
As bad as DC crime - corporate, white collar, K Street crime - has become over the last six GOP controlled years, the really scandalous, offensive, criminal stuff is the stuff that's legal:
- Human Sacrifice Watch: A car bomb rocked the Shiite holy city of Karbala, south of Baghdad, killing at least five and wounding around forty-four, according to this report by CNN. The same report says US forces busted up a weapons site and killed a bunch of Iraqis, around twenty. No word on any American casualties. Though all deaths in this monumental crime of an occupation matter, I'm instituting an informal "Human Sacrifice Watch" to see who will be the last American to die to protect George Bush's fucking ego from having to admit he's been mass murderously wrong, wrong, wrong.
- If you missed Matt Taibbi on the Baker-Hamilton Bush Family Intervention, go check it out. Here's just one paragraph, and bless Matt for unleashing fully his inner DFH (and check out Jon Stewart on the subject, courtesy of Crooks and Liars, and our very own Hugh from last night):
Baker-Hamilton was a classic whore-panel in every sense. None were Middle East experts. None had logged serious time in Iraq, before or after the invasion. All of them had influential friends on both sides of the aisle all over Washington, parties in the future they wanted to keep getting invites to, ambitions yet to be realized. You could assign Jim Baker, Lee Hamilton, Sandra Day O'Connor and Vernon Jordan, Jr. to take on virtually any problem and feel very confident that between the four of them, they would find a way to avoid the ugly heart of any serious political dilemma. If the missiles were on the way, and nuclear Armageddon was just seconds off, those four fossils would find a way to issue a recommendation whose headline talking points would be something like "heightened caution," dialogue with Sweden, and a 14 percent increase in future funding for the Air Force.
- Speaking of skewering the scum sucking cheerleaders for mass murder in DC, please join me in another chorus of everyone's favorite song, "what digby says." Digby riffs off an excellent insight from our good Roots Project friend Lambert at Correntewire, to the point that the pearl clutching civility police are really insisting on deference as a way to sustain their positions of greater social power. It's another way of saying, "Hey, buddy, don't you know Who I AM!!?
- Does anyone have time to go to Jeane Kirkpatrick's wake or funeral to make sure she's really dead? I think lots of people who remember (see the comments) the actual effect her public career had on people's lives would appreciate anyone who can perform this service. And to extend the Lady MacBeth metaphor, "Out, damned spot!"
- Our good friend, the wholly owned K Street subsidiary, Ellen Tauscher, joined GOP'ers and corporate rentboy Dems like Joe Crowley to sell out American workers so corporate America can access slave labor in conservative human rights Shang-gri-la, North Viet Nam. David Sirota has the scoop. Have you bookmarked David's blog yet? It's a must read for those of you like me who believe in holding sellout K Street whores accountable.
- And speaking of accountability sacrificed on the altar of civility and deference, how about this paragraph from the Washington Post about the House Ethics Committee's Friday dump of its Foley whitewash investigation results (for a little more on the whitewash, see this bit from CREW and this from C&L):
But the ethics panel, officially known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, decided against taking any action against the leaders, aides or House officials involved in the saga, declining even to describe their actions as bringing ill repute on the House.
- The Rubber Stamp 109th Congress managed to slip in some extra class warfare into the tax bill. In committee, the bill got loaded up with extra giveaways to the uber-wealthy, never voted on by either chamber, just because. Millionaires and billionaires really just don't get a fair shake in our society, so they need lots of government welfare. Remember that when you see Mr. Potter in It's A Wonderful Life this holiday season.
- I'm reading The Great Risk Shift, recently profiled in our Book Salon. I highly recommend it. I had not had time to read it before our Book Salon. It uses very accessible anecdotes about people and families to make larger economic points. Most of the economics I read back in my student days bored me beyond tears, but this is written with a non-wonky audience firmly in mind.
- Taylor Marsh rocks. Have you been checking out her online radio show? No? Really, and you admit it in public?
- Yes, Matt, the silly season has indeed arrived. Time for us all to buy new special edition silly season pajamas, somewhere.
- Contest: name the uncivil DFH who said,
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows' houses, and as a pretense you make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation. But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you shut up the Kingdom of Heaven against men; for you don't enter in yourselves, neither do you allow those who are entering in to enter. . . .
