
In case anyone missed it this weekend, CNN reported that Rahm Emanuel, former head of the DCCC and now designated to chair the House Democratic Caucus, was aware of suspicious Mark Foley emails to pages in 2005. Justin Rood at TPM Muckracker says:
"A 16-year-old kid was entrusted by his parents to the U.S. House of Representatives, and Congress has a responsibility," Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told the Chicago Tribune in October.
"The most important questions are, 'What did the Republican leadership know, when did they know it and, if they knew something, why didn't they do anything to protect the child?'"
Now, Emanuel's questions are boomeranging back on him and his Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
So far, Emanuel's office can't be reached for any statements, according to Rood. Glenn Greenwald performs a vivisection of Emanuel's past appearance on This Week with Georgie Stephanopoulis from back during the height of the Foley scandal. During that interview, Emanuel donned his ballet togs to dance around the issue of his familiarity with the emails to say he "never saw" them.
Our own Blue America candidate researcher Howie Klein has suspicions about Emanuel's foreknowledge of the Foley ticking time bombs based on Emanuel's early efforts to recruit a former Republican to run as a "Democrat" for Foley's very red district seat, sleezily pushing out a fine local progressive in Dave Lutrin. Why was Emanuel so interested in this race so early, when no signs publicly available pointed to any Foley vulnerability?
Not many people know a lot about the inside machine illegality and thuggery brought to bear to get Emanuel into his congressional seat in the first place. Don Tomczak, whose illegal efforts on behalf of his campaign Emanuel denies all knowledge of, is headed to prison in the wake of Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation of the corrupt Daley machine in Chicago. "Tomczak ran trucks on water projects, took at least $400,000 in bribes and commanded armies of political patronage workers hired in violation of federal court decree":
But if City Hall had not sent Don Tomczak, the corrupt city water department boss, to Emanuel's congressional campaign in 2002--and Tomczak's political army of hundreds of city workers who stumped the precincts with the promise of overtime--then Emanuel wouldn't have narrowly defeated a local grass-roots Democrat.
In 2002, Emanuel beat a fine grassroots progressive with the help of all this machine campaign illegality, and Emanuel would have us all believe he knew nothing about it.
Speaker Elect Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel is corrupt. It's very probable he knew about these suspicious Foley emails well in advance, and rather than initiate an immediate Ethics Committee review or take responsibility to ensure the FBI was informed right away - as Melanie Sloan of CREW did when she received information about Foley - then he consciously chose to keep kids at risk for the sake of dirty insider power politics.
Rahm Emanuel does not belong in a leadership position in the House. Voters cited corruption as their top issue in this election, along with Iraq. Democrats need to be better than Republicans to sustain any governing majority, and more importantly, to change the direction of our country. If Rahm Emanuel won't resign his leadership position, Speaker Elect Pelosi, then he should be removed.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
This man is outdoing Dan Rostenkowski… the corrupt pol who used to own that seat.
Rahm is not fit to lead for a variety of reasons.
Amen! Rahm Emanuel is an ass. If he had foreknowledge of Mark Foley’s activities and did nothing about it, he MUST GO!
Based upon Hillary’s position on the Middle East, the Senator is not fit to lead either.
It seems as if Illinois Democrats just can’t avoid the taint of corruption. Every damn last one of them breaks my heart, including Senator Obama.
My rep is Jan Schakowsky… corrupt.
My governor is Rod Blagojevich… corrupt.
My mayor is Richard Daley… corrupt.
My county president is Todd Stroger… feh.
Dick Durbin still remains in good standing, and I kind of like Lisa Madigan. But that is it.
Oh, please. You’re going to have to find better reasons to hate Emanuel.
He “was aware” of emails. Sheesh. And someone corrupt in Chicago (!) helped him get elected. Mercy me.
An informed electorate is the answer to most of our ills. If the CM won’t step up, then the netroots will.
Time to clean house Pelosi.
As to John Boehner–we call him “Boner” here in Ohio–if there is any evidence he had knowledge of Foley’s acitivities and did nothing about it, didn’t report it, he should go, too.
When Boehner was elected as House GOP leader, his family hired a huge crane and had a giant canvas saying “Congratulations Rep. Boehner, Our Republican Leader” installed on the front of his former high school, Moeller High School in Cincinnati. Talk about no separation of Church and State!
Yeah, Pach!
When two vowels go walking, the first one does the talking.
I’m just sayin’.
