
(Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi hugs her granddaughter yesterday at a tea honoring the late Ann Richards. Photo via Yahoo taken by Reuters/Larry Downing, who always seems to get the greatest shots of un-posed moments. Patience is rewarded, isn't it?)
It is a momentous day for those of us political junkies who are women, I must say. To have a female Speaker-elect just puts a smile on my face this morning, especially considering it's a Democratic one. Congress will be called into session in just a little while, and the official vote for the Speakership will be taken: each member of Congress must personally vote by voice on the record, in a ceremony that takes place every two years at the start of the new session. It takes about an hour, give or take, and then the new Speaker will be sworn in by John Dingell, longest serving member of Congress, and will then give a speech. More here from the AP and also here from the SFChron.
The House has an ambitious agenda for the first 100 hours of the 110th Congress, and it will be interesting to watch how this plays out over the next few days. The folks over at MoveOn.org have organized a petition to push the 100 Hours Agenda forward -- take a peek and sign your name, and take a little time to contact your Representative to let them know you support the Democratic agenda.
My favorite thing? The Democrats will be enforcing a five-day work week. No more two and a half days in DC, and the rest on junkets and fundraising -- members of Congress will be earning their paychecks a bit more, and it is about time. Let the oversight begin!
The NYTimes and the WaPo have some coverage on the Democratic agenda in both houses of Congress, and of some of the new faces on the Hill. But for some detailed analysis of the Senate agenda, you are much better off reading Bob Geiger.
Meanwhile, back at the White House, MSNBC reports that Harriet Miers has turned in her resignation -- she'll be leaving the White House Counsel's office effective 1/31/07. Thus far, it's been Gonzales and Miers as White House Counsel...who is next, Yoo? Blergh. Word to the White House: You might want to talk with Pat Leahy before you pick someone -- you know, pretend to be bipartisan, do some consultation, act like a savvy adult. (Oh, who am I kidding?)
By the way, as long as I'm thinking about it, signing statements need some challenge, and now -- and respect for the other branches of government needs to be restored because George Bush has overstepped far too frequently. Here's to restoration of checks and balances and respect for the rule of law. Members of Congress might want to start here. Get a warrant as the law requires, or stay out of my mailbox.
While Democrats are implementing their legislative agenda based on what is good for all of America, Republicans are falling back on fear. Again. To wit, from the always ready to give a reporter a quote Newt Gingrich:
Gingrich believes that Vice President Cheney and former defense secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, alumni of the Ford administration and now emblematic of the Bush administration's foreign policy, have changed because the world has changed. "Cheney and Rumsfeld have experienced a different world than Ford experienced and are genuinely frightened, and their policies are born out of this fear," he said. "They just don't know how to communicate to the country."
Yes, if only Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were more Venus and less Mars.
Although that does explain a lot about the recent growth industry of CYA PR firms inside the Beltway. Have to spend all that lobbying contribution money somewhere when you no longer control the legislative largesse, I suppose.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
The fightin’ 110th!!
Fitz too!
Sitting here with tears watching Jon Tester being sworn into the Senate….. Way to go Jon!
Now to my new DEM Congressman from Arizona… Hot Damn…
More “accidental” confusing of Obama and Osama
http://blogs.citypages.com/can.....s_pick.asp
I say again: Pelosi-palooza!
Hi Redd- I read yesterday that it’s a four day workweek- up from two..
Wow… what a boogy man, a 5 ft grandmother from San Francisco…. lordy thank God for the Grannies!
rw at 6 — My understanding is that they are reserving the fifth day for committee hearings free of main floor time. But that may have been altered since last I spoke with my Hill contacts earlier in the week. There is SO much oversight to be done, they had to work something out somehow to fit everything into the schedule.
Oh lordy, Howdy Doody is up next. They really are grooming him for leadership, aren’t they, on the GOP side? Blergh. What a craptastic choice.
I just saw that bullshit deal where Clusterfuck,again, decides he is above the law.
Just a convenient little signing statement declaring it to be just peachy for the government to peek at your mail.
Oh, just in emergencies, you know.
(wink wink, nudge nudge.)
Ann Richards. Another giant. I miss her.
