(The debacle in the Supreme Court thoroughly enraged me, and it was great to see the Lake lay the blame where it belongs: at Nancy Keenan's feet. Jane and I first met when I forwarded her some email exchanges between the Executive Director of Connecticut NARAL and me. She's asked me to repost here ar FDL, which I am only too delighted to do -- Brenden)
I used to live in Connecticut, and have never liked Joe Lieberman, a man about who the less said the better. I was elated when Ned Lamont mounted his campaign against the Senator, but was seriously disappointed to see that NARAL was backing a man who believes that Catholic Hospital should be allowed to deny emergency contraception to rape victims, and who had, by voting for cloture, helped put Samuel Alito on the bench.
I was really angry, and emailed a letter to all my friends and family in Connecticut, cc-ed to Carolyn Treiss, the Executive Director of Connecticut NARAL:
To: info@pro-choicect.org
Subject: Lieberman endorsementCT NARAL:
I am appalled and embarrassed that you endorsed Joe Lieberman for Senate.
As you well know, Lieberman believes that Catholic hospitals in Connecticut have the right to deny emergency contraception to rape victims. That’s why REAL pro-choice activists call him Rape Gurney Joe.
Your organization sat by while Samuel Alito garnered Joe Liberman’s vote for cloture, the only vote that mattered in the nomination. Alito’s hostility to Roe v Wade is legendary, yet you support Joe Lieberman, who helped put Alito on the bench. For that matter, he helped put Roberts on the bench too, and yet you support Lieberman.
Your behavior is despicable: I cut NARAL off my list of charities after Alito, and made sure I cc-ed my friends and family in Connecticut. Today I am cc-ing them again: do not vote for Joe Lieberman, and do not give ANY MONEY AT ALL to Connecticut NARAL. CTNARAL will not use your money wisely, as they proved during the Alito nomination.>
names deleted, please pass this email along to your friends and family: make sure that they know that CT NARAL let down all friends of reproductive rights in Connecticut. I for one have not forgotten. Brendan Skwire Philadelphia, PA
I received a swift, and well-deserved smackdown from Ms. Treiss: turns out things weren't so cut-and-dried:
Dear Mr. Skwire, I feel that I must make some important facts clear to you before you continue to spread misinformation about NARAL Pro-Choice CT. We are the CT Affiliate of NARAL Pro-Choice America. We operate as an independent entity and receive no funding from the national organization. Our state affiliate did NOT endorse Joe Lieberman. In fact, our state affiliate CANNOT endorse in federal races because we do not have a federal PAC registered with the FEC. We do, however, have a state PAC which may only make endorsements in state races. I have attached our voter guide so you can see that there is no mention of NARAL Pro-Choice America’s federal endorsements.Furthermore, our state affiliate plays no decision making role in NARAL Pro-Choice America’s endorsements. However, in this particular race, we sent a memo to NARAL Pro-Choice America making our recommendation that they NOT endorse Joe Lieberman, because we in this state do not feel that he has represented pro-choice people in CT, mainly due to his failure to support a filibuster on Alito and his insensitive and damaging statements against our EC in the ER bill. NARAL Pro-Choice America obviously did not agree with our recommendation. But, as I have already stated, we have no power in their decision making process.
I would also encourage you to go to www.connecticutchoicevoice.com. On that site you will notice my name and the names of almost the entire Board and PAC of NARAL Pro-Choice CT. I and members of my Board and PAC have attended numerous Ned Lamont fundraisers and events, and the campaign is well aware of my organization’s support, despite the actions of NARAL Pro-Choice America. Furthermore, you need only do a blog search to see that our affiliate’s position has been widely discussed on www.firedoglake and other progressive blogs.
So I must take issue with your assertion that NARAL Pro-Choice CT supports Joe Lieberman. And in the future I hope you will do your research before trashing a small organization that works very hard on a very small budget to protect and further women’s reproductive freedom.
I hope you will pass this email along to all of your friends and family in CT as easily as you did with your email to me.
