The courtroom was packed today and the theatrics did not disappoint. Patrick Fitzgerald came right out and said that Shooter had his dirty fingerprints all over the crime. As Marcy noted in the liveblog:
There is a cloud over the VP. He wrote those columns, he had those meetings, He sent Libby off to the meeting with Judy. Where Plame was discussed. That cloud remains because the defendant obstructed justice. That cloud was there. That cloud is something that we just can't pretend isn't there.
I recognize that my view is probably somewhat biased in favor of the prosecution, but really I don't see how anyone could have watched the proceedings today and come away with the conclusion that the defense was anything other than a chaotic mess. Marcy and I agreed that Wells sounded like he was a used car salesman trying to fob off a junker he had no faith in, and for my part I'm guessing that much of the defense was crafted by Scooter Libby calling up in the middle of the night and helpfully saying, "make sure you say this tomorrow, Ted."
At the end of his closing statements, Wells broke down in tears and begged the jury to "give Scooter back to me" (or something just as weird to that effect). He then returned to the defense table, head in hand, never to look up again. Some thought it was over-identification with the defendant, but I thought he was grieving his career -- this would be a big loss for him. He ate up 20 minutes of Scooter's precious time rebutting things that Zeidenberg had said about himself during the prosecution's closing statements, as if that mattered, and then left himself with little time to cover all the points he had left. In the end he was reading methodically from his own Power Point presentation. It all came off a bit unglued.
Everyone was punching each other to keep from falling asleep when Fitzgerald took to the floor and treated all to a bit of Shakespearean theatrics, yelling "madness, madness!" He was lacerating and precise, speaking so quickly that the court reporter couldn't catch up. His command of the material was a bit daunting, able to recall voluminous evidenciary document numbers simply by looking at some chart in his own brain. He wandered off into the weeds for a bit (demonstrating an eriposte-like knowledge of the history of the Niger uranium claims) before retreating to simpler ground for his closing. All the while, Wells never looked up at him, even as Jeffress was nervously rubbing his moustach and shifting in his chair.
At one point Fitzgerald started down a road I thought he wouldn't -- mentioning that Libby would most surely remember information regarding Valerie Plame because anyone would when there were lives at stake, identities that might be exposed. I expected Wells to leap out of his chair but he never took his head out of his hand, and Jeffres looked like he was about to have a conniption fit. As the second attorney on the case it wasn't his place to object, but even if Fitzgerald was on completely solid ground based on arguments that they themselves had opened up, at the very least they needed to stop his momentum. He had the jury in his hand at that moment and Wells was in a coma, so Jeffress timidly asked if they could approach the bench. Which Fitz did, but Wells did not. Fitz wound up backtracking a bit, emphasising that this went to Libby's state of mind and should not be considered a discussion of whether Libby leaked classified information because that's not what he was charged with. But during the chat with the judge, Libby leaned over and had a few words with Wells, and I'm only guessing here but most likely something along the lines of "this is what I get for my eight million bucks?"
Wells had pleaded with the jury to return Libby to him, but Fitz begged them to return the truth. "Don't you think the American people are entitled to answers?" he asked. The jury of nine women and three men were extremely attentive to him, and my general impression is that he was quite persuasive. I personally think Scooter has lost touch with reality here, but if there is any tangent left, he's not sleeping easily tonight.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz!
((((((Jane))))))
Jane, I just love to read this and know you were there. Hell fucking yeah. Now I can go to bed and sleep well.
Oh yeah. FITZ!
GUILTY.
and then some.
Thank you, FDL, soooooooooooo much!
-
Your coverage has been awesome. Thanks so much for sharing your impressions. I truly hope the jury saw it this way, too.
You can’t expect Dick to yield supreme executive power just because some watery tarts threw a few swords at him.
Any clue as to what Jeralyn thought? I know she comes at this from a defense perspective - she has been somewhat critical of Wells for his theatrics, but more admiring of Jeffres.
Jane, thanks so much for being there.
though … i was hoping for one last politicstv video summarization. would have loved to see your physical impressions of wells and fitz!
It sure would be nice to see the good guys win one.
TEAM FDL!! Jane, Christy, Marcy, LHP, and everyone.
