I was so happy that Henry Waxman opened the hearing up with remarks from George Bush Sr. regarding leakers (video here):
"I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who expose the names of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors."
I've always felt there was a strong father/son rivalry that was an element to this case that has largely gone unexplored, and that should certainly get Junior's (Pet) Goat.
Valerie Plame was luminous and helped in no small part by the fact that she is smart, sincere, professional and articulate (not to mention gorgeous). The administration was not done any favors by the Republicans defending it on the panel, most spectaculalry by Congressman Lynn Westmoreland, who came out and admitted he'd never questioned a spy before and then proceeded to act like he was chatting her up at a bar. Westmoreland had already given us a demonstration of his intellectual acumen on the Colbert Report, when -- as co-sponsor of the Ten Commandments bill -- he couldn't name them. He was in his usual resplendent form today.
The big news of the day, however, came from Dr. James Knodell, who -- as Director of the Office of Security at the The White House -- admitted that there has been absolutely no investigation into the leaking of Plame's identity by employee Karl Rove. To say the response from the committee was shock would be an understatement.
Toensing's testimony was rife with what could charitably be considered "inaccuracies." She claimed knowledge of Plame's status she freely admitted she could not have had, having not spoken to either the CIA nor Plame on the topic, and she also claimed that Grenier had given her name as Valerie Plame (he hadn't). Waxman seemed to be aware of this as he closed out the proceedings, thanking the administration's spokesman (and ComPost contributor) for her time, promising that her statements would be fact checked. I'm sure Marcy will be doing much the same here tonight.
Curiosly, the juror who was dismissed from the Libby trial -- a woman in a short blond bob -- was at the hearings, and spent most of Toensing's testimony glaring at the back of her head. Toensing may have spent most of her time dissembling at the request of the minority and trying to steal everyone else's time, but at least there was a nice visual metaphor about how the rest of us felt about the whole thing.
Update: How could I forget the NIE declassification? And the Niger forgeries? Committee members also expressed a desire to open up the shilling done by Republicans on the SSCI committee, who openly distorted what happened with regard to the Wilsons and Joe's trip to Niger. Let's hope they follow up on all of these things. I certainly did not see this as the last hearing necessary to get to the bottom of this mess.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Valerie! Jane!
That hearing makes me want to buy everyone a round of martinis…who’s drinking?
JANE!
what a great day!
Waxman! Valerie!
Wow. Just. Wow.
ya’ll is da bomb
I wonder if Dismissed Juror had a copy of the Toensing op-ed mysteriously shoved under her door on the weekend before she left the case?
Toesuck’s moment in the spotlight managed to puncture the balloon of bullshit, showing that she haughtily claims authority on little more than Beltway gossip.
tell us more!
Thank you all for covering this!! I had neither sound nor the time to watch the proceedings. The many comments were illuminating, and, often, hilarious!
(((((Jane!)))))
Anybody got any info on the Pink Moron?
You’re right, Jane - Knodell’s admission was key. Closest yet to a Butterfield moment. I sense that when the hearing is continued we will have a true Butterfield event. I’d rate Knodell’s admission as .7 on the Butterfield scale.
VALERIE AND JOE, WE LOVE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Toensing confirms that those on her side of the debate believe that unless one is convicted beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of which she approves in a case brought by a prosecutor whose judgement matches hers, there is nothing to see here and we should all move along. So much for duty, honor and the American way.
Dog
Waxman!!
Also a shout-out to my rep Van Hollen — ya did us proud!
That Pink Dink is being used to make a visual farce of the hearing by Hack Drudge.
Nice work pink-hole.
-GSD
This means of following the proceedings serves me best of all the available options, and I really appreciate it. I’d never have be able to listen to or watch them myself, even recorded, and MSM would only serve up a soundbite. This way I can follow them as the occur, with the understanding that these are not transcripts, and while some editorializing is going to be part of the process I get a much more complete view of what’s taking place than I could any other way.
That having been said, IMPEACH CHENEY. Thank you.
Has the art curator been heard from yet?
Twisted I’m drinking Long Island Ice Teas as we speak, come on everyone-Bounce Your Boobies!!!
The Pink guy was just some dick.
See my deconstruction of the IIPA statute, and why Toestink’s claim that it only applies to CIA covert agents resident abroad, is incorrect, in the prior thread.
