The other night on Hardball/Countdown, panelists were discussing the Senate's 53-38 vote to end debate on the resolution to express no confidence in Alberto Gonzales. Though the cloture vote "failed" because it needed 60 votes, every Democratic Senator present (Obama and Biden were absent) and seven Republicans had just publically indicated that the Attorney General of the United States had so badly served the nation and disgraced the Justice Department that he should be humiliated into resigning -- or be fired by the President. All this had become necessary because Gonzales had neither the decency nor honor to resign voluntarily, and because President Bush needed Gonzales in place as a firewall against the White House's own involvement in subverting the rule of law.
But that's not the way it was reported. Here was a prominent national reporter, Newsweek's Howard Fineman -- but it could have been any of dozens of Beltway reporters -- wisely and seriously explaining that the no confidence vote was "just politics," just as the Republican leadership, who also hold Gonzales in contempt and wish he would just go away, had framed it. It was "politics" because it was mostly Democrats, and it was "politics" because it was just designed to embarrass the President, and it was "politics" because a no confidence vote would not automatically remove Gonzales, and so Senator Kyl must be right when he said that no confidence votes simply have no place in our form of government.
And I thought, how can a seasoned reporter like Fineman (or any of his like-minded Beltway peers) not see how important these "political" events are? Don't they see the connection to impeachment? And don't they understand that the rule of law is under siege on every front, and that Gonzales has become both enabler and perpetrator of that danger?
I wanted to ask Fineman, what exactly is wrong with the Senate expressing no confidence in a member of the President's cabinet who has so dismally failed the American people and betrayed his office? Why can't we use this tool, especially when all the checks and balances of a well functioning government that in the past functioned to uphold the rule of law have been so severely damaged by this aggressively lawless regime -- and the indifferent and complicit Republican Party -- that the normal methods of righting the ship and restoring justice have become unavailable. And part of the reason for this crippling condition is the media's refusal to take this seriously. It's "just politics."
The Justice Department has become so politically compromised that no one can assume its criminal prosecutions are based on facts instead of political motivations and furtherance of one-party rule. The civil rights division has turned into a perpetrator of civil wrong. Career attorneys who were dedicated to protect Americans' right to vote have been pushed out and replaced by political operatives hell bent on denying likely Democratic voters the ability to even register. Honorable prosecutors have been replaced by White House loyalists and incompetent cronies. Men and women with integrity who would never sanction wholesale lawlessness by the executive or massive invasions of citizens' privacy or sanction torture have been "retired" to make way for political operatives who justify felonies, illegal surveillance, torture, illegal kidnapping, indefinite detention and the imposition of military law on US residents. These thugs simply don't care that what they've created is a daily embarrassment to the American people. And those are just the outrages we know about. All this happened on Gonzales' watch at DoJ or his stint as WH counsel; he looked the other way as his White House masters trashed the justice system and disgraced America before the world.
That's the story, Howard, and you and your colleagues should be reporting it, because this is the most important "political" story to come along in decades. This is not "just politics," Howard. It's about the Constitution, the rule of law, about what kind of a country we're becoming. And "politics" is not a bad word, Howard. Politics is what makes America work, what separates it from dictatorships. It's how we translate the "consent of the governed" into lawful actions by the government.
Americans want their Justice Department back. We want an Attorney General with integrity and courage to stand up to lawlessness. "No confidence" votes are a legitimate, logical way for elected representatives to express the people's will in a democracy. And Howard Fineman should know that.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
‘Morning, Scarecrow!
edit: By the way, FirePups, this is an EXCELLENT article for SPOTLIGHTing to Newsweek’s Fineman and senior editorial staff. Just click the Spotlight link at the bottom of the article and away you go. Tell Newsweek (and MSNBC which carries Newsweek) to catch a clue about the link between the No Confidence vote and potential impeachment of Gonzales.
uno?
