
(Today's book salon guest is Joe Maguire, who is a) author of Brainless and b) a former Reuters employee. His activities in "a" seem to have played a role in liberating him from "b." Please stop by in the comments section and welcome him -- JH. Update: C&L now has an interview with Joe up here.)
Greetings, firedogs! Today for the FDL book salon, we welcome Joe Maguire, author of Brainless: The Lies and Lunacy of Ann Coulter. I have been reading Maguire's book this week and several revelations hit me at once.
I had a friend who was a stripper for a while. One Sunday afternoon, I went with her to Revco or CVS so she could stock up on some work-related supplies. She breezed right by all the things that I thought she would buy, Paul Sebastian hair products, perfumes and eux de toilette, and all the nice makeup. She went straight to the bargain stuff. Giant cans of Aqua Net, two-for-five-dollars lipsticks and nail polish, candy-smelling body sprays.
"Why are you getting the cheap stuff?" I asked her, "You hate this kind of stuff."
"I would never wear any of this stuff in real life," she said, "but for stripping, the cheaper the better. You go through it all so fast. See, TRex, men who go to strip clubs are not very smart. In fact, most men aren't very smart or observant when it comes to women. If your hair is long and blond, they think it's fabulous. If you put on makeup with a putty knife, to them, you look preeeeeeetty. If you smell like candy and flowers, you smell good. Why spend the money for the good stuff?"
Then she quoted Flannery O'Connor, "When teaching the blind, you must draw huge bubble pictures. When teaching the deaf, you must scream."
And yes, Flannery O'Connor-quoting strippers are not as uncommon as you would think. Especially in today's economy.
Ann Coulter is like a right-wing stripper. She's an empty black dress. When you read Maguire's book (and you should) and see a compendium of Coulter's statements piled up together in all their contradiction and unintentional irony, you realize that really, there's nothing there except a jumble of fiercely stupid assertions, a lot of hair-dye, a plunging neckline, and skirt slit up to her upper thigh.
"Why?!" any sensible person wonders, "Why is this brownshirt cheerleader even allowed out of the psych ward, much less ceaselessly paraded before the public? Why, why, WHYYYYY?! She's not smart, she's not funny, and (in spite of what men like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity say) she's not sexy. She's got a face like a horse and a figure like a ten-speed bicycle. Why the hell do people love her so much?"
Well, first of all, it's not "people" who love her. It's one very specific flavor of angry, frightened, bigoted Reich Wing asshole. They love her because she says all the heinous, hateful things that they think but aren't supposed to say. She articulates their paranoid, paternalistic world-view and they just lap it up like poisoned honey. That's her base, and everything she says and does is aimed at them. And that's why she's so completely alien to anyone with a functioning brain. We can't comprehend, for example, why she always wears the same dress because she's not wearing it for us. She's wearing it for the men who go to strip clubs. All they see is the naked skin on her thighs and chest. All they hear is their own pinheaded world view streaming out of her mouth.
So, when Coulter says things like, "(N)ot only should women lose the right to vote, but women's liberation has led to exhibitionism, promiscuity, sex toys, and adultery" and you feel like your head is going to explode because, obviously, women's liberation is the only reason Ann Coulter isn't barefoot and pregnant and permanently chained to a stove, you have to bear in mind that she's not speaking for women. She's not even speaking for herself. She's atriculating the secret, toxic misogyny that the men who read her feel. She's trying to sell books, nothing more. It's a purely commercial exercise.
And that's why she has been allowed to proliferate and spread through the media like a runaway case of genital warts. Large swaths of the media are entirely controlled by the very species of racist, classist, misogynistic old fucktard who reads her. Which is undoubtedly why Mr. Maguire lost his job for publishing his excellent book. Ann's people heard about it, made some phone calls, called in some favors, and hey, presto, Maguire was terminated.
I personally hope that Joe's book goes all the way to the top of the bestseller list and parks there for a good long time. Not only would it be a blow against the Reich Wing media juggernaut, but it would be the perfect vindication for him as an author. I want him to someday be able to say, "Fuck Reuters. Who needs those bitchez? I'm rich, rich, RICH!!" Hooray! Please, buy a copy today. We may not be able to do the massive coordinated buy-outs that conservative book clubs do to push Coulter's illegible, hysterical, fact-free screeds up the charts, but we sure can get the ball rolling.