Speaker Pelosi. This woman just may have the whole world in her hands.
Sitting here on the edge of tears watching Deval Patrick giving his inaugural address. This is a HUGE change for MA. A poor black kid from the south side of Chicago gets a break and winds up Gov. of MA. Talking about “universal human dignity” now.
Ceremony is being held outside in front of the state house facing the Boston Common and huge crowds. This is the first time this has ever happened.
What a day!
and he took the oath on the Bible from the Amistad, the one the slaves held on to for hope.
Great post Christy:
Minor typo:
[Mod Note; thanks for the heads up. Refresh and it should be fixed.]
…Fox News still holding out on covering congress opening. hee hee hee
Good morning (on the west coast, anyway) to all!
What a fine day it is to swear in Madame Speaker!
An honor to share it with the spark of humanity that is FDL!
so they have decided to spy on it instead.
OT: Haven’t read the whole thing, yet, but it looks at least partially promising:
The Law Catches Up To Private Militaries, Embeds
I’m so excited to see history today! CSPAN here I come! It will be Pelostastic!
C-SPAN - election of Speaker of the House
According to CSPAN, there are two Buddhists in the 110th Congress. There is also a Muslim. Nice to know that there are at least some places in the country where
something other thanone’s religion is less of a consideration than character or political issues when it comes to electing representatives.Wonder if they’ll make the Buddhists swear in with a Bible?
It may take a long time, and there will probably be retrenchment, but on days like this, I think that the trend in America will be toward less bigotry, not more.
They’re starting the vote for speaker in the House. Pelosi 8-5.
Random finds on the tubz today:
Maybe a way for Christy to save on rent? (click on ninja thumbnail)
Ian Welch lauds some of his favorite bloggers, with a shout out for you guys.
The Morning News lets Hitchens be Hitchens.
Once and for all — the actual oath for members of Congress is taken en masse and without their hand on anything. They simply raise their hand and take the oath. There is a private ceremony that is for photo-op purposes only that is done on a bible or koran or what-have-you later in the day. The moron who started the whole mess about the Koran being used was bitching about a private photo-op — and essentially lied to the public about the procedure to serve whatever divisive agenda he had. Wanker.
Can’t edit my last comment for some reason, but imagine that “something other than” isn’t there, and it will be a little clearer.
twolf1 @
13
I’m waiting for Brit Hume to put his hands over his ears and say, “La la la la la la la. I can’t HEAR you!”
Christy Hardin Smith @ 21
Wanker indeed!
But I love that Mr. Ellison is going to have his photo-op using the Koran that Thomas Jefferson owned. And the Wanker Goode lives in the district where Jefferson’s home was.
Sweet.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 21
Unfortunately, in this day and age, the photo-op is usually more important than the reality.
Frank Probst @ 23
Kinda OT, but I worked one summer as a bicycle courier in DC, and one of my regular runs was to the Senate press gallery. Hume had a desk up there, and he was easily the most despised reporter there.
Redd–Hard to say what a congresscritter counts as a work day- a day where someone asks em for their vote?
(Unemployed philosopher- one who isn’t thinking)
Go Nancy go!
Woo hoo!
RevDeb @ 24
It was ironic on more than one level. Jefferson’s writings make it pretty clear that he was (at least) an agnostic. I suspect that his interest in the Koran was far more intellectual than religious.
On MSNBC a little while ago, Chip Reid reported that Carl Levin might be open to a troop “surge” if certain conditions were met. Matt Lauer’s response? “Ooh, look! Richard Gere!!”
Does it ever end?
Wonder if anyone has used Russell’s “Why I am Not a Christian” for the photo op?
Did I miss something? Are you saying “Abu” Gonzales has submitted his resignation? Or just that he left the White House to become a worse Attorney General than Ashcroft?
This brings to mind the seemingly-odd move of Negroponte from Directory of National Intelligence to Deputy Secretary of State. My pet theory is that Condi is basically done, she’s been in way over her head since day one. I’m thinking Negroponte is being brought in to take over running the State Department, keeping Condi on as figurehead to preserve her reputation (gag).
