As they've done throughout their history as a minority party, the Republican strategy for the 2008 elections is to block Congress from getting anything done, and blame it on the Democrats. They're now obstructing more than 20 major appropriations and policy bills through threatened filibusters and vetoes. Yesterday, the leaders of the Grand Obstruction Party announced their latest obstruction target, a much needed expansion of the popular and effective State Children's Health Insurance Program.
There are millions of children who receive little or no health care and are too poor to get insurance. SCHIP was originally conceived to provide coverage for children of families who are not eligible for Medicaid but still too poor to purchase private health insurance. It provides health coverage through a pooled, subsidized fund to pay for health care for children in families below a certain income threshold. By raising the threshold, and including other family members, millions more who are currently without care or insurance can receive care. The increased funding -- $35 billion in the Senate version; $50 billion in the House -- would be provided by taxes, in this case, higher cigarette taxes, and reductions in subsidies for private health insurance. But the main idea is to increase access to the pooled funding mechanism.
Despite bipartisan support in both houses for significant expansion of SCHIP, the Republican leadership has decided to block any major expansion and to support President Bush's threatened veto [h/t Jane]. And why are they against expanding a successful children's health program, especially when solving the problem of uninsured/uncovered Americans is high on the public's wish list? The answers reveal today's Republicans at their hypocritical worst.
Partly it's because this is the opening skirmish in the looming battle over the structure of health care reform. You see, if access to SCHIP's pooled funding mechanism is expanded, so that more Americans can choose it, then Republicans fear Americans who have a choice between the tax-funded pool and private insurance plans that are more expensive (unless subsidized) will choose the tax-funded pool approach -- just like a single payer system. That solution costs less, but the private insurers lose business. So the Republican game is to preclude as many people as they can from having this choice by limiting access to the pooled approach, and then pushing people into private insurance plans through direct subsidies, tax credit incentives or simply denying Americans any other choice.
We've already heard the President, who claims anyone can get universal health care just by showing up at an emergency room, attack the SCHIP expansion as favoring a "government run" program. McConnell and Boehner are now labeling the concept as "Hillary Care," echoing the completely stupid claims by Mitt Romney that Senator Clinton's approach (which she hasn't announced) is essentially Marxist. It's the beginning of the debate over "socialized medicine," just as Moore's SiCKO predicted.
Mitch McConnell also knows that by using the 60-vote rule to block every significant legislative action in the Senate, the Republicans may be able to drag the Democrats down to the low approval ratings the Republicans earned over the past six years. Creating the false impression that the Democrats are unable to govern, while concealing that the reason is the Republicans' cynical obstruction tactics, is a pitiful platform to run on, but apparently it's all the Republicans have left.
And if you're too young to remember the red-scare tactics of the communists-under-the-bed era, just watch Mitt and Rudy, Fred and George. The Republicans will replay that history because they think Americans are dumb enough to fall for it again, and they don't care if it's America's children who pay the price.
Photo: Melina Mara, Washington Post, on Boehner's election as House GOP leader: "We must act swiftly to restore the trust between Congress and the American people," said Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio).
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
good morning!
Caw
Happy Birthday, Jane!
Happy Birthday Jane and Bro!
Good morning Scarecrow, and happy birthday to our beloved (((((Jane)))))
America’s children will not be helped by a Health System run by the government with the efficiency of the post office and the courtesy of your local DMV. Doctors, nurses, drug companies–everything that makes the US system the best in the world–would cease to exist as would the health of the entire population.
In celebration of Jane’s birthday, I hope that Harry Reid plans another sleepover.
A birthday, I love birthdays! Happy, happy, Jane
Now here is an issue where I’d really like to see an all-night debate scheduled. I want to hear one Republican after another step up and explain why they are blocking health care to kids.
I’d schedule an all-nighter on every one of these things — the GOP doesn’t want and up-and-down votes, fine. Make ‘em explain why on bill after bill after bill.
