
If you blog long enough you wind up writing posts you never thought you'd write. This is one of those posts.
I read about Lieberman sacking Marion Steinfels and Sean Smith today, and blaming them for their failure to counter Ned Lamont's distortions regarding his record. You might want to sit down here, or pour yourself a good stiff drink, because I am going to defend them.
Now, there isn't much you can say in defense of Sean Smith -- he's a cynical bastard whose specialty in "low information voters" is emblematic of just about everything that's wrong with modern politics. He didn't do his job well, the events were run like crap and he was always ten steps behind the Lamont folks.
Marion, on the other hand, did her job extremely well in my opinion. From the first time I saw her handiwork -- the day Joe gave his Cut'n'Run press conference -- she hit all her marks. It was well organized, her presentation was excellent and she was superb throughout at getting rather lazy members of the press to stay on stories of little interest to their readership and virtually ignore the enormous elephant in the middle of the room -- people were turning away from Joe because of his position on the war, and he adamantly refused to address it.
It was because of Marion's effectiveness that I had to hit her hard, but it wasn't personal. She hit back hard too, and I didn't take that personally, either. Now, none of this excuses the fact that either she or Smith accepted jobs peddling smear and bullshit -- they are entirely morally culpable on that front and everything I ever saw of Marion demonstrated that she was a true believer in the Cult of Joe. But that's not why they were fired.
Early on Colin McEnroe mentioned to me that the Lieberman campaign was run by a party of two, Joe and Hadassah Lieberman, and I never saw anything coming out of that campaign that did not confirm it 100%. Take a look at that bear ad. I'm convinced the only focus group it ever had was that party of two -- Joe and Hadassah -- and it was virtually incomprehensible to anyone else. As Matt Stoller said, it was designed to make Joe Lieberman vote for Joe Lieberman.
They ran Joe's campaign based on an extremely distorted self-image and with complete blindness to the actual problems Joe was facing. To now lay the defeat at Smith and Steinfels' feet is just such a piece cowardly, churlish scapegoating it is arrogant and ungrateful beyond words. I may not like what Smith and Steinfels were saying or who they chose to defend, but they did with a zeal that was everything Lieberman could've asked for. They were saddled with an oblivious candidate and they did more than could be expected with what he handed them. How very Republican of Joe.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Jane!
Go away Joe.
“They ran Joe’s campaign based on an extremely distorted self-image and with complete blindness to the actual problems Joe was facing.”
And so they are running this next one.
KOBE !
www.SoreLooserman.com
Very classy, Jane! I’m sure Marion has a certain fondness for her sobriquet of “Attila the Attack Hen.” I know I would. Ineffective people don’t get to have nicknames like that.
What’s that proverb about lying down with dogs…..?
So, any word on who (or what organization) will be replacing them? Is Joe going to get therapy so he can let someone do a good job? Any sign (aside from these firings) that Joe is ramping up for November? Is it possible he could hire people who will do a worse job?
FITZ– better late than nevah!!
JOE: Getting along by going along.
You just ain’t leadership material.
A beautiful gesture/post by Jane;
~~~
Also;
Markos wrote this;
“Lieberman is no longer a Democrat”.
Here;
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/9/133046/2644
That is all.
Very well said and very generous and with dignity. Good job.
Ughh, they just had a quote from Douchebag Joe about doing better for Connecticut on an AP news update on Sirius. Talk about deluded!
I’m going to miss Marion (and I’m sure Spazeboy agrees with me totally). Watching her silly antics was fun.
Sean on the other hand, is (and always will be) a dick.
MacBeth won’t abandon the race unless somebody gets between him and Lady MacBeth. I was thinking that this morning; your article confirms my hypothesis. (I’m looking forward to the Shakepearean tragedy play itself out.)
Jane, will you be staying in CT for the duration?
Hope that you found time for a nap today.
Maybe Marion is looking for a job with a better candidate…….