This feels like a Kissinger-inspired move, since we know Kissinger is dictating Bush’s foreign policy as an advisor. And Negroponte has the war criminal mentality favored by the bad doctor. I think this is a drawing of the inner circle ever tighter to barricade the Bush government against the onslaught of those who disagree with them.
LindaR @ 30
Whoa! How’s Gere looking these days?
Yaaaay!!! It’s cleaning day.
JF @ 16
Okay, it looks like the contractors will now be subject to the UMCJ in conflicts that are not declared wars. This includes Iraq and Afghanistan.
Wonder who slipped this in?
Frank Probst @ 33
yummy, as ever — ha.
Frank Probst @ 29
He was a Deist and studied it all. Quite a mind.
On another note, the Boston Children’s Choir just sang at Deval’s ceremony. From what I could tell, the song was
“The Storm is Passing Over”
Love it.
Jefferson was, I think, a Deist–as I understand the species, they were struck by Newton’s discoveries and thought that they implied a natural law giver- but not a “personal savior”.
I was EPU’d on this in the last thread. Mrs. BC and I were talking about the line-item veto last night. She studied the case in a Con Law class she took a couple of years ago.
She said that the decision (link is to a CNN story on the decision) clearly says that the Consitution presents the President with two options: sign the bill as it is, or veto the bill. The President isn’t allowed to treat the bill as a Combination Plate (I’ll have a chicken taco, a green chile tamal, cheese enchiladas, and can I substitute guacamole for the refritos?).
The case is Clinton et al v New York et al (link is to FindLaw’s synopsis of the decision.)
The decision was 6-3 against the bill. Given that, Roberts’ respect for stare decisis, and the clear statement about process in the Constitution, I think it’s a slam dunk on the signing statement crap.
Someone with standing needs to file a suit over these things, tout de suite.
BC
When did Abu Gonzales resign???
I don’t understand the reference to John Yoo who helped provide a “legal” justification for torture and the unilateral executive. He served in the Bush Administration from 2001 to 2003 and is currently (and bizarrely) a professor of law at UC Berkeley.
Parenthetically, a complaint was filed against him in Germany November 14, 2006 by a private attorney for providing a legal framework for crimes against humanity under the Nuremberg provisions which dealt with the facilitation of such crimes by Nazi judges.
puppethead at 32 — No — what I was saying is thus far we’ve had Gonzales and Miers in the White House Counsel’s job, and was wondering who would be next.
No one can stop the idiot from producing signing statements- the question is whether or not they have any legal force- that’s for the courts to decide I suppose- (they may have been mentioned in a couple of decisions where they were found at least relevant-)
puppethead @ 32
There are fewer and fewer people left to man the barricades. Robert Gates does not appear to be a yes-man, so I can’t see him doing it. I don’t know what’s going on with Miers, but it can’t be good for Bush. I haven’t figured the Negroponte move out yet, either. Wasn’t he supposed to be a key figure in the sacking of the last CIA chief (Porter Goss, I think)? Lots of Repubs weren’t very happy about that. I’m not sure if the Negroponte move is an attempt to shiv Condi or if it’s a defensive move to keep someone from shivving Negroponte.
katymine @ 40
Abu resigned as White House Counsel to become Attorney General vice Ashcroft.
BC
nice nice reading christy, very exciting times we are in today
let’s point out the following;
it’s important for the democrats to make it crystal clear, a warrant takes NO time, if national security deems mail needs to be opened we need NOT wait for a warrant, we can get the warrant AFTER the search
this important to get across because those that support this president don’t get it
in addition, we need to put a realistic face on warrant less searches, instead of “protect our rights”, or “against the constitution”, we need to change that up and put it in practical perspective, something like so;
“we need to make sure officials aren’t stealing from us, stealing our bussiness secrets and our personal secrets, we need to make sure an official the reasons are national security and not theifery…every single search is going to have checks in place and we will do our best keeping “evil doers” from stealing from us”
nice, I don’t mind if a democrat steals that verbatum
rwcole @ 43
I can’t imagine that they’re going to have any legal force. I suspect that the Court will ultimately rule that they’re legally equivalent to a press release.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen an actual calling of the roll in the House before.
Lots of blue ties today.
