The Reuters' headline reads, Iraq now ranked second among world's failed states. That's not second best; it's second worst. The ranking appears in a new report just released by Foreign Policy and the Fund for Peace.
Iraq has emerged as the world's second most unstable country, behind Sudan, more than four years after President George W. Bush ordered the U.S. invasion to topple Saddam Hussein, according to a survey released on Monday.The 2007 Failed States Index, produced by Foreign Policy magazine and the Fund for Peace, said Iraq suffered a third straight year of deterioration in 2006 with diminished results across a range of social, economic, political and military indicators. Iraq ranked fourth last year.
Afghanistan, another war-torn country where U.S. and NATO forces are battling a Taliban insurgency nearly six years after a U.S.-led invasion, was in eighth place. . . .
The authors of the index said one of the leading benchmarks for failed state status is the loss of physical control of territory or a monopoly on the legitimate use of force.
Other attributes include the erosion of legitimate authority, an inability to provide reasonable public services and the inability to interact with other states as a full member of the international community.
If Iraq is #2 and Sudan #1, then Palestine must get the zed. It's the state that failed in the making. So yesterday, Condi Rice was scrambling to make up for years of neglect and mismanagement by promising all the support the US could muster to what's left of the Palestinian Authority. You'd think she'd show some humility after watching Hamas define what it means for a new order to go through "birth pangs," but she tried to make the best of it, as though the military defeat and and political separation that have now befallen the Palestinians were the result of a US policy success.
"Failed states" could well become the epitaph for the Bush Administration's misguided foreign policy interventions in the Middle East, from Iraq to Afghanistan to Palestine and Lebanon. But it's not just Iraq and Afghanistan and the hopes for a Palestinian state that face the prospects of failing; we're also seeing the destruction of the most sacred principles and institutions that have held our own nation together.
America is hardly a failed state, but it certainly has a failed regime, and the regime's policies are undermining the country's foundations across the board. We could just as easily be talking about what the Bush/Cheney regime has done to undermine separation of powers, governmental accountability, equal access to voting, fair and impartial administration of justice, respect for the rule of law, protections for civil liberties and the Bill of Rights, or just something as basic to our Constitution as respect for the legitimate role of government in promoting public health, safety and welfare. There are common destructive themes running through all of this Administration's policies, and they seem to be powered by a massive indifference to lawlessness.
Photo: AP/Hamad Rashee: Scene of suicide bombing in Samarra
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
zunoed?
Morning, folks!
(Richard Cohen for WOTD!)
zwei
Good morning Scarecrow!
Morning all.
Perhaps failed states are a feature, not a bug.
More work for Blackwater.
More boogey-men to wave in front of the electorate.
More need for “manly” leaders.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 2
Thanks. Tht tells me who NOT to read when I get to the WaPo0 for the morning.
allan_in_upstate @ 5
More refugees
More dead brown people
More news to keep buried and off “real” ‘Murikans TVs
Palestine: not so much failed as never had a snowballs chance in hell
You know who LOVES failed states? The Halliboys!
Is “failed state” the end game of drowning the government in a bathtub?
Our selected officials have no shame.
How did Iraq not get number one?
Tonight on PBS: ENDGAME!
Looking at the rankings, I find it somewhat interesting that the great Democracy know as Pakistan was twelfth while the North Korean failure was thirteenth and that land of total chaos known as Lebanon was eighteenth.
Whatever happened to failure is not an option?
Noam Chomsky’s last book was titled, “Failed State”, and in it he used the standard U.S. guidelines for determining whether a state was failed or not to show that the U.S. is the biggest failed state in the world. It’s also one of Chomsky’s best! Recommended reading for everyone…
Millineryman @ 14
I think once failure is a certainty it’s not necessary to refer to it as an option.