I missed the day, have just finished reading the liveblog. Besides the drunk tank, this is my favorite:
“Why would Libby make up a lie and rely on Russert. They’re not friends. It doesn’t make sense for him to use Russert.”
Because JudyJudyJudy was not credible?
I can’t see how the jury would not convict. I’ll be glad when the verdict is in.
Jane!
Wish I was there to see the big close. Glad you were there!
Oooh, baby! Such imagery. Such guilt. Damn, I love this descriptive writing. Jane, you’re going to have to post fantasies about Cheney and Scooter roasting on spits in hell when this is over, so we can continue to get our fix. I feel as though I was there. Thank you for all you’ve done here, overall, and with the great visual of a (likely) possible guilty verdict.
Will Christy still be there tomorrow?
Jane, truly thank you for firedoglake, the original idea, your heart and soul. I am thankful and appreciative of you, your work and the FDL team. Go Fitz!
Apologies up front, as I posted this on an earlier thread; but it was late in the comments. I have a question for the lawyers who comment here: If Bush does pardon Libby (and is forced to do so fairly soon to keep him from turning on Cheney/Bush), does that pardon actually keep Libby from being forced to testify? I have seen cases where a prosecutor grants immunity from prosecution to a participant so as to be able to force him/her to testify; I was under the impression that refusing to testify after being granted immunity is contempt of court and thereby a new crime which can be punished. In other words, would a presidential pardon for past misdeeds really shield Libby from further prosecution if he refused to testify or lied again under oath?
Video may have killed the radio star, but bloggers like you are killing TV news!
Conviction by Thursday and a pardon on Friday?
I just didn’t know what to expect. And, given the way truth has been treated by Busco. et al., I have to confess to not letting myself be optimistic. But, when Wells said “I must have been drunk”, I KNEW the defense was in trouble. I just couldn’t fathom why a sane atty would say this. Sounded to me that Wells totally undercut any authority (with the jury) he might have had with this one remark.
Reading Fitz’ last paragraph and then looking at his picture you have posted - Well he is the dreamiest man I ever laid eyes or ears on.
Beautiful summation. Thanks for giving us a feel for the courtroom. Wells’ head in hand, afraid to face the truth was an especially nice image.
Thank you Jane. We were all so happy that you, Christy and Marcy could be there to see the day unfold.
I’m curious - Marcy mentioned that some of you thought Wells had great body language and did well before lunch. Did he simply fall apart during the 2nd part of his presentation? I can’t imagine what the jury thought of his body language at the end of the day - not looking up the entire time Fitz was at bat.
Would donations for a transcript of Fitz’s rebuttal be in order? (I’d be willing to put in for a transcript of his opener too, just for completeness.)
presque vu @ 7
… not to mention moistened bints … :) ((((Jane))))
OMFG what a helluva day. Never in my wildest dreams have I ever seen such patriotic, brilliant citizen journalism. This from one who avidly followed Watergate — and believe me, the WaPo of that day (so much better and more ballsy than the eunuch WaPo of today) had nuttin on the FDL gang. My hat’s off to you all.
http://www.pulitzer.org take note!!! The ground has shifted and you are standing on it, Right Here.
Libby = traitor
Cheney = traitor
Rumsfeld = traitor
Gonzalez = traitor
Bush = traitor
Ashcroft = traitor
Feith = traitor
Rice = traitor
Hadley = traitor
Franklin = traitor
Them leave sorrow, tears and blood
Them regular trademark
We fear to fight for freedom
We fear to fight for liberty
We fear to fight for justice
We fear to fight for happiness
We must do something about this nonsense!
Indict, impeach, imprison these Vagabonds In Power!
Long live Fela Anikulapo Kuti!
Ok. That post was utterly fantastic! So totally awesome! Ladies, Please, Take a Bow!
wow
From your summary it sounds to me like they deliberately took a dive, perhaps because the decision has been made on high to retreat the defenses and build them back up around shooter. Perhaps Toensing was not about jury tampering after all, but rather about setting the stage for the next round, the battle royale for Cheney.
Waddayathink?