Please welcome Mr. Maguire to firedoglake. He's here in the comments section today to answer your questions and discuss the book and I personally couldn't be happier to have him. He is a hero for free speech, a rational voice standing up to Coulter and her people's mindless hysteria, and a damned fine writer. Brainless is sharp and funny, a great read, and balm for the part of your brain that has been roughed up and insulted by years of Coulter's bullshit. You're NOT crazy after all. It's Coulter who's insane. She may sell a lot of books, but then again, so did Adolf Hitler. It didn't mean he was right. It just meant that he figured out which lies would win him the most admirers, and he worked that angle for all it was worth. Coulter is precisely the same species of evil totalitarian midget. She has hit upon a successful formula and she's going push the envelope until the culture finally rediscovers its collective gag reflex and pukes her up on the carpet with the other hairballs. Brainless, hopefully, is the beginning of that process.
Thank you, Joe, for coming! And thank you, readers, as always.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Welcome, Joe.
Testing, one, two?
Thanks, TRex, for the nice intro — and thanks to Jane and everyone else involved for having me. It really is my pleasure.
Great intro Trex - and welcome to Joe!
I’m halfway through the book and fascinated! Folks really do need a copy … Joe knows snark and truth and communicates both.
Joe - could you say a bit about why you decided to take on Coulter?
Glad to hear you’re enjoying it, Siun. I hope you’re getting a giggle or two out of it, as well.
Welcome, Joe. We’re thrilled that you’re here.
giggling … and laughing loud enough to wake the house
you have a natural flare for snark and you use it so well
Why take on Coulter? Someone had to do it!
No — to be fair, many people (here at FDL and in other places) have been calling her on her BS for a long time now. I just thought it would be good to put it all together and really deconstruct her arguments, such as they are, in one central place.
At Barnes & Noble, of course.
So, Joe, when are you going on book tour, now that you don’t have to slave away in the Reuters salt mine anymore?
Thanks. It was about time I put my natural wise-assedness to good use.
Welcome Joe, thanks so much for being here.
Loving the literary pie in the face she so richly deserves.
Siun @ 4
I’m upto “Ann on Religion.” Very good stuff.
Ha! Well, the book tour thus far has consisted of my sitting in my apartment in sweatpants and a T-shirt doing dozens of radio spots across the country and stuff like this with you fine people.
Maybe you can call the folks at William Morrow and demand that they send me around the country — nay, the world — on a six-month promotional tour.
A darkblack gem!
Jane Hamsher @ 12
And unlike those Arizona students, Joe doesn’t miss.
Thanks for the thumbs-up, Matt O.
Joe — If I could draw your attention to this boneheaded passage from Ann Coulter on April 5.
As I emphasized in my post, she basically said only one person in this list was “indicted.”
DeLay was indicted last year. North was indicted, convicted, and later had it overturned, but that doesn’t null the fact that it was, indeed, an indictment.
So, Joe, to what do you ascribe Ann’s particular species of hateful lunacy? What on earth can have happened to her to make her this way?
Regarding the Reuters dispute, I have to say I could get used to being a man of leisure. Which is the nice way to say “shiftless layabout.”
TRex @ 16
Joe - I find it pretty interesting that someone with a solid background in financial reporting is the one to finally take on Coulter … but your willingness to actually track down things like bogus footnotes sure shows the kind of get the facts reporting that is missing from the political media at the moment.
Citizen Maguire:
Thanx for puttin’ yerself out there, I’m gunna get the book. Can you give us any understanding of the wheels inside the wheels of Reuters’ decision to let you go after your publication of this piece? Maybe your next book can be an autopsy of corporate media…
KEEP THE FAITH, ALL THEY GOT IS THE MONEY!!
Imagine that, Matt O. — an inaccurate statement. And one involving Joe McCarthy, to boot. (McCarthy, of course, being just the kindly, avuncular man we should all love.)
