Some people say the tobacco lobby is the most evil group in Washington.
Others disagree, and point to the insurance-industry lobby (Sicko makes a good case therefor). Still others point to the oil industry.
But there's one group of lobbyists that may be the most evil of them all.
You see, while the other lobbyists are trying to use feel-good methods to sell you on their expensive, addictive polluting or otherwise-deadly, and/or actively lobbying to keep viable alternatives from being put into common use, there is one industry lobby that, more than just about any other I can think of, does two evil things at once. It preys on people on the lower rungs of the economic ladder and, instead of helping them to fight their real enemies, plays to their worst instincts -- fear and paranoid insecurity in general, and racism in particular -- in order to set them against each other for fun and profit.
I speak, of course, of the gun lobby.
As we all know, the financial condition for most Americans really hasn't improved that much, if at all, over the past few decades; real wages peaked in the early 1970s and have, aside from the respite of the Clinton years, been going down ever since. Our parents may not have had laptops, but they had savings accounts, and they didn't generally have much in the way of personal debt -- and they were able to send us to college on one or two incomes. That's led to a disconnect between the shiny happy lifestyles the TV shows us and the not-so-shiny reality. It's also led to people asking "Who screwed us and why?"
The NRA and its friends in the “militia movement” are into the same stock-in-trade: Fear. Their target audience: Those people, generally disenfranchised white males with at most a high-school education and middling to piddling income, who suspect they’re being screwed but either have no clue who’s screwing them — or who know but don’t have the guts to fight the real enemy. The NRA and its allies push fear in general, and fear of non-whites in particular, to these white males, telling them that blacks/liberals/Jews/women/unions/etc. (but never ever ever corrupt corporations or businesses) are the cause of the white guys’ problem (and that the problem is crime, not the hyper-rich bleeding everyone below them) — then promptly sell themselves as the solution.
But even the two-pronged sales pitch of evil can't always win out. A growing majority of Americans is now on the opposite side of the NRA on every important issue. It's getting harder and harder for the gun lobby to pretend that they speak for all Americans. About time, too.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
zed
zed?
I want to get rid of lobbyists. I support public financing of elections.
Also, everybody in this huge family of mine has guns. But none of us belongs to the NRA. When we hunt, we use bow and arrow.
TexB Think everyone must be reading Harry. Glad you showed up. Thought I was going to be all alone.
Great post PW.
I have very little use for guns, especially among normal citizens who are not police or military.
Good point but I’d like to say that the biggest lobby without any redeeming value whatsoever and which is responsible for The MeatGrinder and our Democratic legislators ‘mysterious’ lack of will in trying to stop Bush’s excellent adventure, at least until the 4th of July week when they all went home and got the memo, is without question….
These guys.
Half the budget goes to them so they get my nod.
ahhhh - the all-powerful gun lobby….just the mention of gun reform drives these folks into a frenzy!! why must we have such powerful guns at our disposal? we’ve seen recently the carnage unleashed by such law-abiding citizens….and yet we demand even more firepower - i say its disgusting
Phoenix Woman!
OT: My First Diary. Please show some love if you haven’t already. If you have, thanks!
What I don’t understand is why the NRA wants people to be able to get assault rifles and I guess bazookas if they want them. What rational person needs those weapons which are designed to do nothing but kill people - not game.
Right On, PW!!! I find it fascinating that when ever I find a NRA bumper sticker I find a ‘W’ sticker on the same car!
We have guns for only one thing. We like to plink and target practice. Bottles, cans, clay pigeons etc. I have a fifty year old Winchester 30-30. Lever action. We call it the Annie Oakly gun. It has never had a bullet in it. And it never will have.
ccmask @ 9
Very cool! Great idea, and a good start. May it be the first of many.
Thanks, PW, for the post. It is really important that this be talked about. Too many kids are dying on our streets.
Twain @ 10
Although in a world with Blackwater and the other para military types floating around and the repeal of posse comitatus, I can sometimes see the point of wanting the fire power(taking off my tin-foil now)
dakine01 @ 15
If they want me, they’ll get me. Let me have pepper spray and things like that in case of mugging or intruders.
TexB @ 16
True. I have a 20 guage shotgun only cuz my dad’s girlfriend didn’t want my brother to take it after dad died. No rounds for it tho’.
Big Energy. Big Healthcare. Big Pharma. Big Insurance. Big Business. Big Tobacco. Big Finance. Big Media. The Military-Industrial complex. The Corrections-Industrial complex. And, yes, the NRA and its allies.