Sincerely, Carolyn Treiss
Carolyn M. Treiss
Executive Director
NARAL Pro-Choice Connecticut
135 Broad Street Hartford, CT 06105 (860) 524-1086
As you may imagine, I apologized immediately, cc-ing my retraction to my friends:
I will pass along your response, and thanks for the update.The email was inspired by your parent organization, NARAL, which sent me a truly offensive email urging me to vote for their slate of candidates. The email included an interactive map. When I clicked on Connecticut, the candidate was Joe Lieberman. There was no mention at all that CT NARAL does not support him.
I apologize for sending out misinformation, but I also want to point out that I received this misinformation from NARAL, which made no mention that the CT affiliate does not support Lieberman.
Considering how much of my own money has been given to the organization, as well as efforts made to sign petitions, make phone calls and travel to DC to march, after NARAL’s betrayal on Alito and Roberts, you’ll have to excuse my haste to slam NARAL whenever I get an opportunity.
Treiss responded:
Of course NARAL Pro-Choice America is not going to publicize the fact that the state affiliate doesn’t agree with their endorsement. It undermines their credibility and ability to raise money. We also disagree with their endorsements in the Murphy/Johnson and Simmons/Courtney Congressional races, but they don’t tell you that either. If you really want to support choice, you should send your money to your state Affiliate, NARAL Pro-Choice PA. They are ones doing the work on the ground in PA and are not corrupted by DC beltway politics. And your friends should become members of NARAL Pro-Choice CT.
In one of the most important races in the country, a race that could have given real pro-choice Democrats a larger majority, Nancy Keenan refused to listen to a state chapter that is presumably much more in tune with Connecticut than an umbrella organization located nearly 350 miles away. I do not claim to know if the national NARAL speaks for my local organization, or for any other of their chapters: in Connecticut they rewarded a senator who voted against reproductive rights, against the clear wishes of their state chapter. Who knows if that was the case in Rhode Island, where Nancy supported Chaffee against Whitehouse.
Make sure YOUR affiliate knows. Call them and let them know how angry you are about Keenan's failed leadership. Let them know that there are other deserving organizations out there like Planned Parenthood, Feminist Majority, and NOW that could use your support.
And let them know that it is time for new leadership, leadership that actually fights for reproductive rights.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
frist?
I’m driving home from work in 2 seconds, pups, will see y’all in comments ASAP.
orrin and gonzo, sittin’ in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G…
omg, almost got the zed, w/o even trying!
Just want to say, I heard some of Keenan on one of NPR’s shows, talking about her outrage at the SCT decision. Made me pretty dam mad, but I was too focussed on Gonzales hearings to listen for long.
Just f*ing amazing.
In addition to Keenan, I also feel stabbed by the DLC and the Clintons.
In addition to the deserving organizations Brendan lists, recall that Blue America supports only pro-choice candidates. Candidates on Blue America’s list won’t support restrictions on choice.
So who are these national NARAL people? As someone at another blog commented,’This is the strangest planet I’ve ever lived on.’
Good on ya Brendan!
I was in CT and had a similar experience - but I directed my ire at DC. As I noted on Kos, I “RETURN TO SENDER” everything I get from Naral (I used to be a contributor and proudly marched on DC years ago because of Naral). I also scrawl - in big black ink - “Never another dime from us. Your endorsement of Lieberman was a disgrace”.
It may not make a big difference, but it makes me feel great.
Trippi joins Edwards campaign. We have an unequivocal leader in Edwards. SCOTUS appts start in the WH. There’s more at stake than control of Congress, building majorities in 2008.
Nancy Keenan = ineffectual embed? What’s her resume?
Fuck NARAL, Planned Parenthood is where it’s at.
Oklahoma kiddo @
3
AND OBAMA who hid out between a NY and MASS appearances so he wouldn’t have to be caught dead with Ned.
I will never vote for Hill or Barack or Harold or Chuck or any of those asses who supported Lieberliar through their lack of action (and don’t tell me their $5,000 donations amounted to support for Ned). They stuck sharp sticks in the eyes of CT Dems.
Why on earth does NARAL’s national board tolerate a horse’s ass like Nancy Keenan? Anyone have a clue? That national board list is just about impossible to find, based on the last time we went around about this crap.
tbsa @ 9
Planned Parenthood in CT didn’t do Ned any favors, either. I no longer have any pro-choice/pro-women group to support.
sounds like they are a crime family too
JDM @
11
Yep I’ve never been able to find a good source for it.
