
Colbert Lives!
Vandehei and Baker, I hope, meant this to be funny. If they did, they deserve a miniature Colbert Award:
Confronting the worst poll numbers seen in the West Wing since his father went down to defeat, President Bush and his team are focusing on the fall midterm elections as the best chance to salvage his presidency and are building a campaign strategy around tax cuts, immigration and national security.
Translation: "President Bush and his team are focusing on the fall midterm elections as the best chance to salvage his presidency and are building a campaign strategy around fat cats, racism and fear mongering." Well, it's nice to see them replay their greatest hits. The macarena never gets old, either. Bring back the orange terror alert!
Modern history offers no precedent of a president climbing from a hole as deep as the one Bush finds himself in, and White House strategists have concluded that no staff shake-up or other quick fix will alter their trajectory. In the sixth year of his tenure, they said, Bush cannot easily change the minds of voters whose impressions are fully formed.
Translation: They're in deep cowshit.
And so short of some event outside their direct control -- such as a dramatic turnaround in Iraq or the capture of Osama bin Laden -- Bush advisers have turned to the election as the most important chance to rewrite the troubled narrative of his presidency and allow him to recover enough to govern his last two years, Republican strategists said. With that in mind, Bush last week called on the National Guard to help stop illegal immigrants, signed tax-cut legislation and headlined three party fundraisers.
Translation: Their only chance is to dig deeper into the black raging racist heart of modern conservatism and Nixon's Southern Strategy to placate white folks terrified of the brown horde. No troops for Canucks! (Please make your check to. . .)
If Republicans retain Congress in November, Bush advisers note, he could assert that for the third straight election, the party defied historical patterns and popular predictions. Bush, they said, could advance a fresh agenda in early 2007. But they acknowledge that a House takeover by Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) would foreshadow a contentious final two years fending off congressional subpoenas and hostile legislation.
"If she's not the speaker, then conceptually I think we've turned this thing around and he has two more years to get some things done," said Ron Kaufman, who was White House political director under George H.W. Bush and remains close to the former president. A Republican loss of the House, on the other hand, "makes the next two years that much more difficult."
Translation: Prison sucks. Women are scary.
Bush has turned his attention to the campaign. Six months before the election, he has made 36 fundraising appearances, more than at this point in 2002. He spoke at a party gala last week that broke off-year records for hard-money fundraising and later attended events in Virginia and Kentucky. Vice President Cheney has been even more active, making 62 fundraising appearances, including one in Nashville on Saturday, and he plans three more in California in the next couple of days.
Translation: Legal fees really suck. Fucking trial lawyers!
With Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove reassigned from day-to-day policy management to concentrate on the fall campaign, the White House has begun setting an agenda. Bush focused on stopping illegal immigration with his National Guard plan announced in an Oval Office address last week, followed a few days later by a visit to the border. In between, he signed legislation extending $70 billion in tax cuts that he has made a signature issue on the campaign trail.
Translation: "With Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove reassigned from day-to-day policy management to concentrate on saving his pasty round ass, the White House has begun watching screenings of Birth of a Nation in hopes of a miracle." Preemptive federal payments ("tax cuts") to legal defense donors can't hurt, either!
To address conservatives, who have been key to his election victories but have grown disenchanted with the administration, Bush and Senate Republicans are reviving their fight with Democrats over judicial nominations, and senators last week voted out of committee a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage to set up a floor vote next month.
Because you can never go wrong calling Democrats sissies. Right, Ken?
This article is totally killing me . . . Vandehei and Baker, yew guyz rawk! I don't want to reprint the whole thing, but the next few paragraphs include some hilarious screwball stenography from Unka Karl's dictaphone, followed by this gem:
Recent staff changes orchestrated by new White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten have not proved to be an elixir. Aides who once talked of a "Bolten bounce" now anticipate a long, difficult summer. Although these aides believe Bolten has brought new energy and a more aggressive day-to-day approach -- and bought Bush some goodwill with Congress -- they believe it will take a long time for the public to notice.
Translation: The last time we rolled out our strategy to rebound, it flopped. Again. But we'll try some more, because, hey, there's a sucker born every minute, right? Maybe someone in America is left who has not been paying attention. . . please? Go get 'em, Snowjob!
Another juicy nugget:
"The president's run into a perfect political storm where the confluence of natural disasters from last fall, gasoline prices, staff changes, the continuing war in Iraq, all are giving conservatives a defensive fatigue," said Kenneth Khachigian, a California GOP strategist who served in Ronald Reagan's White House. "And let's put immigration in there, too. . . . There's just wave after wave washing over them at this point."
