
As Christy reported, Judge Reggie Walton set the start date for Scooter Libby’s trial last week. Jury selection begins on January 16, and the trial starts immediately thereafter. I’ve got to give Jennifer Nix a couple of months to do her magic with the manuscript, so that means I’ve got just over two months to write this book.
Since so many FDL readers have already contributed to this project, it’s only fair that I tell you what it will include and how I expect to get it done in time.
Our goal is to bring this book out just in time for the trial. We’ve got three goals for it
- Provide a primer of the events and the people involved in the Plame Leak so those just tuning in as Scooter takes the stand will know how he got there
- Show how the cocktail weenie culture of Beltway journalism was complicit in the leak, both during the actual leak phase, and in helping Libby and Rove game the investigation
- Challenge the narrative Libby’s lawyers want to tell about the events
When Scooter Libby’s lawyers try to pretend Judy Miller is someone who would lie to incriminate Libby, this book will remind the public that Judy Miller bent over backward to save Libby’ ass.
So how am I going to get it done in time?
As some of you have guessed, this thing didn’t just come out of the blue. Jane and I first talked about this at YearlyKos. After I returned home in June, I finished up my most recent Anatomy of a White House Smear series, which covers everything except Novak’s and Armitage’s recent disclosures. That’s already 35,000 words long, and this book is targeted to be 55,000 words long. I’m going to have to totally rewrite that, though, because the Anatomy series wasn’t written for people who were just tuning into the story.
In addition, there are three chapters and a Preface which aren’t included or developed fully in the Anatomy series. I’ll add a chapter showing that the Administration had been warned their WMD claims were false. I’ll have a chapter integrating the beginning of the leak more closely with Judy Miller’s reporting in Iraq. And I’ll have a chapter showing how the administration laundered classified information through journalists so they could use it to support their claims for war. I’ve made a substantial start to all three of these chapters.
Then, there’s the stuff I am adding to turn my “deep in the weeds” details into a story that does justice to the archetypal scope of both the villains and heroes of this story. Jane’s giving me her best Hollywood coaching on this stuff, for which I am very grateful.
And finally, there are the developments to come. One of the biggest advantages of the blogs to books format is its timeliness. We will integrate events that occur just over a month before the trial. Who knows? Maybe I’ll get to tell the story of a Cheney indictment! In any case, the best way to stay up to date—and make sure crummy journalists don’t set this narrative unchallenged—is to continue blogging the subject.
I intend to continue blogging—and updating my narrative as I go.
Which leaves the Preface, which is where you all get to contribute … again. The Preface is where we explain to those unfamiliar with the Internets, blogs, and particularly the Firedoglake and Plameologist communities, why a bunch of ordinary citizens have spent so much time following this story. We’re going to explain what we as bloggers and commentors brought to this story that the traditional media couldn’t, or wouldn’t. We’re going to claim credit for our scoops. And we’re going to talk about the importance of citizen journalism, particularly in an era where the government is trying to protect its power by cowing us into silence.
I’ve already started drafting the Preface. But I could use your help. I’d like to use this thread as a brainstorming session to make sure I don’t forget anything important and to make sure the Preface reflects the viewpoints of the community. So in the thread, please provide your feedback on the three following questions:
- What are the scoops the blogosphere has gotten before the mainstream media—things like eRiposte’s work on the Niger forgeries, Jane’s scoop on Viveca Novak or Christy’s and my discovery of Libby’s insta-declassification of the NIE?
- What are the special skills and contributions the blogosphere has brought to this story—things like Christy’s and Jeralyn’s expertise as lawyers, or pollyusa’s and the DKos Plame Timeline’s remarkable catalogs of all the events and the coverage of the scandal?
- Why does this matter to you? Particularly if you first came to FDL because of Jane’s and Christy’s Plame coverage (or TNH because of my own Plame obsessions), what was it about the story that you thought was so compelling?
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FITZ!
MARCY!
Truth!!!
Justice!!!
And Marcy Wheeler!!!
Olbermann!
I actually think I may have finished the “Administration knew their claims were false” last night–well, drafting it, anyway.