I have a suspicion that the end game of these failed states is a precurser to Bush launching WW III & total destruction of the Middle East. Think of the profits for Halliburton & Exxon Mobile when a Marshall Plan reconstruction begins.
things come undone @ 11
Bush has not yet declared that our intervention and their ethnic cleansing qualify as genocide.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 2
Yeah, he gets the prize so far, but it’s early yet. Followed your link from the last thread- Cohen’s piece this a.m. was damn near unreadable for me, as facts got somewhat in the way of his basic premise…
Good morning everyone. Looking for good news. Anyone seeing happy stuff out there?
egregious @ 16
So there is no effort to prevent it from happening with this adminstration. Just ways for them to benefit at the expense of the people who they fail.
Everything the Bush Regime has done in the last seven years has been intentional….even ignoring key conflicts all over the planet. They have an agenda and could care less about anything else and of course….Condi shares their values, morals, and ideology.
Israel wants that land without those people, and without having to commit overt genocide to get rid of them. The more miserable their lot, the more likely they are to emigrate. And there’s nothing like a religious civil war with religious overtonesto make a land unliveable.
Scarecrow, I cant find any good news. Im not sure I can take any more bad.
Where are our Democrats?
Scarecrow @ 20
i think a tiny bit of sanity about our nuclear weapons qualifies…
Neo conservative Joe Scarborough on MSNBC is FLAMING the “extreme left” and the Blogosphere. Put him on the list of “Loyal Bushies” who will slander anyone against the Iraq War.
Good News Network
Frank33 @ 26
Joe sort of moderated a bit after Katrina. What bee is in his bonnet now?
snowbird42 @ 24
Well, look harder. It has to be there.
e.g., last night, on Countdown, Howard Fineman actually took the attorney scandals seriously. I’m trying to find a transcript, especially after I criticized him over calling the Gonzales no confidence vote “political.”
Also, did you notice that within hours after Pach posted on Obama needing to apologize for the Senator Punjab memo, he did? Pach rules.
Scarecrow @ 20
Good morning, Scarecrow. Happy stuff…let’s see. I should get done w/work tonight early enough to see Larry Johnson speaking in Encino CA. That’ll make me happy. Any early rising Angeleno FDLers, would love to meet up w/you there:
Larry Johnson L.A. Appearance Info
wigwam @ 23
i’d say that’s true for some israelis - but not, by a long shot, all.
Frank33 @ 26
Oh dear, “if we’ve lost Scarborough, we’ve lost the country.” But at least we have Pat Buchanan.
What is Joe upset about?
“e.g., last night, on Countdown”
I was? Well I was watching anyway.
Fineman had an interesting list of senators who would likely be pulling away from the Bush view of the war in September, when the no progress report comes out: Voinovich, Warner, and Hatch.
That seemed an odd enough list I wrote it down last night. Sorry don’t have the rest of his transcript for you.
wigwam @ 28
“Morning Joe” says the Blogeesphere is “driving” the Democratic candidates to the “left”. Also the Blogeesphere is not scared enough of the terrorists who want to kill us.
Frank33 @ 34
Well, those are two of the best compliments Joe could pay the “left blogosphere.” Not sure they’re true, though.
Scarecrow @ 20
i’m hoping for some good congressional oversight today. especially from the Senate Intelligence Committee on John Rizzo’s nomination hearing this afternoon (he may be one of the “torture” lawyers)
CNN person just gave Michael Moore’s new movie on health care rave reviews — poor John Roberts didn’t know what to say.
Good news? The Cohen “Pardon Libby” column is drawing flames from hundreds of real Americans.
Some good news - Kennedy & Whitehouse requesting the Justice Dept investigate Tim Griffin’s caging scheme. BTW, did anyone watch Tim Griffin’s speech over the weekend?
Scarecrow @ 32
Joe is desperate to get the Imus viewers back so he is pandering to the lowest base instincts of the 30%ers. I wonder if attacking us doesn’t get him enough viewers then how long will it be before he starts making racial comments.
things come undone @ 11
Actually, I’m of the opposite opinion: Iraq is definitely a f**ked up place, but how did it come in ahead of Somalia?
