Comey sounded a little homesick for DOJ didn't he?
Back before Comey became USA SDNY, there was a bit of war in NY over the nomination for that office. The Bush Administration had already abandoned the notion of getting nominations from the Senators (who are both Dems) and had made then govenor George Pataki the point person for both USA and federal judicial nominations from NY.
Because of 9/11 and her special expertise in terrorism cases, Mary Jo White had stayed on at SDNY until 2002. She offered to stay indefinatley, but the White House had publicly shunned that idea. After all, political affliation trumps competence every time with this crowd.
Anayway, Gov. Pataki wanted to nominated a very nice man named James McGuire to be USA SDNY. McGuire reputed to be a decent sort, had zero federal law enforcement, or even federal civil practice experience. He had very limited trial experince. He had been Patki's Criminal Justice Coordinator, which means he was a guy who figured out how to move funding around to push the Govenor's Criminal Justice priorites. This experience might have suited him for a high level administrative position at main Justice, but was never going to qualify him for the most high profile US Attorney's gig in the country.
Now SDNY is the jewel in the crown of DOJ. Jobs there are more highly coveted than jobs in main justice, and along with clerking for a Supreme Court Justice, a stint at SDNY is one of THE most valuable and prestigious lines a young lawyer can have on their resume.
USA SDNY has enjoyed unusual independance from Main Justice, and depending on the personalites involved in some years the USA has held more de facto power within the District than the AG. For this reason the Southern District of New York is widely known as the "Sovereign District of New York."
Chuck Schumer did not take the idea of the home state senators being cut out of the judical and U.S. Attorney selection process lying down. Love him or hate him, you cannot question that during the first Shrub Administration Chuck Schumer blocked a lot of really, really awful judicial nominees--am I the only one who remembers his filibusters?? -- not just in NY, but totally idealogigically insane wingnuts and craven "loyel Bushies" who were going to be slotted into Courts of Appeals with an eye toward putting one or more into the Supreme Court. Remember the Estrada fillibuster?
Schumer did some really hard core pressuring and horse trading with Pataki (which allowed Pataki to put at least one supremely unqualified, incompetant, lazy and just plain stupid person into a lifetime federal judgeship -- every lawyer in NY who is reading this will know instantly to whom I refer), and forced the Comey nonmination for USA SDNY. At the time, I heard about it from a D'Amato person and from a member of the NYS Republican Committee.
In fact, it was Comey's own credentials and personal prestige that made the deal work. Every person who heard the idea (pre-nomination) seemed to have the same reaction, slap self on forehead and say "why didn't I think of that!" followed by a big grin. That was the first I knew that Comey was a Republican. Years later, New York Magazine reported on the deal.
Why do I bring this up? Well, at the time that Comey was appointed to become Deputy AG, the NY rumor mill kicked into high gear again. I heard more of the following from Republicans than Democrats, and since most of these folks were pretty directly involved in the judical nomination process, I take it pretty seriously.
Word on the street was that when the FBI realized that Rove was major suspect in the Plame leak case, they confronted Ashcroft and others about the conflict of interest -- Ashcroft had once hired Rove. Moreover, Ashcroft did not want to have to stand up to the WH if there was going to be a cover up attempt. He was supposedly relieved to hear that "someone" was going to force Comey down the White House's throat.
I don't think the WH had any illusions at the time of his appointment that Comey might be a "loyal Bushie." He had already publicly (in front of over 100 pretty high powered and well connected federal practitoners) questioned whether the WH had lied to him to get him to hold Jose Padilla. Do you think for nanosecond that no one called DC the next morning with that tidbit?
Nope, the WH had to know by then that Comey was not a go along to get along guy. I always thought that the fact that New York Magazine made a point to talk about the fact that Schumer had forced Comey into SDNY to keep a loyal footsoldier out of there in an article about Comey going to Washington was a clear signal that NYMag had heard the same story about Comey being forced down the White House's throat.
I have always wondered who pulled that off. Was it Schumer? Was is a group of non-wingnut Republicans? I can tell you that many republicans saw his arrival in DC as the only hope that the party would not be destroyed by the Plame scandal, not because he would cover it up -- but precisely because they were confident he would NOT allow it to be covered up. When he immediately appointed PatFitz, many good, honest, ethical, decent republican lawyers breathed a sigh of relief.