If you can, please go to the donate link below the thermometer on the right sidebar to help us reach our goal to finance Marcy’s book publication.
Thanks, and thanks to those (including my Mom) who have already donated (Mom kicked in a C-note, beating my $50).
Oh, and repeat contributions are accepted ;-}
And don’t forget to donate to the book right up there ^ by the thermometer.
$100 bucks from 650 readers should be doable although any amount you contribute is most appreciated.
Donate here: CIA Leak Investigation Book by Marcy Wheeler
All that, and a bag of chips!!!
Why is this important to me?
Because I am an American citizen who believes in the rule of law; I find it an outrage that an operative working under deepest cover, at risk to themselves and loved ones for the sake of this country, could be so callously treated, could be expended like so much used tissue by men who have never faced comparable risks in their lifetimes.
Because I am a mother, the co-head of a family, and I’m fed up with the blather of the right-wing about progressives’ perceived lack of so-called family values. Why is the right-wing not as outraged about the outing of a mother of toddlers, and the exposure of all the other families she surely was in contact with during her service to our country?
That’s for starters.
Go, Marcy, go!!!
Thanks for that Pach–Javascript has just declared me dead to it, so I’m having trouble linking anything!!
Marcy - this is getting exciting! Here’s another chunk for this most essential book!
Thank you so much.
Question 4: What should the title be? [Can we have a contest to name it?]
Looks like a good thread to discuss OT’s on prior threads.
Just a quick reminder. I have noticed a chorus of folks who want to donate but cannot and or will not use paypal.
scarecrow @ 12
Tenatively it’s “16 words.” But I don’t know whether the folks running this show like that or not.
Eureka Springs, AR @ 14
Yes, people have been asking for a PO box — there is at least one request every time I post the donate link in the comments.
Eureka Springs, AR @ 14
Very true - I bet there are thousands of dollars in the form of checks that will roll in once you set up a P.O. box!
Thank you for performing this service. I eagerly await the book and my donation has been made via paypal (last week).
Rayne @ 9
Rayne
Thanks. That’s precisely the kind of thing I want to include in the preface.
“About Those Sixteen Words”
Why does this matter to you? Particularly if you first came to FDL because of Jane’s and Christy’s Plame coverage (or TNH because of my own Plame obsessions), what was it about the story that you thought was so compelling?
That’s why I first showed up, and that’s when FDL took off like a jet Plame.
Why? It was an egregious, easy to fathom atrocity, with appealing protagonists and evil villains. And I was ramping back up my interest in politics following my deep mourning after the 2004 election debacle.
hey, there’s a picture up top now :)
Dem campaign spot:
Clusterfuck on screen sayin “Our strategy is simple- as Iraqis stand up- american troops will stand down- and we will leave”
Freeze frame on Clusterfuck’s moronic face
Candidate voice over:
“So 300,000 Iraqi troops have stood up. How many american troops have stood down? None- the president has actually sent MORE troops. This is the man running our country- my opponent has supported his positions 95% of the time- vote democrat- your future depends on it.”
Amy Goodman discussed this issue today…see Democracy NOW with Michael Isikoff and David Corn.
What a lot of work, EW, and how amazing on so short a deadline. We all are pulling for you.
I think my attraction to the Plame story was that, back when Bush’s numbers were still above 50% and most of the public was still being fooled most of the time, here was a chance, a real shot at catching them at their game–and maybe catching the biggest, fattest targets red-handed. Patrick Fizgerald seemed like our last, best hope of getting the b******s and maybe just saving this republic. And irony or ironies, given all the crimes they have committed, he may still be.
—
twolf1 @
20
Oh thank god–I thought I had lost Dick and Bush.
That’s Bush handing Dick the 16 words. All a formality, I think, Bush returning the favor for Dick giving him those lies he told in the first place.
Amazing what you can learn by reading the White House Press Briefings:
Q I also have a question about troops, the troops in Afghanistan, Tony. How does the administration feel about the NATO debate about sending more troops in? The President, of course, last night said that administration efforts have chased the Taliban from power, but they’re threatening in the south.