All the usual suspects. Taking on the gun lobby means taking on them all. Their interest in preserving the system that enables their preeminence is common to them all, and they will thus support each other, as a threat to one is a threat to all.
I’m ambigous about guns. Huge personal tragedy involving a gun, so am no fan of them, but that made me come to grips with my previously incohate thoughts.
OTOH, I know hunters who love their guns and act responsibly. They start out as enemies of the left, regardless of other political positions, and can be won over only if the alternate (W) is hugely bad. I see no reason for the left to be so anti-gun as to make knee jerk enemies of these decent folks.
OTOH, I live in NYC, and would prefer fewer guns on the street (although in my neighborhood guns are not a problem; as usual it’s the poor who are at risk).
I’ve been thinking that the solution is a micro one, along the lines of what Bloomberg has been doing, negotiating with officials in areas where guns come from in bulk.
But then, Virginia put the kaibash (sp?) on that.
But I still think that’s the way to go.
Oh, and working to convince the industry to install safety devices. Remember how long it took to get seat belts in cars, and how resistent the auto industry was? Yet it finally got done.
TexB, the hotel request was honored.
real wages peaked in the early 1970s and have, aside from the respite of the Clinton years, been going down ever since.
I’ve never seen credible evidence that there was a “respite” during the Clinton years. I’d appreciate being enlightened if that is the case, because I’ll add that evidence to my growing stack of statistics about the perfidy of the GOP in general, and the Bushista regime in particular.
Our income went up markedly during the Clinton years, but mostly because we were at the peaks of our professional careers at that point in time.
Loo Hoo. @ 20
Thank you!
Plz email me the name of the hotel and anything else I need to know.
Has this been posted/discussed here?
Italy police raid ‘terror school’
Italian policemen involved in the Perugia raid
Italian police put a laptop seized in the raid on display
Police in central Italy say they have uncovered a bomb school for Islamist militants after raiding a mosque in Perugia and making three arrests.
Evidence of training in explosives and poisons, and instructions on flying a Boeing 747 were reportedly found.
Police said the suspected cell had links to a group associated with Osama Bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network.
They arrested the imam and two other men, all Moroccans in their 40s, and were searching for a fourth suspect.
The three detainees refused to reply to questions when they were brought before a local magistrate.
Twenty foreign students were also arrested in a related dawn raid and police said that those without residence permits would be deported.
Perugia, a popular tourist destination because of its medieval and Renaissance palaces, is home to Italy’s University for Foreigners, where hundreds of students from the Middle East are enrolled in university courses in Italian and other subjects.
The discovery of the alleged terrorist training centre is a matter for serious concern to the Italian authorities, the BBC’s David Willey reports from Rome.
Italian Interior Minister Giuliano Amato said it was now necessary to pay close attention to mosques being used for activities unrelated to religion.
The origin of and reason for the Second Amendment:
has to do with the creation of a militia, when there was no standing US armed forces to fight a possible revival of British (or any) tyranny. The later establishment of the National Guard and US armed forces has rendered the Second Amendment obsolete.
ccmask @ 9
Thanks! Very useful.
dakine01 @ 15
I’m with you Dakine.
Hi, PW. I’m with you most times. Here I differ somewhat. I believe your portrait of the NRA membership is only partly accurate. Check with Christy (or Jane Fonda!) on this. In fact, the fastest growing segment of NRA membership is that of women. Lots of NRA members are pretty well educated too, at least on paper. Another item: the crime rate among NRA members is about zero. I’m not a hunter or even a shooter, but for me the Second Amendment carves out an important zone of personal liberty. The NRA doesn’t bat 100% as far as I’m concerned, but it’s the only game in town insofar as the Second Amendment is concerned. Attacking the NRA on specific issues is fine in my view, but mischaracterizing the NRA membership only serves to further the harmful cultural divide in this country, in my opinion.
LS @ 26
me too
I’ve heard (believable) warnings that the nutcase militias will be back in force the day after a Dem President is sworn in. You know, libruls are going to ban the Bible, repealing the Patriot Act will erode civil liberties, the moon is made of green cheese… And guns.
wow
I didn’t know we could say stuff like this in liberal blogosphere
Betsy, YGM.
Is the 2nd amendment the only one that the Bushies have not messed with?
Biodun @ 25
The militia was viewed by the Founders as synonymous with the citizenry. Read Paul Revere’s Ride to see what I’m referring to. The Founders understood that the only way the people would keep their freedom as if the were armed in their individual persons.