Pretty much from the day he arrived, the word was that Comey was effectively running DOJ and that Ashcroft was off at his farm in Virginia doing the planning work for his next job, and taking care of his health.
Certainly, Comey became the guy with his finger in the dike trying to hold back the worst of the WH power grab and trying to protect his beloved DOJ from the unethical assault that was to come.
You may have noticed from Marcy's timeline and Jane's post building on it, that the really outrageous things which were apparently in the planning stages for a long time, could not be executed while Comey remained in office.
Question, why did he leave? We can all see why he might want to leave, it must have been incredibly draining to be the only meaningful pushback against the WH and the Rovians.
But why did he leave?
Maybe, just maybe .....
Was he the first one purged? Was the purge of James B. Comey the necessary beginning of the larger purges to come?
Follow up question for the still open Comey testimony record.
Were you asked to resign?
If so, by whom?
Where did you believe that idea originated?
Another thought.
Was the "I miss the Department terribly" line a shout out to the miracle worker(s) who forced Comey into the DAG spot in the first place indicating that he would be willing to try to come in and clean up the mess Bushco has made of DOJ?
That would be interesting!
(Update: Steve Audio reminds us of this article on Comey that came out at the time Ashcroft resigned:
Distrust of Comey deepened after some of his early staff picks were vetoed by the White House for not having strong Republican credentials, sources say.
"The White House always wants to make sure the administration is staffed with people who have the president's best interests at heart. Anyone who resists that political loyalty check is regarded with some suspicion," says one former Bush administration official. "The objective in staffing is never to assemble the best possible team. It is to assemble the best possible team that supports the president."
-- JH)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
could it be zed?
Jane!
♥lOvE teh ZeD
no zed for me
I don’t generally care for functionaries. Nor am I seduced by them. The prevailing proclivity is to dislike them. But I respect Comey.
lhp, what a great question that is. Hello, judiciary committee! Ask it.
Justice is what I seek. Nothing more. And certainly not a bit less.
Great read, of course, and terrific questions for Comey. I had not thought of the possibility of Comey being purged, but it would not surprise me one iota. Thanks, lhp.
Comey definitely seems like a decent sort. Wish we had a lot more like him running the govt.
WE miss the Justice Department
(the real one that SHOULD be)
terribly too!
I just thought it odd. If he had reallly resigned voluntarily, the “i miss the dpet…” comment seems kinda out of place.
Plus there are jst so many breadcrumbs in his farewell speech.
BTW, I have been to many a going away/resignation/retirement party including of some really high profile folks.
Even if the press took a couple quotes out of the reiriee’s remarks, I cannot think of another instance where someone went to the trouble of putting them up in written form on the Net.
Clearly those words were meant to be seen by a much wider audience than just the people in attendence
I posted this on the last thread, this will be the last time…but today’s Washington Post is showing yet another reason for firing McKay (that was referenced by Comey the other day) and, to me, it’s as bad, if not worse, than the excuse they used to fire Iglesias.
McKay wanted the Justice Department to prioritize going after the killer of a federal prosecutor and this pissed of some people in Washington.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....v=hcmodule
I guess this is still a big story in Seattle, and is not playing well.
Everybody is so focussed on the 8 who were purges at oncce. The bigger scandal involves those who went in ones and twos. And the even biger scandal is what some USA were forced/were willing to do to keep their jobs.
LHP:
IIRC, the house sub-committee left the record open for five (businesss?) days for both additional questions AND answers. Hopefully, someone connected to the sub-committee is trolling this weekend and picks up on the questitons inquiring minds want answers to.
looseheadprop @ 12
Like NJ who went to the press on Menendez prior to the election? And whatever became of THAT “corruption” investigation?
looseheadprop @ 10
This makes so much sense.
“The objective in staffing is never to assemble the best possible team. It is to assemble the best possible team that supports the president.”