If my lawyer broke down in tears in open court, I might try to go over the table at him. That was a bit over the top. The jury must think he’s insane. I hope that doesn’t make them feel sorry for Scooter, for choosing such a freak for a lawyer.
Love it — thanks a zillion!
Jane, Marcy, et al, you have all just made history. You are watching - and reporting live - what could very well be one of the most important court cases this country has seen this young century. Whichever way the jury decides this, what this is is a watershed moment for our generation. If the press in this country was less corrupt, this complete trial would be on television half as much as the OJ Simpson trial was.
Thank you for bring this to us. This is the day that Dick Cheney’s lies and manipulations were put out by a person in some real authority. This isn’t lefty blogs speculating on the behind-the-scenes machinations. The person (Fitz) making these claims not only has real credibility, he’s also not afraid of the cold hard truth. This country more than than ever needs a man like that, and it needs people who are willing to sacrifice their selves so that the many will also know.
Thank you for your service to our country.
I can’t imagine what would give anyone that impression
;>)
Good health to you, J.
As someone said in another scandal, “guilty, guilty, guilty!”
http://images.ucomics.com/imag.....730529.gif
That is to say, Libby is guilty!!!!!!!
(Darn, it won’t let me inline the image).
Oklahoma kiddo @ 13
EPU’d from moi, a couple threads back:
Similar pools might be done around how long the deliberations will take, when and whether or not (if found guilty) Libby gets a pReznitial Pardon, the date that the next related trial is held, who is indicted, when the impeachment starts… Don’t want to count too many chickens but I thought I’d throw the idea out there, there’s such creativity amongst this community… :) so whaddayathink?
MattC at 32. Ditto my friend. Ditto
Jane and the gang scored center ice seats to game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals! Thanks for taking us on the ride with you Jane!
Jane!
[ok - so the zed’s long past. guilty.]
Jane! and poodles and Plame house and Plame Bloggers!
and Firecats…..cute, adorable Firecats.
Jane,
Thank you for pulling the FDL effort together. The whole of the last few weeks have been great. Tell your teammates that they are all special people.
Jane!
The running through the talking points (and correlating them) was key for me. Regardless of the verdict it stays.
Now why were they so pissed? Couldn’t they have just waited it out? Big deal. Wilson went on a trip examining the Niger claim. Whats up with that?
THANK YOU JANE for all you have done.
We await justice.
Thanks for all the great coverage, Jane, Christy, Marcy, Jeralyn and Swopa.
We await justice.
Oh, yeah!
Present at the creation of a new media paradigm, etc.
Thanks, Jane and FDL, for putting us right there as it happened. You so rock.
“A cloud over the Vice President.”
Yup.
========
Who’s Next?
========
heh heh
Eureka Springs, AR @
28
yes, WOW…
You know, when I heard that on the radio today, I thought it was pretty goddamn weird.
“Brooks Brothers Mountain”, or something. “I wish I could acquit you!”
Beautiful recap of a great day in court. Many thanks, Jane. Only one question:
I give up, any help?
Actually, objecting at that point would only serve to focus the jury’s attention on Fitzgerald’s argument. “Objection” sounds really great on TV, but to a juror it says: “Listen to this, that side thinks it’s hurting them really badly, bad enough to stand up and squawk about it.”
S.O.S. in MA—
Despite running the election pool I must oppose one in this situation.
We have generated enormous media attention because of the A plus coverage of the trial. I think it would undercut our credibility and serious purpose to be associated with a gambling pool for the outcome.
No video report today??
Nice summation, and hopefully a prescient foreteller of the past once this jury finishes its part of the process. There is one thing though that has been bugging me since I first read the Defence closing. If Russert was at that time an adversary/opponent to the VP/President, why then would Cathy Martin (VP’s press secretrary, right?) list it as the best forum to get their message out the way they wanted in on in her testimony earlier in the trial? You think that was missed by the jury, or could that be one of the things that helps undercut the Defence since they made such a big deal about it in the closing? Just a thought.
OldTimer @ 46
There’s a blogger around here, handle’s eRiposte. Yet another steel-trap mind. :) HTH
Does Wells have a history of teary theatrics? If not then he was caught in the trap of Libbys defense fund and all of the Hubris it represents.