And then make sure the Democrats explain the GOP’s obstructionist tactics to the main stream press …. repeat as needed.
Hippo Birdies to Jane!!!!
scarecrow- minor ed. McConnell and Boehner(
t) are now labeling the concept as “Hillary Care,Paraphrasing the repubs, only Hillary cares about the health of the children of our nation. What a lie, all democratic members care about the health of our children.
AJ @ 9
Excellent idea.
Harry . . . . . are you listeining.
Also helps us stay in session in August with 2 upsides
1) repigs can’t raise money at home (dems already way ahead at this)
2) limits recess appointments
Nothing like good ideas first thing in the morning.
RevDeb @ 10
Thank you.
Good morning everyone. Happy Birthday to our Ms. Hamsher.
And a very merry unbirthday to everyone else. More tea?
LibertyLee @ 6
The U.S. system is not even close to the best in the world. And our government would be substantially more efficient when there are fewer people who believe that government is inherently bad running it.
How did Boener get such a rich tan?
Isn’t he working?
must be the golf junkets.
Good morning.
Troll alert or snark?
[Mod: Let’s be careful calling a fellow commenter a troll. All are welcome here, as long as they state their opinions with respect for the poster and others here.]
JPL @ 7
In celebration of Jane’s birthday, I hope that Harry Reid plans another sleepover.
Agreed. Denying health insurance to children? perfect issue to force Repigs to stand up all night to try to defend.
And then - slap the Webb Amendment back on the table.
No sleep!
LibertyLee @ 6
Good morning LibertyLee. You are my last hope, but alas . . . Yes, it’s astonishing that France hasn’t falled completely off the map, and all of Europe, and Canada. The earth must look very strange to some.
Happy Birthday, Jane!
Thanks, Scarecrow, for bringing this up. It’s an obscene example of the toxicity of the Rs’ strategy of blocking everything the dems try to do, just cuz they can.
But why, oh why, do the Repugs always get to have their cake and eat it too?! When the dems did it, it was universally understood as “obstructionist dems.” But now that they’re being obstructionist, it’s the “do-nothing dems.”
How do we break through the Wurlitzer?! Surely we should be able to get some traction with the health of children.
hmmm….. let’s see… our choice is corporate welfare for insurance companies or health care for kids.
why are we even debating this?
Harry we need a filibuster if we don’t stand up for kids and do everything we can for them then were not Democrats!
RevDeb @ 15
Deb, please correct your spelling if you want to comment here. :)
Scarecrow @ 13
wish I could, but I’m late, I’m late, for a very important date . . . .
Nola Sue @ 19
Too-dumb-to-live Ds need backbone. We’ve said it before & we’ll say it some more. They have the right policy, they just need to be effective at talking about it. What are they afraid of?
question - when is this issue scheduled to hit in the Congress?
LibertyLee @ 6
Watch Sicko
i’m guessing today is jane’s birthday? in that case, let me also say…
hippo bird days two ewes, jane!
We ought to be able to figure out another theater event for the Republicans on this one — something to do with Bush emergency room comment and Marxists?
Why in the fuck is anyone surprised by this? Our Beloved Leader raped and pillaged this program as the Gubnor of Tejass.
His attitude towards poor children then was the same as it is now: “if their indentured servant parents can’t afford to care for them, it’s not my problem. Mebbe they ought to stop havin’ something they can’t afford.”
Impeachment is more than a word.
is there a g-day party planned?…I wanna come to it
Don’t forget Fearless Leader has threatened to veto the bill. I guess more 50 year-olds who can’t speak because of cleft palates is his idea of a great country.
The dogs and I are eating birthday watermelon breakfast. Man do they love watermelon.
Scarecrow @ 28
it would be fun if we could get his colonoscopy in there somewhere too. I still think of those polyps with the faces of LIEberman, Russert, McConnell, Fredo, and Bill Kristol.