Oilfieldguy: Your teachers taught you well!
I am sensing that Pelosi will do nothing about this. This really makes me sick. I didn’t like Rahm anyway, kinda thought he was a snake. My suspicions are confirmed.
So, it is time for the blogosphere to do its’ job.
Get the fax machines out. If this can be proven, I will be the first in line to do my duty.
Corrupt, complicit and ethically challenged - GET OUT. We not gonna take this shit anymore.
Absolutely.
I just posted the sam in Balloon Juice’s comments.
I had some interesting conversations on Friday and today. I live in PA and began calling the PA reps who signed off on this.
Mike Doyle is a Democrat from Pittsburg. His staff had the nerve to tell me I needed to read the whole report. Doyle, who’s only 53, has 3 sons and 2 daughters: I aksed what would have happened if it had been HIS kids that Foley went after. No one had a good response except to tell me to read the whole report, that I didn’t know what i was talking about.
Melissa Hart (R-PA) was even better. Her staff guy told me he had no idea the report was released, and that he;d had jury duty all last week. However, after admitting the he himself had kids, I asked him what if it was his kids that Foley was after. “Would it be OK if it was your son’s penis that Foley wanted to measure?” “hell no, was his response. After the rest of my diatribe (I was so mad I was actually screaming) he told me he was going to pass my message along to Hart. “i don;’t want to hear anymore family values speeches from that one,” I said. “not one more word about values, or children, or anything: your boss and everyone else in Congress knew since at least 2001 about Foley abnd deliberately did NOTHING.
And by th way, there are laws in ALL FIFTY states that mandate reporting child abuse, including sexual abuse. You can argue that because the kids were 16, no harm no foul, but that would be wrong: foley broke laws that HE HIMSELF HELPED PASS, and to pretend that this was just negligence is bullshit.
As for Rahm Emmanuel, that is just the typical manipulative behavior I have come to expect from him, ever since Hackett.
Fuck him. I’d like to throw him under the bus personally. Shit, I’ll DRIVE the frikkin’ thing.
it’s “bouquet” not “bucket” !
I think you are being too harsh. I guess he probably knew about them around the time CREW crew found out - around July/Aug time frame.
There was nothing he could have done then, since CREW refered the matter to FBI. No pages were in danger at that point in time. Rahm knew it would come out and he positioned himself to take advantage of that. What is so wrong about that? Remember, no pages were in jeopardy at the time.
ecoast: What’s your documentation that no pages were in jeopardy?
Tim @
14
yes, Hyacinth!
My comment got epu-ed.
I will write more later about my conversations with Democrat Mike Doyle’s office and Republican Melissa Hart’s office: both signed off on the foley report.
Instead, I’ll link to myselfOther People’s Kids
Y’know, I am really fucking pissed about this. Not only am i a parent, but when I was a boy scout one of my fellow scouts tried to get touchy-feely with me on a camping trip: I was 12, he was 17. I made a lot of noise and the scoutmaster came running before anything happened other than me socking him in his face, but I was too embarrassed to say anything.
This shit just pisses me off, and Rahm deserves to be thrown under the bus. Hell’ I’ll DRIVE the damn bus!
Based on his conspicuously parsed non-answers in the interview, this didn’t surprise me in the slightest.
And yes, Rahm. Must. Go. He is utterly unprincipled, and is dragging the Democrats down in multiple ways.
And, besides, Rahm always has the other job to fall back on. That of the ballerina. Or is it ballerino?
Rahm is a shahm.
Liar.
Buh-bye, I hope.
Assuming Rahm won’t go voluntarily, and that the Democratic leadership won’t do squat about him… how vulnerable is he to a strong primary challenger (I remember seeing Chris Cegelis’s name floated several times)?
And would his knowledge of Foley contribute to a primary defeat? Unfortunately, it didn’t seem to be fatal to Hastert or Reynolds.
Paul Hackett, an outstanding candidate, was running for Senator of Ohio this year. Rahm stopped Hackett’s candidacy in its tracks by deliberately withholding all DSCC funding from him.
Rahm ruined the political career of a shining Democratic candidate. Because he didn’t like Hackett. However, the voters did.
karen allen @ 23
I thought it was Schumer?
Not that Rahm wouldn’t have done the exact same thing.
Eli: My understanding was Emanuel and Schumer teamed up on this.