Sha @
12
Actually Carolyn Treiss, head of CT-NARAL, was more supportive — she joined Connecticut Choice Voice, an organization of pro-choice women who backed Ned. Susan Yellon, head of PP-CT, did not. Both did vote for him as delegates to the state convention, but as individuals, not in their professional capacity.
This topic came up last night on the Late Nite thread, where oilfieldguy posted a great letter he sent off:
Oilfieldguy @
192
As I said to him last night, I especially like the subtlety.
Jane Hamsher @ 14
Wouldn’t the state organizations have this info? Has anyone asked NARAL CT? I remember this problem last time too.
707 for OilFieldGuy!
That was sweet.
Jane Hamsher @ 15
Jane: I had an e-mail dialogue with Susan Yellon (for whom I flew to Tampa to canvass for PP/CT for the 2004 election)and told her how upset I was at their lack of public support for Ned as an organization and received platitudes but now real response.
Choice was an issue that could have hurt Lieberman in 2006 and CT pro-choice groups blew it.
Prairie Sunshine @ 8
Keenan wiki
NARAL website Keenan bio
JDM @ 11
After thinking this over it finally occurred to me that it may have to do with security reasons.. So many are threatened when taking a stand on this issue. However, there should be a way to contact the board and also hear from the board via a web site or something. (Just a thought)
Wasn’t NARAL totally off base during the call for filibuster during the Alito affair?
OT — Hardball covering the Gonzales hearing. Difficult to find any cable shows covering anything other than NBC’s decision to show masskiller pr0n. Good on ya, Tweety.
Here’s a gem
http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/1119-12.htm
I haven’t been called by NARAL, probably because I live in CA. But if they call me asking for money, my answer is going to be something like this:
‘Go Cheney yourself. You enabled that decision when you didn’t fight those nominations. You enabled that decision when you backed Lieberman.’
BTW, I’m wondering if it would be worth looking into those last two nominations to the Supremes. To look at how they got nominated, you understand. Were they vetted by 30-something Regents University graduates with political agendas and checkoff lists with ‘Federalist Society’ and ‘loyal Bushie’ as the primary determinants?
TeddySanFran @ 23
Cable jealousy in action: They’re just mad that they didn’t get the package.
After all these years, it’s hard to believe that we are still arguing about whether a woman has the right to do with her body as she pleases. As a man I have no right to meddle in this. Why? Because I’m not the one who has to have the baby.
Is Nancy Keenan a stealth Republican in charge of NARAL so that she can gut it?
TeddySanFran @
23
Ba…ba…ba…bomb Iran?
Jane Hamsher @
29
…right after i finish blowing my nose.
I heard Carolyn Treiss talk at Yale a couple of years ago after the Alito nomination on “what’s at stake for women” if he is confirmed. She was very articulate, outspoken progressive–surprisingly much more so than the representative from the National Women’s Law Center. Don’t cut your support for the CT affiliate because of the poor record of the national organization. They do important work on the local/state level.
California’s Therapeutic Abortion Act appears in our statute books exactly as Governor Reagan signed it in 1967. That must make Republics heads want to explode.
Everytime I read about this it sickens me. There is a business side to running an advocacy group, but that business is always meant to serve the issues you advocate, or in the case of NARAL the ONE FUCKING ISSUE THEY EXIST FOR.
Jane Hamsher @ 29
Yeah, it’s not early onset dementia in McCain, it’s his “cornball sense of humor.” He’s a hawk, and IOKIYAR
From a Georgetown Times’ article on a recent campaign stop made by Sen John McCain.
Another man — wondering if an attack on Iran is in the works — wanted to know when America is going to “send an air mail message to Tehran.”
McCain began his answer by changing the words to a popular Beach Boys song.
“Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran,” he sang to the tune of Barbara Ann.
TeddySanFran @ 23
One good OT deserves another: Christopher Hitchens sticking up for SpitN’Comb’s squeeze on NPR.
If they have to go to Z-list dry (or not so dry) dr*nks to find people willing to stick up for Wolfowitz, then his days must indeed be numbered.
