. I don't know how this image of "cute little Scooter" got started, but I think it's important to remember that he was not only a huge neocon warmonger, but one of the architects (with David Addington) of Bush's torture policy, and as such was part of the push to quash Matthew Waxman:
Waxman, a young lawyer who headed the Pentagon's office of detainee affairs, departed soon after he had a major confrontation with Addington over the issue of clarifying military rules for the treatment of prisoners. Waxman believed that international standards for the humane treatment of detainees should be followed, and argued for reforms in the Army Field Manual. He hoped to reinstate the basic standards that are specified in the Geneva Conventions. This meant the prohibition of torture, overt acts of violence, and "outrages on personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment." Although the Vice-President's office is not part of the military chain of command, last September Addington summoned Waxman to his office and berated him. Waxman declined to comment on the incident, but a former colleague in the Pentagon, in whom Waxman confided, said that Addington accused Waxman of wanting to fight the war on terror his own way, rather than the President's way. The Army Field Manual still hasn't been revised, and, according to those involved, Addington and his protégé Haynes remain the major obstacles.
Scooter may have spent the trial looking diminutive and sporting one of those Laura-Bush-on-Xanax grins but let's remember the OVP's appetite for unlimited power to engage in barbarism, and Libby was Cheney's Cheney. He's not a "fall guy," he's a willing accomplice in a plan to obstruct justice and thwart the efforts of federal investigators, and no matter how Charles Krauthammer may wax nostalgic for blow jobs he's never had it does not change the fact that Scooter's claims to have "forgotten" nine conversations was considered by a jury of his peers to be rank absurdity. He's not some sports hero "taking one for the team," his actions have led this country down a very dark road and he must not be allowed to re-invent himself. He's not going to be on the road with Arrowsmith or Clapton; he'll be playing golf with OJ.
(As a side note, during the trial I spent a lot of time sitting behind Libby's wife, who liked the cameras but didn't seem to cotton to the criminal aspect of her new found attention. She reminded me of Veronica Cartwright's line in The Right Stuff where she breaks down and starts crying because other astronaut's wives got to meet Jackie but she was "Mrs. Squirming Hatch Buster." That pretty much summed up my impression of how she saw herself in this whole thing -- cast out of the Rose Garden.)
. Howie Klein has been on Dave Obey's ass all week over his war record and it looks like he finally worked his last nerve (see YouTube above where Obey is now denouncing "idiot liberals.") Go Howie.
. I'll be appearing with Dan Rather in his keynote interview at South By Southwest on Monday, March 12 at 2pm. Just had a 45 minute chat with him and it was amazing. He has a lot to say and I am really looking forward to it.
. And Jay Rosen writes -- well, just read it. We're all blushing.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
madness!
Jane! Fitz! Poodles!
Just the right playing the victim card again.
In this case it’s Victim Canasta.
Jane, what do you think of this bit from Dana Milbank’s March 7th piece in WaPo & who do you think ‘em is:
Libby’s wife, Harriet Grant, was not as composed. In the first row of spectators, she hunched over and shook. A young member of Libby’s defense team put his arm around her shoulders. After judge and jury left, Grant went over to hug her husband with a furious look on her face. Three reporters heard her say what sounded like, “We’re gonna [expletive] ‘em.”
Fitz plus Starbucks = rockin good time at the courthouse.
I was once married to a an extremely nice guy. Everyone who knew him agreed that he was a nice guy. But a couple of years after we were married he began to beat me. And I spent another couple of years (before I got out) wondering what on earth I had done to make such a nice guy so angry.
And when I finally left him and began to tell our mutual friends why I left him, they all thought I was “exaggerating” — since he was such a nice guy.
Libby has more blood than any of us can begin to imagine on his hands. And Eichmann was a nice guy too.
Great points as usual, Jane. Looking forward to the panel at South by Southwest!
Jane you’re preaching to the choir as far as I’m concerned. I have been scratching my head at this poor scooter wah wah wah all week. Besides, I’m sure that Mike Espy and Henry Cisneros are nice enough guys too but I didn’t hear anyone wanting to cut them a break on account of them being such swell fellas when they were having their legal troubles.
Jane’s coming to Austin???? Oh, happy day!