Rayne @ 1
Mornin’ Rayne! Last night my connection crashed just as I was going to let you know that I actually knew what da kine meant (I figured it out even before Pidgin To Da Max came out.
Mornin’ Scarecrow!
Good morning Rayne and firedogs.
I’m running a little late this a.m., and still fixing typos. Refresh and the title might even make sense.
Lots of stuff happening in Iraq and here. You can bring to breakfast.
dakine01 @ 3
I figured you did because of your “handle” — “dakine01″ is redundantly superlative. ;-)
Good morning scarecrow!
scarecrow, we’ve been under seige since reagan rescinded the fairness doctrine
we’ve been under seige ever since corporations have been able to own multiple media in multiple venue
at one time there were over 50 owners of our media and they needed to both compete and serve
now there are I think 6 owners, they spew the agenda that serves their bottom line and that means they always do it the way their contributors and advertisers want them to do it
we need to break up the media, this is clear
we also need to reinstate the fairness doctrine, this is clear
now onto something I JUST posted downstairs and it is on point somewhat on this thread and I hope you consider my suggestion;
perris @ 246
Scarecrow @ 4
I’m a firedog, I want to be mentioned by name too![jealou]puting smiley[/jealous]
You left out using a US Attorney to seek indictments based on political timing (week before the democratic debates) that are meant to feed the mindless fearmongering, by hyping a totally non-existent terrorist plot to blow up Queens by setting a fuel line on fire at JFK. The NY USA spoke in apocalyptic terms about a handful of loons with no capability and a plan that wouldn’t have been particularly damaging if pursued.
But there she was, sounding just like Baghdad Bob.
Like Fineman says “its just politics.”
Help, Mods! Spotlight isn’t (and hasn’t been) working!!1!
In re: Fineman and his reaction to the No-con vote. It’s just the same ol’ same ol’ with these people. Back during H2Ogate, most of the national media and pundits were either “third-rate burglary” or “politics as usual - look what LBJ and RFK did” (although it was mainly J Edgar and his out-of-control minions who saw commies under or behind everything). In those days it was the FBI now it’s the whole DoJ.
It’s still all very wrong and the Fineman’s of the world need to pull their collective heads out of their a**es and get a clue. Of course, since they like to think the Chimpenfuhrer is a “nice” guy, they absolve him of responsibility and down play the problems. If it were Clinton, they would react more vehemenently than those who were on Nixon’s “Enemies List” did.
I wanted to remind all that Selise has been creating place where we can quickly check on Congressional hearings scheduled for the week. It’s in the Massachusetts Newroots page. Selise also posts these on FDL every Monday morning.
Today, Mr. anti-voting rights, Spakovsky, will be answering question. Eli did a post on this last night.
Need to repeat my request from downstairs, sorry:
Could use some help, was up digging through the DOJ’s latest doc dump until 2:30 am…
I need anybody with access to Lexis-Nexis or similar tool to find articles the week of January 9, 2006, that mention Alberto Gonzales’ trip to New Mexico. Specifically want any articles that make reference to other DOJ or White House personnel that may have been on the same trip to New Mexico.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
(There’s some very interesting redaction on emails referring to travel…I think we have a key person in the loop now, but I don’t want to get my hopes up too high.)
From what my DC buddies tell me ol’Howard has been spending all his nights with his ummm
“mandates”,,,,wink-wink..y’all know what I mean. He is too busy to really know what is going on when he is too busy hiding his “real self”…they are all just awful!
Rayne @ 5
I worked with a lot of locals in the acctg office and actually saw an exchange just like the example used in the book:
“Betty, you see da kine?”
“What dakine”
You know, da kine da kine.”
“Oh, da kine - yeah it’s over der.”
uno??
ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wish they had a clue as to how blind they are…
perris @ 8
This post is dedicated to the inimitable perris.
That’ll be 5 cents, please.
Kathryn at 11 — No idea what to tell you on that one — will pass that information along, but not certain why it isn’t working.