Oklahoma kiddo @
3
How did Hillary vote on the Allito and Roberts nominations?
erik28com @ 33
And because they are the primary single-issue national advocacy group ON THIS ISSUE, their RGJoe endorsement allowed his friends like Senator Boxer to ignore his “short-ride” comment as well as his cloture vote. His friends look to NARAL for the shorthand on which they base (or justify) their endorsement decisions. Boxer was quite clear that NARAL’s skirts made it unnecessary to actually evaluate RGJoe’s statements or votes.
Poor Hitch, he’ll be reduced to doing Senor Whences schticks with his liver as the puppet.
-GSD
So much housecleaning to do.
I work in nonprofits, and so applaud Carolyn Treiss. NGO staffs make this world liveable, and we so often get a smack upside the head for it.
Know your charities. One of the greatest things about the blogosphere is the sheer volume of homework that’s already done for you, in link lists alone.
TeddySanFran @
23
They ran the VaTech story into the ground yesterday and prolly had to back-off today. gonzo gave them a good excuse to avoid today.
Former NARAL prez Kate Michelman sending email on behalf of the Edwards candidacy [karma working–this came after I commented about seeing blognews of Trippi joining Edwards campaign]
Michelman says:
For me, 2008 is about finding a true partner for women in the next phase of our long march towards equality, freedom and dignity—and it’s about finding a candidate who can win. That’s why I’m dedicating the next two years of my life to electing John Edwards President of the United States.
Her email asks me to forward to 3 friends. I thought I’d try for a few more. Here’s the linky.
HRC voted against Alito.
Um… you did ask Treiss’s permission before posting this, right?
tbsa @ 43
And on cloture?
Hey just walked in the door.
Someone asked what the difference is between the national organization and the local orgs. One major difference is that the local affiliate is going to be more in tune with local politics.
conniptionfit @ 45
Not sure, still looking.
((((oilfieldguy))))
I’ve been so quiet all day during the Abu live blogging threads, and now I have a question:
what does IOKIYAR mean?
from what i understand, btw, CT-NARAL was really active in fighting for statewide compassionate care for rape victims. I have a friend at the org, not Ms. Treiss, who tells me they’re still in fights over birth control in CT.
BIRTH CONTROL!?!
conniptionfit @
45
Nay on cloture as well. googled alito cloture vote, 1st option.
OT, but the actions of Code Pink today (someone in the GabblyChat said it was them expressing themselvs loudly at the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting today) made me proud.
Some buncha people, mostly womens’ voices (prolly Code Pink), were raised in song just after Sen. Leahy adjourned the hearing…
LoudounLib @ 49
it’s o k if you are a republican
LoudounLib @ 49
It’s OK if you’re a Republican :)
TeddySanFran @ 53
Beautiful — thanks! ;-)
conniptionfit@ 45: Hillary voted no on cloture.
Lieberman, Keenan’s BFF, voted for cloture, then against confirmation. Cloture was the important vote, as Keenan knew, and yet NARAL sent out this email asking people to thank Joe for voting no on Alito.
brendancalling @ 50
Birth control in Connecticut has always been an issue. IANAL, but there’s a case (Griswold?) about a married woman being able to get birth control that broke open availability of the pill in the 1960s.
LoudounLib @
49
Sometimes put as IOKWIAR - It OK When It’s A Republican
IOKIYAR = It’s okay if you’re a republican
S.O.S., dakine and tithonia, thank you as well!
By the way, goood on Jane (and Howie) for calling out Keenan.
She’s a disgrace and should be forced from office.
I don’t know if the state affiliates can join together and force her out or what, but I’m sure if the board got enough calls from state directors saying “our donors are dropping out until Keenan’s fired”, that eventually a tipping point will be reached.
OT: Good Blue America news.. Dr. Steven Porter sent out notice of his intention to run again and beat Republican Congressman Phil English (R-PA)..
Dr. Porter Narrowed the margin from 70 percent to 53 percent last time around.
Another progressive stands up!
Go Porter ‘08!
TSF - just e-mailed Boxer and let her know that I’m not going to forget she made this decision possible when she backed Lieberman.