[snip] Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint, dill, and cumin, and have left undone the weightier matters of the Torah: justice, mercy, and faith. But you ought to have done these, and not to have left the other undone. You blind guides, who strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel!
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and unrighteousness. You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the platter, that its outside may become clean also.
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitened tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
- From the Friday night newshole: the FCC is trying to shoehorn in a late procedural move to abet telecom consolidation. What's at stake? Among other things, net neutrality, of course.
- Finally, Bob Geiger made me cry this morning. I keep refreshing, looking for his Saturday morning cartoon roundup, to no avail. Go visit his blog anyway. Who knows what you might find. UPDATE: In response to my nagging email, Bob writes back to say he's on the road home after driving to DC to interview some guy named Reid. He'll have that interview written up on Monday, and will post some comics later tonight. Drive safely, Bob.
What's on your mind today?
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
gimme the zed!
Hi Pach - now to read…
I love Matt Taibbi - not that that’s necessarily a majority position….
someone I read somewhere said - “we all aspire to Taibbi-dom”.
Wouldn’t that be a great compliment to have under your belt?
What is on my mind….. hearing stupid so called Democrats whine that the elected Democrats are NOT doing things.
Ok, yes I am listening to progressive talk radio but there are some really stupid people out there who do not know that the new slate will not be sworn in until January 4th.
AND our new Democratic House and Senate are going to be left a nasty bag of crap to clean up too!
Where is the media on that?
Pach!
You’re awesome! : )
Let me get my Bible to see where Jesus said that.
MATTHEW 23:12-27!
Whoa Pach! What a great roundup of important stuff - I’m digging in now to read all the links!
and happy trails Bob Geiger! can’t wait for his interview since no one knows the senate like Bob!
FITZ!
On my mind today are:
(1) people suffering from emotional problems, exacerbated by the holidays.
(2) opportunities for family reconciliation, because of people being sentimental this time of year and more receptive to an olive branch.
The Digby post, and the previous one he references on the “Aristocrats” nailed it for me. Also see Glenn on Baker Hamilton,
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.....d-but.html
Thank you for this critically important post, Pach.
you must have felt my involuntary shudder thru the toobes when I saw a clip from one of JeanneK’s old speeches yesterday.
may we never forget, and never take things for granted, e.v.e.r.
egregious @ 9
Thank you, egregious! I’ll talk about it with my dad…
And once we have our presents picked out, we’ll head over to my mom’s place. : )
I think it was this guy…
http://www.tellercreations.com/pod/thegift.mp3
Happy Holidays!
Holiday blues really suck. Fortunately for me, I don’t have them, though the consumerist wanktopia that is the modern American Christmas holiday rather offends me, on Christian theological grounds, even though I’m not Christian.
I’d be bumming maybe if I were not so happily
marriedensconced in a legally discriminated against family structure, but I’m very fortunate that life for me is pretty good, personally and in my working life. I feel productive, valued for my abilities and thankfully, my many limitations are mostly irrelevant to what I do.Hang in there, folks. As silly as it sounds, one of the best things to do is to keep a gratitude journal, where you write 5 things every night you’re grateful to the (fill in your deity or deity substitute) for. Repeat entries are fine. This really helps sustain a balanced focus and puts many temporal trials in perspective.
PeteCO @ 10
Ah, Glenn Greenwald! He says it so nicely:
I probably would have just said that the Iraq War will screw the reputation of the neocons for quite some time…
But Glenn Greenwald says it SOOOO MUCH BETTER! ; )
Just my opinion, but I think there is a difference between the Kewl Kidz and the power elite.
Runoff election today in the Louisiana 2nd, time to give “Dollar Bill” Jefferson his pink slip!
The Foley investigation itself seems to have been pretty good - the investigators talked to the right folks, dug up the emails and IMs, etc. What I can’t believe is the complete absence of holding anyone accountable.
OK, I can believe it. Why should this episode be any different?
The first two sentences from the WaPo story put it like this:
Top GOP House leaders also “failed to exercise appropriate diligence” in the matter, the committee’s report found, and tried “to remain willfully ignorant of the potential consequences of Foley’s conduct.”
And the consequences, for these GOP leaders? Nada. Nothing. Zip. Zero. Nichts.