Eli: We’ll be looking for a primary challenger regardless and the process has in fact already begun, in small ways. I don’t know if Cegelis is an option, but the more the record on Emanuel gets out there, the more likely talent is to surface.
karen allen @ 25
Fair enough. Sounds plausible to me.
I really hope Pelosi gets the point here - we expect Ds to demonstrate standup ethics - no quibbling, no nonsense. And Rahm has none. Endangering kids so you can manuever a republican into a democratic race - how low can you go?
Rahm’s guaranteed to go much lower– he’s like one of my adolescent university friends–
“watch this and am I not wonderful?”
NO………….!
Dammit — I get in my car, drive to DC, stop at an outlet mall…and a Libby decisions hits the wires. No thought for MY needs, I tell you.
Just got to my hotel. If anyone has pulled the Libby decision already — could you please take pity on a tired ReddHedd and e-mail it to my ReddHedd at firedoglake dot com addy so that I can take a peek before my brain explodes? Thanks much!
Emanuel is noted for his strong partisan style and his fundraising prowess.
***He is the co-author, with current Democratic Leadership Council President Bruce Reed, of the 2006 book The Plan: Big Ideas for America.
Oh — and how awesome is Mr. ReddHedd? I have a bouquet of flowers that were waiting for me in my room when I checked in…I am a lucky woman. :)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 31
Hiya Christy, did you have fun today and are you pleased?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 30
So you definitely haven’t had a chance to read it…
Christy,
For old times’ sake and since ’tis the season and all that, I posted last years’ Fitzmas Carols on my site (link above) under “Fun Files.” That’s IF you need a break from reading the Fitz file. They are still a lot of fun and laughs.
Had to catch my breath on this one until I saw Durbin was reprieved.
dannyM @ 5
Durbin is good. Lisa Madigan is good. Her old man… not so good.
May I ask who was the good grassroots candidate running against Rahm in ‘02. I sure don’t remember any primary.
oddball @ 12
The guy is ambitious slime, to be sure, but he’s our slime. I would give Nancy the benefit of the doubt on this one. He raised a lot of money for us, put a lot of it where it didn’t do us any good. But the kid’s got talent. Let’s give him two years to see how he runs.
Oh, and Christy,
pow wow had a comment on the last thread that you might want to look at here.
I see . . . it was RAHM’S responsibility to deal with Foley. Not Hastert or any other Republican, it’s RAHM’S fault.
Be serious. I might be disturbed to learn that Rahm knew that William Jefferson had bribe money in his freezer, but this is simply ridiculous. Parachutec, go form your circular firing squad somewhere else.
Brenda– Rahm LIED.
He is not worthy.
Knut Wicksell @ 37 Let’s give him two years to see how he runs.
We know how he runs.
That skunk won’t change his stripes.
angie @ 40
Plus he looked the other way when informed of the Foley e-mails. Either because he figured it was the Republicans’ mess to clean up, or because it would pay off at election time - neither of these possibilities is particularly noble.
One wonders why it’s not a leader’s responsibility to act on information affecting both a national institution and the potential sexual exploitation of minors in that institution’s care.
I think Rahm’s own quote at the head of the post as taken from Justin Rood frames the issues rather well.
Granted that I have been around more sparsely lately, but the names of people who are standing up for Rahm do not look like familiar names at the Lake.
Anybody?
Can anyone please explain to me what it is exactly that the Democratic Leadership Council does.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 45
Turns Democrats into Republicans.
Rahm’s responsibility here is no different from a teacher’s or a doctor’s - or a neighbor’s - who suspects child abuse and calls Child Services. Playing this for gain - even democratic political gain - is out of bounds. That’s the bottom line.
Let me just say Redd, a bouquet of flowers sounds about right for being selected to the conference on poverty.
I was going to mention back then that some flowers for the kitchen table wouldn’t kill him… ;-)
My cynicism leads me to guess that Rahm is one of the “protected” folks in the Dem leadership.
His meteoric rise in the 3 years he has been in Congress is based upon one thing and one thing only, he’s da Moneyman!.
He has no legislation of any significance that bears his name, his wisdom or his probity. His only claim to “fame” is as a bagman (i.e. bags of money).
That is not an inconsequential “virtue” with his congressional colleagues. A politico who brings principled positions to bear is awarded a modicum of respect for the principles, but a politico who brings the cash is revered as a superstar, a go-to titan, a master among minions.