It’s not about competence, it’s about *reliability*. Will they always do the right-wing thing, rather than Will they always do the right thing.
looseheadprop @ 12
I agree, I think that’s were the real dirty stuff will start to turn up.
looseheadprop @ 10
Sends the message in a subtle way without being in your face about it. Nothing there to alarm the Bushites but plenty there for those who can properly read the tea leaves. Like yourself! :})
AnnieW @ 11
It certainly does beg the question why the DoJ/WH wouldn’t say “My God, man, do whatever it takes to find the killer!”
looseheadprop @ 12
How many USAs have resigned in total? And how many of those were after Comey left?
AnnieW @ 11
The whole idea that DOJ and the WH would fail to support the effort to find the killer of an AUSA is mind biggling to me.
BAck in the late 80’s or early 90’s a mafia punk named Gus Farace killed a DEA agent.
Every federal law enforcement agency in NY threw everything it had into finding this a**hole. NAd they did. Washington was completely supportive and overtime in the pursute of that killer was not questioned.
Just for a bit of balance, look at the comment by Mary4 a couple of threads back. Let’s get the whole picture, please.
As for me, I’d much rather have Comey in charge than Gonzales, Rove’s sock puppet. But if I were Comey, I’m not sure I’d want the job.
Bob in HI
AnnieW @ 11
The local Seattle news stations replay this story occasionally, usually on the anniversary of the murder. The last I heard, there were still no leads. It has remained a mystery. You have to wonder what cases and investigations Ton Wales was working on when he was killed and if that had any bearing on the murder. I suupose this was investigated, but it is odd that the DOJ would not be obsessively gung ho about one of their own. That fact alone makes one wonder about the crime.
So have we reached the tipping point? It seems the USA scandal has gone beyond the “mean Dems are playing politics” phase and into the “they were doing WHAT?” phase…
TheraP @ 9
Ain’t it the truth!!! And thanks so much for the insider’s perspective, LHP, awesome post.
Yes I actually vaguely remember the Estrada filibuster. I try to pepper my advice to the (more-responsive) senior senator with appreciation for what he’s done well, –glad to have something else to add to that list. (Also his current dogged pursuit of “Nat’l Security Letter” abuse.)
If I were a Democratic President elected in Nov. 2008. I’d look long and hard at Mr. Comey. With an eye to the possibilities.
Eli @ 16
They are like a mafia family. incompetence is forgivable, breaking omerta is not
When I read this post I had one of those Homer Simpson “doh!” moments. Comey should definitely be asked about the circumstances surrounding his departure from the DoJ.
Same goes for Fitzgerald.
Here is a
McNultyconnection, and some scandal linkies. The Nation yesterday had a good update on Wolfie-Gate. But the reference to “Cleveland” leads to more scandal-topia.Robin Cleveland was part of the BOEING SCANDAL. She had to leave OMB, but Wolfie gave her and several other of his cronies jobs at the World Bank at $250 K a year-more than Riza got and tax free. MSNBC had a report over a year ago. It does seem “Iraqi Reconstruction” leads to the biggest crooks.
Robin Cleveland tried to get a job for her brother Peter.
This case also includes REDACTED DOCUMENTS and MISSING PENTAGON E-MAILS. Why was Cleveland not prosecuted? Who was the prosecutor in the Boeing scandal? McNulty.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 26
I’m thinkin’ Mr Attorney Genral Fitzgerald has a nice ring to it. Hmmm? Ring to it?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 26
I was wondering if Mary Jo White would be a good AG. My recollection is that she’s a major no-nonsense hardass, but she might be more valuable as a prosecutor than an administrator.
dakine01 @ 13
If I had such questions, I would fax them immediately to some of the thoughtful Democrats on the subcommittee. I would not wait for them to ask me, or wait for them to look around on the web for my questions.
Bob in HI
Relevant ThinkProgress post mentioned in one of this afternoon’s threads:
REPORT: Karl Rove’s Politicization Of The Federal Government
Link to ThinkProgress report mentioned in the ThinkProgress post:
White House Politicization of Federal Agencies
looseheadprop @ 12
And Yang, who left in October to work for the firm defending Jerry Lewis, even though she’s recused herself within Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. But someone there did arrange a $1.5 million signing bonus for her. DiFi is all over this one.