Jane
Do you think that the reason Lieberman will not concede is Hadassah Lieberman’s insurance and pharmaceutical company lobbying contracts. Should we go after her and show the real reason is money?
Glad to see that smug bastard Gerstein get his ass handed to him as well.
Marion and Sean couldn’t make lemonade from RGJoe’s lemons, but they really tried, to the best of their ability. If RGJoe thinks firing them will convince Connecticut voters that he’s the man they want in the Senate, he is delusional.
Here’s one way to look at it: if Swanny hadn’t pulled it off yesterday for NED, his phone would still be ringing off the hook with job offers today. Somehow, I can’t see that happening for Marion and Sean — what Democrat would hire them today? It’s what happens when the Party of One gets its comeuppance.
How sad to be RGJoe today, telling yourself all the HHH Happy Warrior stories, and re-reading Profiles in Courage, trying to get a clue. It ain’t gonna happen, Joe. Who’s on TEAM CONNECTICUT, anyway, besides that Perez mayor of Hartford guy?
Thank you so much Jane. You never fail to bring out the narrative. I hope Marion comes over to Ned.
“….just such a piece [of] cowardly churlish scapegoating [,] it is arrogant….”
NIce to be back hme. Just catching up.
You know, I do love my client work. I love working with these people. I went into business for myself and one of the benefits of that is taking on projects you like with clients you like.
But it’s nice to be back in the threads.
My brother-in-law in Seattle who worked on Lieberman ads in NYC last month (he’s now working on a packet of ads for Cantwell) said that until this campaign he had enormous respect for Lieberman. But that changed as he watched Joe go negative the past two weeks or so. He says other longtime career Dem campaign pros feel disappointed also.
That was as of the weekend. Haven’t talked to Mikey since then.
Are you sure they were fired, rather than quit? There were the stories awhile back about staffers planning to quit if WATB went indie, due to him no longer being a Dem…
sneak preview info — I just bought another sweet Joe-mockery domain which I will reveal before 8pm EDT — it takes a few minutes for the forwarding to be set up…
Er…….How do you know who suggested what or who developed what theme? Even if Lieberman personally created his entire (and entirely) hideous campaign) why aren’t these two responsible for providing appropriate and incisive feed-back to Lieberman on the campaign’s merits?
It may be true that it’s all Lieberman’s fault, but he ran a spectacularly terrible campaign in the early going. Surely these two bear some responsibility. In any case, after losing to a complete unknown, if you were Lieberman, would you put your future in these two after what just happened? We are speaking of Lieberman’s worst (and possibly only) election defeat ever.
Now please do not take from this that I have even the slightest good thing to say about Lieberman because I utterly despise him, but this is about management and management communication. Speaking only from that point of view, Lieberman needs to quickly develop a better, more flexible, more effective campaign team than the one he had.
Of course, from that perspective I also wish he had retained them……..
I don’t visit here often lately- but just thought I’d stop by and congratualate all those who worked so hard and cared so much for Lamont- Congratulations!
It would’ve been so out of character for Joe to have blamed himself, just as it would’ve been out of character for him to have considered the audience of constituents he ignored all those years.
Three more months of that campaign arrogance will serve our nation well.
As long as Joe is replacing them with the Ken Mehlman/Karl Rove recommendations - bc those two guys are waaay in touch. ;)
Dems have just shown that they can and will clean house. Mehlman is like the yappy, peeing maltese and Dems just pointed an oversized Roomba at him.
yap yap yap yap yap
Billmon says Bye Joe
There is a great cartoon at this link…a cartoon picture of Lieberman and Bush and Bush say “Can I kiss it and make it better”..lol
snip
But on Tuesday he was swept aside in a torrent of grassroots anger at the war in Iraq — channelled by a highly effective campaign by left-wing internet bloggers — and his enthusiastic support for it and President Bush’s wider War on Terror.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/a.....28,00.html
Pachacutec @ 21
Always a pleasure to have you amongst the threads, Pach. Without exposing a client list or anything, I dont think youve ever mentioned exactly what pays your bills? Lawyer? Computer consultant? Architect?
kerril @ 7
on this blog, anti-dog remarks aren’t tolerated readily … after all, Dog is our middle name!
missing your poll updates, rwcole, glad to see you stopping by!
rwcole @ 26
Good to see you RW.