And if you think the National Guard or the Army makes personal weaponry irrelevant….
Look how well that’s working out in The MeatGrinder. Then study up on the latest writing about asymmetric warfare.
ccmask @ 9
Cool. I checked it out and left some love…
ccmask @ 9
cc that’s really good, and handy for everyone coming to town! just right but extra nice, too!
Jonathan @ 27
You should note that PW is not talking primarily about NRA members. She is talking about the segment of the public toward which the NRA’s leadership directs their public relations efforts. A very significant distinction there.
Alice @ 30
Refreshing your browser might make things look much nicer.
Jonathan @ 28
I won’t argue about the crime rates among NRA members - I simply don’t know - but the policies they support, and can generally get enacted into legislation - put a lot of guns in the hands to people who do not use them responsibly. I think NRA members are responsible for their own actions, and also the actions of people that they enable to have guns.
I am no fan of hand guns, but I learned that it takes my local police 30 minutes to respond to a 3:00am call about shots fired, now it turned out to be my neighbors lighting fireworks, but I was sleepy and did not think of that.
TexB @ 32
So far, they haven’t tried to quarter troops in my apartment…but these two seem to be about all that’s left of the Bill of Rights.
ccmask - Haven’t visited Chicago in a long, long time. But at that time the Technology Museum was really extraordinary - lots of really cool, clever exhibits. Spent many more hours there than I had planned to, it was so much fun.
In my humble opinion, the 2nd Amendment is the only thing that has or will deter complete totalitarian rule in America should it ever come down to that. It has nothing to do with being liberal.
Sometimes I think that Bush is succeeding in Iraq. Succeeding in bringing down our military so that they nolonger exist as a fighting force. It is so much better for BushCo to deal with Blackwater (they answer to nobody) and overcharge American taxpayers. There is a ton of money to be made.
I think that Poppy Bush resigned his membership in the NRA.
This family of Republicans and Democrats have no use whatsoever for the NRA.
Ed*ard Teller @ 21
No longer have easy access to the historic data, but the statement comports with my recollection. The economy was good for labor during the Clinton years. Huge increases in employment; and real wages for the average worker did tick up a bit. Describing that as a “respite” is fair.
Part of the reason for the real wage gain was the strong demand for labor. The other part related to medical costs. FAS106 (Financial Accounting Standard #106) was being discussed in the early 1990s. It required corporations to account for the future medical benefits promised to retirees as a liability and flow some of that thru the P&L. That’s what gave rise to the cessation of all medical benefits to retirees (I was hired long enuf before to be grandfathered), and to “managed care,” which for several years held down medical inflation costs. That, in turn, made companies feel a little more generous to wages, since benefits’ inflation was not so virulent. As managed care’s savings ran out, and blowback set in, that interregnum is long over.
Notice I speak of medical care, not health care. Health is not very closely related to medical care-health is much more a function of genes & lifestyle. Don’t give docs any more credit than they can steal.
I’ll have to check it out Gordon. Thanks.
Our President is a nut. A very dangerous nut.
Shrub is continuing the outrage that consists of his GWOT and the travesty of Gitmo and detainees!
Now, the Maladministration is pleading with Scotus not to add further detainee pleas for Habeus relief to their upcoming review of Hamdan!
http://www.scotusblog.com/mova......html#more
ccmask @ 43
There is still a lot of army that is not in Iraq - all those 700-odd military bases around the world likely have a few people left.
LS @ 43
I don’t have any problem with the 2nd. I want guns out of the hands of teenagers and criminals. I read in SF paper that gangs were requiring someone to kill another person in order to become a member. Many young people have been gunned down on the street who had no gang ties and were quite often outstanding kids on their way to college. How does the NRA attempt to do anything to stop that?
The 2nd Amendment obsolete? It may be “obsolete”-but it’s still there. If you want to repeal the 2nd Amendment, go for it-but until then, I’m very uncomfortable with a situation where the only people with arms are criminals and cops. Or people like Blackwater.I don’t think it is a liberal or conservative position either. I think it is an absolutist’s position in support of the Bill of Rights.
Well I’ve come 180 degrees on the gun issue. I don’t think you can begin to compare the evil represented by the NRA with that of the oil industry or the auto industry.
Personally I have no interest in ever owning a gun. I’m a typical overeduated white male.
But opposing gun ownership is a good way to lose elections that matter for the future of the country in rural states.