No, I’m afraid that unless Rahm is caught in bed with the proverbial “dead girl or live boy”, he’s golden with the DC power elites. Money talks and bullshit walks.
For the time being, Rahm appears “untouchable”. In DC, nobody bets against da Moneyman.
For the record, Rahm ain’t on our side. He’s on his side!
Eli @ 43
Big Ditto.
Rahm is the Big Dawg’s boy, the same Big Dawg that stole the CT Senate race away from Ned.
I think the only way we can get Rahm to resign, is if we get one of the most conservative dailies in the nation, the Chicago Tribune, to dig in on this.
“This episode kept popping into my head when I was reading about President Bush and the Baker-Hamilton commission. Bush is the president of the United States, which therefore gives him enormous power, but he is treated by everybody around him as if he were a child.” Johnathan Chait, LA Times yesterday.
http://www.latimes.com/news/op.....columnists
John Casper @ 50
Of course, the problem is, that this won’t be just about Rahm - this will be about the *Democrats* in general. Which is why Rahm is such a stupid shit for doing this in the fisrt place.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 45
Triangulate rightward with every lurch of the Republican party, waiting for that one jump to the left that would bring the hoards of K-Street to the whores of the DLC.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 51
Has Jonathan Chait never seen the “It’s A Good Life” episode of Twilight Zone?
Eli: We’ll be looking for a primary challenger regardless and the process has in fact already begun, in small ways. I don’t know if Cegelis is an option, but the more the record on Emanuel gets out there, the more likely talent is to surface.
A commentadore on MyDD had an eenteresting suggestion recently:
Why not start an Actblue page (or sometheeng similar) to raise money specifically to be used against a sitting rep een a primary, rather than waiting for someone to declare and than sending heem/her money.
Just theenk how much more attractive a primary challenge would be eef someone saw that he or she had some dolares already raised, just waiting for them to declare.
so.
Mad Dogs at 6:04 pm, completely agree.
Even if we don’t “win”, the more we get the facts out, the less influence Rahm will have. We’re bringing civility back, holding predators and those who shield them accountable for their actions and in this case for their massive
fuckingnegligence.!El Gato Negro! @ 55
Draft Not-Rahm!
brendan,
That sounds like some comments I made to a caller for the DCCC.
I saw this story at newsweek via msnbc.com over the weekend and was all set to make a big fuss about it.
but then read these comments below the story and backed off:
now? confused.
Eli @
47
Eli, good to see your snarky self back here!
It’s good that the “Jane Hamshers of the left” are not mindless sheeple that merely bleat the party line.
We are the rabid lambs, never forget.
!El Gato Negro! @ 56
Capital idea!
punaise @ 59
The fact that Rahm knew and did nothing does not make the Republicans less culpable in any way.
But it still makes him an unethical asshole.
Or more of one.
Thanks, Margot!
punaise: Check out Glenn Greenwald’s link with his analysis. I did not want to get that deep in the weeds with this post, but Glenn has more detail.
Eli @ 55
“THERE IS a famous “Twilight Zone” episode about a little boy in a small town who has fantastical powers. Through the misuse of his powers, the little boy has ruined the lives of everybody in the town — for instance, teleporting them into a cornfield, or summoning a snowstorm that destroys their crops. Because anyone who thinks an unhappy thought will be banished, the adults around him can do nothing but cheerfully praise his decisions while they try to nudge him in a less destructive direction.” Johnathan Chait.
The Big Dog should have told everybody to STFU and he should have never lied.
Rahm should have said STFU and “go ask a republican.” He chose to lie.
Lies do damage and Rahm has done damage to us.
Time to fish or cut bait.
done.
If someone smells like a skunk getting a perm in a slaughterhouse septic tank it is safe to assume they are dirty.
Circumstantial that the evidence is.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 66
Ah, excellent. The Bush administration has reminded me of that episode for quote a long while now.
Did you see this
Pachacutec @ 65
I had a comment there. I knew FDL would take the high road.
scout prime @ 70
Because there’s no-one I would rather have as the face of the Democratic Party than… Rahm Emanuel.
Hi scout!
What about Bill Clinton?
Clinton is one of the smartest guys ever to sit in the oval office.
While one can be sure that he did not have direct knowledge of corruption, my guess would be that he have to know that Emmanuel was pond scum.
Clinton has hired pond scum before (Dick Morris), and I’m wondering if we are going to see more of this from ex-Clintonistas.