MR. SNOW: Well, they’re threatening in the — there are several things going on, Peter. And this actually — some of this answer is going to apply to Iraq, as well, so I’m going to broaden it beyond your original question. The strategy both in Iran and Iraq is to get more troops on the ground.
Q You mean Afghanistan.
MR. SNOW: What did I say?
(from Sept 12 2006)
The Plame outing was this administration in a nutshell: vindictive, dishonest, contempt for the institutions of this government, secretive, and a knack for guaranteeing long-term catastrophe for short-term gain. I still believe it will be their undoing.
I so appreciate your efforts to date, Marcy, and wish you every success with the book. Godspeed.
“16 Words”
You might want to sex up the title a bit.
How about “Betrayal: How the Bush Administration Exposed a CIA Agent and Endangered America”
Okay, mine might be a little over the top… but “16 Words” seems, to me at least, a little wonkish for the general public.
emptywheel @ 24
They both look like they’re giggling a little in the picture.
Off topic just a little bit from the prior thread(where it was off topic), but the house is having a hearing on warrantless wiretaps on CSPAN. One witness just called the Wilson bill pernicious.
In the few minutes since then the hearing has gotten quite hot in a genial sort of way
*xyz @ 27
I agree. It’s not in the public consciousness yet. But it will be after they read Marcy’s book!
No offense to anyone, but the only two things that truly matter are the commitment to the whole, unvarnished truth and perseverence that bloggers have shown.
The personal qualities mentioned above have nothing to do with the meduim of blogging. Though without blogs (and the internet), the ability to diseminate the information widely and quickly would be lacking, as would all the feedback.
Why does it matter to me? I may vehemently dislike their policies and the reasons for their policies, but I can’t abide (I really can’t) moronity, incompetence, lies, corruption, cronyism, hubris and many other things the Bush Administration has come to represent. I don’t hold myself to different standards and I expect elected officials, regardless of party (whether I voted for them or not) to abide by those standards as well. For a very hip and cool Evil Parallel Universe, I guess I am old fashioned in some ways.
there’s always “snakes on a plame”
I’m one of those who came to FDL because of the Plame story. What bowled me over is the truly professional insights given to people like me who don’t know a lot about the legal system and how it really works. I’ll never be able to tell a dumb lawyer joke again. Blogging lawyers rule!
And hypocracy. I can’t believe I left that out.
emptywheel @ 14
Oops. I just realized this is a little like asking expectant parents whether they have a name for the baby. Never ask.
But the idea of “16 words” makes sense.
I came to FDL because of the Plame coverage. It was a LONG time ago, when no one knew anything.
I knew that there were big gaps in the MSM story, and I wanted to find out what was happening. I was in college during Watergate, and I knew that good investigative skills could save a country.
I wanted to know that there were good people asking hard questions. I wanted to be part of a collective, networked inquiry, a Q&A with a purpose. ReddHedd (as she once was known) and Jane were able to keep pounding away on this, so that “Move along. Nothing to see here.” was patently absurd.
I also tend to see the worst kinds of nefarious networks with scant evidence. The careful, logical slogging through published evidence and the links to your work and others’ made the emergent denouement less like the twilight zone. This is much more like a particularly gripping episode of a Raymond Burr drama. Understated. Authoritative. Irresistable and addictive.
That’s “irony of ironies” at 23….
The Plame story is most interesting to me because I want to believe in someone and I choose Joseph Wilson. He is my idea of a true Patriot. Someone who worked for our side with few accolades and never looked for at-a-boys from the bureaucracy. He saved the Embassy personnel in Iraq at his own peril and as far as I can tell, tried to keep his mouth shut about the Bush administration’s BS until he saw they were lying to the American people about Iraq. I don’t hate Bush(well maybe Darth Cheney),I just want justice for the Wilson’s.
Emptywheel –
I had an opportunity last weekend to meet the Director of the FBI. As people here know, I asked for (and received — thanks!!!!) input on what I should ask him, given the chance.
It was a great experience in large part because I was able to separate the questions that best express what I feel like:
“When are you going to arrest the President?”