And, as the Bush administration takes democracy over a cliff, there is a certain horrible and undeniable logic to the idea that the people (the great unwashed mass of people in communities everywhere, latino and white and black, Jew and Christian and Muslim) would do well to have access to the means to resist state tyranny.
Oh sure, you call that tinfoil hat thinking. Sure peak oil when it hits will probably be more like 30 year recession than a global depression and population die off with marauding hordes wandering from city to city in search of food.
That’s all probably true, but there is enough of a chance that it isn’t true that I don’t see such a big downside in the distributed capacity for interpersonal violence (personal side arms.)
Many societies have guns and low levels of interpersonal gun violence because they have the social strength and resilience to control that.
I do think that gun registration is a good idea… but I’ve also come to think that gun ownership is a good idea.
I’m not for the NRA… but I’m definitely not opposed to guns anymore.
And as most Democrats understand, being opposed to guns is a good way to lose elections and make the victory of Bush-ist fascism that much easier.
No, both guns and pro-gun politics are a good antidote to the advance of totalitarian fascism in the United States.
LS @ 42
well sure, let’s defend our feedom with guns, ’cause it is working so well in the Middle East and South Asia.
Wouldn’t want to be like those sisses in Eastern Europe who kept writing tracts, sending faxes and signing petitions asking the Soviets to leave. Wouldn’t want to be like that silly woman in the Philappines who responded to her husband’s murder with an appeal to the electorate in an obviously corrupt system. Sure wouldn’t want to be like those pathetic mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, who just walked in circles when their children were dissappeared. Nooooooooo. And let’s not pay any attention to Martin Luther King, Jr..
No, lets get our guns, ’cause that works so well.
TexB @ 32
This is the first administration to publicly endorse the “individual ownership” interpretation. In fact, Bush said there was a SCOTUS decision to that effect. The trouble is, that decision was Dredd Scott, which found slavery legal (by reasoning that the founding fathers wouldn’t have been so dumb as to allow, erm, non-whites to own guns, so, erm, non-whites aren’t people).
It was so nice that the MSM picked up on that and thus Gore won by a landslide, wasn’t it?
I would like to see Michael Moore do a movie on the NRA and the like.
For me the question is why licensing of guns and gun-shooting training are considered a violation of 2nd amendment.
A. Citizen @ 33:
The three modern models:
My bold.
ccmask @ 9
This is a great list for things to do in a great city. Don’t miss the Field Museum!! Boy, I’d love to do the Segway architectural tour — sounds like a blast.
A.Citizen @ 34
I’ve done a fair amount of reading on asymmetric warfare, but you refer to “the latest.” Do you have something specific in mind? If so, could you give me the ref? Thx.
LS @ 42
And yet, the leading totalitarians in the United States today seem not even slightly concerned about letting you own an assault weapon. Could it be that they understand something about the anti-totalitarian deterrent potential of firearms that you don’t?
Christine Edmonson @ 58
I’d like that one too. Everytime I go to NY I keep saying I’m going to go on one of those underground tours in the subway. They are called Urban Explorations.
Miles @ 53, see me @ 19. Much similar thinking.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 55
You’re joking, right?
Jonathan @ 27
i agree. part of this is, i think, the cultural divide between those of us who see guns as a tool (mostly rural?) and those of us who see guns as a weapon (mostly urban/metro?).
i hate hate hate guns. they scare the bejesus out of me. don’t want them in my home, don’t want them around me. i aspire to nonviolence.
AND i want to respect the rights of responsible gun owners.
attack issues - yes.
attack NRA members - no.
my 2 cents.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 55
Actually, I think he already has. titled Bowling For Columbine iirc.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 56
Wasn’t that the one on Columbine?
Twain @ 50
I don’t suggest sacrificing human beings in order to maintain the 2nd Amendment, and I don’t believe the NRA does either. Guns in the hands of violent people is a social problem and a criminal justice problem. Socio-economic factors, cultural factors, and educational factors are the cause. If not guns, they will use knives, bombs, or any other tool they can think of.
EvilDrPuma @ 60
so good
it had to be repeated
RonD @ 51
My dad bought me a lifetime membership in the NRA for my 18th birthday. I turned it in back in the early 80s, or thereabouts - when I saw the growing alliance between them and Christian fundamentalists. I used to hunt a lot, but seldom do anymore.
I own some firearms, but they’re usually kept locked up. And oiled and sighted too, with a lot of ammo, night vision stuff and so on. I’m not so concerned about the government as I am about what rightwing blowhards with long memories would do to me and my family if there was a major collapse of the governments’ abilities to enforce the law around the land.