Mind boggling to this pup…
TRex. you funny!
A not-bad Bloomberg summary, via Yahoo! is making me hopeful that Jane’s summary might be close to how the jury saw it. Oh please please please please please convict this lying neocon sack’o'___!
bobo
OldTimer @ 46
I give up, any help?
eRiposte has been building the case for truth brick by brick about Niger uranium, the aluminum tubes, and lying at the highest levels of the government.
OldTimer:
eriposte is a blogger over at:
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/
Oklahoma kiddo @
13
Predicting what juries will do is foolish.
Guilty on all counts next Tuesday. :)
Hope nobody forgot to feed the PlameHouse maw today; click on the “Donate” icon below Jane’s post, please, if you haven’t done so.
OldTimer @ 46
I give up, any help?
ROFLMAO! where are you eriposte?
egregious @
41
And may it come swiftly. Great closer, Jane. And awesome coverage today by Marcy and FLD team.
Old Timer, eRiposte
TRex @ 45
Let’s see if Wells wants him back after his term in the federal slammer! Probably will be too embarassed to associate with Scooter.
I haven’t seen it mentioned elsewhere, but the AP has additional defense exhibits up from last week.
Who emailed Clifford May’s piece to the OVP?
None other than Laurie Mylroie.
http://wid.ap.org/documents/li.....dx1795.pdf
LOL
egregious @ 48
Excellent point, taken. Suggestion withdrawn.
“Justice shall flow like water, and righteousness like a mighty stream,” unsullied by wagers.
TRex @ 45
Oh, My! An instant classic.
Scotian @ 50
I thought the same thing. Hopefully, someone on the jury notices that as well.
You can’t get 12 Americans together and not find a wingnut in the bunch. Hung Jury.
I’m going to have great dreams tonight. Thank you for writing such a marvelous description.
Isikoff was on Hardball earlier talking about how this is not likely to go any further than this trial. Is that a real possibility? I tend to think the whole thing is too big and that too much has gotten out for it not to.
What a hell of a ride it’s been, and thanks for all you have done, but why oh why didn’t you use Monk’s classic Fitz as ‘the Jesus’ for this post? That is the only possible way it could have been any better.
Scotian @ 50
HEY! Everyone- Scotian is getting into this delurking thing! He had so many great comments on the jury null/JNOW thread. Welcome, Scotian. Always great to hear from someone north of the border!
TRex, 707! hit my head on the floor, now choking and crying.
oh ohh oh he he he wheew.
steve ex-expat @ 66
… but then the other 11 land on the putative wingnut like 11 tons of brix, showering them with irrefutable logic, wearing them down and bringing them to the light.
Guilty! :)
Jane, this amazing citizen-coverage of a historical trial, this top-level analysis of a hugely important and complex crime - not to mention this community - wouldn’t ever have happened had you not decided one day to take a quixotic leap of faith and launch firedoglake. For this excellent post, and all that have led up to it, for the outstanding team you’ve drawn together, for all the posts to come, for all your dogged firedoglaking, a heartfelt thanks.
Ah Laurie Shillroie.
Who would have known.
It is amazing that the media still view the blogoshphere with a more jaundiced eye than they view Bush and Cheney.
Those two have done more to discredit and destroy journalists than the entire blogosphere could ever dream of.
-GSD
NewsClues @ 30
Is there any excuse for his behavior? I’d like to hear from the lawyers amongst us. Whether you’re a defense lawyer or a prosecutor - do you sit there with your head down while the other side gives final arguments?
Unbelievable… Can clients demand a refund?
Scarecrow!
So what was in the treasure hunt?
The early split between the President and the VP?
Mitchell’s role?
steve ex-expat @ 67
This might have been true last year and if the trial wasn’t in D.C.
Jane, you have that Gettysburg-Address-like, ability to capture the moment so economically.
We’re still waiting for the YouTube, should be up any minute.
What, no politics TV? Those have been my favorites.
brilliant and well done to all the FDL crew
tryggth @ 40
I have wondered that too. Given the compliant press, why not just move onto other things, and weather the storm? Given how the WMD house of cards so quickly collapsed, sans Wilson, it makes no sense. Except that these people are vindictive pricks.