Fineman is almost always good when he’s on Olbermann. But he changes his tune when he’s elsewhere. Says whatever is wanted to be heard based upon who he’s talking to and who’s paying him.
A charter member of the new world’s oldest profession.
Thank you, dear heart. There was another evisceration of David Broder i was dying to send to him and was foiled!!
edit- and to all his peers!
It’s comforting to know that these bindle stiffs are speaking to an ever decreasing circle of Americans. This “Who cares what the world thinks of us.” mindset is wearing very thin. The majority of The People are now traitors in the eyes of the Gopers. We should make the most of it.
I think the papers have been alright about reporting this. It’s repeated on the front page when there’s testimony, and it’s not like the whole country is holding their breath like we are about this.
The problem is the President. He’s the one that gets up and says that “it’s political” and that it’s been “drug out”. He’s the one that dictates the party line. Are the newspapers not supposed to print what he says? I agree that they should be more critical of it in the news parts of their papers, but there’s an editorial today in NYT and yesterday in WaPo about how it’s the President who’s stalling.
Reading through those emails this morning, it’s pretty clear that this is a cherry picked few of what Congress has asked for. Bush is trying to stall this until it just goes away. Blame the press all you want, but until Congress steps up to the plate and impeaches Gonzo, or enforces some of these subpeonaes, what is there to report?
btw, Scarecrow, great post. :)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 23
As always
Scarecrow -
This post’s title should read America under
SeigeSiege…I’m chilling out between jobs and I’m exhausted and I’m so far here in Germany but I can’t believe that when the Democrats try and follow the rules it’s called “politics” but what about the last 6 years? The Republicans completely bitchified the Democrats and kept them out of most of the country’s doings, thank god it turns out as more and more illegality keeps turning up. How can Fielding justify not letting people testify? What about precedence?
i wonder if “just politics” is considered a game… where the outcome matters a little less than a regular season baseball game. fun to watch, but not really important.
Scarecrow @ 18
MUWAHAHHA!!!
check comming…my day is complete
off to work all c u L8ter
Scarecrow — Not only do we have von Spakovsky and his FEC hearing, but we also have Laurita Doan and her GSA hearing with Waxman’s committee today. It is going to be quite the day of oversight.
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 25
Oops. Thanks. Anyone see anything else?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 29
Yep — and I know just the person we need live-blogging it. Good morning.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 30
decisions, decisions.
i don’t know… which hearing should i watch? which hearing should i record?
Lorita Doan or Hans Von Sapkovsky?
they make it rain and then complaign there aren’t enough umbrella’s”
or something like that, then go through the list
“they gave the lock box of social security to the richest people on the planet and then complaign it needs funds”
“they create terrorists by invading a country they knew posed no threat and then complaign there are terrorists that they created”
“they ignore the most precise intel telling them we’d be attacked even though other presidents avoided attacks when they acted on similar information and then complaign we weren’t prepared for the attack”
“they close the refineries that produce the most petroleum in America and then complaigh we don’t have enough refineries”
man the list goes on forever
The mother of lines like this is from the Roman historian Tacitus
“They make desolation and call it peace”
(
ruffian @ 17
They do know. They’ve blinded themselves.
Kathryn in MA @ 11
edit comment is gone too…. at least for now. we’ve been spoiled by all the extra functionality.
Kathryn in MA @ 11
Thanks, Kathryn, just discovered that myself.
Christy, please let the mods know that Spotlight fails to pull the blog post; it will let you select targets, but clicking Next button pulls up an error message: “The blog post could not be extracted.” Could be a setting in WordPress that needs to be reset after the upgrade (hope it’s that easy).