We probably need a chart showing how current Senators voted on all this, so we know who we should be swearing at.
Unfortunately, advocacy groups, once they have become well established, tend to make their primary focus their own survival, enhancement, power and financial health, regardless of the compromises required to do that and the effect on the issue that they originally set out to advocate.
The more “professional” the management of these groups, the worse the problem, as these so-called leaders are more concerned with their own profiles and careers than the actual issues at hand.
conniptionfit @ 37
I believe she did not support them. But I am speaking here primarily of the Senator’s vote to attack Iraq and her statement saying that those who did not support her position on Iraq should vote for someone else. And I am also disliking of her close connections to the DLC, a group which came out strongly in favor of the Iraq invasion. I am also not at all comfortable with the Clinton’s coziness with the Bush family or Newtie. But I really don’t have a problem with much else this Senator seems to support. I do not however support Sen. Clinton’s seemingly non-support for a fair settlement to the Israeli-Palestininian situation. And I also did not support her refusal to debate her Democratic opponent Tasini, the labor and peace candidate, in the last Senatorial election in NY.
OfT:
News trailer on MSNBC says Doolittle didn’t tell Boehner about the FBI raid; he may have learned about it from news reports! No wonder they made him resign his Appropriations seat today. Even though it’s all really about MRS Doolittle.
LoudounLib @
60
de nada! We most all had to ask a few questions the first time we see some things. Especially with acronyms. Or there’s an online dictionary of terms somewhere as well.
teddy
then badwater
omg badwater, that totally cracked me up.
just catching up on threads–you all seem to be in fine form tonight.
think the naral board was mentioned in another thread, didn’t bookmark it, sorry.
whitehouse on npr about abu–daggers thrown precisely by him on interview
sessions-”sad day, some good things and some were troubling, this event has done damage”, mentioned his 15? years as usa.
Oh. Almost forgot. I did not like what was basically Hillary’s support for Lieberman against Lamont in CT. last fall. Even though her triangulating and PR tried to convince us otherwise. Yes, I feel stabbed by this once proud “vast right-wing conspiricy” pol.
I view Hillary Clinton as a Democratic chicken hawk. Much like her pal Lieberman.
No excuse for such horrendous violence just deeper understanding.
Cho bullied in high school. I have not heard anyone talk about bullying at VT
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18169776/
Morris Sheppard @ 64
this is certainly the case with Keenan. I don’t know if it’s so for PP or Feminist Majority. I don’t believe it to be so for MoveOn.
And, if I wanted to be even more cynical, I would say that the SCOTUS decision is good for NARAL, as it will freighten people into giving them more money and make them seem even more important, now that the rights that they purport to defend are genuinely under attack. If I wanted to be even more cynical than that, I would say that Keenan knows this, and is secretly smiling at a plan that worked out very well.
Of course, that would be very cynical of me, wouldn’t it? Almost like believing that Alberto isn’t telling the truth.
ok at 27
i just love you!!!!!!!!!!
boy am i behind on comments.
I got an email request for money from NARAL today. What they got instead was an ear full. Give yer pennies to Planned Parenthood or Blue America PAC. Far as I’m concerned Keenan can rot. She’s just another small ego mesmerized by the cocktail weenie circuit.
Never give up.
LoudounLib @ 60
We’re nothing if not redundant. ;)
OK Kiddo and conniption fit, I thought the Kiddo was referring to the Clintons’ and DLC’s tacit support of Lieberman over Lamont in the primary. I guess not, but it strikes me that they did end up making Lieberman’s disastrous votes possible.
Gore Vidal “New York Times instinctively pro-Bush” http://www.informationclearing.....e17558.htm
dmac… ;0)
OT - President Bush Pleased with Attorney General’s Testimony
and just learned in the last few days what being a blue america candidate really means-didn’t know before-have passed that on to my campaign contributing buddies and family members.
god, i love the lake…………..diving back under the water dolphin kick.
OT but of interest -
The Democratic National Committee sued the Justice Department on Thursday, demanding it turn over any e-mail traffic with the Republican Party on the U.S. attorneys controversy and criminal investigations.