I hear Ted Bundy was absolutely charming too, when he wasn’t killing young women.
I am already tired of the Libby apologists.
-GSD
As moronic as it sounds, I think Libby gets a lot of sympathy as a result of his nickname.
When I hear people talking about what a “nice guy” he is, the thing it most reminds me of is the inevitable interviews with the neighbors after the arrest of a murder. “He seemed like such a nice man!”
Crimes are judged based on what someone has done (or at least what can be proven), not how “nice” they are. If it were otherwise, trials would be a lot simpler, and I’d be able to get away with murder (literally!)
Jane in Austin next week?!? Can we have an FDL get together??? Can we have a poodle meet poodle gathering???
Looking at the pictures of Libby and his wife after the verdict, her body language does not convey much support for the little guy. Something funny is going on. Could it be that she is pissed that this has messed up the seriously-big money legal job formerly awaiting him after the White House, and she has cut Scooter off for being so stupid as to take on for the team, while Rove smirks?
Seriously, I will drive through horrendous SXSW traffic to meet you and other Lakers. (Oh dear, my hair touch up appointment is not for another week. Can I face Jane with roots?)
Gnome de Plume @ 15
I wouldn’t recommend it. It’d put you in the company of Comstock and Toensing.
;-p
desertwind @
4
I was sitting right behind her, in front of Milbank. It wasn’t a “young member of Libby’s defense team,” it was Barbara Comstock. Grant wasn’t shaking she was quietly daubing her eyes with a kleenex, and she hugged everyone BUT her husband. And if she said that, I certainly didn’t hear her.
emptywheel @ 17
Roots are acceptable except when you’re carrying a $10,000 purse. Then they make you look deranged.
Just a note: despite how he was portrayed in the movie “The Right Stuff”, Gus Grissom was a great and brave astronaut and he didn’t panic and blow the hatch. And, I might add, he gave his life for his country in the Apollo 1 fire.
Libby doesn’t deserve our respect; Grissom does.
Jane!! What a wonderful tribute to you and FDL from Jay Rosen. Wow!! He is right! FDL ROCKED at the Libby trial and the world as we know it has changed. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.
Well that you all should be blushing Jane but everything in Jay’s article was true and every praise is well deserved. The team from FDL owned the Libby trial and as a result the entire progressive left gained major credence. A whole raft of misinformed opinions about the lefty blogosphere were smashed. I am so glad I got to be a part of it.
As to Libby…you might be too kind to him. He is a rat of the highest order and much of the blood being spilled in the Middle East is on his hands.
Lane Wharton @ 13
That is my theory. She “sacrificed” all these years while he worked from 6 am to 8:30 pm (not a happy situation in any marriage with young children) and my sense is that this mess is not something she feels she signed up for.
She also seems fairly close to Wells, and any decent defense attny (especially in a case as weak as this) is going to try to talk plea options before risking a full-blown trial. Libby saying no to a plea–that is perhaps a get out of jail free option, would for any spouse, be felt as a choice between her and Darth Vader. He didn’t choose her and her kids.
The “He’s a nice guy” saw is an old GOP trick. That was how they sold the country on the current PINHEAD IN CHARGE.
“OOOHH He is such a nice guy. Not like that French loving elistist Kerry.”
What Horse Hockey.!
Reagan was a “nice guy” but he was 100% heartless.
Jane Hamsher >
“…And Jay Rosen writes — well, just read it. We’re all blushing.”
Blush all you want but I think Jay nails it big time. You ladies did a WORLD CLASS job & deserve da kudos.
Oh and Benjamin Franklin is doing a Snoopy Dance for sure.
(Patron Saint of blogs that he is)
Thank You sooooo much !
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” – Buckminster Fuller
Jane Hamsher @
17
Milbank must have been having a Broder Moment when he penned that tripe.
-GSD
P.S. Fox Noise Roger Ailes has crawled out of his cavern to smear Hillary, Obama and Edwards with the Republican themes that the VRWC has settled on.
Any self respecting Democrat should not go within 10 miles of that Goebbels Machine run by Ailes and Murdoch.
By the way, who scooped Pat Caddells’ brain out with a rusty spoon?
