
If there has been one shining light in the past six dark years of the reign of the Boy King, it is how Henry Waxman has remained indefatigable in his pursuit to expose the kleptocratic abuses in DC. The article by Rajiv Chandrasekaran in the Washington Post last week about Mr. Ole 60 Grit Jim O'Beirne and the CPA in Iraq opened a lot of people's eyes, and Waxman is now requesting information and calling for the rug to be pulled back on all the war profiteering cockroaches:
When allegations of cronyism at the Coalition Provisional Authority first surfaced in 2004, the Defense Department denied that political ideology played any role in hiring decisions. However, recent media accounts directly contradict these claims, reporting that a Defense Department political appointee, Mr. Jim O'Beirne, directed an organized and systemic screening process to hire Republican loyalists for key CPA positions. In light of these contradictory reports, Rep. Waxman requests that the Pentagon produce documents related to the screening and hiring of "temporary political appointees" to fill key roles in the Iraq reconstruction effort, including:
- 1A list of the names of all individuals who were hired to work at the CPA (a) as temporary political appointees or (b) by Mr. O’Beirne or his staff, as well as the titles of their positions and descriptions of their employment responsibilities.
- 2A list of the names of all individuals who applied for, sought out, or were otherwise considered for temporary or full-time employment with the CPA, but were rejected by Mr. O’Beirne or his staff.
- 3Copies of all resumes, CVs, lists of references, letters of recommendation, and any other materials submitted by the individuals described in (1) or (2), as well as any notes or other evaluations of these individuals by Mr. O’Beirne or his staff.
- 4Copies of all communications, including e-mails, between Mr. O’Beirne or his staff and the Heritage Foundation, other think tanks, political activists, or the offices of members of Congress regarding potential CPA employees.
Finally, Rep. Waxman requests a briefing with Mr. Jim O'Beirne in advance of a Government Reform Committee hearing scheduled for September 28, 2006.
A group of Democratic Senators have also requested that the GAO examine the hiring practices of the Pentagon. I guess it's suddenly getting fashionable to ask these questions, but it should be noted that some have been writing about this for a long time.
What can I say, you want to know what's going on in the world, just troll through TBogg's 2004 archives.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search
Advice for the lovelorn
;>)
Waxman!
But do you suppose we’ll ever, ever seen any mention among the talking heads about Ole 60-grit’s vested interest in the Iraq fiasco?
darkblack @
1
good one, darkblack
This is what a 360, pedal to the metal, full-scale inquiry into the legality of codified hiring policies and practices looks like. Waxman will get an eyeful. I’m totally excited.
Randi Rhodes was talking yesterday about how some applicants were asked
a. did you vote for Bush in 2000,
b. do you approve of his handling of the war, and
c. Where do you stand on Roe v. Wade?!?!?
“yer either with us or aginst us” all the way, I guess.
c and l has…it’s the biggenst laugh I’ve had from congress in a VERY long time
check out the snark
Video-WMP Video-QT
Mr. Durbin: Will the Senator yield for a question?
Mr. Reid: I will be happy to yield for a question.
Mr. Durbin: Can the Senator refresh my memory? Was Mr. Bremmer the recipient of a gold medal or something from the President? Didn’t he receive some high decoration or medal for his performance in Iraq?
Mr. Reid: The answer is, yes, he received that. I assume one would expect that from somebody who had a throne while he was over there.
Mr. Durbin: Isn’t it also true that George Tenet, who was responsible for the intelligence that was so bad that led us into the war in Iraq, got a medal from the President the same day?
Mr. Reid: That is true.
Mr. Durbin: Did Michael Brown with FEMA receive a gold medal from the White House before he was dismissed?
Mr. Reid: I don’t think he did. Even though he was doing a heck of a job, I don’t think he obtained a medal from the White House.
Mr. Durbin: Apparently, these gold medals were being awarded for incompetence. They missed Mr. Brown, but they did give one to Mr. Bremmer. Will the Senator yield for another question?
Mr. Reid: I will be happy to.
Mr. Durbin: I am trying to recall the exact number — it was in the billions of dollars — that we gave to the President for the reconstruction of Iraq; is that not true?