That twilight episode, was that the one with the kid from Lost In Space? Will?
Hi Eli
Yup won’t it be grand to have that…ugh
scout prime @ 71
Nope, and thanks, scout prime.
Nooooooooooooo!
I have your communication right here.
Oilfieldguy @ 75
Billy Mumy.
As much as I dislike Rahm (and as someone who’s familiar with what Rahm did to Jerry McNerney, there’s a lot to dislike), I think Pach is way off on this one.
It’s worth remembering Abe Vigota’s character’s last line in the Godfather — “Tell Michael it was only business.”
It makes no sense to do the GOP’s work for them, and chasing after Rahm Emanual on “corruption” for this charge is really pushing it. First, even if you can prove the guy is dirty in other ways (and yeah, he is from IL), the problem with the pages really was the Majority’s (and Hastert’s) problem to deal with. Imagine if Rahm had come forward, and imagine how the GOP would have spun it. It would have given them cover, and more to the point, it would have helped them evade their very real accountibility.
Second, there really is a difference between the Democrats and the GOP on corruption, and it’s important to stress that to ourselves and to the public. It’s both stupid and reckless to help the GOP spin this (”everybody’s corrupt! they’re all bums!”) especially just to slam Ramh Emanual.
Rahm deserves slamming, but not in a way that sabotages the incoming majority. Take your time, damn yeh all… there will be plenty of time to take him on then.
There are people who think netroots people are hot heads with no political sense. Why help that meme along through stupid, futile, self-defeating and hot headed nonsense that isn’t going to help progressives going forward?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 77
Also on Babylon 5.
Pachacutec @ 66
thanks - I’ll check it out.
Matthew Saroff @ 73
Weren’t ISG members Panetta and Jordan Clinton guys?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 77
Is that the episode you refer too? Because I remember that one. Whatta brat.
I dislike Rahm as much as any progressive, but I see no story here. Give me some facts. Not a witch hunt based on rumors. Our side is better than this.
You make an important point, as per usual. I say let’s push it as far as we can via the media, not Pelosi. If there are reliable sources about what Rahm knew and when he knew it, there will also be a lot of pressure on Rahm to “take one for the team.” The other issue is, unless Rahm has email or something similar, who will take Rahm’s word for what year it is? Putting the pressure on Rahm, also hits even harder at
BonerBoehner, Hastert, Reynolds, and Shimkus and jesus knows how many more. Maybe we lose Rahm and a few more, but I bet the GOP loses double in the House. Plus the netroots show we don’t give a shit if your hiding predators.FWIW, I’m not pushing the FEC to aggressively investigate Lieberman4Lieberman’s petty cash disbursements in the primary. Rahm, however, doesn’t have that kind of leverage.
I try most days not to cut off my nose to spite my face. If Rahm will enthusiastically support publicly funding all national elections, I’ll seriously reconsider.
Rob - protecting kids from predators is more important that political machinations - and the american people are looking for leadership, not more of the same.
Oilfieldguy @ 83
Yes. Mumy is a musician and song writer. Has been for years. I believe.
Rob From Santa Cruz @ 79
I prefer to think of it not as “helping that meme” but rather as trying to improve the Democratic party by asking tough and appropriate questions about the ethics of our party’s leaders.
Repeat for Christy:
Today’s Order in full (the accompanying Opinion is fully sealed until 12/22):
From the CNN report linked at the head of the main post:
People with questions about the story, I recommend trying out the links.
Pachacutec @
27
This needs doing. But an extraordinary amount of due diligence is also needed before attempting anything in Chicago. That and savvy insiders in the organization. It isn’t readily apparent from the outside just how closed off the place actually is.
scout prime @ 71
Oh HELL no.
Rob From Santa Cruz @ 79– I kinda, sorta understand what you are saying, but I want nothing to do with the “business” in my lifetime during this time when the loss of life is so huge and ugly.
(I do like the Godfather movies, though)
We actually have a good team of Chicago based folks and the conversation is happening … identifying the right candidate will take some doing but we’re lucky to have some very good folks here to work on it.
I feel like we’ll be seeing some rapid response real soon. It may already have begun.
If my party, the Dems, cannot clean up their own house, then we have no business pointing fingers at the Republicans.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 95
And *that* is what it is about. If the Democrats want to establish themselves as the moral party, and the Republicans as the corrupt party, then they have to *be* the moral party.
Eli @ 97
bingo!
Eli @ 97