[snip]
Ed Rogers, a prominent Republican strategist, offered similar advice. "We need less panic among Republicans in town and on the Hill and to some degree in the states, and more energy from the White House," he said. "Use the Rose Garden, sign some executive orders. Activity is our friend." But time may not be, some Republicans say. "Opinions do begin to set in . . . so we need successes now," said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.).
Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!! Well, maybe they can go on a woodlands retreat with Robert Bly to rediscover their manly mojo, eh? Bring your shotgun, Dick!
But here comes what may be my favorite part: the coup de grace from none other than Newt:
Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) offered a novel model for recovery: Bill Clinton. In 1995, after Gingrich's Republicans took over Congress, the White House rebuilt public support methodically. "He split with the left, he moved to the center, he did dozens of little things that worked, and gradually, week by week, he grew more acceptable," Gingrich said.
"You get to the point where you have to take a very deep breath and rethink what you're doing," he said of Bush. "He's still president, and he's got 2 1/2 years left. It's very important not just to him but to the country" that he recover authority.
That's it, the model for saving the GOP. Punch line of all punch lines. James Dobson, I give you (drumroll, please!) the Man from Hope. You can take Peter Beinart, Joe Klein and Rape Gurney Joe with you, too.
Good times, man. I'm gonna drink a shot to Vandehei and Baker. Best laughs I've had all day.
And oh yeah: Go, Ned!
UPDATE: Rape Gurney Joe emerges from the bunker. Great stuff. What a WATB! Still won't rule out an Independent run. The wet sound you just heard came from the seat of Schumer's chair. Go read it.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz, Feingold, and FDL!
Colbert!
Colbert iTunes #1 dl. allegedly…
fitz
Great post (pun intended), Pach!
FitzRoots!
egregious, just FYI — in my 75 page article I managed to slip “egregious” in 5 times or, once every 15 pages. I will work harder on the next one to up your showing….
Always thought there was something a bit odd about that article. The “strategy” for winning back Clusterfuck’s approval ratings is to win the midterms?
Seems like maybe this is backwards- seems that the strategy for winning the midterms should be to raise his approval ratings.
Few words get twisted so often as “strategy”.
This is the meme the Dems need to get rolling:
Stop being so naive about the tax cuts for the rich. Guess what? Do you really believe they are in YOUR best interests?
For too long the Republicans have pulled the wool over the American people’s eyes. Disguising the reality of rewarding the people that put them there, they insist that handing out tax cuts for the rich is good for EVERYBODY!!
Well then, show us the money!! Are YOU better off than you were in the Clinton years? How have YOUR fortunes changed for the better in the last 5 years? If they’re so certain that tax cuts for the rich are better for the economy than balancing the budget, let them prove it.
They remind me of the aliens in “Mars Attacks”—marching down the street saying into the loudspeaker, “We are your friends! We come in peace”! whilst all along blowing away everybody they meet.
Wake up America!
republicans are already running away from bush — except joe lieberman, that is — gore’s big mistake was to run away from clinton, the one person who could have put him over the top — but gore’s as dumb as bush is
by this fall, the economy will matter more than bush or iraq or iran — the only thing that may save the republicans is the pork they bring to their districts — all the present bullshit about immigration won’t matter if the economy tanks
I don’t believe it was reasonable for the White House to expect a “Bolten bounce.” Who the hell is Bolton, to the average American? It might have worked better if Bush had appointed the 2006 equivalent of former Sen. Howard Baker (as Reagan did). The problem is, I don’t think such a person exists in the Republican party in 2006. Baker’s credibility came from his not defending Nixon too vigorously in Watergate. What has any current prominant Republican in this Rubber Stamp universe done to earn the public’s trust?
11 Bolten
rwcole,
As Pach points out, this is not a strategy for winning back popularity, it is a strategy for stopping the endless bleeding which will only increase if the Dems take control of either/both houses.
It is a “CYA” strategy — pathetic, really.
It demonstrates just how much they have lost in any scenario.
Now the tax cuts make sense.
You cut taxes for your friends, screw the country (and the rest of the world), and then collect some of that money you just gave your friends to do it all over again.
Not long-term thinking, but then Cheney’s only long-term prospects are on the wrong side of the afterlife, and thinking has never been natural for the Bushes.
This strategy makes no sense. They want repubs to embrace Bush? If I had self preservation in mind I would tell repubs to distance themselves as much as they needed. Seems like more pride than common sense is involved here.
Heres to an October Surprise! … in the form of a dozen White House indictments, beginning with Death Star Cheney. Bush goes into midterm elections with a 19% approval rating. That should just about do it, I think… or rather “do in” as the Brits like to say.