Twisted M - did Gerstein get sacked too?
rwcole @ 26
I was wondering where you’d been. Is all well?
*ilson, websquatter extraordinaire!
“I don’t visit here often lately-….”
I hope that changes.
Jane,
That was very stand up of you.
Especially, since you took some lumps from these two.
The best part of a hard fought rugby game is at the end. After bashing each other about the playing field, you all get together, share a beer and sing silly songs to each other, cause the bumps and the bruises were just part of the game rather than something personal.
Obviuosly, you GET that kind of spirit.
Good on ya
Not sure, but maybe the loss wiped the smirk off his face.
Pach!
ain’t it grand, folks. no more moral victories!
victory is ours, and it is righteous and moral.
go away, old stinkyman RGJoe
Joe Lieberman: Foe of Third-Party Politics
“I ask those who are thinking about voting for Ralph Nader to decide how they feel — how George Bush feels — about protecting the environment, protecting consumers, protecting a woman’s right to choose, because all of those may well be in jeopardy if George Bush is elected president.” — Joe Lieberman, October 2000
“For Republicans to be putting Ralph Nader on television in a paid ad, certainly might lead your average observer to be cynical.” –Joe Lieberman rejecting GOP support for spoiler candidates, October 2000
“A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush,” — Joe Lieberman, September 2000
http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/?p=409
rwcole,
John Casper @ 37
- same here
Nice, Jane. Think the Hen will work for Ned in Nov?
“Mehlman is like the yappy, peeing maltese and Dems just pointed an oversized Roomba at him. “
Mary (for now–what is this for now stuff?)
That was such a perfect visual.LOL
Maybe Ned should hire Marion as an advisor on defenses against Jiltin’ Joe?? That would be hilarious.
Very classy, Jane. And yes, this tacky action by Lieberman tells us more about him than it does about the people he fired. What a wanker.
Jane is a founding member of the Upright Citizens Brigade if you ask me.
so now he hires Rove?
rwcole @ 4:10 pm
Please visit more frequently.
Jane, you’re a class act. We all knew that before, but I had to say it today.
GO NED!
Democrats fight in primaries. But when those primaries are over, they are still Democrats. Maybe they will square off another day against each other, but more likely they will work shoulder to shoulder for the same candidate to DEFEAT REPUBLICANS! (Unlike Joe and his party of two)
Good on you, Jane.
ccmask @ 41
nicely caught!
These would be well-sent to the Connecticut bloggers as well as the Connecticut Democratic Party. Somebody’s got to knock some sense into stinkyman’s head. With a figurative, non-violent, but firm kind of knock.
vizsla1086 #25:
I’ve spent a third of a century in marketing research and related disciplines. The thing I dreaded getting stuck with even more than a bad product was a client who wouldn’t listen.
Wow. I was *certain* that the mass termination of Lieberman campaign staffers would be a result of Reid/Schumer calling around to remind them that they were supposedly working on a Democratic campaign, and that if they ever wanted to work in DC again in *Democratic* politics, that they’d find a way to leave Joe’s employ.
I had no idea Joe would preemptively just can everybody. Who the hell does he think he’s going to get to campaign for him, Marty Peretz and TNR interns?
Jane, your oh so genteel post reminds me of my adored (Southern-to-the-bone) Mother’s words after meeting Al Gore’s parents some years ago:
Class will out.
punaise - oh so happy to have you back cause you must know you were missed! ;~}
come back soon rwcole!
al-Scooter @ 52
Amen, but this extends to those very many of us in other fields with bad bosses in general. Lieberman is a classic Bad Boss that refuses to listen to underlings.