As for the origin of her “hateful lunacy”, as TRex put it, I think it’s a combination of things: At the perhaps overly simplified end, sibling rivalry as she tries to outdo two older brothers; and at the more complex (perhaps) end, what might really be a textbook case of narcissistic personality disorder.
John Amato says he’s going to have an interview with you up on C&L within the hour, Joe. Looking forward to it.
Well, Siun — I’m a journalist first, a financial journalist second. And trumping all that, I’m a person. And so when I see the tenets of journalism being shat upon, I take umbrage. No matter which asshole is the source.
Which, to answer NorskeFlamethrower’s question, is what makes the Reuters thing doubly disturbing. No matter how polarizing a figure Ann Coulter is, no matter how jokey and opinionated Brainless is, it speaks the truth. And THAT should be the first job of a journalist.
No matter how polarizing a figure Ann Coulter is, no matter how jokey and opinionated Brainless is, it speaks the truth. And THAT should be the first job of a journalist.
HEAR, HEAR!!
Joe Maguire @ 20
Blog comment troll who lives in a forest in order to watch the trees grow, publishes online from time to time, and eats only the darkest chocolate.
I should know!
When all is said and done, why is that Coulter enjoys popularity, at least among certain segments? I just don’t get. Is there a short answer? Of course, I ask, very infrequently, the same questions about Madonna and Britney Spears and a few others. When one gets down to it there doesn’t appear to be any “there, there”. So what’s the fascination?
Incidentally, one of the more disturbing things about Ann Coulter (and her book publisher and syndicate, as well) is her “the rules don’t apply to me” attitude about accurate sourcing and attribution — the hallmarks of good journalism.
The fact is, if you’re published weekly in 100 newspapers around the country, you’re a journalist, whether you want to be or not. And the rules DO apply to you.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 29
It’s like I said in the post, Hitler sold a lot of books, too. When you feel no compunctions about lying your ass off, you can say whatever it takes to make money.
Siun @
22
Seconded. Speaking truth to power, if you’ll forgive the cliche, seems to coming from quarters you wouldn’t expect. Reuters financial reporter, former sportscaster…
Congratulations, Joe, on having such exquisite aim!
Congratulations, Joe, on having such exquisite aim!
Indeed.
Welcome Joe.
I’m a lurker here but just had to jump in and ask why your “letting go” by Reuters wouldn’t be a juicy case of wrongful termination about 200 lawyers would die to take on contingency.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 29
Simply put, she gives voice to the bigotry and hatred that many people on the right can’t (without retribution) give voice to themselves. Let’s face it, if you’re a conservative politician, you can’t call Muslims “ragheads” and expect to be elected. You want people who use such terms to vote for you, of course, and so you let Ann Coulter do it for you — and draw the ire.
A comparison to Keith Olbermann? How flattered am I right now?!?
About a possible wrongful-termination suit, let’s just say that my lawyer is about to have some fun.
Narcissistic personality disorder — hm, now that’s interesting. DSM-IV says that is “a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy,” which seems to fit. This site suggests that it is caused by “very early affective deprivation” and is probably an irremediable condition.
Joe, how do you arrive at this conclusion? Is this based on something about her family history?
About a possible wrongful-termination suit, let’s just say that my lawyer is about to have some fun.
I’m glad to hear that. If there’s anything we in BlogLand can do to help out, please let us know.
I thought you section about Coulter and Kanye was really good at demonstrating how she works and how she knows precisely which buttons will connect with racist thinking, etc ….it’s a scary skill and it’s so important to have it called out as you did!
Of course, I also love that section coz I am not among the 37 but we won’t get into that!
Joe Maguire @ 36
it’s great when one enjoys one’s work
keep enjoying, and we’ll encourage all three of you
(Folks - remember you can click the Amazon link on FDL to buy Joe’s book - supports FDL and Joe in one click!)
Buckeye Hamburger @ 37
Well, she clearly has all the symptoms of the disorder. As for her family history, I point to a variety of authoritative sources on things such as birth order, her being the only female child, etc. as possible contributing factors. But the fact is, I’m not a psychologist (nor do I play one on TV), and so it’s hard to put things in concrete terms.