Can we get an impeachment out of this? Please, pretty please?
three words…
Mining Safety Enforcement.
“Translation: Legal fees really suck. Fucking trial lawyers!”
All the money Cheney’s raising for Doolittle and Pombo today in California, ostensibly for their re-election, can be converted to a legal defense fund, a la Bugman, if (when!) needed.
Thank you, Pach, very funny deconstruction of a very funny steno piece….
So who gives W the blowjob to help ‘raise’ his poll numbers (and buff his legacy)? W must be so jealous of Barbaro.
Newt’s off with his prescription for Dubya. “Rethink what you’re doing” implies prior thinking.
Seriously, though, RoveCo Industries, Inc. has always been about winning elections, rather than governing. Is anyone surprised that the solution to today’s problems in the White House is to spend more time on politics and less time on governing?
Blub,
IF Fitz was a vindictive sort, then I do believe he would return indictments right before the election. he claims that he would have been able to clear up the whole affair before the 2004 elections if only the key players had not lied to him (thrown sand in his eyes). Poetic justice would demand no less.
However, I fear Fitz is too much the professional (and not enough poet) to do what the ancient Fates would in this circumstance.
“Bush Legacy”
Now there’s a phrase.
Like “Buddha’s Estate”
Okay, relating Robert Bly with the right wing Cheney hunt crowd is just genius. Great post.
You can’t return to governing if you didn’t do any governing in the first place.
Bush has been campaigning for all 6 years of his presidency; when he gets close to actually having to govern (he realizes that making some initiative happen requires WORK), a new campaign takes shape, he commissions a whole new set of backdrops, so that the people he’s talking to can use it as a clue to what he’s saying, and whatever he was all fired up about before is turned over to the lobbyists, dies a slow death or gets sucked into the quicksand of the bureaucracy.
Maybe if his campaigns didn’t leave out the 49% of the people who didn’t vote for him, if he had spoken to all of the people with the same interest and intensity he reserved for the party faithful, he might not be where he is today. But he rested his fortunes on maintaining the loyalty of the true believers, and that’s great, but by all accounts, they feel betrayed, the scales have fallen away from their eyes, and they see the George Bush that the rest of us saw. They see him for what and who he is, and they don’t like it.
The diagnosis of insanity is official: just keep doing the same thing over and over again, and expect a different result.
Hoist by his own petard: couldn’t happen to a more deserving person.
Bush’s new strategy for governing: Campaign?
I understand where you’re coming from, Pach, but this is actually kind of scary. The lies, incompetency, corruption, cronyism, and killing, yes, killing, from this administration will continue unabated unless the Congress changes hands. Now that Bush’s conservative base is fleeing maybe it will actually happen.
From where we stand today, the chances that Democrats will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory seem slim.
But we’ve screwed the pooch before. Let’s not laugh too much.
Here’s Drudge’s non-withdrawal withdrawal of his story about Dean and Nagin:
DNC: WE DID NOT PICK LANDRIEU OVER NAGIN
The Democratic National Committee strongly denies it placed political operatives in the city of New Orleans to work against the reelection efforts of incumbent Democrat Mayor Ray Nagin.
Well-placed DRUDGE REPORT sources claimed DNC Chairman Howard Dean made the decision to back mayoral candidate and sitting Lieutenant Governor Mitch Landrieu (D-LA).
The DNC says the report is “unequivocally and absolutely false.”
DNC Communications director Karen Finney explained: “The DNC does not as a policy get involved in Democratic primaries… The only thing that the DNC did was a campaign helping ensure that displaced voters had an opportunity to vote.”
The DRUDGE REPORT takes chairman Dean and his spokesman at their word.
*Newt Gingrich* is telling *BUSH* to learn from *Clinton*??
This, coming right after Finland (a.k.a. “0 points”) won the Eurovision Song Contest with heavy metal monsters?
The end is near! Repent!
RWCole at 8
—
Perhaps I state the obvious, but the tone is this… (At least as I see it.)
If the Dems get control, and the people acually learn what we’ve been doing the last 5 years, 30% is going to look positively wonderful.
So, to maintain these “good” approval numbers we have to win elections in 2006 and keep control.
The better numbers aren’t better in comparison to today, but simply better than they will be if there’s some sunlight sending the cockroaches running.
What a freaking disaster the GWB admin and repub congress as been huh?
Personally, I see a serious blood-bath in congressional elections, but perhaps I’m just way too optimistic.
We’ll see I guess.