The people of Holland are taller. Infant mortality rates are higher than in other western countries and our life spans are shorter. We are doing something wrong when the French drink and smoke as much if not more than us but their life spans and cancer rates are not as bad as ours. Healthcare can be administered well but not by Republicans. I say steal from the best lets just copy the French!
Rev Deb, At least Bush can affort to get a colonoscopy.
Jane Hamsher @ 31
I used to have a cat who loved cantelope.
Hope you have a great one Jane!
(((((((Happy Birthday Jane!)))))))
Jane Hamsher @ 31
Thanks for the link, M’Lady. You get a h/t.
Is this the same watermelon that got blown up? You really should move to a nicer area.
This would be a great birthday present, in case anyone was wondering.
JPL @ 34
afford? I can think of lots of folks who would stand in line to goive him one for free. They’d probably leave out the anesthetic though. Or charge lots extra for that.
Happiest of birthdays, Jane. May you have many more surrounded by friends, loved ones, and firepups (not necessarily different people! :)
for today’s viewing:
BUSH ADMINISTRATION
Contempt Citations
The House Judiciary Committee meets to consider contempt citations against Fmr. WH Counsel Harriet Miers & WH Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten. Both have failed to comply with subpoenas issued by the committee, and Miers refused to appear at a scheduled July 12 hearing. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) chairs the markup.
WEDS., C-SPAN3, 10:15AM ET
Has Waxman scheduled hearings on TILLMAN yet?
Scarecrow @ 28
What would freak out the Rs into a paroxysm of hate spewing would be if some House or Senate committee sponsored a showing of Sicko, followed by a panel of experts to either confirm or refute it. Packing the panel should be easy as pie.
LibertyLee @ 6
this is corporate propaganda
private industry is least efficient when it provides a neccessary or mandated service, they price according to need
insurance, health care, etc…they overprice way over profit indications due to the need…there is very little competition when the service is needed or mandated
private industry is only efficient when they are providing a product that is not needed…then they price according to demand
when they price according to demand their prices have to reflect the market willingness to purchase
when they price something that is needed or mandatory the price reflects the highest dollar amount they can come up with
mandatory or neccessary services are known as “the commons”
army, roads, beaches, water…these are commons
health care is commons….our society relies on healthy populace, the healthier the populace the more productive, the more revenue, the more progress
so, no libery lee, you have been hypnotized by the corporate propaganda machine that likes to call itself “the liberal media” to which everyone knows they are actually “the corporate media”
this has been a public anouncement from the no propaganda zone
Jo Fish @ 29
Bush said that?Please tell me there is video or witnesses!
Jane Hamsher @ 38
If there’s anything that we can do to help make that happen, you know we would!
LibertyLee @ 6
U.S. healthcare ranks 25th among the top 25 industrial nations of the world in terms of quality. Also, it is the most expensive, costing twice as much per resident as the average and 50% than Switzerland, which is in second place in terms of cost.
Note that there is much more government involvement in the healthcare systems of those 24 countries nations that outrank us in both quality and efficiency.
BTW, the U.S. has an pays for universal healthcare — it’s called “the emergency room,” and it’s truly horrible and very expensive care.
AARP and the AMA are running segments here asking TV viewers to contact their Congressional members to vote for SCHIP. I’ve heard it described in Bush country as Hillary’s socialized medicine (by people who have medical insurance).
This site has information on your State’s Congresspersons’ stand:
http://www.yourcongressyourhea....._state.php
Astronet Daily for Leos:
Have things been snappish between you and a dear one? Try taking a completely different tact in your next interaction. Before you start talking, set your intentions. Make this person feel warm and welcome. It’ll help.
Happy Birthday, Jane!
RevDeb @ 32
I don’t trust you guys with colonoscopy themes. GB’s health plan gave him a free c . . ., but all our kids get is this crappy emergency room.