Hi gang, I haven’t been around for the past couple of days, so perhaps this has already been suggested, but won’t these folks Joe has fired be getting some of their own back by leaking unsavory behind the scenes stuff about JoMo? Aren’t we seeing this already with the Rove “how can we help?” call. (I know I would, lol.)
Pacha–Yep everything’s fine- (other than being in the middle of moving out of one house and into another. I got bored with the Lieberman stuff- but I’m sure the topic will change eventually and I’ll be back.
www.Sore-Loserman.com
Now we see Plan B coming to the fore. A quick quote from the pus-filled pervert with the erection problems and the penchant for taking trips with “the boys” to nations known for their sex tourism.
(Snip)
Limp-baugh: One of the factors in his defeat was the fact that he’s just Jewish…
(End)
Of course the anti-Semite vote in Connecticut just reared its head after almost 20 years of Joe Lieberman.
Fuck that revolting shitheel Limp-balls and his repellent talking points.
-GSD
Perhaps the fact that Joe was “just Jewish” was what compelled so many Republicans to vote against Joe Lieberman in the 2000 election.
Jane is fair and balanced.
Perhaps it’s human nature to search for scape-goats to paper over our own lack of judgment and defects. For me the prime example of this is how Nixon let Haldeman, Erlichman and Mitchell go to jail, and Nixon never accepted responsibility for his own irresponsible behavior. Nixon should have stepped up to the plate and pardoned those guys, and he should have served their sentences. Remember Truman and “the buck stops here” business?
Discussion on the Lieberman Talk page regarding his party status:
Party status should change
snip
Respectfully, that’s missing the point. The point is that to be a Democratic politician, by definition you must support (or at least not oppose, certainly not run against) the Democratic nominee for the office. You can’t run in and lose the Democratic primary and then merrily still be a Democratic candidate for office. Otherwise, why would the Democrats have a primary at all? Thesmothete 05:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
read it all here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Joe_Lieberman
hey, Anne Holliday! Good to be back (it was only three days, but it was strange to be out of toobz-range in the home stretch).
Oklahoma Kiddo, Whatever you are smoking/drinking, I want some. Nixon should have pardoned Halderman and the rest of the bag men?
And then taken their places in prison? Man, that has got to be some fine stuff. :~)
*ilson, the votes are in, you are the man.
So, about this Connecticut for Lieberman party line: can anyone run on that, or only Liebermans? How come the CFL didn’t have a primary?
Oh, wait, they already did. And lost.
punaise @ 64
You working for BP or something? They cut some toobz earlier this week due to corrosion. Maybe you slobbered on your ethernet cable once too often looking at porn and it corroded it?
It’s already been mentioned, but I’ll reiterate that in Gwen Ifill’s interview Joe on The News Hour Lieberman comes across as just awful: smarmy, selfish, petulant. No surprises there.
R-Dub #26:
How the hell are ya?
Fini #56:
Every once in a while you run into an executive who thinks that communications are supposed to glorify his/her personal sense of aesthetics, or settle a grudge or whatever. There’s just no comprehension that the target audience, sitting en banc, is the judge, jury and executioner. And they don’t care.
(I threw in the en banc because Mary and LHP are here, and they might appreciate the legalese in a boring business-related comment.)
Fini FiniTOOBZ! @ 68
LOL - you’re just getting me back for Doughy Pant Quote, aren’t you?
*ilson at # 60:
Pretty friggin’ good!
Check it out, y’all:
www.Sore-Loserman.com
I’ve been down the same road as these two. Unfortunately, they will not realize the consequences of being “true believers” for years.
hizzhoner
From previous thread, responding to a previous thread; (meta threads)
Stephen Parrish @71, regarding the Woodward report of Rove being against Hans Blix because Sweden seized Norway back in 1814…the Swedes and Norse and Danes have been fighting since iron was discovered in the archipelago. There are many historical sites to visit over there that changed hands back and forth over centuries (and worth a visit if any of you get a chance.) The concept of someone being obsessed with anger over one of these invasions shows either psychological instability—the ravings of a paranoid tweaker—or a complete lack of historical knowledge. Or…hmm…yet another questionable Woodward story.