Cheers,
Greg
Funny thing, they don’t mention that at those Bush and Cheney candidate fundraisers, the candidates themselves are staying away rather than risk being photographed with Shrub and Big Time. (I know that’s true of the recent one in Virginia, at least.)
kvenlander: LOL!
The other thing the Dems—and the liberal side of the media and blogosphere—need to be hyper-aware of is the Repubs’ consummate ability to Change The Subject. Meaningless, divisive issues that tend to arouse furious disagreements such as flagburning and gay marriage only serve the neocons’ best interests. If I were the Dems I would simply NOT engage them on these topics—for example, just let them pass whatever immigration legislation they want. We’ll just add it to the immense pile of elephant cr*p we’ll have to shovel up after we take back Congress this year and/or the presidency in ’08.
When the dust finally settles on all this corruption, malfeasance and betrayal, and when the perps are behind bars or otherwise suitably shamed, then we talk reparations.
Who wants to join me in a class action suit against Bushco to recover lost earnings due the constant diligence we have to exercise in order to call bullshit on every last one of their rotten acts? (rhetorical question)
This is the purest expression in the whole piece of the mindset of the incompetent. The administration isn’t responsible for any of these things, they just happened to them, a “perfect storm.”
If you’re competent, you see when you’ve made mistakes and try to avoid repeating them. If you’re incompetent, everything that goes wrong just happens, for reasons that have nothing to do with you.
No sweat — his legacy is secured.
They will win big this November and say “See, everyone loves Bush and we’re on the right course” cuz the Repubs swept Congress.
Meanwhile, THEY JUST STEAL THE VOTES via the 80 percent of the vote that is counted by Republican, err, Diebold and ESS, machines.
http://www.nightweed.com/usavotefacts.html
kvenlander 26
This, coming right after Finland (a.k.a. “0 points”) won the Eurovision Song Contest with heavy metal monsters?
The end is near! Repent!
I wondered what those Finn toil hats were all about….
Jefferson, CNN -My Lawyers have advised me…..
I wondered what those Finn toil hats were all about….
Lordi, Lordi….
this cat says: purr f**ked storm, my hairball
I swear, this article still has me giggling!
too funny, pach
EPU’d:
#89 Palast was on the same edition of Radio Nation as Christy last night. Excellent interviews!
undercoverdick wrote; ” but gore’s as dumb as bush is”
Gore was smart enough to win the 2000 election, understand the danger of global warming very early on, clearly see the folly of the Bushco/Bushcult Iraq venture, and the danger to civil liberties we now face. Gore may have his problems but a lack of intelligence is not one of them.
Well, Pach, it is the closest, back door only, kinda suggest it by negative inuendo way that pool boy can get to: “Bush is so Screwed.”
Read it that way and then it all makes sense.
It’s clear that GW Clusterfuck prefers campaigning to governing- but this is one that’s pretty much outside his ability to influence- other than by raising money. This is a series of hundreds of individual races- coming down to fifty or so that really matter. If he tries to nationalize the election- he loses. Best he can do is to raise the money and keep his yap shut.
Here’s the scariest part- as rumors of dem takeover start to circulate- his big donors are starting to think “maybe I’d better split my donations- don’t wanna get caught with my pants down and with a congress who won’t give me the time of day”.
Those decisions are being made RIGHT NOW.
oscarsmom
Got to wipe a coffee spit-take off my screen…
My copy of “How Would A Patriot Act?” just arrived in this afternoon’s mail. I may not be spending as much time on FDL in the immediate future. Looking forward to the discussion on Sunday.
Clothodi,
Thanks for educating dick.
T-
immanentize: the sweeping, dramatic language and turns of phrase in the article read almost like snark to me, which is a long way of saying, you could be right. If they don’t mean to be funny, they nevertheless are, Poolboy and his Buddy. And if they mean to be funny, they are being really, really sly and slick.
I tend to doubt they mean to be funny, but who friggin’ knows?
Translation: They’re in deep cowshit.
And sure as hell they’ll tell you it’s only at their ankles. What they WON’T tell you is they dove in headfirst!
Pop’s is hangin with the Big Dog so why shouldn’t junior hang with Hilly?
Kristol said years ago ‘ we’ll move left’.
Francis the talking mulyake Fukomama is sayin we are all Wilsonian’s now!
It’s depressing to see the Venn overlap here when Wilson was for unitary executive theory in the 1880’s , rolled out the Red Scare and loved ‘ Birth of a Nation’.
A small army of repugnant goopers and freepers merely retreat just outside the beltway into lunar right wing stink tanks, neo-confederate ‘ heritage trusts’, spook agencies and large gated estates for their next assault on democracy.