If you folks are still intent on sending a message to Newsweek between now and the fix of Spotlight tool, you might want to surf around for the email addy’s for these folks:
Newsweek:
Dan Klaidman, Washington Bureau Chief
Evan Thomas, Asst Managing Editor
Howard Fineman, Chief Political Correspondent
Jon Meacham, Managing Editor
Jonathan Alter, Senior Political Editor
Michael Rogers, General Manager and Editor News
Richard Smith, Editor in Chief
And now back to hunting down the person traveling with Gonzo in January of 2006…
I don’t think Fineman’s even that good on KO. [He said this trash while on KO last night, with a substitute host.]
I wonder every night why Keith doesn’t put on some REAL journalists like Christy, Jane or Marcy, and then I remember that he’s probably restricted to the “stable” of, well, you fill in the blank, that the MSNBC/Washington Post/Newsweek cartel provides him. It ain’t a pretty lot: Richard Wolff [pompous windbag who never gives the Dems any credit]; Fineman; Jonathan Alter; Chris Cirella; Craig Crawford. And the insufferable Andrea Mitchell!!!
It only “gets real” when he has on a guest like someone from VoteVets. And this is the best he can do on MSNBC!
MR. Bill @ 34
there’s the lead for the blog…r u onit?
Lurita Doan hearing at 10:00 A.M. EST on C-Span 3.
Anybody know what time von Spakovsky faces the music?
I saw Fineman on Olbermann, with the replacement host. She pushed him a bit, but he stuck to his story that this is just politics. There is no doubt that the repubs are trying to gum the issue to death. If we want to see better coverage, we need stronger meat than that vote. After the weak display of questioning in the House, how the heck does impeachment of Gonzales ever get off the ground?
jayt @ 40
10am… will post details…
selise @ 33
Lurita is in front of Waxman and is on CSpan 3. I don’t know what time Hans von’s hearing is but he’s in front of the Senate Rules & Admin committee with DiFi chairing. Other members of that committee are Schumer, Durbin, Dodd. I think that one, witht eh judiciary committee connection just might be more long term entertaining and effective as the Senators seem to question a little bit better than the house.
My $.02
Rayne @ 14
I just did a lexis search for
Gonzales and New Mexico for the dates January 9-16, 2006 and no articles mentioned a trip.
Re-posted from Eli’s thread last night:
Senate Rules and Administration Committee:
Dianne Feinstein, (Calif.), Chairman
Christopher J. Dodd, (Conn.)
Robert Byrd, (W.Va.)
Daniel Inouye, (Hawaii)
Charles Schumer, (N.Y.)
Ben Nelson, (Neb.)
Dick Durbin, (Ill.)
Byron Dorgan, (N.D.)
Patty Murray, (Wash.)
Mark Pryor, (Ark.)
Robert Bennett, (Utah), Ranking Member
Trent Lott, (Miss.)
Ted Stevens, (Alaska)
Mitch McConnell, (Ky.)
Thad Cochran, (Miss.)
Saxby Chambliss, (Ga.)
Kay Bailey Hutchison, (Texas)
Chuck Hagel, (Neb.)
Lamar Alexander, (Tenn.)
jayt @ 40
Looks like they are both in the same time slot.
Also looks like there might have been a shift at some point from Senate Judiciary to Senate Rules Committee for the von Spakovsky hearing…interesting.
Don’t know if the Rules Committee will have live feed, will have to run to their page and check.
selise @ 28
It’s tempting to think of “just politics” as not only a game, the object of which is to get as much attention as possible, but also perhaps as a fantasy world in which the wrongful conduct, inappropriate behavior, and mistakes of those who inhabit that world are not fraught with adverse consequences.
10 am - House Oversight and Government Reform
to examine statements made by GSA Administrator Lurita Doan that impugn the reputation of federal officials who cooperated with a Committee investigation into Ms. Doan’s conduct at the General Services Administration.
Witness: Luirita Doan
10 am - Rules and Administration
To hold hearings to examine nominations to the Federal Election Commission
Witnesses: Steven Walther, Robert Lenhard, David Mason, Hans von Spakovsky
[Hans von Spakovsky’s voter fraud background from TPM]
live feed at the links
p.s. here’s this week’s list (or you can click on my name)
Hey Scarecrow!