Just listening to Ned again on Hardball. He makes a great point that George Herbert Walker Bush and Bill Clinton never would have invaded Iraq.
Another thing I missed was the profound meaning, I think, of his mention of Teddy Roosevelt, as one of his favorite Republicans. He specifically mentioned that Roosevelt fought the “Trusts.” I think that’s a not-so-veiled reference to the monopolies, one of which was J.P. Morgan.
Another great point he made was that he is not taking any money from corporate pacs or lobbyists. Joe can’t make those claims.
OT-Why are the R’s so enthusiastic about Lieberman? They attack his opponent, they have him on their shows, they praise him and love on him and treat him like he’s one of them.
Could they be planning for a post November world with fewer R’s in senate seats? If it’s 50-50 and they sweet talk Lieberman into switching with promises of any chairmanship he wants, would he go to the dark side? I’ve wondered why he hasn’t switched parties already. If it was the difference between the R’s having control of the senate or not, they’d promise him damn near everything he wants. But he has to keep his seat for it to work.
Just thinking out loud.
how Swede it is
kaleidescope @
8
Well, not likely unless he could lure the staff of the State of California Democratic leadership guys and gals who just loves them PBC/AT&T springtime orgies of money and golf.
Lamont on Hardball just now. Matthews LOVES LAMONT. He ended the interview with great praise to Ned for doing what he’s doing.
We have us another convert folks!
al-Scooter @ 69
I know exactly what you speak of al-Scooter, I’ve done voiceover work for a long time, sometimes I have had to put together ego centric radio ads for clients who have no clue that what they have me recording makes no sense to their audience, yet if I deviate from script one iota its helltopay. Bad Clients/Bosses are everywhere, its the ego centric buffoon syndrome.
Lieberman ran the worst campaign in the history of politics, ever
Another example of hate-filled lefty bloggers?
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/09/syria-fox/
not!
punaise @ 70
Not intentionally, I was just joshin wit ya, but if you want to call it payback and settle on a truce we can. I was over Doughy PantQuote about ten nanoseconds after you used it the other day. Actually thought it was phunny.
As Matt Stoller pointed out, the third, and perhaps the biggest looser in Conn., is AIPAC.
And as Matt says,”AIPAC doesn’t loose”. The political intersection of AIPAC having to recover from a huge political defeat and things going very poorly for Israel in Lebanon is quite frightening. The IDF lost 15 kia today,adjusted for population, that is equivalent to 1,400 US kia’s in one day. Those numbers won’t be tolerated by the public in Israel.
With AIPAC, Christian Zionists, and the End Time folks hammering on Bush, we are in deep shit. Are we looking at US troops in Lebanon again? I hope not.
I think it’s also a good idea for Reid and Schumer to make it quietly known that working on HoJoe’s indy campaign will mean, to quote Julia Phillips, you’ll never eat lunch in this town again.
(If this were in the UK, Joe would lose the whip pronto and now be working out of a broom closet. That Zell Miller was not repudiated as a Dem for the last year of his Senate term, I do not understand.)
Colin McEnroe mentioned to me that the Lieberman campaign was run by a party of two, Joe and Hadassah Lieberman,
Now add Rove to the next one and
the three will run it…with some other poor lackys trailing along…
Fini FiniTOOBZ! @ 83
we’re good. especially since I said you’d never be confused with a DPQ, or something like that.
The OtherWA — I’ve wondered the same thing. I imagine Jow and Hadassah sittingat home and Joe saying, “I am the king maker! neither side can rukle without me. I wqill be able to demand — and receive — whatever we want….”