The RIGHT shall rise again!’
‘ Shrub surrended - I never did’
Can’t we plan a real scorched earth, poisoned well, Sherman-to-the-sea policy for Va, Maryland and NC?
Smoke them out of their caves and get them on the run?
Tell me it can be done.
Yo, check it out.
I got a response e-mail from Lil’ Deb!
“I sent it to him. Deborah”
I sent her a note re: Kurtz’s column. It’s #49 here: http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/22/coinky-dink/
Ever notice that their “strategy,” ever includes doig what is right? How’s about addressing the actual issues that have most of America PISSED OFF!?
I won’t iunumerate , it would take up too much space!
I am always amazed to hear the media talking heads ask (over and over and over) “what does this president have to do to improvbe his approval numbers”
the answer to this now oft asked question is simple…there IS one thing Bush can do that would immediately push his approval numbers up to 70 or 80%
that one thing is to RESIGN
if Bush did that even I would give him a postive approval rating :)
“Things are goin so well in Iraq- cept fer all the dead people of course- that my favorite poodle Tony and I are gonna withdraw four troops- real soon now. Take that ya negative nabobs!”
Gingrich’s advice is double whammy hilarious. He not only suggests that Bush should do what Clinton, of all people, did, but by suggesting that he is suggesting that Bush do something other than ’stay the course’. Which Bush has proven again and again during his disasterous lifetime that he doesn’t change course until he has completed his apparent goal of running whatever it is he has taken charge of (puppet or not) into the ground.
I realize that Bush has already accomplished having done that to the government of the United States of America, but Bush is not aware of that so he’ll keep on hammering the same bent nail until he is yanked off of the of the platform.
“Dead people are kinda the same thing as liberty- I mean- ya can’t have liberty without dead people- and no one here is dead- so we all owe a big applause to the dead people who are bringing us more and more liberty every day- am I right Tony? Of course I am!”
OT: Print ad for elections re: tax cuts.
A picture of a sleek “have more” Bush-Base jerk standing next to an $84,000 car (an H3 Hummer?) Next to him is a harried looking middle-class guy standing next to his $50 toy version of the same car. A text box explains the astonishing tax cut differential.
Caption: ….By The (Wealthy) People… For The (Wealthy) People….
Or: “Bush: Some people call you the have-mores. I call you my base”.
Steve- Daschle tried that one- didn’t work real well.
Greenwald, May 22, 2006
Attorney General Alberto Gonazles announced on national television that the Bush administration has the power to imprison journalists who publish stories revealing conduct by the President which the administration wants to conceal (such as the warrantless NSA eavesdropping program, which he specifically cited). Gonazles went further and made clear that the administration is actively considering prosecution against journalists who publish such stories. The video is here.
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.....lists.html
John Adams, 1765
Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right… and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean of the characters and conduct of their rulers.
A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law (1765)
#53 Me too! I would *definitely* approve of the way Bush is doing his job if he fired himself! LOL
#45 Yes it took me awhile to realize what exactly the Republicans’ ceaseless, blatant lying reminded me of, but it’s definitely the Mars Attacks aliens. They lie and lie and don’t even care if people know it, because they know they will get away with it (because they HAVE gotten away with it for years now).
I saw an interview of Mehlman, and he said that before the elections in 06 we would capture bin ladin. Maybe Jim Vandebush is in the know. I hope this will not be enough to herd the sheep in the rethug direction.
OT
Re: Quash Recipes. The filings in the Libby case lay out the chain by and through which Fitzgerald could be removed.
At this point, unless some secret things have been done (like that could ever happen) Margolis is the only one that can remove Fitzgerald. McNulty has the power to revoke the delegation to Margolis and if McNulty did revoke the delegation to Margolis, McNulty to could remove Fitzgerald.
I know Judge W and I placed more emphasis on agency law than others, but in general, the power to remove (revoke) is also the power to modify and amend, such that IMO, it would be conceivable under agency law (as well as DOJ statutes) for either Margolis or McNulty to modify the delegation to Fitzgerald (i.e., require more consulations, place limits on actions, etc.).
I don’t know anything that would make any of that actually LIKELY, but along the lines of, “what happens if I turn the toaster on while I have this fork poking here” that is how something could happen that would affect Fitzgerald’s authorizations.
If you are interested in the mechanics – here is how it went. Ashcroft recused. Comey became acting AG for that matter. He delegated to Fitzgerald and Comey continued to have the supervisory right to remove Fitzgerald (princial - inferior officer issue in Libby’s litigation)[and also probably to modify the delegations parameters].