Mr. Reid: It started out at $18 billion. But as the Senator from Illinois will remember, part of that money, stacks of one-hundred-dollar bills, was used by some of the contractors who were sent over there to play football games — some of these same people.
Mr. Durbin: It is also true, is it not, that the Democratic policy conference has been holding hearings — in fact, I think it is the only agency on the Hill holding hearings — on this waste and abuse, this profiteering and corruption at the expense of American taxpayers and even, equally important — more importantly — at the expense of our troops?
Mr. Reid: I say to my friend, this war is approaching 3 1/2 years, and there has not been a single congressional oversight hearing on the conduct of the war. This war has now cost us, the American taxpayers, about $325 billion. There has not been a single congressional oversight hearing on the war.
Mr. Durbin: I ask the Senator from Nevada if he might comment on this as well: Are we not in a situation where the President has told us that he wants to “stay the course’’ in Iraq, and Vice President Cheney, when asked a week ago, said he wouldn’t change a thing in the way they have done this war in Iraq? Is it very clear that unless there is a change in leadership in this town soon, we are going to continue down this disastrous course, exposing our soldiers to danger every single day, their families to the anxiety of separation, and the taxpayers of this country to billions and billions of dollars more being spent that don’t make us any safer?
Mr. Reid: I say to my friend, I spent the weekend reading a book. I did other things. I spent a lot of time on an airplane. The book is called “Fiasco,’’ written by a man named Thomas Ricks who has spent his life covering the military. He has written books on the military. I don’t know his political persuasion. This book is on the best seller’s list of the New York Times.
The Dentist Who Knew
Dentist who claimed to have met 3 of the 9/11 hijackers in Shreveport and notified the FBI about them was poisoned while working on a manuscript, and finally passed away last week.
Big coincidences…
db, very, very poignant, not to mention true.
Ties into the Alphonso Jackson mindset at HUD, too…’Step to the right, or no cake for you’.
Unamerican, period.
mutzali @
5
Those are the kinds of questions that throw us back to the ’50’s. It’s as if these guys never lived through the civil rights era.
Waxman should be paid a million dollars a year. He is one of the few true, ethical, hard charging and relentless public servants still left in Washington.
Perhaps Mr. Waxman can look a little further into the tenure of Dirty Bernie Kerik.
-GSD
I have been singing Waxman’s praises for quite some time. If you look back at every major mess-up (Soldier’s body armour, voting machine fraud) you will find that Waxman is the guy going out and trying to get answers out of everyone.
He is this congresses Truman, and if the R’s lose this Nov, he will have subpoena authority!
Mmmm…meet the New Ba’ath, same as the old Ba’ath.
-GSD
Bernard Kerik, Iraqi Police Forces / Coalition Provisional Authority. “In May 2003, a team of law enforcement experts from the Justice Department concluded that more than 6,600 foreign advisers were needed to help rehabilitate Iraq’s police forces. The White House dispatched just one: Bernie Kerik . . . The first months after liberation were a critical period for Iraq’s police. Officers needed to be called back to work and screened for Baath Party connections. They’d have to learn about due process, how to interrogate without torture, how to walk the beat. They required new weapons. New chiefs had to be selected. Tens of thousands more officers would have to be hired to put the genie of anarchy back in the bottle. Kerik held only two staff meetings while in Iraq, one when he arrived and the other when he was being shadowed by a New York Times reporter, according to Gerald Burke, a former Massachusetts State Police commander who participated in the initial Justice Department assessment mission. Despite his White House connections, Kerik did not secure funding for the desperately needed police advisers. With no help on the way, the task of organizing and training Iraqi officers fell to U.S. military police soldiers, many of whom had no experience in civilian law enforcement ‘He was the wrong guy at the wrong time,’ Burke said later. ‘Bernie didn’t have the skills. What we needed was a chief executive-level person. . . Bernie came in with a street-cop mentality.’” (Washington Post, 9/17/06)
http://releases.usnewswire.com.....p?id=72728
Darkblack,
That was such a heart wrenching photo. To be jilted for $$$’s because we know that is what that particular devil is whispering into W’s ear. Sad.