But it’s probably a safe bet to say that a domineering father (who was a “union-busting” lawyer, for good measure), combined with the above — and throwing in a privileged upbringing — and you’ve got a recipe for “me, me, me.”
My favorite chapter title in the book is Chapter One, “Annoyance Starts With Ann”. That about says it all, I think.
NorskeFlamethrower @ 23
I’d like to second that thought. What is going on with our corporate media and the journalists that once asked difficult questions of those in charge? It does seem to be somewhat similar to the talking head show producers that give someone like Coulter a platform. Is there any hope “journalism” will return to major news organizations? Or are we doomed to be spoon-fed FOX-lite on every channel and in every paper for the foreseeable future?
I was esp. disappointed that it was Reuters who did the deed - I’d always respected them as a better source than the usual but this will end up hurting them more than Joe I hope … in many ways.
TRex @ 43
Well, you gotta have a little fun!
One of the things I noticed about Ann a long time ago is that she and Tonya Harding have the same eyes. Even when their mouths are shut, they look like they’re screaming.
I think Joe has a great future as a blogger actually - he knows how to combine the serious fact checking (which we do do!) with the fun!
and the book is sooo much fun to read … laugh out loud fun
Trex@47 - nightmare image! egads!
Joe, have you had any direct, eh, “feedback” from the blond one in last night’s cocktail dress?
I’ve never read Coulter- my impression is that her books are simply full feature length bashes of invented opponents. Does she ever actually take a position that one could attack?
TRex @ 47
Yes, agreed. One can definitely see something swirling, dark and pinched-off looking back at you.
Siun @ 49
She really is the Tonya Harding of the pundit class. Here she comes to whack you across the knees with another brain-dead argument!
Hey, Siun — I really appreciate it. I think the fun in reading it comes from the fun in writing it. The opportunity to call out Ann Coulter on her crap was a great time.
Reading her four most recent books, on the other hand, was what one person recently compared to a stunt worthy of the “Jackass” movies.
I assure you it was far more painful.
Somehow, stapling my elbow to a 2X4 seems mild compared with fact-checking “Slander.”
I would just like to add my voice to the “Thanks, Joe!” chorus and add that I hope your lawyer has lots of fun :-)
TRex @ 47
I suspect that Ann would welcome the opportunity to kneecap a few people who get in her way, too.
I have a colleague (a prof, no less) who adores Coulter. I think it’s for the reason Joe states — these are guys who really think the stuff she says, but are afraid (in public, but not always in private) to say it. The guy I’m talking about always made me feel like I’d climbed out of a cess-pool after talking with him for any length of time. It’s really weird, and for the life of me I can’t understand what turned him into a fascist. I just can’t. Some kind of lumpenproletarian hatred, I guess. He was denied tenure at Dartmouth.
TRex @ 31
Good point… so considering how dangerous this type of behavior is (lying in print through major media outlets) what’s the consequence of such actions? If she keeps getting away with it what’s to stop others from lying and not facing negative consequences bush .
Somehow, stapling my elbow to a 2X4 seems mild compared with fact-checking “Slander.”
I used to work at a bookstore chain which shall remain nameless (*cough*BORDERS!*cough*) and one morning I was there and tired and irritable and I walked by a huge pile of copies of “Slander” and before I knew what I was doing, I had actually punched one in the face. There was just something about her smug, bitchy, rich-girl expression that lit up something primal and atavistic in me.
If only she could have been there in person. I would happily have broken her jaw.
rwcole @ 51
The beauty about Brainless (if I may be so bold) is that now you don’t HAVE to read Ann Coulter’s rubbish to be informed about her lies and lunacy. Brainless is your short-cut.
Seriously, you DO NOT want to read her books. Unless increased blood pressure and the urge to throw books through your picture window are your idea of a good time.
TRex @
16
Hey, in defense of the students at my alma mater, they still managed to show the harpy cowering in fear of a shaving cream pie.
Welcome Joe. I’ve purchased your book (and congratulations), but haven’t had the chance to read it yet, I’m afraid.