If this had been a teacher in a high school, trolling for fun with students, not only would they be gone but so would the administrators and board members who tried “to remain willfully ignorant” of what was going on. If Hastert still has a teaching credential back in Illinois, I hope the state revokes it on Monday.
And what happens to the next member of the House who is brought up on ethics charges? “Hey, if what Hastert, Shimkus, & Co. did doesn’t bring disrepute upon the House, how does my conduct do that?”
Bring on the grownups!
“We may soon have to face this fact: With the midterm elections over, and George Bush already a lame duck, the Iraq war is no longer an urgent problem to anyone on the Hill who matters. The Democrats are in no hurry to end things because it will benefit them if Iraq is still a mess in ‘08; just as they did this fall, they’ll bitch about the war without explicitly promising to end it at any particular time. George Bush has already run his last campaign and he’s not about to voluntarily fuck up his legacy with a premature surrender or a humiliating concession to Syria or Iran. “
Bingo. Nothing will change.
AirportCat @ 17
I hope so! : )
Katymine at 4, re: bag ‘o crap
I rescued a little dog last weekend. I am not a dog person. But I take him to the dog park often where he can be a dog.
Yesterday, one of the people at the park saw his dog pooping. As he went to clean up, he said, “Gotta go pick up the Republicans.” Made my day.
Poop=Republicans
The other thing that Bushco cannot let go of on the war is the whole recruitment and morale thing. If they start the talk of getting out, it makes the whole enterprise unsupportable. Low morale and low recruitment. All those patriots who have signed up (or have invested their children) for the WOT will begin to lose faith. Can’t let that happen. Especially not with the holidays coming.
The Taibbi piece is so good - and a reminder that our work is just beginning.
The nurse’s aide, who so lovingly cleaned up my mother after an “accident” yesterday said that she had been on an eight day “vacation” and missed saying goodbye to my mother’s roommate, who died a few days ago. I asked her what she did on her vacation, and she said she worked more on her other job. One job pays for rent and transportation, the other job pays for food for her family.
I told her that there were people who worked hard in the last election to change things for people like her. She looked at me with incredulity. “I didn’t think people even knew that people like me existed.”
Any ideas? There are strict rules against giving employees gifts. She is one of many, but she is the one who has been compassionate to my mom despite her weariness.
Gratitude is the way to sanity, and must be expressed.
I think we’re on the way out of Iraq- and the Iraq study group just drove the stake throught the heart of the Clusterfuck non-policy..
The ISG is blamed in some circles for not coming up with a better military or diplomatic plan to “save the day” in Iraq..
It’s actually clear that they BEGAN their discussions with the assumption that there IS not better military plan for Iraq- that Iraq is lost–they then started working backwards to figure out what political road leads out of Iraq most expeditiously..
The whole thing is politics- helping to build the perception that we’ve got a bloody mess and that it probably won’t get better- even with “one last shot”…They also propose beginning a withdrawal- once it has begun it will NOT stop..take that to the bank..
The “one last shot” is really kind of a joke- a chance for the dead enders (here- not in Iraq) to prove to themselves that we really have lost…
This things on it’s way to over-
NZ Expat—Any ideas? There are strict rules against giving employees gifts. She is one of many, but she is the one who has been compassionate to my mom despite her weariness.
My dad used to say, Sometimes you have to rise above principle. This was specifically in reference to showing mercy.
You could take her out to dinner, that’s not a gift strictly speaking.
Or a gift card/certificate might not attract too much supervisory notice.
http://meteor-blades.dailykos.com/ It’s long but worth reading
Here’s a very brave young American soldier who really has become an expert on the debacle that is Iraq. He’s self taught. He learned 1st hand. And, he learned the hard way.
A Message From An American Marine
Peterr #18,
The House ethics committee did think everyone associated with this affair had been negligent, and went on to prove their point by being negligent themselves.
atdnext, message for you at chez egregious about your Mom.
My wife and I were talking about how there is such similarity between Americans and the gap between the elites and non-elites, and how the middle east seems to be evolving a similar gap wherein the sunnis and shias are beginning to come together among the masses against the elites (see current events in Lebanon). And how these similarities are not because of sectarian differences but because of class warfare.
And that reminded me of Pareto’s “Circulation of the elites,” or the circulation of the lions and foxes.