Gonzales had the same kinds of conflicts when he became AG, so he also recused (I believe this was a promise in his nomination hearings, not that things said in those hearings seem to matter for anything anymore) and Comey continued as acting AG for the Fitzgerald delegation.
When Comey was getting ready to leave there was no Dep AG already in place to take over the supervision and Gonzales could not, so Comey delegates his acting AG status for the Fitzgerald appointment to Margolis. Comey’s affidavit proffered by Fitzgerald indicates that once McNulty took the position as Dep AG, he stepped into Comey’s old shoes re: the delegation to Margolis – so that McNulty could revoke the delegation to Margolis and become the Acting AG for the Plame delegation to Fitzgerald if he elects. I posted about that at the time and I think the litigators all were pretty certain that the reality of the situation was that: a) that Margolis would not interfere with Fitzgerald, and b) that McNulty would not revoke the delegation to Margolis and take back the supervisory status and/or interfere with Fitzgerald’s prosecution.
I haven’t really done more than a very fast look at the Kos link and I am out of the loop for the last two days, but this partially addresses the issue I think.
To those predicting a big Dem win this fall: you don’t get it. It doesn’t matter who votes or how they vote, the only thing that matters is WHO COUNTS THE VOTE?
Must be bad if even Newseek is writing about it.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/052206B.shtml
Will Your Vote Count in 2006?
By Steven Levy
Newsweek
29 May 2006 Issue
“When you’re using a paperless voting system, there is no security,” says Stanford’s David Dill.
Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the voting booth, here comes more disturbing news about the trustworthiness of electronic touchscreen ballot machines. Earlier this month a report by Finnish security expert Harri Hursti analyzed Diebold voting machines for an organization called Black Box Voting. Hursti found unheralded vulnerabilities in the machines that are currently entrusted to faithfully record the votes of millions of Americans.
How bad are the problems? Experts are calling them the most serious voting-machine flaws ever documented. Basically the trouble stems from the ease with which the machine’s software can be altered. It requires only a few minutes of pre-election access to a Diebold machine to open the machine and insert a PC card that, if it contained malicious code, could reprogram the machine to give control to the violator. The machine could go dead on Election Day or throw votes to the wrong candidate. Worse, it’s even possible for such ballot-tampering software to trick authorized technicians into thinking that everything is working fine, an illusion you couldn’t pull off with pre-electronic systems. “If Diebold had set out to build a system as insecure as they possibly could, this would be it,” says Avi Rubin, a Johns Hopkins University computer-science professor and elections-security expert
read on, follow link
rw—I hope I’m not insulting you or anyone else’s knowledge of the Market;
I think last week’s sell-off and this week’s, um, weakness are due to understandable nervousness about interest rates and the health of the overall economy. From my limited view it would appear that institutional investors were acting in chorus last week along with most other investors, trying to get in front of any downturn.
In my experience, the big-money game these days is to catch a trend before it does too much damage to your portfolio, and catch it again before you miss most of the upside. So-called computer (or program) trading programs are designed to jump into or out of market positions based on trigger points using technical analysis, which often means a bunch of institutional programs triggering each other, and that means everyone is selling—or buying—at the same time and that causes an amplified event sequence of spikes in market pricing.
Back to this week: I see very valid concerns in terms of interest rates and also in terms of U.S. and Euro economic health. I think the repercussions of oil prices are just beginning to be felt on both sides of the Atlantic. I also think that investors are hearing tales of upcoming sales and earnings issues with corporations, due to costs and soft sales, and that’s being priced into the market. (Wall Street tends to buy and sell ahead of actual events or the reporting of events these days; they call it pricing in.) (And information is everywhere to feed the traders: I remember we used to have a sales guy from an electronics parts distributor come in every week to sell us resistors and such. We realized at some point that he knew what was selling and what wasn’t, and that those sales translated to a one-to-two quarter window on the entire Tech market. We started trading based on his numbers. We called it the resistor index…)
One last thing: Wall Street and other markets tend to be pretty ‘emotional’ these days. I expect that Cluster’s 30+% rating, the clear lost-in-the-weeds behavior of the GOP, and the prospect of another nasty hurricane season right around the corner is modifying the usual positive attitude.
Don’t mess with Howard:
“Drudge ‘retracts’ story on Howard Dean after receiving letter from DNC lawyer
Conservative heavyweight Matt Drudge has all but retracted a story about Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean after receiving a letter from the DNC’s lawyers, RAW STORY can report.