Scarecrow @ 35
The only Democrats who know their left from right are Kucinich, Lee, Waters, Norton, Frank, and Feingold.
The rest of them get where they need to go by making a series of right turns.
Republicans are just naturally scared people and it’s why when they are given any sort of power they change our country and the world to meet their needs to make themselves feel better about the world they live in. See? They aren’t comfortable in their own skin so they change their environment so they can meld into it. It’s why they walk around with a bible stuck to their faces. They’re just naturally scared.
*end observation of republicans as a whole*
Okay, going to work. ;-)
allan_in_upstate @ 5
Sure sounds that way, doesn’t it?
Jil In Pattaya @ 41
over 4 million refugees and probably close to a million dead?
selise @ 36
Thanks for the reminder, Selise. Also, Sherrod Brown, (D. Ohio) now regrets his vote for the Military Commissions Act, in an interview with the Young Turks.
Scarecrow @ 37
Around 3 weeks ago, Fox News gave him a good review!
Anyone else feel like we’re falling down a rabbit hole?
Jil In Pattaya @ 41
What critera did they use to rate a failed state?
masaccio @ 38
A lot of familiar monikers there.
KayInMaine @ 43
Now I’m envisioning Bibles as the facehuggers in Aliens. Thanks for the mental image, Kay!
HRC being questioned by Tweety on MSNBC.
She says “no permanent bases, no permanent occupation”. A few troops left behind, with very specific missions, to protect our interests (embassy, e.g.)
Like we needed a report to tell us that Iraq is a failed state. I think they only put it as number two so that it would have somewhere to go next year, when the failed Government has had time to really screw things up.
Did you guys know that Cheney still owns a huge amount of stock in Halliburton?
All of this makes it likely that Republics will try to make the next campaign about issues like gay marriage and school prayer. Fox News will gladly follow along. The rest of the MSM probably will as well. Very sad indeed.
jayt @ 51
That doesn’t exactly square with something Matt Yglesias heard - that she was saying we’d be there for years and years.
Scarecrow @ 20
Please click on this link: http://www.happynews.com/
Well, they said they were opposed to nation building. Turns out to be true. It’s probably better to combine such a position with an isolationist, rather than interventionist stance.
Attended a PDA meeting last night and they reported back on their visits to congresscritters over the break…. One AZ congressman said that all the freshman congressmen were told to vote FOR the supplemental Iraq funding because they were in vulnerable RED districts by the DCCC… I did not look to see if that is true if it is then THAT stinks.
And the two new Dems from AZ, Gifford’s joined the Blue Dog Caucus and Harry Mitchel was turned down but WANTS to join. Broke out laughing over that one….. Markos at kos was going on and on about Mitchel when he announced last year at Yearlykos and said that since he was mayor of Tempe and ASU being there he MUST be progressive [ya right].
Good news Scarecrow….. just might have my pool remodel done by this weekend for the first 110 degree day!
Not necessarily good news, but Charlie Savage is still on the signing statement trail. from today’s Boston Globe
Scarecrow @ 20
is McNulty still on for this afternoon? that ought to be fun.
things come undone @ 48
Hmm… not sure… but Somalia definitely qualifies I imagine.
selise @ 45
Iraq has a semi-functioning government whereas Somalia has none. Iraq has semi-functioning infrastructure whereas Somalia has none. Iraq has a semi-functioning economy, whereas Somalia has none.
Some Good news.
Per my reading of this past week, the energy stored in Thorium
reserves exceeds that available from all fossil and nuclear fuels. In
principle, Thorium could cover the world’s energy needs for centuries.
According to this article http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/1341
Norway has made the commitment to proceed with the development of
Thorium reactors. And according to this site
www.thoriumenergy.blogspot.com, in contrast to Uranium, Thorium:
- requires no refinement or processing.