With the reasons I want him to answer that question. LHP and Mary4 and Anne and others helped me get to that point.
What my questioned ended up as (complete with preface) was:
“Many here teach law students — future lawyers. We generally teach that the Congress makes the laws, the executive faithfully executes the laws and the Judicial branch interprets the laws. It seems that currently, there is some idea that the executive is responsible for making and interpreting the laws, not just executing the laws as enacted by Congress and interpreted by the courts. How does the FBI see its role in this question of the source of law in this country? As an executive agency, do feel bound by the executive alone, or do you currently follow the congressional text/judicial interpretation structure?”
Never got answered.
BUT — the point is, the reason I ask that question is the same that the Libby story is so critical. we are currently on a new adventure in constitutional structure. It is primarily a discussion about who holds the authority to decide what is lawful. What is right or wrong is a political (or moral) dispute. That discussion should happen outside the question of what the law allows or proscribes. Whether we follow a person or a set of laws mutually agreed upon by the community was, I though, the fundamental decision of the framers — choosing the community over the King. We are now rethinking that same question. And although it is heady stuff for scholars and philosophers to debate, the practical effects of this ultimate and critical discussion appear in seemingly small ways.
One place that this new urge to allow the rule of one man to thwart the decisions and best interests of the many has played out is in the Plame affair.
2 threads at once
[Mod Note]: twolf1, the FDL timeclock got a little screwy. You got a sneak preview of the 4:00 thread. Pretty good one, ain’t it?
Brainstorming titles:
“The Big Lie”
“National Insecurity”
. . . .
That’s all I’ve got so far. Also, a book like this needs a subtitle, such as “How Bush and Cheney Betrayed America” or some such thing. Maybe you need to get the Plame name in there, I dunno.
STELLARTON, Nova Scotia (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice acknowledged “difficult going” fighting a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan but insisted Tuesday that the world cannot afford to pull out now.
“We owe it to the people of Afghanistan to help them finish the job,” Rice said as she thanked Canada for its role as a leader of NATO forces in the country.
So where was Condi when the Afghan govt was sayin that if the US didn’t send money they were goin under? In Iraq- that’s where. Clusterfuck stiffed em- and now the mayor of Kabul is goin down.
Clusterfuck’s such a dumbfuck!
Although there’s something stealth and clandestine about the title 16 Words that does evoke intrigue and a bit of mystery. Marcy may be 100% genius with this title, after all. :)
This matters to me because:
I want to watch ESPN again, and will end my boycott when ABC agrees to produce the film of Marcy’s book gratis, without commercials, using only FDL staff. I get to be ‘Best Boy’. Or ‘Gaffer’. What are those, anyway?
Now on to the fun:
Title: Plame On! The Bloggers Who Torched BushCo.
Starring:
Valerie Plame-Wilson ___ Gisele Bundchen
Joseph Wilson ___ Jon Stewart
Irving Libby ___ Paul Reubens
Ideas anyone?
rwcole @ 43
I gotta say I hate what they have done to Afghanistan, Iraq and the world. I am going to go cook dinner now and hope to get back to emptywheel’s question when I can get the steam out of my ears.
From the minute I heard about the outing of Valerie Plame I was certain that this was a very deep story. Because of my upbringing in a family with connections to aeronautics and the military industrial complex and having known Intelligence folk my whole life, I sensed hundreds of people were potentially involved and endangered. I knew that this heinous action meant the destruction of a structure that had taken years to develop and regardless of the area of expertise, that great damage had been done to our national security. And then we learned that the area of intelligence gathering was about nuclear activities in the Middle East……..
And then it was so blatantly politically motivated, and I so loathe and dispise this administration. I don’t recall just how I “found” FDL, but when I did arrive here, it was clear that I had found my home. The connections/links that brought me into the arena of the rest of the people, like you, Marcy, who are devotees of learning the truth about this situation has brought some hope into my life that justice will be served!!
So go fitz, and thanks to all the great people who are so much a part of my life now.