Time for a Loud Mouth Soup.
Rumor has it that Victoria Toensing has a fake tooth that contains a cyanide capsule to be used in an emergency. The capsules are provided to all Party loyalist.
Hey Jane:
Have a great weekend…Thanks much for founding FDL. There’s no other blog like it. Period. As LHP said: a virtual think tank.
Hey Jane! Hope you are comfortable and enjoying the post-hearing glow.
“……by the fact that she is smart, sincere, professional and articulate (not to mention gorgeous).”
A very nice description of Valerie Plame. The same words also describe you Jane!
I like the placement of the PoliticsTV logo.
Bluetoe- I am not surprised by that, but I am LOL
Jane, all the best to you. Hope you enjoyed today’s festivities.
Did I miss something or did Toensing just flat out lie under oath? Is there some legal interpretation of Plame’s status that I’m not understanding?
Toestink is despicable. I hope Waxman goes after her sorry lame butt!
David Baerwald- She lied about her age for one thing!! Love your music, too!!!
Well, thanks!
Henry Waxman did seem to question Toensing’s veracity. They gave her the rope and she put her head in the noose.
In honor of St Patty’s day, I’ll even buy a Guinness!
Did I miss something or did Toensing just flat out lie under oath? Is there some legal interpretation of Plame’s status that I’m not understanding?
OK lawyers, seemed to me she framed everything as her “opinion”. Can she be prosecuted for that?
It does seem that the point around which the hearing, that trial and those other disclosures are moving is simply impeachment.
After hearing testi-lying from Discredited Republican Operative Vicky “T-Bag” Toensing I have come to two conclusions.
Firstly her chair should be thoroughly Febrezed.
Secondly the hearing room should be exorcized by some Mayan Priests.
-GSD
EPU’d
hard to keep up today, wanted everyone to know=====
OT
just heard on NPR ari shapiro;
abu’s former cheif of staff kyle sampson has a new position,
in legislative section of environmental division
no kidding, they re=employed him
and thanks to all who live-blogged, i REALLY appreciated it…….no cable, on dial-up, a friend is taping it for me tonight, so i can see it later…….
now going back to catch up on comments
SWEEET! That was the juror?!?!
so i couldn’t see toensing’s testimony. she continued to say that plame’s status was noncovert even after the head of the cia confirmed she had been?
How. Is. That. Possible?
and why did the committee let her get away with it?
I loved Waxman’s categorization of Toensing’s testimony - that she would interpret the words so narrowly to make them fit her story.
Thanks, bluetoe. We’re getting snowed in here in CT, I’m trying to find someone to plow the drive before we get blocked in but it was a real boost to watch the hearings today.
Nap? Never heard of ‘em.
Is it me or does Mr. Waxman remind me of a character actor from the movies and tv?
No investigation into the leaking of Plame’s identity by employee Karl Rove? I’m sure Bush will be shocked! hahahahahaha
I loved the women in PINK. She stood up at just the right moments to get the message across. It was a wonderful tableau. Won’t be on POX News. But then again they won’t cover this. Frankly, I’m very surprised they allowed her in the room with something like IMPEACH BUSH NOW on her chest. She also had something written on her back and on the silly crown she was wearing. Before the Dems took over she would have been out of there.
There was also a guy who put up a sign written on a newspaper that said GOT IMPEACHMENT? And just after he showed it to the camera some one in the audience yelled IMPEACH CHENEY FIRST.
A far cry from when the protesters during the Iran Contra investigastion tried to yell info to the members and were escorted out.!!!!
Knodell was going to mount an investigation but he had first to arrange a golf date with OJ to learn how to seek out the real culprits.
Topanga-lib , She, you better adjust your tv.
Knodell looked he was gonna need one of those little hemorrhoid cushions for later.
I’m in upstate NY at the moment (out by Binghamton) and we’re supposed to get 10-22″ of snow during the rest of the day.
Humpty Dumptysville….
watertiger @39 –
Yep, that was the art curator. I think Pach talked with her afterward.
As soon as Marcy gets WiFi she’s gonna lay into Toensing. Popcorn!
Shorter T-Bag Toensing.
Don’t listen to the Director of National Intelligence on the status of CIA spies, listen to me because I knew Barry Goldwater back in the 60’s.
-GSD
I thought the Pink Guy was a gal.
spew alert!