I recently rented a Feature Presentation titled Poseidon. It’s about a country whose political leaders and media refuse to expose false flag terrorism.
a href=”#comment-304226″>beth meacham @ 2
Let’s see if Matthews will ask Kate next time she is on to spew Repug talking points? I mean, since he thinks the war in Iraq is “bullshit”
“(O’Beirne) and his staff used an obscure provision in federal law to hire many CPA staffers as temporary political appointees, which exempted the interviewers from employment regulations that prohibit questions about personal political beliefs.
http://warrenreports.tpmcafe.c.....the_rescue
Noting that Waxman can only ‘request’ the Pentagon provide the documents, without subpoena power we can only ‘rely on the kindness of strangers’ - I’m not holding my breath.
“Who’s Running the War?”
Who are those guys?
Representative Waxman must have already collected the information he’ll need to go full speed ahead investigating the Republican crooks and liars once there’s a Democratic majority. Dorgan has also tried, without success, to get some accountability from the thugs. Both will need food tasters in the days ahead.
meta @ 10
They fervently wish it had never happened, and would like to rectify that error as quickly and thoroughly as possible.
Oklahoma kiddo @
20
Okiddo, do you mean this in a Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid kind of way?
The whole Waxman letter is quite the gem. If Rumsfeld deigns to give him what he’s asked for, someone’s gonna be burning the midnight oil at the Pentagon putting together the stack of documents Waxman asked for.
September 28th - that’s one week.
On the other hand, if Rumsfeld decides NOT to give Waxman what he’s asked for - which he can do, since this is a polite request and not an official subpoena, we need to be ready to back up Waxman and make life a bit more miserable for every Pentagon spokesperson who steps up to a microphone and every Republican apologist for the Pentagon that does the same.
“Ideology before Competence” is no substitute for “Duty-Honor-Country.”
The Bushies seems to have problems with oversight in the US also. Today’s NYT has an article about 4 Dept. of Interior auditors suing their department for allowing them to recover oil royalties.
Interior Dept leasing
One day this site will take on Mel Sembler in conjuction with the General and then my town (St. Pete) will become a place to live again. Until then it will continue to hold fundraisers for HolyJoe under my nose. I am sorry I wasn’t there to cause a scene. Off to be a mom. See you all in the morning.
25 should have read “not allowing them to recover oil royalties”
Sorry about the goof.
LindaR @ 23
Well… now that you mention it, yes I do.
We got the 60 Grits, we got Campbell Brown and Dan Senor, we got Matalin and Carville, we got Chrisitan Amanpour and Jamie What’s-his-name, we got (had, thank god) Daryn Kagan and Rush; we got Andrea Mitchell and Greenspan; how many others do we got? How many more of these whacked out unions am I forgetting. I’d like to see an org. chart detailing just how incestuous the Beltway/Mainstream Media/Lobbyists really are. Can somebody get on that, please? It might open a few eyes.
Waxman will probably only hear crickets chirping. I’m still waiting for all those photos with Bush/Abramoff complete with detailed log books of his Whitehouse visits. Remember that kids?
Oh, and the five star employees that Mr. Grit hired were in charge of nation building. Ronald Dumsfeld is in charge of the destruction part. Seems like they’re on the same team tho’.
Saddam is sitting in jail for torturing his people. Bush just received an “okay” to torture Saddam’s people. So, why is Saddam in jail if he had no WMD and tortured his own people?
Seems like I was reading a couple of years ago about hundreds of millions of dollars that had gone missing in Iraq, and there was barely a whisper about it. A couple of years ago was, of course, a Presidential election year. No need to bring that unpleasantness up to upset the voters and make them think the Democrats are a bunch of dangerous radicals.
I must be mistaken ;)
… Oh, good. The ironymeter’s still unplugged.
OT although the mindset is the same. My favorite from Froomkin today concerned the story of Maher Arar the Canadian who was deported to Syria and torture. Gonzales denied it.
Unfortunately, Arar’s deportation was a matter of public record.
So what was Gonzales’s response?
Yeah, that’s what Gonzales meant. When in doubt, lie. When caught, obfuscate.
Since the Repubs aren’t much into oversight, except for their wallets, it certainly is time for replacements with brain cells. The Sacramento Bee endorsed Charlie Brown,CA-4, on the 18th which is good news.