Lhp Thanks for writing about Comey and mentioning Padilla. A lot of mean things have been said lately about that case. I don’t know everything that really happened but knowing you (from the lake) and trusting your opinion will give me something to throw back at the naysayers. Why am I so worried about him? He looked awfully stressed out at the hearing. ( talk about a ShowTrialHearing) Something was not right. I certainly hope that after reading today about all the deaths relating to the fired attorneys nothing happens to him and Fitz. Do you think that the reason that hearing was conducted in such a manner means that it is possible they got him on the record behind closed doors?
Could they have deposed him and just asked basic questions in public? So many questions.
ps. sorry if I am rambling. I take drugs and have a cognitive disorder.
lolo
This is going to be Dubya’s “Watergate.” I swear, this bunch makes Tricky Dick & Co. look like preschoolers.
Astounding.
Hi y’all!
Eli @ 20
Did they ask that at the hearings?
Is that just one of those lawyer things? Don’t answer a question unless you are asked it? Otherwise, why wouldn’t Comey already have told the cmte. that he was asked to leave?
TeddySanFran @ 35
I’m kind of amazed that it’s even legal for a defendant’s law firm to hire away his prosecutor.
I think I read somewhere that Yang might not have realized that they represented Lewis - doesn’t she have a serious ethical issue if she did? Doesn’t she have a serious ethical issue now that she surely does know?
SnarKassandra @ 38
Hi, Cassie! Welcome back.
Feliz Cinco de Mayo! Have you heard any good mariachi this weekend yet? I used to play some…
Bob in HI
SnarKassandra @ 39
An what’re they doing now, and for who, and for how much?
Also, as pointed out over TPM, 1.5 million for a signing bonus might be fine for a big name lawyer who will no doubt bring over some big clients, but Yang doesn’t meet that criteria.
Bob Schacht @ 42
Lots of mariachi and Mexican dresses at school yesterday. And a dance last night.
Eli — Yang was leading the Lewis investigation (or perhaps slow-walking it….) How could she NOT know GD&C was representing him? Wouldn’t the firm’s name be on every communication with Lewis? Lewis has incurred almost a million in legal bills; isn’t all of this with GD&C?
conniptionfit @ 43
This would be especially interesting for the ones who resigned to take a new job, as opposed to the ones who resigned without having anything lined up (like the guy who resigned to clear the way for Paulose).
off topic, does anyone here download torrents? anyone know how you open something that is TS.XViD-mVs ?
I am pasting Mary4’s comment from the a=earlier thread here because I think it is relevant.
May 5th, 2007 at 11:20 am
24 -
It was the Independent Counsel laws that were allowed to lapse in 1999. During the initial stages of the CIA leak, there was a push to re-enact something along those lines.
When the Indep Counsel laws lapsed, a new set of regulations were put into effect for one category of Special Prosecutor - outside Special Prosectuors.
From Schumer’s website quite awhile back, before he threw in the towel that he seems to have only recently refound:
Since the Independent Counsel statute expired in 1999, the Justice Department promulgated new regulations that allow the Attorney General to appoint a Special Counsel when there is a need to investigate a unique case involving high-ranking Executive Branch officials and/or there is a conflict of interest for the Department. (Under the Independent Counsel law, the independent counsels were appointed by a panel of federal judges upon application by the Attorney General.)
The Attorney General has total discretion over whether to appoint a Special Counsel, controls the Special Counsel’s jurisdiction, and oversees the Special Counsel’s investigation. The Special Counsel essentially has the same powers as a US Attorney, including subpoena power and the ability to convene a grand jury. If the Attorney General precludes the Special Counsel from taking any proposed actions (such as subpoenaing documents, interviewing witnesses or presenting evidence to a grand jury) he is required to report those instances to Congress after the probe has concluded.
http://www.senate.gov/~schumer…..02072.html
Now, what Comey pulled off was having the CIA leak handled under a different Special Counsel approach - one where the investigation did NOT involve an outside counsel, but rather where someone inhouse at DOJ was given jurisdiction to handle a particular matter of investigation that would normally be outside their jurisdiction. Because of this, the Special Prosectur regulations for an outside counsel, which would, for example, require reports to Congress on any interference with actions, did not apply to the Fitzgerald investigation.