And that explains (to me) the current situation with regard to the Washington insiders and people like Webb and Testor.
http://www.sociologyonline.co......Pareto.htm
Pach at 14 one of the best things to do is to keep a gratitude journal, where you write 5 things every night you’re grateful [for]
Just got a new, larger journal for 2007, and was pondering how best to use it.
That’s it! Now I am grateful for you and your many talents.
This pretty much sums it up.
Redstaters! Your Republican Congress!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NZ Expat @ 23
The rule against gifts is understandable– my favorite gifts was the spoken thank you and hug & maybe a written word to me that I could hold on to. I also suggest a written word to her employers with a request for the employer to laud that employee and get back to you with a description of how they handled it.
None of the many greats that work in healthcare want gifts– the gift is taking good care of their patients and seeing that it is well done. The greats do suffer the losses because they have been touched by those they care for.
remembering her weeks, months, years from now with a call, note or a visit would make her feel part of that intimate process that is life and death.
(or ask her if she has a favorite cause– like her children or where her momma lives and gift to the daycare, school or whatever in her name and make sure there is a plaque with her name on it)
egregious @ 29
Thank you… I’m there. : )
Good morning pupsters,
Pach,
I do hope sometime in the future you will consider the question you brought forth last night in another post. Hope that is not to forward for a comment pup to ask since I understand many posters don’t always appreciate this type of mini request.
The Kirkpatrick MacBeth post was certainly a unique post, kudos to you for pulling a new twist in the blogoverse.
OMG, as I write there is a fight in a church/funeral on CNN!
Anyway the role model question may be as unclear to many as our most wonderful rayne thought. Perhaps a New Orleans dancing in the street funeral thread-moment was not the best time for raising/answering the important question.
oh gee, I hope that makes sense….
(((Pach and Rayne)))
NZ Expat @ 23
Maybe you could find out what this woman would like to contribute to if she had the resources, and make a contribution in her name.
angie @ 33
Beat me to it. ;)
As for Jeane Kirkpatrick, it seems unseemly to speak ill of the dead, which is probably her best defense at this point for her short-sighted, narrow-minded, “brown people are unimportant unless they have oil” view of the world. She was an icon at the American Enterprise Institute which is consistent with its core mission of giving a home to useless, washed up neocons. I can only think that John Bolton another pointlessly abrasive UN Ambassador who often seemed to be channeling Kirkpatrick must have his moustaches hung in mourning tonight.
I am curious why you have to use the language like
“… George Bush’s fucking ego…”
I dispise the man and his policies, but I simply don’t get the use of that sort of language in political discussion.
I have recently returned from Italy having attended my brother in law’s memorial. Gianni Rigacci was a devoted political activist on the far far left in Italy for 5 decades and he was a dignified man and would never use that type of language in a political discussion. He was so well respected in Italy despite his far left politics that the speaker of the Italian parliment came from Rome to pay respects to him.
Why are we so easy to use this type of language? I don’t find that it helps in any way. Am I too old to get it or what?
Thanks for all the suggestions. The thing is, this woman is struggling to put food on her own table. So, while I’d like to do something in her name, I’d like her to have some luxurious little something, some la-la-la in her own life too. After Mother is no longer a patient there, I think I may be free to do what I want.
We all need some la-la-la, and even as my elderly French student back in NZ says, some ooo-la-la in our lives.
DefJef
Why not?
Why must the use of “fuck” be defended rather than the aversion to it?
daily affirmation:
my contempt for war whore Joe Lieberman endures, unabated.
Just give the woman a gift and screw the policy! Take a chance- what’re they gonna do- give ya a ticket?
Just watch how when someone of the “stature” of Joe Wilson is around the use of such language disappears and everyone acts grown up… splain that.
DefJef @ 39
Can we please skip the civility police routine? It’s not as if anybody is forcing you to read language you don’t like.
I am curious why you have to use the language like
“… George Bush’s fucking ego…”
imho, once the name George W. Bush appears in a sentence, there is no term too ugly or disparaging so as to not be also included.
DefJef @ 39
Being an occasional “potty mouth offender” as well, I can tell you that sometimes I just get SOOOOO MAD at what these GOPers do, that I just let all my rage flow from my head thru the keyboard to my posts…
I’ve sometimes received complaints from folks on my email lists who ask me not to use such “foul language”, and I’m working on keeping my temper down…
It’s amazing how I’d never curse at someone like that in public, but when I’m writing my blog, I sometimes just let it all hang out.