Biodun #57,
You are obviously correct in pointing out that the courts have indeed ruled this way-but, for myself, much like the courts saying that Free Sppech Zones don’t infringe the 1st and warrantless surveillance somehow doesn’t violate the 4th, I believe they are mistaken, as it seems apparent to me that all of the Amendments in the Bill of Rights were meant to guarantee the rights of individuals.
Hello, everyone! Has everyone got their zeds?
Here’s a bit of good news: Senate Dems block GOP bill that would have kept the Fairness Doctrine from ever being revived. We’re one step closer to getting our media back.
Ed*ard Teller @ 69
Well you are up in the frontier country where ownership makes far more sense than in the urban areas of the east coast.
Phoenix Woman @ 71
I’d rather see a bill that revived the Fairness Doctrine, but ten to one would say Bush would veto it and the Senate couldn’t override.
By the way: Yes, the picture above is a parody of the infamous NRA drawing with the caption “I’m from the government…”
Another point, extensive safety training should be encouraged, and programs on nonviolent conflict resolution. Some European countries have more household guns per capita than in the U.S. (Switzerland, for example, where the military is a militia), but don’t use them to kill each other.
I live in Maine which has the highest per-capita gun ownership rate, and the lowest murder rate in the nation (less than 1/3 rd the national average). I don’t own one, but I’ve had to call one of my neighbors to come shoot a rabid raccoon hanging around my house (when my son was about 4).
OTOH, almost all of those guns are hunting rifles, and we have strict tests to get a hunting license, (including mandatory safety classes) and very strict regulations.
Good at first read, not on second thought…
The logic of gun ownership is more symbolic than practical. IF civilization collapses, all bets are off and weapons might be very useful. UNTIL and BEFORE civilization collapses gun ownership is a psychodynamic issue involving the politics of masculinity, strength, personal autonomy and many other issues.
By opposing gun ownership Democrats line themselves up on the wrong side of issues that they dare not cede exclusively to the Republicans. Real men vote soci*list and real men vote democratic… and you’d do better to include guns in soci*lism than to try to separate masculinity from gun ownership… because I can guarantee you that in large parts of the country you won’t ever succeed in doing the latter.
Meditate on it.
[edited by Mods and released]
GordonM @ 77
Now that’s the kind of gun laws I approve of. Here in TX though, I think toddlers can carry without a permit as soon as they’re old enough to say GUN.
biodun says at 24-The origin of and reason for the Second Amendment:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. “
has to do with the creation of a militia, when there was no standing US armed forces to fight a possible revival of British (or any) tyranny. The later establishment of the National Guard and US armed forces has rendered the Second Amendment obsolete.
============
i know many gun owners who would take issue with this, not their definition of why they have the right to bear arms………
gordonm says at 29-”I’ve heard (believable) warnings that the nutcase militias will be back in force the day after a Dem President is sworn in. You know, libruls are going to ban the Bible, repealing the Patriot Act will erode civil liberties, the moon is made of green cheese… And guns.”
i know there are nut cases out there, but that is like saying that all progressive democrats are militant……..the ‘militia’ people i know of defend the constitution, that is it…they believe we are a republic,that ALL things should be run according to the constitution…and i know some from each side of the state, and they all follow along the same lines…….the constitution……
they don’t ally with bible thumpers, don’t use the word liberal to describe anyone that i’ve ever heard, and don’t like the patriot act in any manner……so i don’t know which nutcase militias you’re referring to…
they are constitutionalists, not dem, not repub….and they like to harp on how corrupt the justice system is…and how the ‘old boys club’ runs the world…which being from that world, i can tell you, yes they do…….i am not a militia kind of person, just know a few, and they like to talk, though haven’t seen them in a while…..but they aren’t nut cases, not by a long shot, and they educate themselves, in the law and other things, and community preparedness, most of them are very involved in their communties…….i wouldn’t mind having them watching out for my family…….and i’m not a militant……
“Bowling for Columbine”. I’d like to see Moore take it further.
dakine01 @ 72
When I worked in the field of corrections in Anchorage, I never got a concealed carry permit like a lot of colleagues had. I’ve had pistols pulled on me more than once in parking lots or whatever - all random bits of bumping into rage or, in one case, a guy coming down off a week-long free-basing binge. Having a gun on me would have probably made those situations worse, not better. When I need heat, my bodyguard, Bossa the Shriner Clown packs. He’s had a permit since they came out.