Also, unlike a Congressional investiation, which was also being pushed as an option at the time, information could easily be kept from Congress and from the American people and all the things like the RNC email accounts the fact that, criminal or not, Rove was sitting in the WH leaking information about CIA operative in an election year for political revenge - all would at least have had an airing of some sort before the disastrous 2004 elections.
As just about the only one who thought the in house approach in an election year was an awful thing, not really offset by having a “by the book” prosecutor (who would also be by the book about not letting Congress know anything he found out) you have to take my input with a large grain of salt I suppose. *g*
I think Fitzgerald did a remarkably good job with what he had, and I think Comey, far from being a saviour of liberty, did a remarkably good job of CYA for Ashcroft and Bush. Far better than any other result they could have hoped for. But the miles here vary so wildly that I am clearly stuck with the plodding burro while the porsches leave me in the dust. So all fwiw.
Mary and I have gone around and around both in the threads and via email about the Comey thing. We have agreed to disagree on this point.
However, I would point out that if the Plame outing had been allowed to go to a Congressional investiaagation WHEN REPUBLICANS STILL CONTROLLED CONGRESS–well, do you remeber the bang up job the Intelligence Committee did with tat NSA report?
What report you say?
You know, the secend phase report!
The second what? Oooohhh…..Nevermind
IIRC, Mary, aka, Mary4ever was the first I recall mentioning it.
Thanks doesn’t even begin to say it lhp.
Does anyone have a fax number for Comey where we can send him our appreciation?
TeddySanFran @ 46
That was my thought as well. But I’m pretty sure I read that possibility someplace I trust, so it was either here or somewhere in the TPMiverse.
TeddySanFran @ 35
I have never heard of “signing bonuses” from law firms. Never.
SnarKassandra @ 48
Try giving it an .avi extension.
Eli @ 53
just change the name? STILL looks like a BIN.
WRT: dead AAGs and such.
These are amazing stories. I do recall the wingnut tinfoil hat business got a huge boost during the Vince Foster suicide.
Projection much?
I mean, there were the deaths by small aircraft prior to 2000. And this is a lot of dead attorneys.
Quite a lot.
Wow- excellent question and brain-work, Loose!
Interesting comments as well.
As for cronyism, that goes on everywhere, but probably should have a higher standard for WB: is that the issue?
It’s becoming more and more clear that we absolutly MUST have a thourough examination of the circumstances of every USA , and every DoJ employee hired or fired during Bush’s tenure. The trustworthyness of the DOJ is paramount to honest government.
lolo @ 36
I was very upset at how exhausted and stressed he looked. He was almost unrecognizable. And the bags nder the euyes from lack of sleep reminded me of the pix of PatFitz on the day he hosted the meeting in Chicago where Gonzales met with a bunch of USAs from the midwest.
Same large luggeage under the eyes. Same haggard look of a man who had paced the floors instead of sleeping for many nights in a row.
I don’t know if House Judiciary did a better job in a private deposition than they did in public testimony. I have no reason to believe there was nay private testimony at all, but really don’t know.
I imagine that if I knew all the backstory, I would be even more worried about them as individuals than I already am.
Debra Wong Yang is co-chairing the firm’s crisis-management team, along with Theodore B. Olson, former BushCo Solicitor General and widower of 911 Pentagon plane passenger Barbara Olson.
SnarKassandra @ 38
Afternoon Cassie! How goes finals prep?
looseheadprop @ 52
“Signing bonus” sounds oh so much better than “bribe” or “hush money”.
Bob in HI
looseheadprop -
the thing i have difficulty getting my mind to comprehend is - what lies could comey have been told that would EVER make locking up an american citizen (padilla) w/o a lawyer ok.
something just doesn’t compute.
It would be interesting to see a comprehensive layout of the “dead” USAs, timelines, and circumstances, connections, and what they were working on. The odds of that many strange deaths in that kind of profession seem..well…odd.