DefJef: It’s a New York thing.
I confess I (occasionally) mix rather elegant English with street profanity and blatant dirty trash talk in my writing. I understand it’s not to everyone’s taste. I am sometimes purposely crude.
As I note along with my digby link, I actually feel shocking invective is precisely what’s called for as part of our discussion of politics today. As always, YMMV (you mileage may vary), and I know some folks get really bothered by some of my usage and imagery. Others, not so much.
To me, the greater obscenity is not my f-bomb but the human sacrifices to Bush’s ego.
Just don’t want to jeopardize her situation….enough said on this….thanks for the comments.
And thanks to the posters who keep those in these economic binds before us, front and center.
jayt @ 46
That often describes my sentiments, as well. ; )
DefJef @ 39
Let me see, soon to be 3,000 American deaths in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives already lost, immediate costs of $500 billion and total long term costs of $1-2 trillion, destabilization of an entire region, and all because a certain man had a bruised ego and remains so blinded by it that he still thinks he was right despite mountains of evidence to the contrary and refuses to accept any responsibility for his mistake. I think Christy was being easy on Bush.
Perhaps it would be easier to speak civilly if Republicans would stop doing such obscenely uncivil things.
I find the refusal to use profanity when appropriate an annoying and irrational practice.
Pachacutec @ 48
Really? I thought it’s just another example of our Californication. (hehe) ; )
rwcole @ 52
Fuck, yeah!
Hugh @
38
uh- huh.
that purty much sums it up.
rwcole @ 52
I find the use of profanity to be something of an art form.
It can be done badly, or it can indeed be done well.
Fukitol
From Apocalypse Now:
Kurtz: We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won’t allow them to write “fuck” on their airplanes because it’s obscene!
-GSD
Let’s not gang up on DefJef. I understand some people find my writing style bothersome, and it can lead to all manner of misunderstandings. He asked a legit question, and I tried to give an answer, by way of my own accountability.
I’m not saying the thread can’t include spirited disagreement, and last night I took some crap, no problem. I rather enjoyed it, actually.
I’m just walking a little bit of a fine line here this afternoon to be sure no one walks away from all this accusing our commenting community of enforcing a no-dissent policy because a number of people happen to voice the same point of view. Those who agree with DefJef are more than welcome to chime in. No one’s pushing you out.
I use profanity here instead of my kids hearing me screaming it at the TeeVee.
Kids don’t hear words they shouldn’t from Mom and I can spew which is more healthy.
Pacha–You tellin us not to disagree with defjef- or what?
I always recommend the word “caca-bum”.
-GSD
rwcole @ 61
Fuckoff.
;-)
Pachacutec @ 63
Boy I was getting worried that someone else was blogging under your name… ;)
Pacha- much better!
Pachacutec @ 63
Ah, that feels so much better now. ; )
my only input on this: avoid swearing a lot in a foreign language in a foreign land. it’s too difficult to judge the intensity and appropriateness.
doesn’t keep me from uttering the occasional “putain de bordel de merde, espece d’encule!”, however….
Using the f-word, the c-word (in the English sense of describing someone as a useless individual, rather than the mysogynistic, American usage) all of the b-words (bloody, bugger, bollocks, bastard), along with “Wanker” are all appropriate when discussing G.W.Bush, IMO.
NZ Expat @ 49
be crafty. where there is will, you can find a way….
Serious and sustained disagreement and debate is a very rare occurance..Many people have never witnessed it. It is a rare specimen to be prized and supported.
Slip a C note into her pocket when she’s not looking
This is why I love Calitics…
They’ve been after her for quite some time.
Don’t worry…
We in the Golden State are keeping the heat on her. ; )
rwcole @ 70
I beg to differ!
j/k :~)
Pun- beg all ya want- yer fuckin WRONG!
Pachacutec @ 59..”enforcing a no-dissent policy”
I think your “Kirkpatrick” thread yesterday was a water-shed in breaching a possible unstated “no-dissent policy.” The comments were heated, at times ugly but still within the “civility” that is a hallmark of FDL. I have been lurking on FDL since it was only Jane and Redd was a commenter. Your Kirkpatrick thread was unique and I use the term as in the Latin definition.
