to Chuck. (202) 224-6542
Let him know that while it would be embarassing to have to withdraw his support from Mukasey, it would be at least as embarrassing to be the deciding vote sending Mukasey out of committee. Oh, and if his staffer tells you that they are taking “a tally,” you might ask what torture techniques would not warrant a tally in making up the Senator’s mind about what is right, and what is wrong. Resist the temptation to refer to Holocaust when asking this question.
eCAHNomics @ 53
lol, get out of head!
False flag scenarios are already in the oven.
Bush doesn’t have to sell this war. Patriotism can always be called on to provide irrational support for machismo.
Has GWB had a psychiatric evaluation? He really seems like he is out to lunch. Doesn’t he?
SanderO @ 60
We do indeed encompassing ALL branches.
SanderO @ 60
Juan Cole is asking that we all stand up and support these State Department employees. He thinks it might be the only way that we can begin to end this misbegotten travesty in Iraq. If we could close the existing embassy in Baghdad it would be an important step.
Another top lawyer resigns from Cheney’s office.
twolf1 @ 13
This, by the way, is the result of taking impeachment off the table. The Senate’s confirmation power has also been removed. Bush will stop nominating people to positions that require confirmation entirely, leaving the government to be run by unconfirmed interim appointments.
Keep in mind that a petulant response from the administration to a rejection of Mukasey could well be an interim appointment that is completely beyond the pale.
What does the Senate do then?
egregious @ 67
We won’t be happy until Addington goes. Not holding my breath.
egregious @ 67
a Coffin leaves Cheney’s office!
jayackroyd @ 62
from Think Progress:
And how is condoning torture putting the rule of law first?????
tw3k @ 70
Empty, unfortunately.
eCAHNomics @ 53
well, the house voted on it last spring (saying that bush should go to congress before attacking iran), and it failed badly - 136 to 288 (with 100 dems voting no).
so i expect bush has known for a while it’s not a problem with the majority of congress.
jayackroyd @ 68
*crickets*
tw3k @ 70
Too bad it doesn’t have the Dark Lord in it with a stake through his pacemaker.
eCAHNomics @ 40
well, atrios got spanked. But he always takes the under….
Spot on! my straw stuffed friend
Another one of my Halloween scenarios is that the GOP will pull Jeb out of their ass at the convention, and pair him with Betrayus.
And then the ususal cheat, cheat, cheat with a terror threat or two thrown in.
And Bob’s your uncle.
Just to put things in perspective: the 1940 Axis had a GDP 77% of the US GDP. The 1960 and 1980 editions of the USSR had GDPs about 40% of the US GDP. Iran, pre-war Iraq, and North Korea–combined–have a GDP about 4% of the US GDP.
GDP is a crude measure of the relative threat level, but a hell of a lot less crude than “because my speechwriter named it an Axis of Evil!”
RevDeb @ 57
congress could give a helping hand to the military with resolutions or even begining an impeachment inquiry - but they are pointedly not doing so. very bad.
From ThinkProgress:
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said he is “weighing” whether to support the Mukasey nomination. “No nominee from this administration will agree with us on things like torture and wiretapping,” Schumer explained. “The best we can expect is somebody who will depoliticize the Justice Department and put rule of law first.”
Yeah, Chuck, just keep spinning!
RevDeb @ 74
We already have an interim apppointment that is beyond the pale. What’s your point? Right now (except for little pocket like USAO NDIL) DOJ is DOA
RevDeb @ 59
cross country.
And again, Bush plays the Dems like a fiddle, Have you noticed that Bush is getting everything that he wants everytime? The Dems rattle their cages and say this, that and the next thing….Bush stays the course he is on and slaps them down in a manner such as this. It absolutely cracks me up. About the only thing I can think that Bush has backed down on is the Immigration Mess which he has apparently changed his tune on.
I hope you all remember how your fellow Dems have failed time and time again when the next elections arise. I am not asking that you vote republican, I am just saying remember this when looking at Nanci Pelosi’s name before knocking out that chad.
Even though I don’t agree with most of what is on these posts, I admire how most of you stand by your beliefs. I guess that is what makes this country great :] .
eCAHNomics @ 72
No, it was full of shit.
revdeb
on the thinkprogress “weighing” quote, that also appears in a NYT article this morning about rocks and hard places for Schumer. And a fe