Jane Hamsher @ 38
It would be even better if they go for inherent contempt and skip all the other baloney.
happiest of birthdays, ms. hamsher.
another sharp post, scarecrow. you’re absolutely right — this is the front edge of the fight AGAINST health care reform.
we heard these nonarguments — these distractions, really — in the 90s, and we will hear them in the coming years as the issue returns to center stage. the system is broken, and the pressure to fix it is rising daily — anyone who gets caught seeking health care knows how perverse the situation has become.
and to the commenter who noted that government ought to be run by people who believe in government, that too is spot on. you put someone who hates the thing he’s doing in charge, why would you be surprised when he does a bad job?
i don’t find this stuff amusing anymore.
Sally @ 47
Even Pharma has been running commercials on TV promoting SCHIP. Of course it’s in their best profit interests to do so but for this, we’ll take that support. Then we’ll take them out of the game afterwards.
LibertyLee @ 6
Do yourself a favor and go see SiCKO then come back and try and spew that crap.
eCAHNomics @ 42
I like that. And more videos of emergency rooms at county hospitals.
Jane Hamsher @ 38
This would be a great birthday present, in case anyone was wondering.
Crap. They’re gonna go with judicial contempt as opposed to inherent contempt.
I still say that, as a tactical matter, they ought to get Harriet Miers on inherent contempt, and use Bolten’s contempt as the test case to run through the courts, in order to thrust Bush’s obstruction into the daylight - and perhaps, perhaps, even into the MSM arena.
Hit ‘em from both sides - outflank ‘em.
{{{{{{{{{{Jane!}}}}}}}}}}}}
Happy Birthday Happy Birthday
Happy Happy Happy Birthday
Happy Birthday Happy Birthday
Happy Happy Happy Birthday
HAAAA-py Birthday
HAAAA-py Birthday
HAAAA-py Birthday
To You!
Enjoy your day Jane!
Jane Hamsher @ 38
hey jane, howz this for a birthday present?
cheney running for president.
man, that would be the greatest gift I could imagine
if this is not a demonstration of how mad the man is, he thinks he has a shot at winning the presidency
the man is insane
I wonder how we compare to nonindustrial countries that have some form of healthcare?
Happy Birthday Jane! May the force be with you always:)
A little OT, but there is a tie-in with currents posts…
Question:
Who is probably the one person who could unite both the Dems/progressives etc and real old school conservatives?
Who is not tainted by any of the political/criminal/grandstanding crap going on now?
Who, by name and pedigree, would remind everyone of what America stood for?
Also, this is probably the one person that the MSM couldn’t/wouldn’t be able to go after very easily….
Check out the speech ( scroll down ). This man has passion, history and has very quietly been doing his bit for the country all his life.
And as a brief side-note, the irony of this man defeating the
‘Dark-side’ (What with the tangled history of the current players! ) tickles me no end..Poetic justice anyone???
http://www.myspace.com/rfk_jr_for_the_usa
Here in GA, PeachCare, our part of the SCHIP program, has been about to run out of money for a while. Our 2 Rep Senators (Chambliss and Isaakson) went to bat for extra funding earlier. They were actually pushing for it, realizing that many of their constituents really need the program. Now, since Bush has promised to veto it, Chambliss, at least, is wavering. Sounds like it’s time for some phone calls.
Happy Birthday Jane and many many more. You truly are an american treasure. Shine on Girl.
It certainly is true that SCHIP has the potential to expose people to the reality of single-payer, and that should frighten the die-hard free-marketeers. A debate in which Senators stood up and said how that they didn’t want insurers telling parents what treatments their kids could have might work, although if the coverage is like that of the WaPo on the Gonzales “hearings” it won’t even be printed.
Too many people are like Liberty Lee, believing that the USA is Number 1 at everything, that government doesn’t work, and that if we change anything they will be injured. They fear change so much that they cannot handle information that contradicts their impressions, and fight blindly against both the information, the bearer of the information and the people who create the new data. They are easily manipulated by those with a vested interest, a money interest, in the current structure.