Saying he took the DNC at their word — and declining to mention the fact he had received a letter from a DNC lawyer asking him to take the story down — Drudge posted an update to a story claiming that Chairman Dean had intervened in the New Orleans mayoral race. His update noted that the DNC had vehemently denied the report”………
http://tinyurl.com/ney5r
Oscarsmom-
That’s one of the aptest analogies I’ve seen for their MO.
“Mars Attacks” will be a part of my Rethug image from now on.
marksb #62
ARE YOU SAYING THE TAX CUTS FOR RICH PEOPLE ARE NOT STIMULATING THE ECONOMY??? I’m shocked, SHOCKED!
KnotIookin @ 1:56 pm (#53) - I suppose the other answer would be “Stop screwing up everything he touches”, but I’m sure that’s just all negative and angry sounding.
klevenstein—The image does stick with you, I’ve found! :)
Mary @ 2:12 pm (#62) - No doubt this is appropos of nothing, but if I were running a cabinet department and some lawyer in some court case tried to rearrange my org chart to suit his purposes, I’d be a bit cross.
Cujo359 2:20 p.m.
You’re just engaging in “wild speculation.”
Never Underestimate Your Enemy
I enjoyed this article, and enjoyed the funny interpretations by Mr. Pach. But I take a slightly different tact on the article. In my opinion, we’ve just read the “R” team playbook. From fundraising frenzy thru presentation of morals issues….this article, for me, sets forth the enemy’s playbook.
And I worry…that so far, all we do is sit around and laugh at this playbook. I’d much rather see us rolling up our sleeves, and plotting a point-by-point method to carry the attack to the enemy.
And I also worry, and this is NOT directed at any particular person, but I worry that too many of us are sitting around on our asses waiting for Fitz to somehow save the day. I fear, that a plan of attack based only on laughing at the enemy, and awaiting some judicial proceeding to occur…is a recipe for disaster.
Never Underestimate Your Enemy
We’ve got their playbook. I’d rather see us mount the offensive….and carry the attack right down the throat of the “R” team.
Ghostman
The alternative to DiFi
Mars Attacks — so it’s TRUE, Bush Rove and Cheney REALLY ARE space alien invaders, sent to Earth to suck the brains out of gullible GOoPers.
#67 “ARE YOU SAYING THE TAX CUTS FOR RICH PEOPLE ARE NOT STIMULATING THE ECONOMY??? I’m shocked, SHOCKED! “
Of course it is. I’m sure Prada, Chanel and Mercedes sales will benefit. Monster home sales. Luxury SUVs. Money managers. All good stuff. Best case conceivable for repealing the estate tax too… Something will trickle down, on a good day… maybe…
By the way, Matt Cooper is now over at HuffPo defending McCain in the Rohe affair. Makes me wretch.
give him a piece of your mind
Teddy – thank you for the USNWR link below. I guess thank is the right word. Too long to run the analogy, but reading it I felt a lot like I did when I held a horse I had owned for almost a quarter century while a vet put him down. Still tossing his head, still fighting it, still ready to be alive, but with a shattered scapula that could not be repaired. Taken down from within, insidiously, by a disease that dismantled his very structure and support system, even while his heart and soul were still fighting. That’s what Addington & Co. have done to this Country and our Constitution. To then claim a ” lifelong love affair with the U.S. Constitution” doesn’t seem to make much sense – unless you’ve worked with women and children in a shelter or in an elder abuse program. If you have, you’ve seen the Addingtons and heard how much they love their wives-girlfriends-children- parents. Everyone of them puts themselves on the side of the angels too.
How many Constitutional principles can we squash with one headline?
From Raw Story: http://tinyurl.com/elbxo
“Clarence Thomas: Pray for Bush”
Dear gawd, chekc out Rape Gurney Joe’s emergence from the bunker:
http://www.newhavenindependent.....mum_o.html
Lots of stuff there!
In my opinion, we’ve just read the “R” team playbook. From fundraising frenzy thru presentation of morals issues….this article, for me, sets forth the enemy’s playbook.
There is nothing new in the playbook. That is what is funny. It is simply a repetition of the same “strategies” used by TEAM LOSER in each and every past election. And, though it has worked in the past, this is not the past.
And, although it may not be the best strategy, I believe that doing nothing while your opponents destroys themselves is not necessarily a bad one.
Actually, the macarena is 10 years old this year.
currently reading “Truman” by David McCullough. HT achieved the political miracle of this century by attacking. his advisors told him to ease up; but he knew better: this country likes a fighter. read pages 676,677. (sadly, it was an effective tactic for W, strutting around like some bantyweight, but the country responded to his ‘toughness.’) we need to get busy with the WARRIOR DEMOCRAT meme. why do think John Murtha resonates so deeply? stop being such pussies and call these idiots by their real names: bullies, hypocrites, cheats, thieves, elite rich boys who think we’re stupid.