TRex @ 2:43 pm (#38)
I think if there’s any justice left in our justice system, this case should get a hearing. Toadying to power, if that’s what this really is, should be something that no journalistic institution would be caught dead doing.
Some people are attracted to negative energy because they are constantly filled with their own anger and resentment and need the reinforcent.
Cujo359 @ 62
Well, whatever happens, happens. The fact is, the dispute has been the best thing to happen to this book.
And whether I’ve been caught up in the aftermath of Reuters’s fake-photo scandal or if Ann herself got to someone (which I doubt) is a matter of debate.
Joe Maguire @ 35
I think you have nailed something very important. My surfing through the blogosphere over the past four years leads me to believe that she and her ilk do the dirty work for those that get elected. They hit the notes that trigger our reptilian brains but might or would surely raise some hugely negative responses if they were voiced by those running for office. It seems to me much of the leftish or progressive blogosphere folks do not serve this purpose and are not deliberately serving it for profit, however popular their blogs.
I’ll be buying the book soon and look forward to reading it.
Joe,
Have you sent a signed copy of your book to Ann? If not, I hope you will.
Really, what does it say about our society that Joe Maguire can get fired from Reuters for calling out a shrieking, venomous waste of perfectly good oxygen, yet the likes of Joe Klein keep their jobs?
And I won’t even comment on Katie Couric’s colonoscopy.
Knut Wicksell @ 57
Well that’s the scary part isn’t it? There is a lot of hate, intolerance and bigotry out there smoldering not so below the surface and mightily frustrated by “political correctness”.
This is the Republican constituency.
dwwenz @ 66
I’m hoping to hand her one in the green room before we debate on Bill Maher’s show. (No — I haven’t been booked yet. I’m just hoping!)
Actually, I gave a talk on free speech the other night at the People for the American Way here in New York, and they were kind enough to reserve a seat for her. It was raining pretty hard — I think she might have been stuck in a cab in traffic, and she didn’t make it.
Joe Maguire @ 69
Melting…melting…
Just for accuracy’s sake, Tonya’s didn’t do the whacking herself. It was Shane Stant — hired by Shawn Eckhardt and Tonya’s ex-husband Jeff Gillooly — who did the actual deed to Nancy Kerrigan.
After the Democrats take back this nation next month and in 2008, will we hear less, or more from this hottie babe, Coulter, in the future?
Sets the pretty sentences up on the mantlepiece to admire.
Shiny.
So, what are your future plans, post your world book tour of radio phone ins and fun with discovery in the metaphorical bowels of the Reuters organization?
watertiger @ 67
Disclaimer: I will never confuse myself with Bob Woodward.
But why is it that the Washington Post is more than happy to splash its name all over a book like “State of Denial”? I mean, it doesn’t get more slanted than that, does it?
One of the conditions I agreed to when I wrote “Brainless” is that I wouldn’t associate the Reuters name with it at all — thus making it an entirely personal endeavor. If Reuters thinks a corporate code of conduct can govern a personal endeavor, I wonder how they feel about CEO Tom Glocer’s recent comments that Dubya sees things in Manichean black and white, while he (and other at Reuters — and, yes, he invoked teh Reuters name on Charlie Rose) “live in a more complicated world”?
I wonder if Glocer has met with HR yet?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 72
Personally, and I say this with caution, I think Coulter may have jumped the shark this last summer when she went after the 9/11 widows. After that, her book sales halved every week that the book was on the charts. I think she has alienated all but her most stalwart fans, so we may be seeing the Twilight of Coulter.
We live in hope. And failing that, there’s always the chance she’ll OD and aspirate her own vomit and die. That notion makes me go all warm and fuzzy inside.
boadicea @ 73
Future plans?
Well, I should really clean my apartment. It’s filthy.
After that, I think I’m gonna give this book-writing gig a shot. Of course, I’ve gotta convince William Morrow that my next idea (whatever that may be) is worthwhile.
TRex says:
I look at pictures of her and I think she is the perfect expression of “GOP pretty.”
It was Bob Adams who said that “a liberal 2 is a conservative 10 — no wonder they hate us.” No woman with any self-respect could adopt a world-view in which women are just so many piles of useless garbage, hence the beauty that comes from within just doesn’t.