(glad I’m only drinking mate…)
IIPA does not determine who is covert and who is not covert. The CIA grants that status.
The IIPA determines the conditions under which the leak of a CIA covert employee can be prosecuted. For example, if the CIA covert employee hasn’t not traveled outside the USA in five years, and therefore is considered inactive - the leaker cannot be prosecuted under IIPA BUT wait! Plame asserted she had traveled out of the country in the five years prior to the leak of her identity.
And what about this executive order that says anyone who leaks this information, even if only by accident or recklessly, they are subject to consequences.
With apologies to Rep Cummings and not to diminish at all what Valerie Plame’s been put thru by the outrageous conduct of WH operatives and their journalist-fellow travelers, we mustn’t lose sight that this isn’t about Valerie Plame. It’s about the work product. Not the covert officer, but that officer’s networks and intelligence gathering and information and future credibility.
That’s why the CIA referred it to Justice. That’s why this matters so much. That’s why hearings and accountability are long overdue. That’s why Scooter should burn in hell prison for throwing sand in Fitzgerald’s eyes.
Because Bush and Rove and Chee-knee and Novak and Libby and Matalin and the rest of the WHIG and their media apologists from Toensing to Hannity and Limbaugh and their ilk should be held to account and shame down thru history.
Because they didn’t just assault and betray one woman and her husband. They assaulted and betrayed America.
Raven.
LOL.
-GSD
I thought it was great how they made Noodle look so stupid, it was like he didn’t even know what his job is/was.
So Jane, who would you cast as Victoria?
EPU’d from below. Sorry to keep repeating this, but I figure with the accumulated Plame knowledge here, there’s a good chance someone knows it off the top of their head. If not, for the sake of completeness it might be worth tracking down if for no other reason than to add to the documentation of all the, ahem, factually challenged assertions by Toensing.
The one thing I’d like to see followed up is her claim that the CIA threatened another journalist (I heard “Winer”, but could have gotten that wrong, maybe Sanger?) with criminal prosecution if he published Plame’s name. She was claiming that the CIA was being negligent by not making the same threat to Novak. I’d really like to know what she was talking about. Likely it’s just another case of her saying something that isn’t true, but it sounds interesting.
This was at about 2:01pm EDT, for those with access to the tapes.
HE?????
That is even funnier!
Tap Duncan. Don’t know his name but in “Cold Turkey” (1969)Big Hank resembles the actor playing the right-wing head of the local milita caught up in his newly granted authority to police the smoking ban.
There was no investigation in the White House on the outing of a covert CIA operative because their true interest was not that of national security but trying to provide cover for their false intelligence. In that regard their ultimate goal was accomplished therefore no need for an internal investigation on the outing.
I thought the Pink Guy was a gal.
If you can stand it check Drudge, there are 2 screen caps up there.
oops - let out teh funny:
Snowing like crazy here in NY, mid-Hudson valley. But I have this warm glow….
Be well, Jane!!!
GSD @ 37
ROFL! (and that’s a good idea. Spray with holy water, too.)
I imagine seats for those hearing were pretty dear. How did the Libby juror manage to get one,I wonder.
.
If you do get snowed in Jane, can’t the poodles double as sled dogs?
The pink people at the hearing sucked. Period.
This was a day for truth, not grandstanding by protestors.
The protestors were a distraction from all that was important about the hearing.
I have no idea what organization they were associated with, but I suspect possible double tricks.
Exactly, JH: okay, interesting, now where are we again?
…because it’s all happening and coming down so fast that I’m pretty dizzy.
Highlights: JH mentions, by the way, gorgeous. Could obviously say a lot more, along with spy story central casting at Bond girl level, but let’s just move on.
To Rep. Davis. Showing that he knows how to ask questions and form coherent (biased, but still) thoughts, which begs the question: was this guy the chairman of the oversight committee this whole time? Assuming that he was, this guy is a truly disgusting disgrace of a human being.
Lynn, chatting up Val at the bar (lol) was purely comic, and another highlight was the big glowing smile she gave him, kind of like “you do know how highly skilled I am at this game, don’t you? You’re the one who ends up telling me everything you know, not the other way around.”
I guess I keep getting distracted, but in the end it was just so refreshing to hear the truth, real questions and statements, people who are angry and unwilling to listen to lies and spin.