Mary–LOL! Yes, you have described the way we live now–let’s see, what will happen if I turn on the toaster while I have this fork stuck in there–lovely, thank you!
Clothodi #42 — you’re right as far as such things go — gore lost florida because lieberman told the retired jews living there that bush was a great friend of israel — gore lost new hampshire because nader, being lebanese, can’t stand lieberman, a zionist who demonizes palestinians
gore chose lieberman to run with him — lieberman insisted that gore run away from clinton — QED
Is anyone else offended (pretending for the moment that we aren’t outraged over this country’s descent into fascism and upteen other things)that Bush is spending all his time and energy campaigning? Shouldn’t he be doing some presidentin’? What the hell are we paying him for–if all he’s going to is fundraisers and photo-ops, let the RNC pay him, not the taxpayer.
(Not that I actually want him to do more presidentin’, because he really sucks at it.)
Democrat Gives Early Support to Hayden
http://www.forbes.com/technolo.....63898.html
Sigh.
rizbiz #82–Totally agree! Dems need to understand that nobody respects politicians who do not seem to be saying what they really think—no matter WHAT, exactly, they are saying!
There are only going to be 2 choices on the ballot, Dems! What are you afraid of??
They need to get the “wimp” monkey off their backs.
mark sb 64, and rw cole
The selloffs last week were caused by large derivatives trades by hedge funds and securities firms, because they have been acting as counter-parties to large, leveraged bets on the direction of stock market volatility in recent months - and these bets are now unravelling because volatility has increased sharply.
And volatility is increasing because we’re seeing the Fed heading down a dead end due to the wonderful handling of economic policy over the past five years. The forces of gravity are returning to the markets.
Cujo 68I’m sure that’s just all negative and angry sounding.
Not until the voices in my head began to join together and chant it, at steadily increasing decible levels, punctuated by random screams. Then - yeah.
2006 strategy = 24/7 homo nups. That’ll bring those values voters out!
Flash: Shuster on Rove
Is Carl Rove still receiving a salary c/o the U.S. taxpayers, now that his new job is to keep the Congress in the hands of the Republicans?
What an a$$:
From above link at #79 parachutec:
“[Lieberman] added that some delegates privately told him they voted against him at the convention but will support him in August. They just wanted to send him a “message,” he claimed they told him. (His tongue-in-cheek response: They should have just “sent an e-mail.”)”
Yeah Joe—that ain’t worked so well in the past!
“Lamont supporters, on the other hand, claim that delegates told them that they voted for Lieberman at the convention under pressure from party leaders but would pull the Lamont lever in the primary.”
OT…I know no one will ever believe this. I sent Lil’Deb an email about Kurtz and the fact that Byron York had an announcement about the article….Lil’Debs response…..”Who is Byron York”…I mean it, I am not making this up!
Again, the pressure to decide on Rove comes from Rove’s team - not Fitzgerald.
Cujo - my comment for your “angry sounding” comment is awaiting moderation. I think that means I win - my comment is angrier sounding than yours. :b
Where is Rayne and is she going to call Levin? He did such a fantastic job, after all, with his careful handling of the GITMO situation when he collaborated with Graham - he clearly has these Executive Power machinations and Republican enabling all thought out. While I’m being all “angry sounding” an im-moderate.
Shuster suggests something I’ve been thinking: Fitz has been busy dealing with the Libby defense, which is why Fitzmas has been delayed.
What about the mission to Mars (bitches)? That’ll save them for sure!
94 and 96.
Rove not hearing anything after he testified, and now for this long means he’s heading for an indictment. If Fitz was going to take no further action, we would have heard within a few days of the last GJ appearance.
When was the last Orange Alert, anyway?
You people are so unsettled.
-The Decider
harry @ 2:40 pm (#88) - Yes, I can hear Mary Matalin now “The Clintonistas refused to repeal the law of gravity, so here we are. But do they admit they’re responsible. No!”
I’m having an unbearable craving for a Murray Waas article and some chocolate ice cream.
obsessed#102……Ah pure delight!
re: Jinny #65
Gee, I wonder if tomorrow Kurtz will report that Drudge was dead wrong. Oh, never mind.
Mary @ 2:54 pm (#95) - I still think how moderation works more like You Bet Your Life - say the magic word and the “your comment is awaiting moderation” message comes down. I bet if I used a certain phrase for making nuclear fuel better, this comment would be in moderation, too.
Thankfully, there seems to be no such problem with synonyms for sex organs.