Good points Pach! and I really hope folks think about the gang-up approach. DefJef asked a legitimate question about language and if we want to be effective advocates and activists, we should be thinking about language a lot. Audience and context matter - as does personal voice. I really like Pach’s response - claiming his own voice while respecting DefJef’s perspective.
In general, I think we do need to think about language - Do we slip too easily into fuckin’ this and that rather than look for a more interesting or more shocking or more effective expression? Is our goal expression or change? Does it always have to be the same - can we rant today and then provide more studied commentary tomorrow? and lots more …
language is always worth thought and discussion and hopefully is never a matter of dogma
rwcole @ 74
that’s it - we’re gonna have to take this outside!
DefJef @ 39
Perhaps, and you must allow me to apologize for agreeing with your supposition.
When you read the circumstances surrounding a post like Pachacutec has made here — read the links; investigate the many opinions, some biased, some legitimate, many ringing clarion true — I feel a violent sense of indignation is a valid human response.
Different people tend to express indignation in different ways and you cannot deny the current generation their attempts at righteous indignation; that would be a grievous sin against them and yourself.
While it is not your style, consider that history might have benefited from a similar display of righteous indignation. If the Italian people had had a collective voice to say, “We will not follow in the footsteps of this insane nationalistic dictator in embracing the concept of fascism for the sake of his FUCKING ego;” then Mussolini might never have been loosed upon the world.
But consider, above all things, they are but words. And, it is the power behind the words and the results of that power reaching out and effecting results which is of tantamount import.
They are but words, but wise men learn how to use them effectively or they go to their grave, realizing ineffectiveness. It sounds as your brother in law found a way to be effective; I ask that you have the courtesy to allow others to find theirs. And, I think we all must be wise enough to realize there will be some brush fire resulting from words which do fork lightening. Now, more than ever in my lifetime, is lightening called for.
Thank you Pach.
Gang, I’m headed out to grab some lunch. I’ll be back again to be offensive like my good DFH friend Jesus (quoted above) for Late Nite FDL.
Try to have a good argument while I’m gone.
pun- OK–Psst- where’s the door?
From A22 of this morning’s LA Times:
Well, duh!
I cancelled my subscrition to the LA Times because of their editorial policy- but they insist on sending the damned thing anyway.
Hey, Pach, great post, thanks!
[psst: The “Matt” link goes to Taylor’s blog, as does the “Taylor” link.]
DFHs RULE
johnswifty, i like your style.
rwcole @
82
F*****g c***s.
TeddySanFran @ 83
Damn, right!
NOW we all can start talking…
Teddy’s here! : )
Mommybrain @ 84
Ditto.
Oh, I forgot to say f@#$ - oh never mind.
It is becoming clearer by the day that Bush will have to be pulled kicking and screaming from Iraq, proving once again that he is too ignorant and stubborn to learn anything.
In Bush’s radio address today, he cherry picked those items in the Baker/Hamilton ISG report that seemed closest to his own “stay the course” views:
Of course, what Bush leaves out it is the contention of the ISG that in the absence of rapid progress in these areas we should leave. As the ISG report notes, these goals may take a long time but they are the Iraqis’ responsibility, not ours. Bush also ignores that a non-precipitous withdrawal as defined by the ISG is one that should be largely accomplished in just over a year. In addition to his deliberate misreading of the ISG report’s recommendations, he went on to express his intention to dilute the report’s findings as much as possible by his own tame and Bush approved study groups:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news.....61209.html
As I said, kicking and screaming.
TeddySanFran @
83
Fixed, sorry. Thanks.
Swifty–an elegant defense of profanity- but there’s no fuckin profanity in the whole fuckin thing- why the fuck’s that?
Saddam’s fucking nephew escapes prison in Iraq
DFHs RULE
Can I still be a DFH if I no longer have the appropriate amount of accompanying hair?
jayt @ 92
Depends. Have you bathed recently?
Mommybrain @ 84
Thanks, I like your brain!
I don’t know about you, but my hips alone now qualify me.
Can I be a DFH now if I was one in the 60’s?
Can you be a real one now without being one then?
I really F**k’n want to know?
rwcole @ 90
Oh, come on, I called it Mussolini’s FUCKING ego fur cripessake!
Mommybrain @ 93
well… yeah.
But I felt bad about it.