The question : “Does God exist?” may have more in common with “Does the number four exist” than with “Is there a cat on my mat”- that is- it ain’t an empirical issue.
Okay — I’ve edited above to make clear I’m talking about the White House Counsel’s position only — Gonzales has NOT resigned. Sorry if that was somehow unclear in the reading.
From a purely standing perspective, could it be a congress person, or would it have to be someone, somewhere, who has been adversely effected by the executive acting in accordance with the signing statement but contrary to the actual law the statement is attached to?
Here’s a fun one from CNN,
Oh how I love my new Representative, Keith Ellison. He just sought out and introduced himself to Virgil Goode on the House floor.
Frank at 44 — Don’t be too sure about Gates not being a “yes” man. William Arkin had a blogpost the other day saying that he was flanked by Cheney’s “minders” on his trip to Iraq.
Thomas Jefferson would be unelectable these days.
RevDeb @ 48
They usually use the electronic vote thingy if they want an exact roll call. I suppose this is political theatre?
Frank
Well if there is a serious question about the meaning of an ambiguous statute- then the question of what congress meant when they drafted the thing and what the president THOUGHT it meant when he signed it may be relevant (but not the final word) for the court. On the other hand- if the statute is clear- then I can’t see any role for the signing statement.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 50
More’s the pity.
I’ve got to put a plug in for a colleague’s book. General Ashcroft: Attorney at War is a really good study of Ashcroft and Bush’s view of the office of the Attorney General. It’s well worth the read.
BC
I fancy Nancy as Speaker
Frank Probst @ 47
Well, it looks like Murtha’s not gonna play nice (via ThinkProgress):
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/.....scalation/
Boo fucking hoo!
Cujo359 @ 56
absolutely political theatre. And I’m ready to give it a standing O.
Madame Speaker!
MADAME SPEAKER!!
gawd, I love the sound of it!
Cujo at 56 — This is the only time that a voice vote is required, the election of the Speaker. It’s a requirement that each member has to register their vote out loud and in public — long-time tradition of the House for this vote. I linked a couple of articles above that talk about the tradition on this.
puppethead @ 53
whoo–hoo for you and Ellison, too. Now that is how a fine and upstanding Congressman acts- classy!
Saw Mr. Webb get sworn in– ramrod straight and elegant.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 50
I got a little excited for a second there…
jeffreyw @ 51
IANAL and the question of standing in these things is tricky. A related decision by the Supremes held that congresscritters didn’t have standing to challenge the line-item veto bill. I’ll defer to Redd, LHP and the other lawyers here.
BC
The sun is shining here. This feels good. (shall I throw away my anti-depressants now, Dr. Frist?)
raven @ 52
Christy Hardin Smith @ 54
Larry Johnson wasn’t too impressed with his independence either. Let’s see if I can find that article… there it is:
http://noquarter.typepad.com/m.....hes_b.html
I noticed a few more since then that haven’t been overly complimentary, either.
Frank Probst @ 44
It’s part of the Stonewalling strategery. With Harriet missing, who is going to know where all the documents are that the Democrats will be subpoenaing?
rwcole @ 49
Ummm. Begging to differ, rw, but I can prove that the number four exists, if you’ll give me any integer and a successor function.
I don’t know what axioms are needed to prove God’s existence.
BC
So, is Harriet going to work for Hallmark now?
Hugh @ 41
If there are people leaving the administration, they’ll have to get new people from outside. Yoo is a “worst case scenario” of a sort that is, unfortunately, not unlikely in an administration that specializes in them.
Thanks, BC. That was my understanding, though I don’t remember seeing anything I would consider definite.
puppethead @ 32
I was puzzling over that, too. But the reference is to the two people who have been White House Counsel to Bush, not to two people who have resigned today.
Miers probably needs to salt away some cash for her retirement- she’s of more value with Clusterfuck still in the White House than after he has been replaced by a sane person.
It’s cash in time- put away the diapering tools and get back to work.
Re: Goode. Was there not some great pix of Leiberliar as a Goodie in a bonnet? That came to minde. . .sanctimonious.