Scooter Libby is just the sweetest, most innocentist guy ever. No wealthy white powerful Republican guy should ever be convicted of anything especially if the laws he broke don’t seem so important to other conservatives.
On the other hand Bill Clinton should have been dragged from the White House and thrown in a dungeon and tortured forever because he might have lied about having sexual conduct with a woman.
Also Hillary Clinton personally murdered dozens of people in Arkansas and killed Vince Foster by shooting him in a park.
That nice Scooter Libby, it’s about time right wingers started standing up for the rights of conservatives to block investigations and lie to investigators.
jane - don’t know if you saw it when jay rosen showed up in the comments.. if now, here it is.
he had very nice things to say about pach’s post and FDL in general… i was hoping he would write up something on the trial for pressthink. now, i’m off to read it….
you deserve every good thing that people have to say about what you’ve done. many, many thanks.
Just read the Rosen piece. I think he might have liked the FDL work on the Libby thing, but I could be wrong, it was har to tell.
The conversation below was started two threads back. I carefully crafted a detailed response, hit a button, and the whole thing disappeared into cyberspace. Vanished. Unrecoverable. I think it is highly relevant, so please excuse the EPU recovery:
Mary4 @
177
Aloha, Mary4, and thanks for your response.
I had in mind Fitz’s office of special prosecutor, which he still holds, even if it is “inactive”.
My authority in this is “Synopsis of Article on Why They Can’t Fire Fitzgerald,” By Marcia Macmullan (August 13, 2005), which includes the following (I’ll use “code” to differentiate from other quotes in this message):
Fitzgerald was empowered by Comey with unilateral authority to "expand" his jurisdiction and "pursue it wherever he wants to pursue it." ...The Government Accounting Office, (GAO) concurring in Comey's explanation that Fitzgerald has full authority to act independently, without obtaining permission from the AG. The GAO stated:"Thus, Special Counsel Fitzgerald need not follow the Department's practices and procedures if they would subject him to the approval of an officer or employee of the Department.."Not only was it Comey's intention to prepare Fitzgerald for the coming assault on his legally mandated plenary authority by vesting him with complete autonomous rule, but the GAO, through their approval of "permanent indefinite appropriations" to perpetually fund Fitzgerald's office, at the request of the Justice Department, has made a strong legal argument, in Decision B-302582, that Fitzgerald has all of the protections and authority normally granted to an independent prosecutor under the expired independent counsel law....That sounds like plenty of room to roam, to me. your response below appears to confuse the narrow scope of the Libby indictment with the full range of authority of his office.
This seems directly contradicted by the Comey clarification and GAO assessment referred to above.
Agreed– on both counts!
Bob in HI
according to juror number 10
Scootie is a real nice guy. Judy Miller said he looked real cute in a cowboy hat and he’s jsut to nice to go to jail.
Gotta make Scootie the victim so when he’s let off it;s the right thing to do
Irving is a criminal
I posted this earlier today but it fits as one of Irving’s legacies.
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/U.....82007.html
and twolf1 just posted a link 2 threads back that the Pentagon mysteriously lost one of Padilla’s interrogation tapes…..
> She also seems fairly close to Wells, and any
> decent defense attny (especially in a case as
> weak as this) is going to try to talk plea
> options before risking a full-blown trial.
> Libby saying no to a plea–that is perhaps a get
> out of jail free option, would for any spouse,
> be felt as a choice between her and Darth
> Vader. He didn’t choose her and her kids.
It isn’t that easy though, and she has to know that. Irving Libby faces a real (not classroom) and very difficult problem in game theory. If he talks to Fitzgerald the entire Cheney, Bush, and Radical machines will turn on him and bleep him like he’s never been bleeped before (to use Rove’s words). And he better than anyone knows what that means.
But if he doesn’t talk to Fitzgerald, maybe he gets acquitted. Maybe not. If convicted, maybe he gets a pardon. Maybe not. Then there is the question of whether or not his patron, Cheney, will still be in office during pardon season in 2009 (real wildcard there). Would VP Rice care about getting Irving out of the pen? How about a Bush family retainer put in the VP slot to salvage whatever was left of the Bush family legacy?