Great post as always. I really enjoy reading you first thing in the a.m.
Not real crazy about how my blood pressure spikes though. Small price to pay for the truth.
P E A C E
Rayne @ 47
This is Hans von Spakovsky’s confirmation hearing for the FEC. But would anticiapte that the people like Schumer and DiFi will be intense in questioning while most of the southern Rethugs will be giving Orrins (reach-arounds).
Howard Fineman should do some reading on how the Nazi Party was able to subvert all aspects of governance in the Weimar Republic thereby ushering in the 3rd Reich.
These people just insult my intelligence every time I turn on the teevee. Thanks, as always, scarecrow, for doing the dirty work for those of us who can only stomach it in small doses.
as always, scarecrow, you have the great gift of summary. this graf really should wrap it up for even the willingly blind:
The Justice Department has become so politically compromised that no one can assume its criminal prosecutions are based on facts instead of political motivations and furtherance of one-party rule. The civil rights division has turned into a perpetrator of civil wrong. Career attorneys who were dedicated to protect Americans’ right to vote have been pushed out and replaced by political operatives hell bent on denying likely Democratic voters the ability to even register. Honorable prosecutors have been replaced by White House loyalists and incompetent cronies. Men and women with integrity who would never sanction wholesale lawlessness by the executive or massive invasions of citizens’ privacy or sanction torture have been “retired” to make way for political operatives who justify felonies, illegal surveillance, torture, illegal kidnapping, indefinite detention and the imposition of military law on US residents. These thugs simply don’t care that what they’ve created is a daily embarrassment to the American people. And those are just the outrages we know about. All this happened on Gonzales’ watch at DoJ or his stint as WH counsel; he looked the other way as his White House masters trashed the justice system and disgraced America before the world.
fineman actually IS worse than others within the beltway journopundit loop. his slobbering about bush has despoiled the very notion of what constitutes legitimate commentary.
even so, you’re right. his is just another voice in the choir — the chorus, “nothing to see hear.”
there really ought to be a journalism prison where these inveterate offenders should be forced to do hard time.
the picture up top of abu torture reminds me to repost this;
leahy begins hearings about the “warrantless wiretaps”, on thursday they will authorize subpoenas
think progress has this;
if anyone has contact with leahey’s office we need to get him to start framing this discussion with the correct vernacular
he’s got to start saying things like;
“without warrants it’s too easy for officials to steal from the public and bussiness, we are going to do whatever is possible to keep people from stealing from us, THAT’S why we need warrants and officials that were hired without oversite, who made it into their position by “contributing to someone’s campaign” are CERTAINLY people we don’t want with our personal information nor our bussiness secrets”
see this?
THAT’S how this must be discussed by EVERY democrat
I’m sick of blaming the press. That’s the Repug game. Sure, they lie. Esp. Fox and WSJ. But the Democrats have to get better at getting the facts out and standing by them. They’re getting better at it, but they’re still timid in the face of any public criticism.
In this case, the way to keep the facts on the front page is to keep up the subpeonaes, enforce them, keep getting testimony, and impeach Gonzo - that will grab some headlines. Every time the President, or the Repugs, stand behind Gonzo, they lose face. Keep it up and the media will follow.
kdh22 @ 49
Sorry about the blood pressure. I could do recipes, but mine would probably kill you.
argh. i am going to have to learn to be more careful about hitting “submit comment”… at least until edit comment comes back.
here is the link to TMP for Hans von Spakovsky background.
janda (44)– thank you very much for that; I’m going to continue to dig in search engine archives and hope I get lucky.
I think SOMEBODY from the White House traveled with Gonzo…same SOMEBODY exchanged emails with Sampson.
selise (49) — thanks for that, just found the link to the Rules site, but you beat me to them both. Nice to know we have our choice of feeds; how are we going to liveblog them both??
edit: Ugh, I just realized I’m going to miss them BOTH. [sigh] Kid’s got a birthday party to attend. Take lots of notes, gang.