EW:
I have yet to comment over at TNH about how thankful and excited I am about the project (I have contributed some $).
There are a combination of several factors as to why I was so taken by the Plame scandal. First, it struck at the heart of the biggest tragedy and crime that this administration put us through: lying us into the war. The Administration’s Plame/Wilson pushback was their dastardly attempt to protect themselves from exposure as frauds. It is quite a dramatic story.
Second, it lifted up the veil and allowed us to see the disgusting underbelly of this secretive and corrupt administration.
Third, as a criminal defense attorney, I am always fascinated by a good crime story, particularly the mens rea and motives of the different participants as well as the futile attempts to coverup criminal behavior.
Finally, the story brought some extremely fine and perceptive minds to the forefront and allowed logic (as well as creativity) to enter into the discussion.
The time I spent reading EW’s and Christy’s and Jeralyn’s posts was invigorating and helped me to believe that this country can rebound from the depths that the criminal syndicate in charge of this country had lowered us.
Hope that helps.
JK
OT, as usual. (I must confess that I’m always off topic in my life too, but here I have the excuse of twirling around the globe on a different time and season for coming off schedule to any party at FDL).
On another thread, poormary was talking about children’s books and the Left Behind series. May I suggest the Redwall series for children to her, by Brian Jacques? They are long, though, and that may not work with the point system your child’s school is having (funny how the program often works against what it is proposing).
But I want to give a shout out for reading aloud to children long past the time that they can read themselves. My husband is 40 plus years older than our offspring. He is an old school, Naval Academy grad, an engineer, who has little emotional vocab (other than spitting nails anger at the Bushco cronies), who dearly loves his children but for the life of him can’t figure out why they aren’t like he was in the 1950’s.
What he did do (and still does), though, was read to them. Always and often. He has read The Count of Monte Cristo aloud. Twice. (the kids are six years apart). It is 1000 pages. He has read volumes and volumes. The daughter is now 22 and across the ocean. When they are next together, he will pick up the volume of Dumas where they last were and he will read to her.
My son is 16 and he just picked a book about Napolean. His dad reads to him while he cleans his room (that could take lengthy volumes).
My husband has traveled through time and space and emotions he can’t particularly voice himself with his children. He has planted the sound of a sentence and the arch of a narrative in their ears and their brains. He has given them a rich vocabulary from inside out. I may be the writing teacher, but the engineer gave them the key to being good writers.
Sorry for the long digression. It does relate, though, as we need to teach our children the language, from inside out, so they will be less susceptible to having it used against them. They need to own their words and the meanings behind them.
Evil Parallel Universe @
34
hypocrisy too !
Jenny from the Blog @ 43
Well, it was actually a friend who thought of it.
He talked me out of “Sources and Methods.”
Marcy, thaks so much for taking this one on!
A little backstory: even though I was opposed to the Iraq war from the get-go, Powell’s infamous UN speech sealed the deal for me that the Iraq war was a frame job writ large. When the Joe Wilson op-ed was published in the NYT followed by the Valerie Plame Wilson outing, I went ballistic and haven’t returned to Earth since.
I fought through an earlier war and I’ve seen good men die for this country and what it stands for. So what does it say now that its government would out one of its own deeply covert intel agents just to save a few votes in an election? And how can a government even begin to function when its own secrets, if one actually buys into the currently-operative cover story, can be promiscuously disclosed in a casual conversation by some Uncle Fester look-alike running his mouth?
There has to be accountability here for all our sakes, and justice (remember that?) has to be done on behalf of the Wilsons. Period.
To your question concerning sources, I remember that Josh Marshall and Laura Rozen were collaborating on the SISMI part of the Niger document forgery story back in ‘30-’04. IIRC, they were partially scooped, but they still might be a good source for background details.
Oh, and Godspeed!
Good luck with this book!
Because rule of law matters to me. The future of America matters to me. Bush has violated so many laws and priniciples of American democracy and decency. Bush is destroying all that is good about America. This outing of a CIA officer is something a regular person can understand, i.e. blowing a spy’s cover is bad. I began following this to see how it would be presented to the public and whether justice could still be done in this country.