Very difficult and complex questions. And I strongly suspect that Libby did not tell (and still isn’t telling) Wells everything - meaning Libby has no honest source of advice. Nor can he tell his wife everything - Fitzgerald is known for going after family members to squeeze key players.
Quite a puzzle.
Cranky
Yes, indeed.
OK, my daughter works for one of the biggest media shops in Austin and gets tickets for everything. I am going after Jane show tickets. If we can’t have a dog meetup, I will just start stalking . . .
Jane - “I was sitting right behind her, in front of Milbank. -snip- if she said that, I certainly didn’t hear her.”
Thanks for answering my question, Jane. (and, for all your hard work, and your vision, insight, good humor, talent and class.)
I can’t shake the feeling Scooter plays games and compartmentalizes his life. He’s a phony through and through: good old Scooter hammering shots in cowboy bars; tough neocon ; toady propping up Cheney’s leg; good sport with good over-40 tag football arm, etc.
Cranky Observer @ 33
I don’t think prosecutor can force a spouse to testify against a spouse. If anyone knows the whole entire story, it is Harriet. If he were my husband, I would’ve forced him to come clean, else I would be mia at the trial. And her being a lawyer, she would know how to question him.
Jane, Go Baby,
This is a time when Dick Cheney will tilt his head when someone comes up with some idea about using FDL for his new purposes.
His machine’s willingness to attack and seek to corrupt journalists, the Department of Justice, Congress and the entire Executive Branch is on par with the worst of history.
It is going to take many smart people with well developed ethical standards to do battle. We will have to overlook human failings of those who faltered when the laser beam tilted and turned on them.
This is a scary group which will insanely destroy even as little people band together to stand in the way.
“Scooter is a nice man” is just another part of the “feel sorry for Scooter so we can pardon him” campaign. The nice men I know don’t compromise the identities of CIA agents and then lie about it in front of a grand jury. And then there’s The Apprentice. Yecch. I know it’s only fiction, but you’ve gotta wonder if some of that crap comes from his own fantasies. Not a happy thought.
I’m not buying this “we should let him off because he’s the only one being punished” argument. The proper remedy for that is to investigate further, via Congress, to see if we can’t give Scooter some company in da Big House.
Cranky: I agree. I am CERTAIN that Libby has not told Wells everything. If he had, Wells would’ve been hamstrung, since as an officer of the court he cannot perjure himself. As strange kabuki relationship often at play in client-atty relationships. IANAL, so I am sure defense atty’s can shed more light on this type of relationship/
Maybe we could sum this up with a bumper sticker:
“Nice guys don’t start wars.”
Jay Rosen is correct and kudos to you all.
I am so grateful for the day I started lurking here.
I am glad that you will be interviewed by Dan Rather– he’s a major part of our past and together you can illuminate our present and future!
Everything Bush and Cheney and Rove have touched has melted in their sweaty, fat palms.
They are collosal human failures who have all the power in the world at their hands to continue perpetrating their frauds.
Look who is about to get destroyed once again by flunkies and functionaries in the party that he has steadfastly sworn obedience to.
McCain to get swiftboated.
-GSD
Dan Rather!!!
Jane Hamsher!!!
South by Southwest!!!
Jane, is there any chance you would like to participate in a Plame panel at the 59th Annual Conference on World Affairs at CU Boulder, April 9-13, 2007?
I’m sure all of the local FDL fans would turn out for that . . .
As long as they’re netroots, you should be fine.
It’s a D.C. jury and, starved for information about the trial they were just on, they are probably reading the Washington Post and watching tv voraciously. Their pronouncements about Libby can only get worse.
That said, it’s not as important about what else they’ve said: Where’s Rove, and the rest of them?
This case is now in the political arena and they’re adding legitimacy to pursuing it further there.
Ha-ha — way to fact-check Dana Milbank, Jane!!
“young member of Libby’s defense team” = COMSTOCK
Hahahahahaha!
bloggers rule
Oh thank you TRex. I was just rummaging in my closet (no, not that closet) looking for proper footwear just in case I get to meet up with the fabulous Jane. I have no Jimmy Choo’s nor any Manolos. What am I going to do??!!!
The Republicans can have their Rod Majors. We’ll take this Brazillian woman protesting George W. Bush any day.