LINK
Oklahoma kiddo @ 69
I am not a big Hillary fan, but let me point out that she was one of only 17 Democrats who voted against Porter Goss’ nomination to head CIA.
twolf1 @ 79
But of course!
allan_in_upstate @ 82
Understood. ;0)
P J Evans @
63
I got your chart right here:
Dems who voted for the Ban include
Lincoln
Pryor
Biden
Carper
Bayh
Landrieu
Conrad
Dorgan
Nelson
Reid
Johnson
Leahy
Byrd
I don’t care how the Repugnants voted (I can’t saddle them with the name Pugs, cus pugs are just plain cute.
Thanks for this thread, Brendan.
And yes, right on schedule yesterday afternoon, NARAL Nancy put out a begging letter. Excerpts therefrom:
What Ms. Keenan isn’t telling you is that Tuesday’s Scalia-Roberts Supreme Court ruling does an end run around Roe while leaving it technically intact.
As for the Freedom of Choice Act, NARAL’s own site mentions that it’s been floating around Congress since 1989 — eighteen years — and hasn’t got anywhere. (By the way: I couldn’t find the actual text of the bill on NARAL’s website — but it’s available over at an anti-choice site, complete with a current list of sponsors. Just another example of how Keenan’s not doing much of anything with the cash she’s Hoovering up from us.)
David “axis of evil” Frum is one of the many neo-con promoters and schedulers of the “grim reaper” coming to Iraq.
It is difficult to read his explanation of how hard it is for the American public to try to “make sense of the senseless” in Blackburg.
Frum is up to his neck in Iraqi blood. He is the “grim reapers” assistant.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opi.....do1802.xml
dmac @ 80
It is important that we continue to publicize the Blue America manifesto — Howie Klein does an excellent job of vetting candidates against very specific criteria before he presents them to us ‘pups for support.
by the way, and this was edited out of the post due to length, but when i called NARAL in DC yesterday, they were rude and dismissive to me. After I emailed my friends and colleagues about NARAL’s role in the SCOTUS disaster, I called back at 4:30 to read them what was going out. The line was busy, which made sense whether you like NARAL or not.
At 5:00 it was still busy.
At 6:00, still busy.
I wrote this post last night, and at 8:00 PM EST, NARAL’s phone was STILL busy.
I have to speculate that someone took the phone off the hook. Now why would NARAL not want to hear from its donors and support base?
So many questions…
I raced through the live blogging. Fascinating. I know people were told to hold down the comments but I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed the excellent snarky paraphrasing of the proceedings. Hilarious. It is going to make actually watching the hearing & Gonzales’ expressions all the more fun.
ironranger @ 90
I guarantee you will enjoy his “scrunched up squinty I am being very Serious and Thinking Deeply” look. Good times!
brendancalling - I was thinking Roberts and Alito (all those votes).
I also will have a nit to pick with the friend who thought that Roberts would be a good justice because he seemed to be capable of sound legal reasoning. Won’t cut off the friend, but will add it into the equation when he makes political comments.
There are far too many like Keenan flying under the radar. On many issues.
News that Alan Johnston is alive.
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/B.....92007.html
By the way: Is the graphic rendering on everyone’s browsers? I’m not seeing it.
Copy cat threatening in California
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/C.....92007.html
Well, Senator Clinton asked me for help today; in light of yesterday’s SCOTUS decision, she thinks next year’s Presidential election is very important. My response:
Phoenix Woman @ 95
Ah, never mind — it works in Firefox.
We’re going to be stuck for a mighty long time with these reactionary conservative Supremes for a mighty long time. Think what the court will look like if another Republican gets into the WH in 2009.
Is there a simple way to find out which Demos voted for confirmation of Thomas, Scalia, Roberts and Alito? I’ve looked, Google, etc., but…
Phoenix Woman @ 95
Ugly woman with the word sellout?
Check.
twolf1 @ 79
You have to be shitting…
This debacle goes all the way to Rove’s place and beyond.
Give Monica immunity and let’s get on with it..
Jack
TeddySanFran @ 97
;0)
Keenan the Barbarienne
CNN Lou Dobbs’ Question of the Day:
“Should AG Alberto Gonzales resign?”
See the QuickVote panel on the left side -
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/
We can make a difference with this poll!