Need to take a little break to get ready for the Friday afternoon doc dump, news dump, general spew that will go down over the next couple of hours…
Just checked Drudge
Your right it was a guy!!!!!
Victoria Toensing could not have made it more obvious that she was there to spin for the administration. Babs should have invested in a couple of acting lessons. When she beamed that aside about Barry Goldwater, the great libertarian, I thought I’d throw up. Not needin’ to telegraph your sympathies to the viewing audience much, eh Vicky?
Have long respected Mr. Waxman; after today, I love him.
As for the Pink Person, my first thought was that it was Judith Guiliani, as so few people wear tiaras these days. But she’s smaller, so I figured it was Rudy, playing dress-up again.
XYX,
I am with you. Prostesters are fine, but there is also a time to stop with the attention grabbing and let the facts and the process do the talking.
Pink Dink go home.
-GSD
AZ Matt- I say Charlize Theron, she’s the only blonde actress that might be prettier than the Valerie herself. IMHO, and I might be wrong, but I doubt it.
I wonder how much the going rate is these days for being a
paid Judas shill“witness” for the “it’s OK to betray covert CIA officers” dumfense?Vicki baby, you so earned your 30 pieces of silver!
‘Course, it beats having an honest job!
Go Marcy!
Hectic morning! Hated to go to physical therapy this morning - missed the beginning of Toensing. When I tried to get out of the driveway, there were three moose blocking the way. I honked and they just stayed, so I went back to my shop and let my faithful Strider out. He just stared at them, but they got the point and moved on.
When I got back, my shop roof was starting to blow off (it has been blowing between 25 and 80 here for WEEKS - coldest March and coldest winter on record in AK). But instead of getting up there and doing emergency repairs, I went back inside and turned on C-SPAN and firedoglake. My dog watched the end of the hearing with me.
Time to deal with the roof!
TBogg points us to the reaction of conservatard Dan Riehl:
It gets worse after that.
IANAL, but she sure as hell did.
And Waxman not only knew it, but called her on it — that’s why he said he was leaving her testimony “open” so it could be fact-checked.
Vicky’s spent the last couple decades of her life lying without consquence, to paraphrase Vince Foster. She’s now about to see what consequences look like.
So Jane, who would you cast as Victoria?
Veronica Cartwright. she does icky so well.
Toensing was forced into conceding that she is speaking only for within the very specific language of the IIPA, when she claims Plame was “not covert.”
There’s not much room for her to “stretch” in those confines - maybe she is wrong even in that small space?
I love the line Vicki T throws out that covert agents don’t have desk jobs. And every agent she talks to confirms it. Can’t you just hear that conversation…
“Desk job - I don’t have a desk job. I’m undercover. I don’t need no stinkin’ desk. I don’t even need a chair. All I need is a bed of nails and a blanket.”
Fascinating stuff.
I smell treason in the air.
Scooter Himmler, Dick Himmler, Karl Himmler and George Himmler.
Those wacky Himmler boys.
Releasing classified information yet again!
The pink people at the hearing sucked. Period.
This was a day for truth, not grandstanding by protestors.
The protestors were a distraction from all that was important about the hearing.
I have no idea what organization they were associated with, but I suspect possible double tricks.
I know there are folks here that think I’m nuts but I think there is great potential tommorow at the March on the Pentagon/Gathering of Eagles for idiots like the Pink Dope to start some shit. The message boards on the Rolling Thunder and GE sites have these people foaming at the mouth about “protecting the Wall”. I hope folks will be cool down there Saturday
Bluetoe says @ 33
“Henry Waxman did seem to question Toensing’s veracity. They gave her the rope and she put her head in the noose.”
Seemed to?? He asked her the source of the information on which she based those assertions. Did you talk to the CIA? Did you talk to the WH? How do you know? She had no answer. He then said the commite would fact check it and leave the record open.
He didn’t just “seem to”, he in fact questioned the authority of her claims and their accuracy.
Friday afternoon to do:
1. Call/email panel members in support;
2. prepare cocktails;
3. wait for Olbermann
AZ Matt, I’m just now learning how to read, sorry, for toesuck, I’d cast Doris Roberts. But that’s an insult to Doris Roberts, sorry Doris, I love you!!!