I came to FDL because of Plamegate. Simply put there was no traditional news outlet for what FDL gave me: breaking news, insightful legal analysis in plain English but not dumbed down for a 5th grade intellect besides the 5th Grade reading level, fact checking, and comprehensive coverage. Also, the news wasn’t tainted by the MSM’s he-said-she-said stenography that they insincerely call “journalism”.
Also, it was refreshing to be among people who wanted to think and discuss important things in a civilized manner.
*ilson - Remember, there is metric spelling in the EPU.
The MSM, even at its best, is a mile wide and an inch deep, and that is especially true of broadcast journalism. Heck, reading the NYT cover to cover everyday on a 3 hour RT commute to NYC comes nowhere near what can be found on a blog.
I was outraged by Plame’s outing, and the MSM don’t cut it. I wanted inch wide and mile deep coverage.
An added attraction is interactivity, the ability to ask a question or engage in a bit of dialogue. Its also a rapid response medium.
Thanks for all of your work. I have saved virtually all of your posts in searchable doc files.
windje
And are you really sure it is a mistake? It does work on many levels.
I found FDL because it was mentioned in an article in the New York Observer as a good source of information regarding the Fitzgerald information. How long ago was that? Feels like ages. So much has happened.
EW -
It’s the kind of title that could be remembered for a very long time (not to be too hyperbolic) but I’m liking it more and more.
SIXTEEN WORDS. Kudos to your friend. You do know that so many brilliant playwrights (Joe Orton comes to mind) could never write their own titles. It’s just one of those marketing things that eludes the creative mind, sometimes.
Good luck with the book…
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) Calls Out Cheney For Continuing To Push Faulty Intelligence
Sixteen Words is a great title, but only for the really hard core junkies who follow this stuff. I think you should call it what it is: Treason: The betrayal of an undercover CIA agent for political gain.
In-joke titles seem clever but they can be too clever. A physicist named Woit (I think) just published a book called “Not Even Wrong” about the problems with string theory, but only those who know something about Wolfgang Pauli would have gotten it. In his case it was OK because only the people who got the joke would be able to understand the book, but in your case you are going for the greater American public, so don’t be subtle. BTW I kicked in my C note.
emptywheel @ 24
If you keep writing salacious prose like that, it should be a runaway best seller.
al-Scooter @ 51
You’re right. JMM, in particular, also covered the Plame story heavily from the start. One of my favorite posts of his is when he shows how, when Novak has used the term “operative” in regards to intelligence professionals, he has always used it to refer to someone who was covert.
Jenny - You do know that Harold Robbins said that once he thought up a title, it only took him a week to write a book. The title was the difficult part.
If you wanted to sex-up the title, I would add a “THE”:
THE SIXTEEN WORDS
(How Political Pushback Compromised Our Future)
Let me add one other thing, focusing more on the book itself. I know that it appears that the general outline and goals have been established.
But to really catapult it into the stratosphere (and to potentially get the talking heads talking about the real implications of plame), I would suggest that you make a thesis/subtitle of the book this:
“How the evidence available to the public strongly suggests (or shows) that the Vice President of the United States was behind the outing of a spy”.
How can the public ignore that? It’s what you have been saying over and over again over at TNH. Isn’t that the book you would love to write?
The Spy Who Was Thrown Out into the Cold (and Under A Bus)
Evil Parallel Universe @ 62
EPU - I laugh because it is so true! It’s a whole other chunk of the brain that seems to conflict with the art part. For example, most painters I know can neither title nor frame their work. It’s pretty funny and I love the counter-intuitiveness of the whole phenomena.
I think the title of Marcy’s book should be a little off-kilter and not too wonky. I like the brevity of the title she’s chosen, and she can also, (as Pach mentioned) have a subtitle that gives a clear description of what’s inside the covers…
Alphabetically, 16 Words trumps almost anything else. Very important if you’re listing it in the Yellow Pages.
Main title - OUTED
Subtitle - Scooter was a bad dog
BTW and OT - NZ expat I feel your pain. I commute between US and Oz and never know what day it, what season it is, what time it is or how to spell anything. And no, it isn’t (just) senility.