Thanks Jane, btw, it was awesome to see you on KO last night. IMHO, you really have the skill set it requires. I hope it was the first of many visits to KO and other shows.
When the Republicans took over running the Congress after the 1994 elections, I was home a lot and watching a lot of CSPAN, having been disabled in a car accident. I remember watching the Rules Committee meetings and being appalled at the way they didn’t even try to pretend to show any manners to the Democrats. Their attitude was basically, “STFU. We have ultimate power.”
Meanwhile, on the California Channel, the Republicans were deregulating energy with gleeful abandon.
It doesn’t matter who, specifically, is running the war — as far as individuals. Corporatism is running the war, as it is running everything now.
The underlying assumption is that what serves the corporation is good and what serves the human citizen is class warfare. This assumption allows congress to (figuratively, of course) close its eyes, lie back, and spread its legs, and not even ask for a kiss anymore.
Individual members are fungible. And though we like to think with Democrats in power things will be different, I think we’re going to have to be ever vigilant to make it so.
Just goes to show, you shouldn’t hire staff for something important the same way they hire staff for the National Review.
TBogg AND Matt O.
Waxman and Conyers have pushed and pushed and pushed.
BTW - did Rumsfeld ever respond to the one and only subpoena that seems to have gone out of the Rep committees? The one that Shays agreed to send out and which was supposed to have a July response date? I never hear anything (it was primarily on whistleblower issues).
I got the book yesterday. Imperial Life in the Emerald City. I’m about a third of the way though it, unreal!
“Bush, and GOP rebels agree on detainee bill”
GOP rebels? What a blatant, and oh so characteristic Rove charade. Problem is; a lot of people may fall for it.
cujo359 #32,
That’s a good point. Fraud in the UN’s oil for food program drove conservative UN bashers crazy (although a lot of it was not exactly unknown and was tacitly condoned at the time) but the $8-9 billion the CPA lost, not so much.
ccmask - I wonder when someone will ask Bush (let’s put our money on never) whether or not:
In the Iran/Iraq conflict - the Kurdish rebels met his definition of being “enemy combatants” and if not, why not. And if so, should all torture short of that causing organ failure and death be waived at his trial and should organ failure and death only be charged if his intent was something other than protecting his country.
Swopa @ 36
Best line of the month.
By the by, how often is Jane allowed to be on Keith’s show? You were great. And my poor family couldn’t hear you over my repeated screams of “Its Jane. Its Jane.”
Husband: “Do you know her?”
Geez
Oh, come on! Jane is a freakin star! She knows all the questions and she has all the answers. The only reason she isn’t a nightly regular is because she’s on the wrong side! I mean, after KO last night, if the media was liberal I fear we’d be sharing her big time. Compare her with O’Beirne (the crook’s wife) and Coulter (?). These women are nothing but hate-filled cannoli’s.
OT:
Did anyone read David Broder today?
I sent him an email:
On the subject of fiascos,
Notice how the conversation has completely shifted from “will we attack Iran?” to “how we will attack Iran.” From the question to the methods. The entire media has been absolutely complicit in this, saturating us with hastily sewn rationale at the whim of Bush’s desire for new fodder.
It’s been suggested that Bush’s UN speech was so very clever because it was addressed to the Iranian people rather than the government. But as Jessica Matthews (of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) critiques it, this was not the case at all. For if it were, it would have employed a language Iranians could relate to. Instead, Bush’s speech was littered with Americans political terms such as “freedom,” “democracy,” “elections.” Matthews argues that, for the Muslim world, “freedom” is not the operative word. “Justice” is more appropriate to their reality. Bush’s terms don’t translate when all they see every day is broken systems and civil war.
Bush’s false choice of either a nuclear Iran or military action do not have a chance of working. He could have ratified the nuclear test by treaty and worked that way. But now we are on the cusp of losing the non-proliferation regimes. And by demonizing Iran - good guy/bad guy Bush policy on nuclear weapons (India 0k, Iran not OK) – his “policy,” such as it is, will never work. Once again, many wasted years of doing nothing has gotten us to where we are now, and the media is all too happy to help Bush repeat our past mistakes.
me to me @ 6– saw it live and it was brilliant! All the while streaming cspan 3 with Dorgan et al and the DPC– simultaneous ka-boom!