But I guess at the time they thought the WMD thing would hold, so it was a shot across the bow of whistleblowers and critics. What they failed to realize was Joe Wilson stared down Saddam Hussein (afterall, they didn’t know Wilson), so he was not easily intimidated. In other words, they never dealt with a real Patriot before.
kml @ 67
Isikoff and the rest of them pray this is the end of it
What happens next to some extent depends on us
SOS in Maine,
Amen to the Pulitzer suggestion.
And yes, we didn’t get this kind of coverage of Watergate. This is such a treat.
I’m still loving what Fitz said:
“He stole the truth of the judicial system. You return guilty you give truth back.”
Where’s the teeshirts.
the defense counsel literally cried? Cried tears? And closed by asking them to return Libby to him? Weak.
Scooter is definitely not sleeping tonight - Fitz’s voice is going to be haunting him all night long.
“Nice resume you’ve got there, Scooter . . . it’d be a shame if something happened to it. Of course, I don’t think you need a resume for the jobs you might be applying for in your new location.”
“Nice friends you’ve got there, Scooter . . . of course, they aren’t the ones facing a move to (ahem) public housing. Of course, I’m sure they’ll give you a nice party before you move.”
“Nice boss you’ve got there, Scooter . . . anything you’d like to share with me about him? I could make it worth your while . . .”
Come to think of it, Cheney might not be sleeping really well tonight either.
excellent point, Pectopah!
I still fume over Shooter denying that he knew Joe Wilson…….
he and his crowd wouldn’t and couldn’t know a Patriot– someone so unlike them and their cabal.
dab from CT @ 75
I was taught to never cry in court; even if your goal is to make the jury feel sympathy for your client, your job is to lead them to tears. Actually crying yourself is usually seen as false. Real people try not to cry. They don’t actually cry in public. Watch people talking about something emotional on TV. They don’t cry, they get choked up as they choke themselves to avoid the show of emotion.
I would see his tears as the classic crocodile variety.
Gotta wonder if BigTime had a large yellowcake on its way to Baghdad marked “To: Saddam From: Niger” that would have validated the mushroom cloud WMD claims very prettily — but saw it all melt away with Ambassador Wilson’s NYT OpEd.
Jane,
I gotta believe that Libby, Wells and crew are regular readers of this blog.
I gotta believe that they view us as the enemy and look to our venom for their defense.
Sooooooooo Mr. Wells, We have a term here at the lake called 707, and when I read that you had your head in your hands, that was my state.
On. The. Floor. Laughing. Out. Loud.
I hope your night is restless Scooter. I will sleep like a rock!
Dick “Shooter” Cheney.
Loathed at home.
Reviled abroad.
Cheney receives a “hostile” reception in Japan.
-GSD
dab from CT @ 75
The way he’s been portrayed here, Wells has been such a disaster that I wonder if he’s purposely being the fall guy for an appeal. After a guilty verdict, can Scoots say he wasn’t represented adequately this time around? Don’t know much about courts, but then this thing can be dragged out longer, and probably after ‘08 elections at least. Dunno…just a thought….
(((((jane, jane, jane !))))
simply thank you, thank you for all of this and the unimaginable efforts to get us all here
plenty of misty eyed firedogs over at the FDL Bounce House this afternoon just thinking of you and Christy actually being there on this day, to see that close - yeowza!
Oh, and now that its over, shouldn’t Chimpy be asking Fitz (his employee) to lunch to ask what it was all about? Readers Digest version…
Can’t think of a single reason that shouldn’t happen.
TPhillip @ 57
I suspect the jury will take its duty seriously and will deliberate for several days, so no one can accuse them of being hasty, even it their minds are already made up.
Since I have a piss poor record of predicting the outcome of sporting events, I will not jinx this one with a further prediction, save the one above.
GSD @ 90
oh no, no more Koizumi hugs?
Sounds like Zeidenberg delivered the clinic, and Fitzgerald delivered the passion. And that Zeidenberg covered the “little” case while Fitzgerald covered the “big” case.