-GSD
Do you suppose she meant Shooter, Chimpy, and Unca Karl? Or the goddamn liberal netroots who ruined everything?
Me?
I could care less ‘what a good man Scooter Libby is…’ or isn’t. I’m all about the rule of law.
Which is why I wrote my post: ‘A Modest Proposal for the disposition of the Libby verdict.’
Gnome de Plume @ 48
Wear whatever feels best. Jane is a lot more mellow about these things than you think. I can only think that Jane would want you to wear your absolute favorite outfit to the meet and greet and if that’s your pajamas, a bathrobe, and bunny slippers, then more power to ya.
I was intimidated about meeting her at first, too. But she’s really a kind, patient Firedog. She just doesn’t suffer fools gladly.
TRex @ 50
Well, since Wells called Libby a fall guy, and she loves Wells, then my sense it is the former.
angie @ 42
I’ll be interested to know if he has any thoughts about our grassroots efforts to fight back against the kind of bogus “scandal” that took him down. We’ve learned so much about pushing back, and there are so many events that might have been different if we’d known sooner how to do a lot of this, and if we’d known just how evil Rove and his minions are. (The Bush Administration is always worse than you imagine, even if you take this rule into account.)
> Do you suppose she meant Shooter, Chimpy, and
> Unca Karl? Or the goddamn liberal netroots who
> ruined everything?
Keeping in mind that there is controversy over what if anything she said, if she did say this I would assume the latter interpretation: liberals, Democrats, bloggers, and Fitzgerald. It is human nature to crawl back to the tribe when wounded and rage against the Other, even it it was your own tribal leader who ordered you on a suicide mission. No difference here.
Cranky
South America—No likey Bush.
-GSD
Jay Rosen . . . wow.
Stand tall, Jane. You’ve put together quite a place here.
Really great point about “good ol’ scootski.” We’re hearing all of this fall guy, sympathy stuff–that’s cutting edge journalism for ya–but what is needed is a breakdown of who he really is and what he’s done over the years. “This is Irving Libby, convicted felon.” You make the point, JH, but there’s still work to be done.
Which gets me to Rosen. All well deserved, dead on, but it raises the question: what’s next? Rosen articulates clearly how FDL transcended assumptions and expectations by putting “boots on the ground,” keeping sustained effort and focus and, well, just about everything any of us could ask for.
I’m guessing that the Waxman hearing is the next opportunity, since it’s still part of the same thread, but I don’t see yet how it will take shape. Obviously you guys must be in the midst of working that out, but it seems like the bar will be set a little bit higher in terms of competition from the MSM. But judging from the way the news appeared instantly here and got immediate reaction and discussion, and the way that it is meandering its way ever so slowly into the MSM, it’s another big piece of fruit hanging surprisingly low to the ground.
Some worthwhile reading from Larry Johnson:
http://noquarter.typepad.com/m.....es_to.html
For additional information, please click on this link as well:
http://www.thewashingtonnote.c.....001994.php
What the hell is Obey’s problem? If he feels like we don’t know the freaking facts, then maybe he should be making an effort to make himself clearer. Those “idiot liberals” just happen to be 80% of the American population.
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 59
Daddy Bush protecting his old stomping grounds? All out war between Bush the older and Cheney the imposter Daddy? Pach, what think you?
Jane writes: I don’t know how this image of “cute little Scooter” got started
Maybe folks referring to him as a “reprehensible little man”, or words to that effect? I’ll bet that in the world of the neocons, that’s a term of endearment.
Have you ever heard of a con man who wasn’t likeable?
jim oconnor @ 63
Not any good ones, that’s for sure.
TRex, never fear. I only have one pair of spikey heeled shoes, and they only get worn to formal high roller impress-the-superficial occasions. But now that you mention bunny slippers, you give me an idea . . .
I guess what I’m saying is that this is the time when we’re no longer on deck; we’re up. To make a mistake, a misstep, a whiffffff……. or worse.
I cannot believe how ruthless these people are.
Who wrote that thing from Hill Street Blues?
Be careful out there.
Do I have it right?
Stephen Parrish, CPA @
59
Gates rightly sees that axis as leading the nation on a path to more ruin.