The only way to make sure this evil vignette does not come to pass is to make sure that Joe is defeated in November. EVERY Democrat should be made to see that.
Tuesday Lumbaugh was all about ‘experience.’
Joe yes. Ned no.
So, now it’s religion, who could’ve imagined…
–Only listened while Colin McEnroe coming up.–
With the large number of contentious elections coming up in November I doubt Lieberman will have a chance to even elect a B team for his campaign. Where’s he going to get it? He’s not a maverick so cross off that magnet. And GOTV and message staffs have careers to think of and this November is going to be a humdinger not to be missed. Standing on the sidelines with a no-party off-message candidate doesn’t seem like the place to be. Maybe Katherine Harris has some recommendations.
Lie down with dogs. . .
Jane,
Did you get some sleep?
Did you eat something?
Immanentize…
Actually I don’t smoke anything or drink alcohol. But your reference borders on name calling. Nice.
As for Nixon, he should have gone to jail. And his guys, Haldeman, Erlichman and Mitchell were operating with Nixon’s knowledge if not his under his direct orders. A good boss accepts responsibility for those he/she supervises. Bush should go to jail too. Have a good evening.
time to redouble our GOTJ efforts:
Get Out the Joe
Average price for regular gasoline 8/9/06 in 50 states and DC
$3.00 plus 29 states
$2.90 plus 21 states
$2.80 plus 1 state
Average national price: $3.035, down $.001
Highest recorded national average price: $3.057 9/5/2005
Highest average price: Hawaii $3.357
Lowest average price: South Carolina $2.869
Nymex Crude Future $76.35
Dated Brent Spot $77.52
WTI Cushing Spot $76.35
Essentially unchanged. The BP plot continues to thicken with accusations that BP knew of problems for years, did not investigate them, and cut back on anti-corrosives in pipes.
If you are interested, the Nymex Crude Future price refers to deliveries in the following month and is a way of reducing risk by tying in a price early. The tradeoff is that if prices go up, you get the previously agreed price but not the extra profit. It gives you an indication of what prices are likely to be a month out.
Dated Brent Spot refers to a North Sea oilfield off the Shetlands. Spot means oil that is “available” for immediate delivery. Dated Brent Spot is the world (non-US) benchmark price for oil. If you were selling oil, you might sell it at Dated Brent Spot plus or minus some amount which reflected how light or heavy (tar content) or sweet or sour (sulfur content) it was.
WTI Cushing Spot refers to West Texas Intermediate grade crude available for delivery to Cushing, Oklahoma. Like Dated Brent Spot, it is a benchmark price but for the Western Hemisphere, principally the US.
So let’s see, Joe has alienated the majority of CT Dems by calling them the “extreme left”. He then implies “I’m the true democrat and I know what is best for the party” - but then registers as an independant. Now he is hoping to tap into the Republican votes for November. I’d say if he splits any group it will be the Repugs, he’s bound to lose quite a few of those who voted for him yesterday.
I think he is going to go over like a lead zeppelin. (Not the rock group)
Jane, you’re an independent operator, which makes it especially kind of you to say what you do about joe’s flunkeys — theirs is a thankless task
Carsick, excellent point. Where is Joe going to get a new staff from? Everyone decent is already working for someone else. Well, there’s always Katherine Harris’s leftovers.
Could Joe be stupid enough to fire his current folks without having new people lined up? It’s 3 months to the election, he has NO time to lose.
please, oh please, oh please, let him be that stupid. :)
Well, I’m sure you can sympathize with the number of people named “looseheadprop” who might visit this site. *g*
They, like me on my firster, tend to sign in as “Mary” It has happened enough that I thought I was kind of hogging the “ez” name, so I tried to make myself more complex. Think - Boone’s Farm to Gallo.
TheOtherWA @ 97
of course not: he’s got Marshall Wittmann lined up.