Mutant Poodle @ 60
Not yet prepping. Still finishing papers and stuff. And blogging of course! Going to see Spiderman 3 tomorrow and then I will get serious about studying.
TeddySanFran @ 59
Theodore B. Olson! we will never confirm you for anything ever never ever!
DiFi on the Wong Yang case, re Harriett’s interest.
Stephen Parrish, CPA says
May 5th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Mr. Parrish:
(Oft) Any idea how Wolfowitz’s girlfriend gets her salary tax-free?
Isn’t she domiciled in the U.S.?
I gotta say, the Miers SCOTUS nomination is looking more and more suspicious alla time.
conniptionfit @ 40
High ranking DOJ employees sign executive agreements. They CANNOT jiust go tel Congress whatever they feel like in response to a request for information. They have to get whatever they are going to say cleared.
You submit your proposed stement in writng for review nad they are supposed to clear (or deny) all or partds of it within 45 days.
Under this Admin. it’s been running mor elike a year to two years instead of 45 days.
That’s why the fired USAs needed subpeonas. That’s why Fitz had to tell Waxman that he had “been reminded” that he couldn’t just talk to Waxman in repsonse to request for information.
Comey agreed to talk with them in exchange for a subpeona that made it legal for him to answer questions. I doubt he did any on the record but not pursuant to subpeona sharing. It would not be logical.
SnarKassandra @ 38
Cassie –
I missed where in Texas you live — I’m in Dallas, mourning the Mavs’ empty-jersey showing in the first round.
Eli @ 47
They usually give you at least a couple months notice so you can find another job and make it look to the outside world like you wanted to leave.
FWIW, morality always occurs in a historical context. I love Abraham Lincoln, (and I don’t think it’s possible to overestimate his moral accomplishments) but he and most other abolishionists* were, what we would call today, “white supremacists.” They were in favor of abolishing slavery, but not abolishing legalized white supremacy. Many were not in favor of the ex-slaves voting and they wanted them segregated away from European Americans.
Based on what I know now, I don’t see anyone except Comey having the sand to stand up to the WH.
*AFAIK, Lincoln was never considered an “abolitionist.” Also like a lot of people, his thinking on the issue evolved. Finally, I’m no Lincoln scholar, so I throw these opinions out with all humility.
Other Pat @ 70
I am not allowed to say the name of the town but we are south of Dallas.
John Casper @ 50
SOmehow, I don’t think Lockheed MArtin will be very happy if we do that. Better to express it here where he can find it
howdy firedogs - how y’all doing’ !
hmmmm ummm ummm . . .Ms Loosheadprop and James Comey ?!?!
double delish !!!
and lots of groovy firedogs on board - yummy
so before I go savor the post - am I seeing he was asked to leave ??? and am I gonna find out just whhhyyy he didn’t say anything
off to read - brb
It is sad, that over the past thirty years or so, the Republican party has polluted the American social structure to such extent that any Republican is guilty until proven innocent. LHP has made a strong case for Comey being a good guy, however, can any political appointee in the Republican govt be clean? How to undo the damage???
Hope Wednesday’s storm wasn’t too bad for you guys. It’s been amazing to see split trees everywhere.
Excellent point.
Bob Schacht @ 61
WAXMAN has some singing bonuses available, I bet
I seem to remember that Comey has five children to put through college, and his wife doesn’t work outside the home so he would be in a perfect position to be swayed to join the private sector and a huge salary. Who could blame him?
However, this may have been the Rove way of getting rid of him the quiet way. Heck, one of my former bosses used to do that regularly. If the competition hired someone really good, and there were no openings for us and we couldn’t hire them, she made darn sure those people got job offers from other companies in other parts of the country. My former boss had been in the same business for many years and had networked her butt off. She knew many, many people, and helped our bottom line by enticing away people she didn’t want to compete with.
It would not surprise me at all of Lockheed (defense contractor) was asked by someone in the WH to offer Comey a job.