- is three times more abundant than isotopes of Uranium combined.
- is readily available from friendly countries; Australia, India,
Norway, U.S., and Candada have the world’s largest reserves (in
that order).
- is clean burning, producing between 0.01% to 0.1% as much
by-product.
- has by-products having much shorted half-lives.
- is unsuitable for weapons production.
- can be used to incinerate Plutonium weapons and waste.
In addition, Thorium:
- works at very high temperatures, allowing for very efficient
production of electrictiy and/or hydrogen.
- can supplement the fissile fuels in a conventional reactor.
- can support a self-sustaining reaction in molten-salt reactors:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor, which are
particularly economical and safe.
GordonM @ 54
Until I hear one them lay out a very clear plan about how to get out resulting in a residual force of less than 5,000, I won’t believe any of them. Every single statement has weasel language. I understand why that is–the reality is that the number, if it is zero, is zero for the same reason it was zero in Vietnam and is zero in Castro’s part of Cuba. You can’t explain that in the seven words or less soundbite that Wolf or Tweety can process.
But, all the same, they’ve gotta do it. If Edwards and Obama don’t they’re ceding the race to CLinton, who benefits from the candidates being hard to differentiate.
Some good environmental news. A couple steps in the right direction.
Climate Resolutions Get Big Support from Shareholders
Zero_Emmissions Recycling Machine Turns Auto Parts Into Fuel
Good morning TO ALL
More missing E-Mails stories all over the web ,not much thou on the boob tube.
If only the msnm would inform the people they just might see the next election is a joke also .HAS anyone got the hearing times on the next hearing about E-Mails senate or house?
Watching the MSNBC coverage of Clinton answering questions — the commenters afterwards keep mentioning the “hard left” but never define it — but it appears to be people who are against the occupation and want universal health care. Anyone else here a definition.
“just pandering to these groups, moving too far to the left.” = typical comment. Who is that clown?
Scarecrow @ 20
Some good news this a.m. via a friend’s email link. Friend is a teacher in NOLA:
Bill Will Restore Art & Music Programs in La. Schools
Marie Roget @ 66
That is good news. Thanks.
TiredFed @ 59
I can’t find him on any of the schedules. (But I’ve got him on my calendar; Doh!) Is this a private chat?
dakine01 @ 58
Stand by for Christy’s first piece this morning — she’ll be talking about this.
A must read. Glenn Greenwald’s response to Cohen’s article.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/g.....index.html
If Michael Moore is getting good reviews for Sicko on Fox and CNN, I guess teh healthcare issue is going to be big in the election. . .that would be good news.
Also, wigwam, I like that good news about thorium/Norway. Norway rocks.
Phoenix Woman @ 69
I should have known Christy would be up on this. ;})
Scarecrow @65.
To the Republics the ‘hard left’ ever since FDR is anyone who thinks that one of the purposes of government is helping ordinary people live slightly better lives through provision of public services. What the commenters have in mind are the anti-Vietnam war resisters that more than half the living population of the United States know only from a few newsreels and incessant propaganda coming out of the rightwing media.
Helen @ 68
must be. it’s on my calendar for 1 pm. oh well. will just have to keep my eyes and ears open in case it pops up somewhere. not on any of the schedules on the Hill (HJC, SJC or Henry’s Oversight Comm).
Helen @ 68
it’s thursday - i just called the house judiciary committee to confirm. will update the hearings list with the witness scheduled to testify.
this from Think Progress last week:
McNulty to testify before House Judiciary Committee.Salon’s Tim Grieve reports that Paul McNulty, who recently resigned as Deputy Attorney General, will testify next week:
Word just in from the House Judiciary Committee: The Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law will hold a hearing next week related to “The Continuing Investigation Into the U.S. Attorney Controversy and Related Matters.”
The witness: Paul McNulty, who has announced his resignation as deputy attorney general and — in the wake of attempts by Gonzales and Monica Goodling to implicate him in the U.S. attorney mess — may suddenly be feeling a little talkative.