Googling I found that Toensing’s birth year is listed as 1941. This would make sense since her wiki says she graduated IU in 1962. This would make her 65 to 66 years old. I thought she said she was only 25 and had worked on Intelligence Identities Protection Act 30 years ago, suggesting that she is 55 years old. BTW the act was passed in 1982 or about 25 years ago. Toensing seems to have problems not only with the truth but with basic math.
Yeah, gotta keep that free speech contained in the proper zones, outside, in the weather, off in the distance. Because we don’t want the People to think that they have some role in these Congressional hearings…
Populism is messy: neat and tidy is how the Fascists operate.
For Jane,
Lance Mackey, the winner of this year’s Iditarod and Yukon Quest sled dog races, is a cancer victor.
I think poor Vicky needs a reality check; she mistook committee hearings for Fox & Friends.
What I want to know is why none of our team asked some very simple questions of that useless sack of sh*t Toensing:
– Was Toensing CIA at the time of Plame’s outing?
– Was she CIA at any time during this administration?
– If she wasn’t, she couldn’t be in a supervisory capacity over Plame, yes?
– If she wasn’t CIA and not Plame[s supervisor, she would have no direct knowledge of Plame’s status while Plame was with CIA, would she? Unless of course somebody leaked to Toensing?
– As an author of the IIPA, if a covert agent whose status has been confirmed by both CIA at large and DCI is not covered under IIPA as Toensing claims, who the hell did Toensing write the IIPA to cover? Nobody?
– If it didn’t cover or protect Plame from people who spent hours and days and weeks actively researching Plame and her spouse, actively disseminating information that they should have known by virtue of their roles to be classified, of what use was the IIPA? Resume padding?
– Toensing was a Bush Cheney transition team special advisor, theoretically having a management-like capacity in preparing strategy for the Bush Cheney administration. Is the outing of covert agents something the transition team planned, yes or no? Is the lack of investigation into destruction of intelligence assets something that was planned at inception of this administration, yes or no? If not, how can Toensing explain why Bush Cheney administration failed to adhere to either regulations or codes of conduct in this respect, let alone the advice of the so-called transition team?
Good God but that witch with the horrific abuse of hair color was sucking waste of oxygen.
raven @ 11 -
Ms. Redshift is sure the person was at the Code Pink meeting last night. She (as Ms. Redshift put it, he/she is “between genders”, so I’m being polite) is from out of town, and perhaps didn’t get that camera-hogging isn’t appropriate at a hearing as it is at a protest. In any case, I find the arguments of him/her being a Republican plant doubtful; there were several other Code Pink people at the hearing (including at least one other who wasn’t in pink), so if the person had been an actual crasher, they would have done something. Misguided, but not deliberately harmful.
2 Beers- I’ll be passed out by then, shit, oh well!!!
Victoria, who started off so confidently, looked like a puddle by the end. Loved it.
Casting Toensing?
How about Veronica Cartwright?
It sort of comes down to superficials, visuals and tones of voice; stuff like that. We get Valerie Wilson, they get Victoria Toensing. I can live with that.
Now we’ve gotta cast Westmoreland too. Who’s the guy who played Ernest? Oh, yeah - Jim Varney…
Great they didn’t just let Vicious Toestink ramble on and on, though she sure tried, and succeeded a bit. But she got smacked down a couple times. I sincerely hope they do the same to Condi the next time she sits before a committee.
Redshift, I also found he/she more than a little distracting, HOWEVER, don’t impugne the messenger for the message
Jane, you kick ass in every way.
If I were a casting director I would cast Roger Ailes in the role of Victoria Toensing.
That’s just me though.
-GSD
On chronicling and thereby exposing the corruption and decadence of the ruling elites of Rome, Roman Emperor Claudius at the end of his rule said, in the fictional biography by Sir Robert Graves, “let all the poisons come out”. The poison is coming out in the new Rome. Let the people know what the Republican Party has done to the nation, it’s citizens and the world.
zhiv @ 71
Yep, when he was in charge, he thought the really important subject for government oversight was steroids in baseball. Really.
Hugh- She lied- under oath!!
Jane, how are you feeling?