Both Cambone and Boykin should be sitting in a think tank somewhere sharing petit fours will Bill Kristol.
-GSD
Gnome de Plume @
48
I’m wearing a suit from H&M that cost about $80 so I wouldn’t worry about pricetags.
Cujo359 @ 62
I like the term “degenerate” and I feel that it is an underutilized insult. Just a thought.
Gnome de Plume @ 65
Utterly OT even to this OT, but I got GoodMrsPuma a pair of Freudian Slippers for her birthday a couple of years ago. She says they’re very comfy, and the little soft plush busts of Unca Sigmund are always good for a chuckle.
zhiv @ 58
I agree.
Even though there is hope that the hearing will be on C-span, not everyone will be able to watch. Live-bloging would help those who want to be informed and know that they won’t be by the MSM. Complete coverage will be really important if we want to stop the inevitable spin that will appear after Valerie Plame and Fitz speak. Like it did in the Libby Trial, it will give us tangible trail to refer back to. A way to witness what really happened so that we can quash the lies that will be blasted out there. Very Very important.
a good analogy would be to compare him to one of hitler’s boys like Speer. He tried to do good for germany as he designed death camps.
we should look hard at how he is being labeled a scapegoat, and how people feel sorry for him. if this investigation doesn’t go forth in congress about the conspiracy to destroy the CIA’s middle eastern intelligence gathering, then something is seriously wrong.
Larry Johnson is infinitely qualified to lead the way on this matter
http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/
All I know is Irving is as good as Guilty!
It’s no coincidence Hollywood paints a smile on every monster.
Re Matthew Waxman, wasn’t there also a Navy lawyer that spent all his time arguing against unconstitutional actions in 2002-2003 plus?
Every word of Jay Rosen’s piece was true and richly deserved.
TRex at 60. Obey’s very smart very competent. I worked on his 69 campaign and have been following his career ever since (although it is difficult to get timely updates now that I live in CA) Judge him by what he’s done and said since 1969, not just this one instance, remember that he comes from rural Northern Wisconsin, not normally known as a liberal strong hold. (He replaced Melvin Laird when he became Nixons’ Sec. of Defense)
Where I grew up the motto “never pay retail” was part of the pledge of allegience as I recall. So good on you Jane. I was really just funning about the wardrobe stuff. Right now the wardrobe issue is more of a weather one. We are heating up so in the afternoons that summerwear is calling. Will your schedule permit a gathering of firepups?
Libby belonged to the White House Iraq Study Group, as far as I know. No Mr. Nice Guy here.
One question: one thing I have not understood: how exactly did Plame’s identity end up with VP?
That Jay Rosen piece should be reprinted on the front pages of the NYT and ComPost with a heading: “He’s right - we stuffed it”
never pay retail
That kind of says it all.
Scooter always reminded me of and evil garden gnome, with smirk on his face and blank stare in his eye.
*xyz @ 69
“Devolved”, while overused, is applicable as well, and doesn’t have the sexual overtones of “degenerate”. Libby is a horrible human being in ways having nothing to do with sexuality. Still, for a truly personal perspective on Libby, something like “reprehensible” or “contemptible” sums it up pretty well for me.
2strange @ 76
“Idiot liberals” is a pure partisan slam, and it provides its own context quite well, thank you very much.
Gnome de Plume @ 77
My Dad, who grew up in a Jewish family in NY (and thus was subject to the same mantra), after he made some serious money said that he now ALWAYS paid retail, that way there was a warranty and you could take it back if it didn’t work. He may have a had a point.
Back on topic, I think that FDL has established a new model and a new standard for journalism in which talented people report but are backed up by thousands of lurking fact checkers who while cheering them on also are intolerant of any factual error. And facts have a liberal bias.
Also the collective expertise of the FDL community is amazing. I watch as almost any reasonable question in a comment is answered authoritatively, with links, within minutes. This is a hard group to fool.
ot - my apologies if this belongs in another thread, (i’m still kinda new here), but thought this was worth sharing.
i decided to support bill richardson a couple of months ago & got on his mailing list. he sent out a good one today. (ya i know he’s not perfect)
Dear —-
We should be ashamed. When our government sends our military men and women to war, we enter into a covenant to provide care for the injured and protection for those in harm’s way. Our soldiers have been sent into a war we cannot win with insufficient equipment; and now, when they return wounded in the line of duty, our government has failed to provide the quality care our service people deserve. Our government has broken the covenant, and shamefully failed our troops.