Eli @ 51
Sampson Tries to Convert Yang, and then He Tries to Oust Her
by emptywheel
I’ve been meaning to write this post for a while. But now that Adam Cohen has revealed more details about Harriet Miers’ close attention to the departure of Debra Wong Yang, I’m going to do it now–mostly from memory (all my USA Purge documents are on my computer at home, and though this thread is on TPM, it doesn’t include the whole thread). Cohen reports that Miers was asking about ousting Yang “as late as mid-September,” just one month before she resigned.
Ms. Yang was investigating Jerry Lewis, who was chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. Ms. Lam and most of the other purged prosecutors were fired on Dec. 7. Ms. Yang, in a fortuitously timed exit, resigned in mid-October.
Ms. Yang says she left for personal reasons, but there is growing evidence that the White House was intent on removing her. Kyle Sampson, the Justice Department staff member in charge of the firings, told investigators last month in still-secret testimony that Harriet Miers, the White House counsel at the time, had asked him more than once about Ms. Yang. He testified, according to Congressional sources, that as late as mid-September, Ms. Miers wanted to know whether Ms. Yang could be made to resign. Mr. Sampson reportedly recalled that Ms. Miers was focused on just two United States attorneys: Ms. Yang and Bud Cummins, the Arkansas prosecutor who was later fired to make room for Tim Griffin, a Republican political operative and Karl Rove protg.
Given that timing, folks should look more closely at an August 9, 2006 email thread between Sampson and Yang. The email starts with something I’m very familiar with from having worked in a Mormon company in UT for two years–a half joking attempt to convert Yang (it was bad enough in UT, but in a federal government job? I’m sure this violated some laws). It appears that Sampson had told Yang something that often surprises those unfamiliar with Mormons–that a huge number of Samoans and Tongans are Mormons. Her reference to that leads Sampson to say he’ll send some missionaries over to her house (Yang turned what may have been an uncomfortable conversation into a joke, asking for attractive missionaries, ones who were good skiiers).
Aside from the overt religious content, the rest of the conversation relates to John McKay’s candidacy for a judgeship and another USA’s candidacy to serve as acting director of BATF. Yang appears to be very much an insider here, particularly with her reference to the Federalist Society as a qualification. And then there’s this one line:
PS: will call some corp folks regarding myself later this month and will share other info.
In the context of the two other discussions about moving USAs around internally, this reference seems to be a clear reference to her own job search. She and Sampson were discussing her departure, well before she had actually started to search. I’d say there’s nothing nefarious about it, but for two things. First, it has the same tone of informing DOJ as to the schedule. And then you throw in the fact that Miers was already asking Sampson about getting rid of Yang, and it seems likely that her warned her she needed to leave.
Maybe I’m reading too much into this–but this certainly seems to be evidence that Yang kept Sampson apprised of her job search even as Harriet hassled him to get rid of her.
LLinkink
SnarKassandra @ 45
My favorite is Jesucita en Chihuahua. Polkas and pinatas and pico de gallo and pulque!
Toque la guitarra handole! [Insert here Mexican equivalent of “Yeee-haaa!”] (Where’s El Gato when you need him??? Probably out partying.)
Bob in HI
looseheadprop @ 58
What a nightmare.
Would the Estrada that got blocked by Schumer be the same one that works for Gibson, Dunn also? Along with Eugene Scalia?
They do have a veritable who’s, who from the government working for them.
http://www.gibsondunn.com/fsto.....ovtExp.pdf
TeddySanFran @ 59
she is drinking the koolaid. : (
What was Wales working on when he was murdered? McKay was passionate about finding the killer, but nobody from DC came to the anniversary of the killing.
Sounds like maybe Darkside stuff.
conniptionfit @ 57
As Comey said during his testimony, if they really were litmus testing new hires in the USAOs well how DO you put that genie back in the bottle?
It also means that all the good. decent honest new baby lawyers who got hired on merit will NOT have a valuable line on their resume b/c folks will just assume that if you began during the Shrub Admin you must have been a bottom of the barrel, no talent hack.
This is really bad. Where does DOJ go to get its reputation back?
It’s not the same Estrada, by the way. Sorry.
TeddySanFran @ 59
And the man who helped win the Supreme Court coronation of Shrub in Nov 2000
TeddySanFran
Of