Throughout the history of the Second Amendment and subsequent commentaries, there has always been an extensive debate about whether the words “militia” and “people” refer to a collective or individual model.
GordonM @ 76
I grew up in KY where they had a strong fish and game department and many variations of training from the state conservation dept and groups like Ducks Unlimited. Lived all over places in NE and upstate NY. A lot of the folks in southern NH couldn’t recognize or didn’t want to accept that their old hunting grounds were being swept up in new housing. In upstate NY, a lot of guys who hunted refused to hun the “lower tier” as that was amateur hour in their eyes - a lot of hunters out of the city who shot at anything that moved.
Alice @ 53
My ex-LS and his entire family were victims of the Papa Doc regime. First they took all of the guns from the citizens, then they purged and murdered those who were not on Duvalier’s side. Thirty members of his family were brutally murdered and hauled off on pick-up trucks to their deaths; including a grandmother who was thrown onto the truck with her rocking chair in which she was sitting at the time on the porch of their house. They were shot, bludgeoned, etc. to their deaths. His father and uncle were arrested and thrown in jail; his uncle, a General in the Army, was tortured. His cousin, who attempted to overthrow Duvalier and his murdering thugs, was publicly hung and it was shown on national TV.
Had the people been able to fight against the evil personal maccouts of Duvalier and his despicable regime, perhaps so many people in that country would not have been killed.
Just my 2 cents.
Phoenix Woman @ 74
Thanks, Ron…
i have always taken the NRA as an astro-turf front organization for the gun and ammo industry.
the genuine and responsible gun owners have never had any reason to fear gun registration and shooter licensing, let alone the regulation on military weapons.
ashcroft spoke of respecting the privacy of gun buyers, INSTEAD of doing background checks on them to see if they were terrorists,
before Congress in sworn testimony,
after September 11, 2001.
Another point: gangs. How about effective anti-gang programs. LA (I think) just figured out that locking them up turns out to be counterproductive. Like duh, guess they never heard that there are gangs in jail.
If you trace back my comments, you’ll find the common thread is to identify the areas where guns area problem, and doing something about them, nota full frontal assault against gun owners.
Not completely OT:
Outrage of the day in gun marketing:
During a recent visit to a local gun store, I saw this package deal: a 9-millimeter Glock pistol, with 3 high capacity magazines, ammunition, and a concealment holster. The sign on the display?
“The Gangsta Special”.
For your consideration.
OT~ (SINCE WHEN IS FITZ OT?) Teeheehee
Fitzgerald Deserves Top U.S. Law Post, Comey Says (Update3)
By Patricia Hurtado and David Voreacos
July 20 (Bloomberg) — Patrick Fitzgerald won the convictions of four Osama bin Laden associates in May 2001. In March, he got Lewis “Scooter” Libby. Last week, he nailed Conrad Black.
Fitzgerald, 46, isn’t saying what he’ll do next in his career. Friends and colleagues say he probably will remain a prosecutor rather than join a law firm. One colleague says Fitzgerald’s destiny may include the top law-enforcement job in the country: U.S. attorney general.
“I think he would make a spectacular attorney general,” said former Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Comey, now general counsel at Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed Martin Corp., the world’s largest defense contractor. “He certainly is one of the very best federal prosecutors in America.”
Remaining a prosecutor would distinguish Fitzgerald from predecessors in the Chicago post. James Thompson became Illinois governor and chairman of Chicago’s Winston & Strawn. Dan Webb succeeded Thompson as chairman of the law firm, whose partners earn more than $1 million a year. Fitzgerald, son of an ex-Park Avenue doorman, makes $145,400. Yesterday, he eliminated one option, telling a radio show host he won’t run for public office.
Fitzgerald “doesn’t look at any of these cases as a springboard for something else,” said David Kelley, a former U.S. Attorney in New York who ran that office’s Organized Crime and Terrorism Unit with Fitzgerald. “He’s drawn upon his own innate sense of what is right and wrong.”
Local Success
Fitzgerald, who has held his job for almost six years, declined to be interviewed by Bloomberg News. His spokesman, Randall Samborn, wouldn’t discuss Fitzgerald’s career plans.
A girl can dreamFITZ
eCAHNomics @ 86
The most effective anti-gang program would be an economy that doesn’t sap the life out of the lower and middle income classes. Historically, a top-heavy distribution of wealth and gang mentality at the bottom are kissing cousins.