Jane, A lot of this has been said upthread, but I just wanted to add my 2 cents. You are one classy lady. This morning you were willing to give Joe the benefit of the doubt, you went head-to-head with some of his staff that has now been fired, and you still look for some positives after all this.
We are fortunate to have two of the classiest ladies leading us in our endeavors.
Get some rest, take time to smell the flowers, and then give us our marching orders.
This FDL community is the best!!!
I’m looking for some work.
-Michael Brown
David Ehrenstein @
91
David, we do not make slurs concerning dogs on this blog, please. My pitbulls don’t have fleas and usually one or two sleep with me … I have one sleeping on my left foot right now …
GSD: heckuva Joe
Party of One is p.o.o.
Who needs that sh**?
I just keep hearing this in my head, so I repeat myself here.
ccmask @42: spot on! These are the kinds of quotes that need to be thrown back in his face. And great post Jane! The fact that Lieberman believes he is helping himself by firing his most ferocious proponents (who, as you suggest, seemed to understand the situation on the ground much better than he did and who undoubtedly helped him close the polling gap in the last few weeks) merely serves to reinforce his image as another Bubble Boy like his buddy Bush. Narcissism, denial, delusion, arrogance, stubborness - a lot was shared in that kiss.
I don’t think it - staffing - is issue to Joe. His role is Rover’s spoiler. Money, attention out of other races.
Joe’s Dem party may have been run by a party of two but man he’s still got some help in the Fourth Estate.
If you look up useless gwen ifill’s name is next to it. When Joe pontificated on the importance of “devotion to party” Gwen might’ve asked him, “then why didn’t you accept the verdict of Democratic voters?”
but she didn’t.
When Joe lamented an excess of “partisanship” she might’ve asked, “then why paricipate in a Democratic primary?” Of course she didn’t.
I don’t understand. Joe lost, but his sad clown thuggery has been on all the big shows. What gives? HE LOST!
First time I’ve had a chance to check in since noon-ish so this may have already been covered, but since when does Tony Snow-Job get to stand up and give an editorial before a press conference?
A vote for Ned Lamont is a vote for Osama bin Ladin?
WTF???
“I may not like what Smith and Steinfels were saying or who they chose to defend, but they did with a zeal that was everything Lieberman could’ve asked for.”
Jane this is grace beyond measure and it shows how comfortable you are in your own skin. Forgiveness of ones enemas requires a presence of heart that I find rare in this world.
That being said, Phuque ‘em.
“(for now–what is this for now stuff?)”
“That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet.”
I have a truly great suggestion for Joe: Immediately consult with Katherine Harris regarding staffing needs.
She has it DOWN and so too can Joe. Shall we take bets on how many people he runs through between now and November.
Or, maybe he is coming to his senses and really preparing to throw in the towel.
It’s all so pitiful. And the wife. Maybe she is the source of the dementia.
Mary for now
“Think - Boone’s Farm to Gallo.”
What–no Night Train?
John Casper @ 4:29 pm “He specifically mentioned that Roosevelt fought the “Trusts.” I think that’s a not-so-veiled reference to the monopolies, one of which was J.P. Morgan.”
The Sherman Act, enacted in 1890, was one of the weapons available in the legal arsenal for trustbusting in Teddy Roosevelt’s administration.
I wrote a rant today about Tony Snow talking about the key question about the CT primary.
According to him it was all about whether you “take the war on terror seriously”.
I have two things to say about Joe.
Joe Lieberman Working hard to turn defeat into humiliation. (Suggestion for campaign slogan)
Joe, Joe, Joe. The people of Connecticut have spoken. They’re just not that into you.
Wes Clark’s new official MySpace group just invited the Roots Project to join their group, so I did. New ally anyone?
actually I think Joe’s needs just cry out for Dick Morris . . .
rwcole AND Apple Canyon2 - so nice to have you both back
Thanks sp, cpa.
Announcing a new whine from the Lieberman Vineyards.
Noted whine