I am tired of being ashamed of the failings of this Administration. Our veterans need help now. I will not wait for this Administration to do right thing. I will not wait for Congress to hold their hearings and assess blame. I am taking action. And I am asking you to do the same.
Call on your state’s Governor to join me in finding state funding for the care our returning soldiers deserve, but our federal government seems unwilling or unable to provide.
This week I asked the New Mexico Legislature to increase the state funding for services for the 180,000 veterans here in my state. We will:
* Fund $1.65 million in facility upgrades at state-run veterans’ centers.
* Add $650,000 to the Telehealth program, increasing access to veterans unable to get care at a local center.
* Pass funding for additional veterans’ services officers.
* Double the budget for training therapists in effective treatments for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
* Add a new primary care clinic to the new nursing facility being built at Fort Bayard in Silver City.
* Convene a task force to better coordinate all of these services.
I’m not sure what is more outrageous-the conditions at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center or the anemic response by President Bush. Regardless, our military men and women need proper care immediately. And if we can’t count on the federal government to meet its responsibilities to our service people, we must turn to the states. If we can do it in New Mexico, we can do it across the county. It is time to stop waiting and start getting things done. Contact your Governor now.
Sincerely,
Bill Richardson
One aspect of the Scooter Libby pardon activism that’s taking place is the continual bleating of the phrase ‘no underlying crime was charged’.
Doesn’t anyone else find this kind of puzzling? Not from the conservative activists, of course they’ll say anything to mitigate Scooter’s behavior. But the press seems to have largely failed to notice one of the really glaring hypocrisies here.
There was no underlying crime in the Clinton fiasco. The alleged perjury itself was the crime. Obviously, the underlying action, oral sex outside of one’s marriage was something conservatives frowned upon, but few of them would suggest that that a criminal charge be brought upon that basis alone.
But in Scooter’s case there clearly was an underlying crime being investigated. An undercover CIA agent’s identity was exposed in the media by people legally and bindingly pledged not to do so.
Shouldn’t perjury by an SAO on a material matter during a criminal investigation regarding the betrayal of a CIA NOC’s status be judged as far more damaging to the legal system and our national security than alleged perjury regarding an immaterial matter in a civil suit?
It doesn’t seem like it should be too complicated an analysis to present, even in today’s soundbite news milieu:
Clinton’s obfuscations had nothing at all to do with an underlying crime but were to conceal a personally embarrassing sexual affair; Libby’s obfuscations were designed to conceal — and have so far effectively concealed — the details in a criminal matter affecting national security.
Why are Libby’s pardon advocates being allowed to so frequently conceal that distinction with the hypocritical “no underlying crime *was charged*” mantra? It just doesn’t make any sense.
.
And facts have a liberal bias!!!
Quote that.
I hope the donations zoomed to the top, it would show the most appreciation.
JGabriel says
Sometimes they blow that talking point like John Fund did yesterday on Hardball…
“There was no underlying crime”
Huh?
Woodhall Hollow:
Hmm. Dunno.
This is such a crew of corkscrews, my first reaction is to become suspicious of a noew off books outbreak elsewhere.
Devolution, it gives me no satisfaction.
-GSD
JGabriel @
86
Oh, come on. We know the underlying crime WAS the blow job. It was a dirty, evil crime and needed to be punished.
-GSD
HuffPo has a big splashy banner that says the Dems may all boycott the Fox debate. Heh. I think they should, but televise the empty stage on Fox anyway. Brit Hume can moderate. He can just ask loaded, baiting questions to the air.
Or maybe the candidates could just send their personal assistants to say, “No comment” over and over and over.
GSD @ 92
JGabriel @
86
Especially if a Democrat does it. I mean, come on. At least when Republicans do blow jobs, it may lead to Republican intercourse and Republican offspring. I think what I’m saying is, basically, that it’s a eugenics thing.
Jane, you are a true patriot. I remember hearing