When Rumsfeld and DoD seized control of Iraq reconstruction management from the State Dept. (not that State and USAID are a whole lot better), I knew that all this would come to pass. DoD is, frankly, a corrupt den of iniquity and has been for decades. DoD practically invented the revolving door, and the situation got immeasurably worse during the Reagan years. That set the standard from then to 2001, and Rumsfeld and his cronies have now reached new depths–they’re so far down in the muck that they must have been issued breathing equipment….
Oilfieldguy @ 30
Oh, you mean these log books . . .
Of course, it took a lawsuit to pry them loose, not a politely worded letter.
OFG: This is why he hates the left bloggers:
The center is beginning to fight back. Michael Bloomberg, the Republican mayor of New York, is holding a fundraiser for Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat running as an independent against the bloggers’ favorite, Ned Lamont.–BIG BAD BRODER
Oilfieldguy @ 46
Very coherent, with very telling points. Good job.
I’ll say one thing for you Jane.You sure do your homework.This war has been a catastrophy
made worse by those hoping to profit from it.
Great reporting!
Peterr @ 49
Heck, that just happened yesterday and the story in todays paper. Lookout Iran!
Give me a break. Regarding the detainee theater: I’m supposed to think that McCain, Warner and Graham are statesman?
“Who’s Running the War?”
Somebody is running this thing? Could fooled me. *g*
Rummy spends his days with Darth in the bunker tellin’ tall tales, arm wrestlin’, chewin’ tobaccky, and playing, yep you guessed it, gin rummy (or vodka when the gin runs out).
Junya says that they’re going to let him drive it one of these days, but only if he promises not to tell Poppy.
Poppy never would give him the keys ’cause Junya always drove with his eyes closed.
Said that a Spirit told him that closing his eyes would someday make him the King in the land of the seein’.
BTW: Broder should have said “……Sen. Joe Lieberman, a failed and voted out of office Democrat, running independently in the “Lieberman for Connecticut Party” against the good people of Connecticut’s favorite, Ned Lamont.–
fran @ 52
The worse it gets, the higher the profits. Double or nuthin on Iran!!
Oilfieldguy #46,
Good comment, to the all knowing, all powerful
OzBroder. As ccmask said in the last thread, Broder is losing it. He makes stupid statements like the Plame Affair is a tempest in a teapot, gets called on it, gets angry, makes more stupid statements, gets called on those, and gets angrier. It’s a positive feedback loop and I’m assuming at some point his head will explode.Unless someone instructs me otherwise, I am going to Spotlight this post to as many places as I can. I just googled on Jim O’Beirne’s name and the original “War Profiteering” story that broke in the WaPo does not appear to be gaining traction with the TM, yet. Or if they are, they are not including Jim O’Beirne’s name and that imo is crucial because Kate is pimping Iraq so much.
An unlikely ally, however, did pick it up.
From Howard Kurtz on 19 September 2006.
I’d like to take Graham, McCain, Warner and Hillary and book them into a little hotel just outside the ‘green zone’.
Oilfieldguy @ 46
meta - on language, speaking to the people in the area, the morass, etc., it has been linked at least once I think, but the Harper’s articleon 6 Questions with Emile Nakhleh has a lot of insight in a small amount of space.
Nakhleh worked with the CIA for 15 years and was “Director of the Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, the intelligence community’s premier group dedicated to the issue of political Islam.”
He’s not gunning for anyone, but he sure isn’t pulling punches.
On the ramifications of the War on Terror:
On “democratizing” the Muslim world:
He also mentions that going to Iraq hoping for a big wet Shiia kiss while at the same time supporting militarily and politically oppressive dictator based Sunni regimes - not a great way to set up the date.
And on staying the course in Iraq:
emph added
Soviets in Afghanistan, US in Saudi Arabia’s holy cities, then US in Iraq - all stimulants to jihad. Like water on a chia pet.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 55
Yes, you are. The statesmen of Oceania. The Karl “Kabuki” Rove intermission is over and the final act now begins.