Good one, petedownunder. I was just thinking that Le Carre taught me that there is a reason for every betrayal. And often not a good reason.
jk @ 64
Yes, I have been saying over and over, haven’t I? Maybe the gig is just to wait on the subtitle, and if I get much surer of the NIE stuff, then we can just use, “How Dick Cheney Outed the Spy Who Could Prove He Lied Us Into War.”
I agree. I don’t think the idea of a longer subtitle is a bad idea either - to give the less informed some idea what the book is about. Subtitles also seem very fashionable these days.
The thing that bothers me most about the whole incident is the lack of resolution. Everyone was “outraged” that her identity was revealed. The President threatened to fire anyone involved. But now we get to the point, seems like everyone knows what happen and the only person being charged with a crime is Libby. So what did happen? Was it not wrong to discuss a convert CIA agent working on the most sensitive matter to the country (WMD) all while exposing the yes the wife of our diplomate in your country could be spying on YOU. Where is the justice.
Is there a PO Box where I can send a check? I don’t do credit cards :-}
Also - #38, please don’t call him “Darth” Cheney;
Vader was redeemed at the end. Not a chance in hell that’ll ever happen to Cheney. (Maybe “Adolf” Cheney?) That creep veep is evil and rotten through and through.
I gave a hundred bucks to become a “silent publisher” of 16 Words because this book needs to be written and I can’t write it.
I came to Firedoglake for the Plame coverage. I admit, I’ve never had any respect for George W. Bush and Company, but even I couldn’t believe they would actually out a CIA agent. For any reason. There had to be an explanation that didn’t lead to treason.
I stayed because the coverage was — and is — based on facts and reasoned analyses, challenged by a group of smart, educated people who want to know what really happened. The end result is a body of information that stands up to the test. I believe 16 Words will be a book people can refer to for the truth. If I can be a part of the effort to make that happen, how can I not?
windje @ 68
I like it, windje.
But can we use Dick instead? That’s the one we’re going after eventually.
“Lies and War: The Inside Story Of How The Bush Administration Betrayed a CIA Agent and a Nation”
OT– Bruce Fein just said that most recently people who voted against Lieberliar and for Ned Lamont were called unpatriotic … he is on fire!!! I am listening to this while cooking and thank goodness for Maxine Waters, Bill Delahunt, and Sheila Jackson Lee.
immanentize says:
September 12th, 2006 at 2:43 pm
I like it better without ‘The’, and that subtitle rocks!
Thanks for taking on this project.
I came to FDL because the Boston Globe and
other MSM were not even covering the story…
It is an enormous story with many layers
of intrigue and abuses of power…
This book will inform and tell the REAL story
of what went on to sell the war and smear good
folks. I grew up with Watergate and felt
that Nixon was lying and then the tapes proved the case. I know Bush, Cheney and Rove were the masterminds of this attempt to hijack our country… but…
They are so cunning, I hope Fitzy will prevail since he believes in the TRUTH.
I am so so sick of being lied to that Canada
seems like an option…
We must win this one, our freedom is at stack…
Thanks again,
Jack
I was online the night that the Kaloogian(sp?) photo fraud was discovered. It was such a rush to be even the tiniest part of that.
To oversimplify, the blogosphere brings EVERY point of view and skill to bear. It’s distributed intelligence, where many of the sources are experts in their own fields.
First off, it matters because the Plame incident perfectly encapsulates what is wrong with this administration. They are fundamentally un-American, because they will not tolerate dissent. They will attack anyone who challenges them; and they don’t just attack the message, they try to *destroy* the messenger.
emptywheel @ 76
Hope that the Dick will be dicked springs eternal, but I’ll believe it when I see it happen - he’s pretty slick at keeping his fingerprints off the doorknobs.
or “Lies and War: The Inside Story Of How Scooter Libby Betrayed a CIA Agent and a Nation”
P J Evans @ 79
Yeah, imm. I love the subtitle too. Bigger than a breadbox but smaller than an SUV. No downside in also having a catchy subtitle, like the one you suggest…
If you put Scooter Libby in the damn title, it is going to make it much, much tougher to pardon him. Put Scooter in the title. Make him the focus. Prevent the pardon.