Most self-respecting women like to think that with the right lighting and makeup, and if we’re feeling upbeat and positive and doing something we feel good about, we can hit a liberal “6″ or “7″. But even when we’re feeling sick and bloated and flu-ridden and catch a glimse of our ashen-skinned selves in the mirror as we reach for the TheraFlu, it’s somewhat comforting to know we’d still be a ‘10′in the eyes of the GOP.
Trex - I prefer to think she’s holed up at one of her many houses reading Joe’s book and developing massive writers block and stage fright … I sorta like the idea of her cowering somewhere afraid of the light.
watertiger @ 67
Oh do.
Great job on the book–I hope it’s a huge success. What surprised you the most once you really started studying her work?
After that, I think I’m gonna give this book-writing gig a shot. Of course, I’ve gotta convince William Morrow that my next idea (whatever that may be) is worthwhile.
Ooh! Ooh! You should go after Michelle MalKKKin next! I’ll help!
On Ann’s looks: Let’s just all agree that she’s no Jane Hamsher, shall we?
Disclaimer: I will never confuse myself with Bob Woodward.
How do you look in a tux, cocktail weenie in one hand and a martini in the other, while laughing it up with the Secretary of State at a dinner your paper has thrown in her honor?
[alright, to be fair, that was the New York Times]
Except that if I were to draw the eye of the GOP myself, I’d only be tempted to poke it out.
With a spork.
Joe Maguire,
I can’t imagine reading a whole book about this woman, even if was the best profile written in the past fifty years. But, I’m glad you did it. Good luck with your next gig!
A couple of months ago, the Anchorage Daily News, Alaska’s largest circulation paper, had an article about Coulter making the media rounds, on the front page. I wrote a letter to the editor complaining about treating her as real news, when she’s nothing more than gossip column fodder.
I called her a “slut” in the letter. They phoned me and told me I had to change the term. I brought the subject up here at firedoglake, where commenters came up with several brilliant solutions, most of them hilarious. The one I used to replace “slut” was “meretricious purveyor of calumny.”
Jane Hamsher @ 79
No pun intended, right? ;-)
Coulter and many other “conservative” rock stars were born during the great blow job scandal. Their style and emotional attitude were the result of out of power goopers who were frustrated with liberals in power.
The fact that most people are now frustrated with goopers in power totally changes the emotional dynamic. The conservative rock stars- who once were agents for change- are now sorry assed apologists for a failed “movement”. No way they survive this- they’re toast- throw Rush on the same fire- he’s done too.
No way they survive this- they’re toast- throw Rush on the same fire- he’s done too.
Yeah, but stand clear of the grease-spatters.
LoneStarLiberal @ 80
As sad (and disturbing) as it sounds, what surprised me most is just how good Ann Coulter is at masking the lies. Her ability to hide the true source of the “information” she uses is astounding.
Which is not to pat myself on the back for peeling back the layers, because it really took some luck/serendipity to discover some of the more pernicious lies. I mean, her propaganda is downright Goebbelsian. (I just made that word up.)
Them turkeys practice “Gobbleism”.
ET - I was sorta not looking forward to reading Joe’s book - I hate Coulter and thought it would be like penance you know … but instead I sat howling with laughter (and scaring the pitpup) … you would serious enjoy this one - and get great ammo for your next letter to those editors!
TRex @ 88
Old Faithful’d have nothing on that geyser.
Lardorama!
Joe Maguire @
82
I move for unanimous consent.
Siun @ 91
Gotta admit, there’ve been dozens of LOL’s in this comment section, and it is just crankin’ up. I swear if Ann Coulter didn’t exist, TRex would have to go out and invent her……
The first thing that attracts me to a woman is how well her brain functions and how well it connects to her mouth. Not, God forbid, that I would ever have the opportunity to be with the lovely Ann, but I would, if necessary pay money, large money, if required, NOT to have a dinner date with Ms. Coulter’s brain and/or mouth. Coulter’s overall attribute for me, at least, is one of un-attractiveness.
Buckeye Hamburger @ 94
I second. No contest.
Looking forward to reading this book.
Joe, any final s