Repugs have now saved the Republic and wouldn’t ya know, just in time for the elections.
The
Rapturefantasy continues…Oklahoma kiddo @ 61
Nah - just change the names and ship them to GITMO after their legislation gets put into place and have them explain how they manage to get out. Seriously. There’s the question for Graham. Walk us through the process if Pres Bush has you disappeared under a different name to GITMO, Sen Graham. Under your legislation, how do you ever get to leave?
Thanks Mary
forceat 5:22.This is the Iraq website for the CPA. The last story was published in 2004. Wierd
http://www.cpa-iraq.org/pressreleases/
Hugh @ 4:57 pm (#41)
Yes, I seem to remember that, in certain circles, talk of the U.N.’s corruption and general mendacity was all the rage, but no one seemed to take much notice of that other thing. This clearly is a “recovered memory”, though, and we shouldn’t trust it. After all, the opposition party would have brought such a profligate waste of taxpayer dollars to our attention, don’t you think?
Mary, thanks so much for the info and link. We are mired in a web of hypocracies so intertwined and iterative, it will take a whole new agency to sort it all out.
Cujo359 @ 67
Bingo!
JC - the whole thing is worth the read, but here’s why I read it -
On Guantanamo:
But hey - why let them have judicial review when they are being illegally held under any definition or concept of enemy combatant and as such are not susceptible to military detention or trials?
What is so freaking outrageous is this stuff is completely unknown by the public, most of whom would not support it at all, and yet it’s not “hidden” information. It’s just drowned out in the sea of Dancing with the Stars and lies that are delivered in a PR format where they are not susceptible to questioning or revelation as lies. And Dems who don’t want to ask questions (and well over 50% of Americans think torture is just plain wrong period for always and ever, even with the stupid ticking time bomb issue - so how FREAKING MANY do they think are in favor of paying bounties to get innocent people so we can cart them to a legal limbo hellhole and have them around for sadism and torture on request for YEARS and with no possiblity of any recourse any time in their future, but for the “grace” of our ever graceful President?
I hope to God the lawyers involved end up in a hell where they are given all kinds of laws and are told to make an argument to get themselves released, then when they make it, they get a pat on the back, told they are right, and tossed back into hell forever because someone forgot that there should be a little thing called habeas or right to judicial review.
When I was a kid and Henry Waxman was a freshman congressman, I used to babysit for his kids. He and his wife always had money to pay me at the end of the evening and never shorted me. I’ve liked him ever since then. And that’s my only “celebrities I have known” story.
ccmask @ 5:27 pm (#66)
I think the CPA was dissolved at about the same time Bremer left Iraq. So far (I’m about halfway through) the “historical review” seems remarkably long on generalities and very short on specifics.
…a spokesman for Halliglutton said: Millions? With and ‘M’?
*wink
John Casper @ 69
Faux touted that line haaaard and still has not let go… of it… grrrrrr, give me my squeaky, chewy toy! aarff, aarff! Kofi bad, Bush good.
Mary4 sez:
Reminds me of my favorite Grant Gilmore quote:
Henry!!
My hero!! Best Rep. in congress.
New post y’all. I believe that EPU has bestowed his power upon me.
For the Republicans to claim that this whole torture thing was a victory for them is laughable. They do this every time things go badly for them. Rovians come out from under their rocks and claim victory. And why not - black is white and yes is no.
I’m sorry, but the fact that Colin Powell broke his silence to object - and perhaps worse yet, former Secretary of State George Schultz came out against what BushCo was proposing (Schultz set up Bush’s National Security team in 2000) is not a big win.
I’m sure it was also the Rovians putting out the meme (repeated by idiots like Dana Milbank) that the discussion about the President of the United States asking Congress to override The Geneva Convention and legalize torture was a great thing because it kept the focus off of Iraq, doesn’t even make sense. (And, gee, didn’t I hear Cokie Roberts use those exact same words the other day on NPR? Way to go with those Rove talking points!)
I don’t know about you, but when the discussion turns to torture, I think of those ghastly pictures of Abu Gharaib. How is that not related to Iraq?