Nothing will change until we figure out how to reach these frightened souls.
happyyy birthhhhdayyyy 222222222 uuuuuuuuuu
off 2 work all, see u L8tr
SanderO @ 60
I read that and thought it said “ancient treasure.” And I’m like, “oh don’t stick me in the ground yet.”
things come undone @ 57
Great Q. I’ve never seen any stats or reporting on this. Has anyone else?
jayt @ 54
Crap. They’re gonna go with judicial contempt as opposed to inherent contempt.
I still say that, as a tactical matter, they ought to get Harriet Miers on inherent contempt, and use Bolten’s contempt as the test case to run through the courts, in order to thrust Bush’s obstruction into the daylight - and perhaps, perhaps, even into the MSM arena.
Hit ‘em from both sides - outflank ‘em.
I actually think judicial contempt at this point is the wise choice. Make Bush block it, and paint it as obstruction of justice (which, of course, it is). He has said he will not allow it to reach the courts. Once he blocks it, then there is no other option than inherent contempt. I think the Ds are playing this one wisely (slowly, but wisely).
jayt @ 54
Crap. They’re gonna go with judicial contempt as opposed to inherent contempt.
I still say that, as a tactical matter, they ought to get Harriet Miers on inherent contempt, and use Bolten’s contempt as the test case to run through the courts, in order to thrust Bush’s obstruction into the daylight - and perhaps, perhaps, even into the MSM arena.
Hit ‘em from both sides - outflank ‘em.
Actually I think that starting this way is good strategy. This gets the entire DoJ on record for obstruction on top of everything else they’ve been doing. There will always be inherent contempt to fall back on. This is part of the political theater, the entre act before we get to the main performance.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 14
The trouble is: Government IS inherently bad at running anything except the Defense and State Department (not too good there either)…With no profit motive, there is no drive to excel and therefore no drive to make things better.
Happy Birthday Jane. See you in Chicago.
PS: My cat loves watermelon.
RevDeb @ 45
Here is an interesting thought:
Sally at 47:
This site has information on your State’s Congresspersons’ stand:
http://www.yourcongressyourhea….._state.php
Thanks for the link.
Jane Hamsher @ 64
jane, age is just a number.
and yours shall ever be 27.
Jane Hamsher @ 38
They were ready to do this 3 months ago, but we asked them to hold it for your birthday. That’s what you wanted, right?
OT, but Gonzo is always on topic here, isn’t he..
The only Gonzo oped I saw was in the WaPo. Nothing in the NYT. And, as usual, nothing in the WSJ.
I take the fact that there is nothing in the WSJ, and never is, that there is no support for Gonza.
If the Democrats really want to be seen as doing something, the should impeach Gonzo.
AJ @ 9
Yup - I can’t see how making the repubs filibuster on this would be anything but a winner for the democrats.
Scarecrow @ 18
If those systems are so good why do their people come here when they need high tech fixes for what ail them? In England they don’t even wash the sheets between patients to save money; in France, the taxes are so high for the government “services” that Sarkozy is trying to repeal the 35 hour week; Canadians come over here for medical procedures (e.g. Mayo Minnesota), while we go over there because they subsidize drugs. That is non-sustaining.
Ah, Jane, happy birthday! My gift to you is news of my granddaughter, aka FreeSpirit. It’s her birthday, too! She’s fourteen.
She’s being raised in my son’s politically conservative household (complete with rightie talk radio — yeah, I know. *gut clenches*). But get this!
FreeSpirit is asking questions, forming opinions and tilting totally left. She is smart, articulate, has a kick-ass attitude and the potential to be a powerful progressive advocate.
I am tickled that she shares a birthday with you. She is one of the bright lights for our future, pups!
things come undone @ 57
We rank two above Cuba overall.