UPDATE: ThinkProgress has confirmed with the House Judiciary Committee that McNulty’s hearing will be Tuesday, June 19, at 1:00 PM. June 12, 2007 2:16 pm | Comment (13)
Posted by Amanda June 12, 2007 2:16 pm
Two of the Judiciary subcommittees have hearings today, but this one is not on the website.
selise @ 75
thanks selise. should have waited to hear from you.
Today’s hearings, h/t selise: Link to selise’s list for Wed, Thurs
Tuesday, Jun. 19, 2007
9:30 am - Senate Armed Services
Business meeting to consider the nomination of Preston M. Geren, of Texas, to be Secretary of the Army.
2 pm House Judiciary - Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
Hearing on: War Profiteering and Other Contractor Crimes Committed Overseas
2:30 pm - Senate Intelligence
To hold hearings to examine the nomination of John A. Rizzo, of the District of Columbia, to be General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Scarecrow @ 65
I think the candidates have to start addressing this directly. I think they have to say to a reporter asking questions about Iraq respond by saying:
“Your colleague Anderson Cooper said that this is left wing position last night. This is completely not true. The centrist position in this country is to end this occupation and bring the soldiers home as soon as possible. The radical position is held by about a quarter of the country and all the Republican candidates except Ron Paul–that we stay in Iraq forever. The people spoke very clearly last November, when the Republicans didn’t pick up a seat in the Congress. They want his awful war to end, while George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the republican presidential candidates want it to go on forever. THAT’S the radical position.”
Arianna did just that in post-debate analysis in Manchester. It’s not hard. Tony Snow does it all the time–refers to the frame the reporter is using and reframes the question.
selise @ 75
TiredFed @ 77 -
don’t wait for me! i depend on the rest of the firepups for info with which to update / correct the hearings list.
thank you everyone for the help and reminders!
Knut Wicksell @ 73
Knut-
The issue is that Wolf Blitzer, Brian Williams and Katie Couric are told by their producers that the hard left is anything to the left of that prominent centrist Joe Lieberman.
My uncle from Ft Worth was visiting NYC this week. Retired short colonel in the Air Force. Flew B52s during Vietnam. He turned against Bush in 03–was sarcastic to begin with (”Shrub”) but after the war started he was done.
I asked him about the climate in TX. He said that he used to either not say anything, or at least probe a little before expressing an opinion about Bush or Iraq. Now, he says, everybody’s just disgusted.
So it’s getting increasingly mysterious to me why there still has been no shift in coverage.
Millineryman @ 14
At BushCo Industries, Inc, it’s a standard feature — it comes with almost every model, unless you want to pay extra.
Iraq
Katrina/Rita
US Attorney firings and the administration of justice
Gitmo . . .
hey all … sitting in Jane’s panel at TBA …
very crowded room …
EPU land now but a little fun if not good news. C&L has Keith snarking on BillO from last night’s Countdown.
Still looking for good news? ’cause I thought this was good news, ’specially for Pach.
United States and Peru Extend Agreement to Protect Archaeological and Ethnological Heritage of Peru
US and Peru extend agreement
Siun @ 84
Liveblogging for us, Siun?
Elliott @ 86
does this mean we’ll have to send him back???
sorta Peterr …
don’t want to interrupt comments on new post which seems to be live
Introductions now ..
Chris Bowers
Jim Dean
Oliver Willis
Jane now
Matt Stoller
new thread
cathy @ 70
FIREDOGLAKE is a bright shining light.
————————–
When it comes to the behavior of our highest and most powerful government officials, our Beltway media preaches, “it is often best to keep the lights off.” If that isn’t the perfect motto for our bold, intrepid, hard-nosed political press, then nothing is.