EPU’ed and now whining here. HHS is hosting a pandemic flu leadership seminar today in which their contracted pr firm - Ogilvy, is doing “live-blogging”. Please visit the HHS hosted Pandemic Leadership Flu blog and comment! HHS is abdicating pandemic response preparation and has told “the public” not to rely on it when the flu pandemic hits. They are in full Katrina mode, and the Flu Wiki bloggers - and other public health professionals and community activists are getting more worried by the minute.
The system is blinking red, and once again, HHS and the Bushco crowd are turning their heads and are being willfully ignorant. I can’t emphasize enough the importance of FDLers to watch this, comment on it and take the lead in getting the word out. A pediatric pulmonologist and founder of the Flu Wiki is a speaker today. But he doesn’t speak for the HHS, and he’s concerned about his ability to influence HHS to move off its duff.
Help!
what gets me is that political reporters consistently bemoan the fact that they “must” cover the horse-race aspect of politics — who’s ahead, who’s behind, etc. they’d really PREFER, you understand, to go out and do hard hitting investigative stuff, or policy analysis…
and here you have only one of dozens of scandals begging for coverage — the facts are already laid out, the whistleblowers available… and they do nothing.
Scarecrow @ 56
‘…mine would probably kill you.’
Yeah, I’m sayin’ stick with the exceptional commentary. I have pills for the blood pressure. Don’t know of any for the death.
My sincere apologies for being OT, but considering the topic of discussion yesterday centered at some point on Mudcat’s disdain for “leftist incivility,” I submit Dennis Miller on Harry Reid (laff track and all) from the Fox News “comedy” show 1/2 Hour News Hour.
I’ll be honest, I didn’t watch the whole thing. I heard part of it, just enough, on the Young Turkles this a.m.
Hi all…
Here’s a little something….
“The [Bush] bureaucracy is like all ruling classes in that it is ready to shut its eyes to the crudest mistakes of its leaders in the sphere of general politics, provided in return they show an unconditional fidelity in the defense of its privileges. The more alarmed becomes the mood of the new lords of the situation, the higher the value they set upon ruthlessness against the least threat to their so justly earned rights. It is from this point of view that the caste of parvenus selects its leaders. Therein lies the secret of [Bush’s] success.”
Replace Bush with Stalin and you have Trotsky’s 1937 indictment of the Soviet dictator written in The Revolution Betrayed three years before his assassination.
They just don’t care…watching the GOP apologists yesterday, listening to their speeches, gave me a knot in my stomach. This is all a game to them. They don’t expect to be out of power long enough for anyone to repair the damage they’ve done to America. Maybe they won’t get the White House in 2008…they don’t need it, they’ve infiltrated every nook and cranny of the bureaucracy and are eating away from the inside. It’s like a termite infestation - outside everything looks fine, but the structural integrity of the edifice is shot.
Anyone who voted even once for Nixon, Ford, Reagan, or either of the Bushes is responsible for this crime that has been, and continues to be, perpetrated against America.
dmg –
I actually have hope for Fineman and the usual suspects on MSNBC. I think he and others like him have been infected by a cynicism that there’s nothing they can do; that they don’t really have a role to play in keeping the system honest, other than call this like a sporting event — but they can do better. They have the ability, the smarts — they just need their butts kicked.
And I’d substitute journalism school and a course in Constitutional law for prison.
selise says
June 13th, 2007 at 5:56 am
Thank you!
I’m goin’ for the Senate hearing. Fireworks potential - high. Popcorn potential - ditto.
Or maybe I’ll just bring ‘em both up - and switch back and forth based upon the times when the R’s are questioning….
dakine01 @ 43
good points…. also with c-span covering waxman’s hearing, i expect i will be able to catch a repeat. watching the rules hearing live webcast may be my only chance to watch/record that one.