There’s always one in every crowd. :)
Marcy, if anyone can do it, it’s you and Jen, so I’m 100% confident that 16 Words will be 100% terrific — and my god, what a service to the public!
The theme of absolutely over-the-top public disservice is what makes this story so compelling to me, and of course so infuriating. That the minions of Public Servant No. 1 have tried this long and this hard to set themselves above the law — and so nearly succeeded — makes them greater villains than I ever dreamed possible, especially after Nixon.
But their arrogance set up their downfall, and I believe that the Plame case — whatever course it takes after January 16 — will soon become recognized as the point at which the law began to catch up with them. As the facts of their ineptitude burst through into daylight with Katrina, the facts of their criminality burst through with Plame.
They will go down. And long after they have, the book you’re pulling into shape now will serve as an invaluable landmark for historians.
I’ve been delighted to be an onlooker as you, Jane, Christy, lhp, Mary, imm, and others whose incredible pro bono diligence I’ve witnessed here and at TNH have teased out the story to this point.
When the P.O. box goes up, I’ll be even more delighted to enlist more directly in your effort!
Jenny from the Blog @ 87
Sing with me, Jftb:
“Every party has its pooper, that’s why we invited you –”
please, no LieberChow for trolls !
immanentize @ 89
heehee! When I first started working, I’d come home ranting to my dad about some obnoxious person in the office and he’d say: “Jenny (not really), there’s always gonna be one SOB, wherever you go.” Smart guy, my dad.
okay, *ilson. I was just leaving anyway… :)
No doubt it’s been mentioned, but the Jeff Gannon story came from the blogs.
Hey Marcy — did you get this email today?
Emphasis mine…Um…do you know anybody in Levin’s office?
To reiterate, it would be so powerful to put Scooter square in the middle of the title. If he is to be the firewall, he must be made to realize that he will have to act as such without the benefit of a pardon. Making him the focus of the title will get his name out in the national consciousness. If this book makes Scooter the public face of treason, his odds of getting a pardon decrease. He is the lynchpin - take him out.
“Many here teach law students — future lawyers. We generally teach that the Congress makes the laws, the executive faithfully executes the laws and the Judicial branch interprets the laws. It seems that currently, there is some idea that the executive is responsible for making and interpreting the laws, not just executing the laws as enacted by Congress and interpreted by the courts. How does the FBI see its role in this question of the source of law in this country? As an executive agency, do feel bound by the executive alone, or do you currently follow the congressional text/judicial interpretation structure?”
Never got answered.
imm, bravo on your question — perfectly phrased, I’d say. And that it “never got answered”? I’d say it did. Alas.
Marcy: a few suggestions.
(1) Be sure to include a detailed timeline of events as they unfolded, beginning with the runup to the SOTU speech and the 16 words.
(2) Be sure to tie the book to a blog (Next Hurrah?) where readers can check in to follow developments as they occur.
(3)Possible title: Slam Dunk This brings in the CIA involvement which is critical to the whole story. Also brings in Tenet, Plames’ uber-boss at the time.
(4)Possible subtitle: Words of Mass Deception
(4) Possible subtitle: Anatomy of Deceipt
Um…do you know anybody in Levin’s office?
No, and he didn’t send this to me (though I haven’t checked my special Senatorial spam email address. Maybe he’s just cross at me for getting so many people to call him before the Convention about supporting his buddy Holy Joe rather than his party.
But maybe you and I should go visit together? He likes you…
orangejumpsuit - agree 100% regarding the timeline. Put it right at the front so it can be referred back to, and to pique the interest of the reader…
I found FDL and TNH when I became aware of the Plame leak.
I was drawn to the story because I found it riveting.
I felt a sense of betrayal that my country had deginerated to a cesspool of politically motivated attacks on a CIA agent.
I wanted justice and I felt that the truth was being hidden away. I went on a search for truth.