Eric Boehlert (h/t Attaturk) previously documented just a few of Cohen’s heroic light-blocking efforts over the years (”The case for war is a good one,” pronounced Cohen in February of 2003), and my personal favorite is here, where Cohen mocked Howard Dean as a “fool or a Frenchman” for daring irreverently to question the obviously conclusive case made by the Serious Colin Powell about Iraq’s massive WMD stockpiles. As is true for so many of our Beltway elite, the fact that war opponents turned out to be so right, and our serious Beltway geniuses so wrong, has increased the contempt for those who were right; hence, in defending the pro-war Libby, Cohen hurls one insult after the next at war opponents and blames the Libby injustice on “them.”
Chris Bowers - not only say “D’s should stand up for something” but also do something, cites Lamont campaign, stopping Bolton, getting Gannon tossed out and something like the Plame case that was done by Jane and the writers are FDL.
No one blog post changed a thing, instead a focus at a site … over months … become the place where the influential people on that topic gather.
if anyone is watching the nomination hearing for the Secty of Army, could you let us know of any highlights? Looks like another Bush crony is on tap.
Bowers continued …
need as many blogs as possible with your blog as a content hub on the issue it starts to have influence
I don’t know of a mainsteam media newsroom that is not reading the blogs
Google Bomb campaign described
Bowers continued:
you need advocacy groups, etc to join in - you cannot move things by blogs alone
build a blogosphere coalition then add others from outside to join in
it is difficult to get people to join our causes
end of Bowers
James Dean up now:
take a step back … in you’re my age, you’ve been in a one way conversation, the tv speaking to us but with blogosphere what is evolving an entity that allows all of us in this room to get involved
give people the opportunity to get involved which is what people on this panel have helped to do
self-regulating, the best of free market
celebrate but need to be responsible and to persevere
media is threatened by this conversation
that it becomes what is should be, a two way discourse
“like liberation of eastern europe” - our democracy is only as good as our when our citizens are really involved in it
Oliver Willis:
We’ve found progressive candidates and we’ve been so successful that the right is trying to replicate us. They are not doing well at this.
We prob have one election cycle before they catch up. The conservative movement is not dead yet
It’s great to be focused on elections etc but we need to be about the war of ideas. What it all really means on a day to day basis
Not just top 1% of blogosphere but every blog - no barrier to entry
Oliver Willis cont
We just need to show up to win this … imagine what will happen if we really try.
Jane up!
Big applause …
between 3rd and 5th biggest blog… from the very beginning what excited me was the ability to bring people together.
the right had done such a good job destroying the liberal message machien
netroots allows testing of ideas
the right cannot replicate since they are top down and cannot accept comments
Alito is example, credits Prof with pushing the need to do something and we coordinated with other blogs and did something. We got so many responses we took down efax
Blue America Pac - we raised over half a mil, not for the people who were likely to win but those who were fighting for what we belive in, like Lamont …
even if the powers that be said you can’t win esp if you challenge CW on Iraq
Ned won and has not gotten credit for how much his primary changed the results for other candidates
Siun — can you move the live-blog to the next thread, please?
thank you siun!
Jane part 2
Change over our community on FDL with Lamont …
loss of Ciro was really hard
This time, that’s not happening this time … our candidates are running again, we can lose and keep coming back … we are part of a process that takes time but we can keep coming back
Jane pt 3 - Libby trial
It you want to measure what the landscape looked like before and after blogs, look at Whitewater when there was nothing we could do but yell at tv. That is not longer true - journalists cannot just accept the spin, we push back.
We saw the journos at the courthouse, Marcy as the institutional memory that does not allow the journos to spin
Libby case is wonderful example of what we’ve been able to accomplish
Stoller up now:
(And Donna Edwards is sitting right behind me and is awesome - can’t wait for her Blue America session with us!)
Stoller - “we’d like to take credit for ‘06 but we can’t, the credit goes to that slogan “together we’re better” big laugh
not just blogs but go back 98 with Move On then Kerry campaign, etc