Scarecrow @ 64
who’d have figured you for an optimist? fwiw, most of the folks like fineman have already done jschool, where constitutional law — focused mainly on first amendment cases but with offshoots into other areas — is often part of the curriculum.
From Michael Leavitt, SEC HHS, he’s crowing about what pandemic prep has been done:
Do the math - 40 million doses out of 300 million population. The HHS Blog is only for five weeks - 2 weeks to go and it will be shut down.
mornin y’all. Libby’s reply is up on PACER. will take a few minutes to get it out to everyone.
gotta go see my kid graduate … 4th grade.
bbl, all.
waving my wings.
dmg
Hasn’t it basically been admitted that the WH top officials were using RNC servers illegally? Has that just gone away and been forgotten?
TiredFed @ 70
woohoo!
TiredFed - you are sooo awesome!
GeorgeSimian @ 56
If you’d like to see what the Dems said, on the record, about the Gonzales vote, check out this post from Bob Geiger — it’s pretty impressive.
scarecrow - Another great piece! The hits just keep coming here at FireDogLake!
Fineman has enough talent that he could be breaking the story of the century - BushCo’s nearly complete covert coup d’etat, with democracy as we know it hanging in the balance.
But, noooooooo!
The way the Goopers are framing this is that BushCo is being ‘attacked’ from outside the governmental system - as if an uprising by the peasants was occuring.
That’s not the case, of course - the Founding Fathers constructed a government that contained within it a remedy for peaceful change far short of armed rebellion - impeachment.
A ‘no confidence’ vote is a CLEAR SIGNAL that impeachment - the last resort, the last gasp for our Constitution and the Rule of Law - is just around the corner.
This is a crisis of the first magnitude! We’ve arrived at a Reverse-Lincoln situation - the Government is attempting to secede from US, leaving us mere serfs to choke on administrivia, state media and the interests of big money.
Impeachment is meant to reflect the unrest of the people over ‘bad’ government. But, the People have to get mad enough before the representatives can speak for them in this, the most extreme of Constitutional options to protect the basic interests and rights of the People to have ‘good’ governement.
The ‘no confidence’ vote was just the first bell ringing somewhere in the countryside.
But, it is a call…
ReddHedd, ygm. enjoy!
dmg @ 61
Ain’t that the truth. The bloggers have done all the work for them. I swanee, but they’re either the laziest bunch of pampered, flaccid pansies or they feel their careers are threatened by the blogs and therefore continue to counter the truth with the manufactured Beltway “centrist wisdom” they have spewed for so long, fearing they will soon become irrelevant.
My guess is the latter.
selise @ 72
bet you would like to see it. hehe
If this country succeeds in fighting off the Bush administration’s multifarious assaults on the Constitution, we’ll have politics to thank for getting us out of another extremely close call.
Fineman is clearly unqualified to cover his beat. He fails to address the deeper issues, describing the political maneuvering instead, and then dismisses an ongoing constitutional crisis as the only level he is capable of perceiving: politics. This is carrying self-deprecation too far, to the point where it deprecates others’ sincere efforts to save the country from a criminal rampage that is enjoying the protection of a corrupt and dishonest attorney general.
These are perilous times for those of us who have survived so far. For many here and in other countries, these times have been fatal. The Republicans have thoroughly discredited themselves as participants in a constitutional democracy. They have a lot to prove if they’re going to present themselves as representatives of the electorate rather than their patrons. Politics gives them a chance to demonstrate that they have reformed.
Politics is the nonviolent means of dealing with those who have usurped power. If politics the nonviolent means don’t work, what alternatives do we have? It’s a shame that Fineman finds this trivial. Maybe he should find a subject he can take seriously and leave the constitutional crisis to someone who cares.
damn. gotta get to work. you guys just gotta let us know how “cookies” does today!
Driveby comment:
Great post, Scarecrow! You made my morning.