Thanks for all your effort, I just sent in some Dinero (but you can’t have my Camaro) ;-)
dmg @40
Toensing changed her words a bit on the she was not covert…to she was not covert under the definitioin of the IIPA which she helped to write when she was 25 years old for Goldwater 30 years ago. And how does she make the assertion that Plame was not covert based on that legislation, well because under oath she said she can make that decision based on information from testimony that occurred at the Libby perjury and obstruction of justice trial..(a trial that Judge Walton strictly limited testimony about the testimony and questioning of her covert status). Toensing also under oath stated she made that non covert status based on the IIPA legislation claim even though she admitted the had never discussed with the CIA head or Mrs. Plame the facts of her covert status and for which both have stated under oath and for the record she was a classifed covert cia operative working at the cpd. In my opinion…Toensing is guilty of negligence as a lawyer …kind of like when Bill Frist diagnosed Terri Schiavo as being responsive based on video tape he watched from the Senate floor.
When any individual is dressed obviously as a woman, the proper pronoun is she.
If a “she” dresses like a man, she is still a she, unless she has a goatee. Then you use “he”.
FWIW :)
poor Jane. I hope Toensing’s testimony didn’t make the chemo worse.
The good thing is that Waxman beheaded her. She’s harmless now.
fashionpolice
says who?
I love Marcy. I can’t wait for her post!
Tom Davis on the other hand was a disgrace. His opening statement was an unfair and misleading assessment of the validity of the inquiry. He took every chance to undermine it, cast doubt, diminish the significance of important revelations, and characterize it as much ado about nothing. He served his party today: He certainly did not serve his country.
Anybody else tired of the obfuscation of Bush apologists and enablers?
Tom Davis can spend his first 1000 years of death in pergatory for what he did today, that is if you believe in port-mortem atonement. In the short term, I hope the people he represents in Virginia take notice.
Seems like Congressman Waxman’s office is fielding some calls. First I got a busy signal, then I got through and was hold for a short period.
Here’s his numbers in case you have a few minutes to thank him.
(202) 225-3976 (phone)
(202) 225-4099 (fax)
I’ve never read that Riehl guy before but I think he has the hots for Amb Wilson.
Aren’t credibility and integrity necessary qualities for a lawyer? Victoria Toensing must be convinced that Fox News and the Republican Party will always be willing to hire her as a commentator. Since she has willingly abandoned those qualities, how can she ever be a lawyer again?
the ‘missing blonde white woman’ meme just nicely reversed itself….
how do those ‘psychological blurs’ in the ‘whittled down white house’ deal with this?
Is the libby verdict was Fitzmas, is today proceeding Epiphany?
Casting Westmoreland? How about the guy that played Mr. Hainey on “Green Acres”?
Aren’t credibility and integrity necessary qualities for a lawyer?
You’re killin me over here!
Hugh @ 88: At least one other person thought that she was saying that she helped draft the IIPA law 25 years ago, correcting Waxman’s 30, rather than claiming to be 25 years old at the time. This is consistent with the fact that the IIPA is dated 1982: see Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (50 U.S.C. 421 et seq.)
This is probably the one factual detail that Waxman got wrong and VT got right. However, Waxman’s response, “we’ll check out that fact also”, was brilliant and hit exactly the right note.
Jane, from the sub-cockle area of my familys’ heart, Godspeed. You are truly a light in the tunnel.
If
Case in point, Anne Coulter.
What role do prominent Adam’s Apples play?
HI pups -
The “Pink People” are Code Pink.
Code Pink is a legit group (whatever one may say about their members’ level of tactical/ situational/ media awareness).
I wouldn’t have signed up with a Code Pink affiniity group for Seattle (IIRC they didn’t exist then, anyway) ’cause I prefer a higher level of tactical/media awareness: some Code Pink actions seem to be more about personal expression than about targeted advocacy.
Having said that, I’d feel quite safe strolling through a big “traditional” demo like Saturday’s with the Code Pink contingent.
Code Pink are definitely not purposeful disruptors or agitators.
They’re OK.
PS: If Code Piink is the most dissonant element Saturday, count your blessings - that can only mean ANSWER got lost and couldn’t hog the podium (or podiaa?)
I think the Pink Guy was a republican plant to make people who want Bush impeach look ridiculous.
I also seem to recall that Toensing referred to all the agents she had talked with. Is my memory correct? If so, did she have a security clearance at the time? Did they inappropriately and illegally disclose their covert status to her (compare to Valerie Plame who clearly went to great lengths to protect hers)?
I thought the pink man?lady wearing the impeach bush now was cute. Her presence was a distraction. I thought Waxmen handled it well.