Jo Fish @ 29
Yes, but don’t forget. No birth control, and certainly no abortion. We will subsidize your little blue pills, though.
things come undone @ 26
I have seen clips; it is cleverly edited propaganda from the same people who said Fidel Castro was the great Liberator of Cuba…
wigwam @ 77
One of the ‘poorest’ countries in the world, according to Moore (on Tweety’s show - C&L has video).
jayt @ 41
Yes jayt, August 1st.
I’m not against running contempt through the courts. But Harriet Miers didn’t even bother to show up. That’s pretty much inherent contempt by definition.
Holding inherent contempt as a fall-back position smacks, to me, of “keeping the (expletive deleted) powder dry”
First - show them they’re serious with at least one inherent contempt in the bank - *then* let Bush fight them in court.
Another supporter for Reid to bring this bill up for a vote, and refuse to conduct other Senate business until there is a vote. Force a GOP filibuster on it — but only pull an “all-nighter” after forcing the GOP to maintain the debate themselves for a full couple of days on the Senate floor.
Good Morning!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY JANE!
(Who spits the seeds the farthest?)
So is it fair to say that the Bush Republicans are aborting SCHIP? One more example of how they ostensibly revere the fetus but abandon the child.
Good Morning
Happy Birthday Jane!
perris @ 43
The last time I read my Declaration of Independence there is no “right” to free health care. If you define medical care as commons, what next? Lawyers? Cars? Or just what some elite decides should be mandated? That way DOES lead to totalitarian Communism and Fascism.
wigwam @ 77
Link?
Wordsmith @ 78
It’s amazing the degree to which we’ve been propagandized with we’re-number-one rhetoric and the economic gospel according to Reagan that government-provided services are inevitably inefficient. The reason they are inefficient is that in this country they are delivered by a government run by Republicans, who don’t believe in government-provided services. In other countries they work fine.
My .02 on who has “better medical care”:
Other countries have better universal coverage for simple procedures that don’t cost much. The United States has among the best care for complex medical situations. I worked at Mass General which had people come from around the world for treatment.
So the answer is not them or us, the answer is, it depends on what kind of medical procedures you are talking about.
LibertyLee @ 76
Most enlightening. Thanks for being here this morning. Just so nobody accuses you of repeating unsubstantiated Republian talking points, I’d like to invite you to provide links to back up the above claims so we’re all on the same page.
Jane Hamsher @ 38
In view of executive branch refusals to enforce congressional actions, I’m starting to think that Congress might need to legislate an increase in the Congressional Sergeant-at-Arms staff, say to 300,000, and with appropriate equipment. I’m getting flashbacks to the Long Parliament, Divine Right Monarchy, and the need for Roundheads.
Those with money opt out of universal care systems.
High-tech U.S. medicine is actually part of the problem, not part of the solution. It costs a lot, but adds very little to the health of the population.
Look at outcomes, not inputs.
As for the commons arguement, public health departments were established to deal with infectious diseases. I amnot aware that was in the Constitution, but few would argue that we all are not better off when infectious diseases are contained.
WRT other medical care, do you think the economy would not be more prosperous if everyone had basic medical care, and it was provided at half the current cost?
eCAHNomics @ 86
That is according to Michael Moore on Tweety’s show of Monday (I think) — C&L has video per wordsmith@78.
LL:
Apparently you’re unaware that Americans have been going there for health care they can’t afford here. But let’s assume that the US system had a super duper procedure for curing X, and noone else had it. While it techically exists, only the wealthiest could get access to it; everyone else is out of luck, and even though you might have insurance, the incentive of your insurance company is to claim (1) this is medically unnecessary, (2) the costs are too high, so it won’t be covered, and (3) you had X as a pre-existing condition, so it’s excluded. I don’t see how one can ignore the thousands/millions of experiences like this that characterize the US system.
This is not a technology issue; it’s a question of getting access with no questions, no forms, no hassles. Make access to the US system available to everyone without discrimination and without the perverse incentives that private insurance funding unavoidably imposes, and we might actually have a discussion. But you have to start by acknowledging the stories of millions of people who are frustrated and denied access by this system.
Liberty Le