Don’t buy the BS. BushCo was desperate to get something on the books to retroactively legalize all the waterboarding ordered by the administration, because the Red Cross is about to pay a visit to the prisoners in Guantanemo and a lot of dirty laundry is about to be revealed.
I do hope the Dems have been playing out this chess game several steps ahead of BushCo, knowing full well that Rove is desperate to keep the focus on terrorism and not the failure in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon - and to label Dems as soft on terrorism. He certainly doesn’t want the focus on the ongoing slaughter in Iraq and how Halliburton, CACI, etc have been robbing the American people blind and short changing & endangering US troops placed by BushCo in harm’s way.
And there’s a lot I don’t like about Dems in the Senate & House, but I can’t believe for a minute that they were counting on McCain for anything.
I’d love to see Jane debate Ann Coulter - Jane, a smarter, better-looking blonde, would cause Ann to melt down totally.
I hope God isn’t holding Halliburton stock or we’ll get screwed again. Hopefully he had a lot of Enron.
Kathryn in MA @ 80
That would be a true waste of any and all of Jane’s time and talents. There is no sport or humor in bear bating. It would be like Einstein debating time/space physics with, well, me.
EPU’d….did anyone see this article about the CIA refusing to operate the secret prisons anymore thus Bushco trying to get immunty retroactively…if this’s been here before, sorry to bother you….
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092106A.shtml
I got tired of my congresscritters pretending to be crickets when torture is being discussed - they may be talking, if they are, but it isn’t being reported - and I’m sending them this (with no hope of any action):
I have been registered and voting as a Democrat since [year]. I am writing now to express my deepest disappointment at the lack of response by you and other Democrats in Congress on the issue of torture and the Geneva Conventions.
What I would like to hear from you, as individuals and as a group, is something like this:
We [as Americans and as Democrats] believe that torture, under whatever name, and in whatever form, is unAmerican and evil: UnAmerican, because we were founded on the principles that all men are created equal, have value in themselves, and should be equal before the law; that we should be ‘a light unto all the nations’, and an example of how countries should behave in the world. Evil, because torture, under whatever name and in whatever form, treats humans as disposable objects, mere things to be used up and thrown away when done with. We believe that those who authorize torture, under whatever name and in whatever form, those who say that it should be done, those who say that it is permissible in time of war, should be charged with war crimes and tried, under the rules of the international court at the Hague.
What I have been hearing from you, as individuals and as a group, is [sound of crickets].
Your silence jeopardizes the future of this country.
Sorry, that should be ‘talking, but if they are, it isn’t being reported’.
Preview should be my friend.
P J Evans - thank you - you said it all!
Siun - You’re welcome! (That one was writing itself on my way home, triggered by Pelosi and Rangel going after Hugo Chavez and ignoring all this stuff sitting right in front of them. And it’s saved on the machine, too.)
PJ Evans at 84
Very well said.
Mark, feel free to use it. Hear that, y’all?
I’m glad the wapo article opened somebody’s eyes but some of us have known about the CPA situation for years:
http://www.harpers.org/BaghdadYearZero.html
Naomi Klein RULES. Waxman’s staff should certainly read that article if they haven’t yet.
These moments when the alignment of events
shines a bright light on the weak spots of
the arrogant power abusers are the best.
I am reminded of the scene in the STAR TREK
movie “FIRST CONTACT” where the BORG CUBE’s
weak spot is pinpointed by Pecard and the
Federation Star Fleet concentrates its fire
power on that spot. BORG CUBE’s relentless
advance comes to an explosive end in short
order. Not to credit the GOP or Bush2WH with
anything like the BORG in terms of integrity
of operation or mission focus. Just like the
idea of finding the unknown “weak spot” which
any investigation of corruption into CPA surely
is and concentrated fire of inquiry. Explosive
results surely must follow as GOP runs and the
Bush2WH run from their deplorable CPA record.
AZ Matt @ 34
AZ - That’s very good news. I met Charlie at Yearly Kos & have given him a contribution several times already. Glad to see that my money is going to a challenger who just might upset a venal incumbent. I’m from Madison, WI. where my incumbent, Tammy Baldwin, is in a pretty safe Democratic seat giving me the luxury of donating elsewhere.