I think it was a pointy hood.
bg @ 78
Bargain Countertenor @ 72
cogito ergo sum
Re Gates, I would argue that he is likely to prove a yesman. If he backs the Bush surge then it is definitive. If he disagrees with escalation, then he should resign. This would send a powerful message but I don’t see it happening.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 80
cogito ergo sum
OKKiddo,
In my case, it’s perturbo ergo sum.
BC
As the first woman, the first Californian, and the first Italian American is elected Speaker today, I can’t help but recall newly sworn President Gerald Ford’s words to the nation: “My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.”
Hooray for the Republic! It has, perhaps, survived another assault.
Hugh @ 69
This was on NPR this morning. It gets even better. He was on the painkiller since 1972, and was doctoring shopping and taking 3 times the prescibed amount. The FBI also intimidated witnesses that were going to testify against him at both Senate confirmation hearings. His drug problem was covered up by the Senate committee confirming his position as Chief Justice. I bet Rush is the first to defend him.
Pelosi just voted, to a standing ovation. [snoopy dance!]
rwcole @ 77
Miers never having had to deal with a Congressional subpoena, perhaps she’s realized she’s outta her depth. “Best President EVER,” feh!
“prove that the number four exists”
Well you can certainly make a proof inside mathematics that “there is an integer x such that…” but that doesn’t exactly answer the question “Do numbers exist-or are they just logical fictions?”
Questions about the ontological status of common “objects” are rarely empirical- and your “proof” is not empirical either.
What these questions boil down to is “can objects be said to exist that are not medium sized pieces of household goods that make up the furniture of the universe–like tables, chairs, and teevee sets?”
It actually bugs the shit out of people that you can’t see and pick up things like “the national debt”- so does it exist?”
raven @ 79
Check out this photo of a little creative redecorating of Goode’s district office!
Where’s the hip-waders.
rwcole @ 87
Break open the champagne!!
{{{VICTORY DANCE}}}
OT - Mullah Omar says hasn’t seen bin Laden for years
Murtha on MSNBC
I like it that Sheehan is putting pressure on my party, the Democrats, to end the war in Iraq. She lost her son there. And I support her.
rwcole @ 87
I think the way to explain that is - “See the extra X dollars that aren’t in your wallet? That’s a real manifestation of the national debt.” (X=their part of the national debt at the moment)
Kinda helps if you’ve studied semiconductor electronics. You get used to thinking about where the holes go.
rwcole @ 87
Okay, I see your point. I concede that the proof is inside (meta)mathematics, but my point was that the existence of four is provable in some logical system.
Proof of the existence of god? Not so much… and not for want of trying, either.
BC
“Je pense donc je suis” is the original formulation. Descartes’ Discours sur la methode in which it occurs is commonly cited as the first modern European philosophical treatise written in vernacular and not in Latin. The phrase is a classic example of begging the question since the conclusion (I am) is held in the premise (I think).
Does Cheney’s black-hole soul exist?
oh baby, this is too rich, I’m surprised this isn’t the lead line in the story;
OH BABY, I LOVE THIS RANGEL
raven
Not a fan of philosophical discussions I see- pity.
They’re in the T’s, and Pelosi’s ahead 209-185.
The GOP radicals are such weasels when it comes to signing statements and the “unitary executive” that it makes them hard to challenge. Bush never writes “I’m not going to obey this part,” he writes “I will construe this as advisory consistent with the Constitutional powers of the presidency” or some such crap. And they’re careful to make the strongest statements about things that would be done in secret, so they can deny they’ve ever actually followed through.
Cheney believes the president should have dictatorial powers, but they’re too weaselly to actually put that to the test and risk having the courts say no. Instead they’re building up a paper trail of stuff that has never been tested, so in the future they can refer back to it as precedent.
It needs to be definitively destroyed, but how to get a grip on it, I’m not sure. The best opportunity may be the various laws already passed that including reporting requirements that the administration has ignored.
RevDeb @
11
What a day indeed - your comment brought me to happy tears - good thing I hadn’t put on my mascara. May just throw in the towel and be late for work - just glued to C-Span and FDL.
Glorfindel @ 97
No. His personality just sucks so much that no light escapes.
Pectopah @ 71