It’s unfathomable how the press can miss the importance of this symbolic vote. Yes, “the rule of law is under siege on every front, and that Gonzales has become both enabler and perpetrator of that danger…” That’s why we need the wonderful bloggers at FDL who get it!
Off to a meeting.
TiredFed @ 78
not very subtle, eh?
How do we get a special prosecutor to look at Gonzo for not prosecuting war crimes? Which should be a slam dunk because unless the Congress has voted to repeal the Geneva Conventions Gonzo as our countrie’s top law man is obligated to enforce the law. Despite whatever Bush has told him if a special prosecutor won’t work vote to turn him over to interpol and the Haige. Let Bush fight it in the Supreme court the story on the news will work our way if any Republicans vote against it to protect Bush we investiagehow much THEY knew and when they knew it.
10 am - Rules and Administration
To hold hearings to examine nominations to the Federal Election Commission
Witnesses: Steven Walther, Robert Lenhard, David Mason, Hans von Spakovsky
[Hans von Spakovsky’s voter fraud background from TPM]
von Spakovsky certainly merits his very own hearing. I’d love to see the other three just sent home to come back later, so that the committee can properly take care of its most pressing business….
radiofreewill @ 75
Couldn’t agree more. And to be a reporter in this time, to watch this? It’s a terrible time for the country, but an amazing time to be a journalist — as you say, the story of the century, and they’re missing it!
What amazes me is that the media fully gets the outrage on the right about immigrants. And they’re trying to legitimize that outrage — why else give so much time to Senator Sessions — he’s the new “hero” at CNN. Sessions, a hero??? What are these people talking about. But they can’t see the heros on the left and won’t legitimize their anger at what Bush is doing to the country.
The country’s anger over the betrayal of American values by this Administration is the most underreported story. And no one who represents that anger, who can express it from deep inside without sounding crazed is allowed on the major shows.
Great post, Scarecrow. I tried to spotlight, but got the message “Post could not be extracted. Sorry for the inconvenience.” I hope spotlight worked for someone else.
things come undone @ 81
Am I wrong in thinking that the problem seems to be enforcement? I mean, there are clear cases where Gonzo and the WH have broken the laws, right?
I would love to see all the Main Stream Media talking heads try and defend Gonzo’s not prosecuting war crimes like allowing torture as “just politics”
Lindy @ 86
Thanks for letting us know about the spotlight dysfunction. We’re on it.
I’m reminded of a scene from Thirteen Days, when McNamara is in the Navy war room while the Soviet ships are steaming toward the blockade, and one of the U.S. ships did something provocative. And McNamara yells at the admiral, “Don’t you understand!? This is LANGUAGE! We are communicating with the Soviet government here!” (or something to that effect)
It drives me crazy when the “it’s just politics” canard comes out. What is politics? IT’S LANGUAGE! It’s a way of saying publicly what has been said privately, but was ignored. It’s a swat upside the head to those who need it. Yes, it’s kabuki. But even kabuki has a purpose. All this posturing serves to demonstrate to the president just how weak his support in Congress really his, how bad the opinion is of Gonzo, how catastrophically bad this whole thing is for the Justice Department.
If it helps one iota to get us closer to dumping Gonzo, it’s worth it.
TiredFed @ 80
shoot. if you’re not here… i’ll do the honors for you.
say thank you to TiredFed! (pdf) - for sharing libby’s reply from PACER.
Gonzo is the firewall…. review why Watergate finally was investigated…..
AG resigned and the Senate demanded a special prosecutor prior to any confirmation hearings. Cheney et al lived that history, they are preventing it being repeated.
katymine @ 90
Spot on.
Right on. The latest document dump gives me some hope too.
BTW. IMHO Keith Olbermann has had some really crappy commentators who have that smugness of DC “insider,” but sound hopelessly myopic. Howard fineman is iffy, either really bad or just o.k. There are a few commentators on his show that are even worse. KO needs more Rachel Maddow and Sam Seder.