Fitzgerald, who seems to speak quite rapidly as a rule, may have been forced by the limits on time to speak more rapidly than planned or preferred, but at least he seems to have gotten it all in. I thought Fitzgerald very effectively demolished a few late-game doubts that Wells/Jeffress raised or re-raised - such as re Cooper’s 7/12 notes (which read like utter gibberish to me), and Russert being mistakenly named by Libby instead of Cooper or Novak, as well as how unique circumstances tend to make a person vividly recall a memory of something like a seaside conversation from years before, if not routine. It also sounded like we have Jack Eckenrode to thank for Tim Russert’s testimony, all the way around - Eckenrode’s early call to Russert at home, instead of the office, and his approach to Russert, seems to have let the cat out of the bag before GE & NBC’s lawyers had a chance to slam the door.
Fitzgerald’s telegraphing about Cheney and the broader investigation, and the appeal to the jury to deliver the truth to the American people, I imagine, really registered with the jurors, after Zeidenberg’s compelling recitation of the evidence constructed a very solid foundation at the start of the day.
Congratulations and grateful thanks for a job super well done, Special Counsel Fitzgerald, Deputy Special Counsels Zeidenberg, Riggs Bonamici, Kedian and Fleissner, and fellow staff and investigators who helped bring this one home. A golden day for justice in America, as the Scooter Libby case is handed over to the jury.
Jane, Christy, Marcy, and team (& Lurking Mod): I am very, very grateful to have had the access to this trial that your efforts and your passion have given us. May you be amply rewarded, in many ways, in recognition of the groundbreaking public service you provided to us all with your superb trial coverage.
Pectopah @ 81
it’s also the authoriatrian thing. cannot brook ANY dissent from a credible opponent. Must. Crush. Now.
Hey all, please give a big FDL welcome to Scotian, who has recently delurked.
Pectopah @ 81
They don’t just respond to their critics. They try to destroy them. That’s how they operate. If they were truly trying to respond to Wilson’s “What I Didn’t Find in Africa” article, they would have just said, “He didn’t look hard enough.” But they wanted to hurt Wilson, and they did it through his wife. Because that’s the kind of person Dick Cheney is.
GSD @ 91
He’s coming here this weekend. ABC (Aust. B’Casting Co) News Radio has been talking about the traffic tie-ups he’ll cause in downtown Sydney and at some of the favorite tourist areas near the harbor. Should do wonders for the image of the US. PM John Howard also taking heat as an election looms and even the Poodle (no offence Kobe) is bailing on Iraq.
GSD @ 91
Love it:
Seems to me that the Chief Cabinet Secretary may be following the Prettyman goings-on rather closely, yes?
egregious at 16 — I’m headed home tomorrow. My flight leaves late morning-ish.
Wells is an attorney who’s doing his job. The system doesn’t work without people like him defending the worst of the worst.
Just like Sam Adams defending redcoats or lawyers doing pro-bono work for Guantanimo detainees.
Libby is squirrely shitheel who is learning that things are great when you are in the catbird seat but that the powerful lose your number quickly when the worm turns.
-GSD
TeddySanFran @ 89
Try VX nerve gas intercepted by B-J. No wonder they were ticked. No WMD, what to do.
bonkers @ 91
I have thought the same thing on occaision. But if Scooter’s conviction were to be overturned on this basis, Wells and Jeffress would never work again in court.
So unless they are both looking forward to retiring in the next year or so…although, with the money they are being paid, perhaps that is part of the deal. But on the other hand, the amount of money and time and personpower spent on this case would itself make it hard to make that argument.
Welcome, Scotian. :)
Alice @
82
That’s kind of what I thought. Just bloviating on their part.
As far as it being up to us, what do we need to do? Send Fitz flowers, home cooked meals, beg him to continue his pursuit of justice?
Welcome to the delurked Scotian. Waving howdy from the west coast.
egregious @ 48
Oh, heck, I never win anyway!
angie @ 96
Koizumi took his Elvis act and up and quit. Now Shinzo Abe has to explain to his far right wingnut buddies why Bush sold them out and “negotiated with evil” when they cut a nice Condi Rice style deal with Kim Jong Il.
-GSD