
It's awkward being a defender of civil liberties when they're being invoked by the very people who work so tirelessly to destroy them. Digby's a bit worried about Big Pharma at the moment:
I'm guessing Rush is under some stress these days and I don't blame him. As much as I hate him, I am very much against prosecutors having the right to fish around in your medical records. I believe strongly in a right to privacy. Just like the socialists Ginsburg and Breyer. And unlike the Real Americans Scalia and Thomas.I have a sneaking suspicion that Rush thinks he should have a right to privacy, too. I wonder if he wants the One And Only True Party to ask prospective nominees about their views on that subject or if he just believes that Dear Leader knows what's best? He should probably get on the Dick-phone and say something because I don't think the right to privacy is a big item on the GOP agenda. In fact, it's highly likely that the new and improved wingnut supreme court is going to make it much more possible to put Rush in jail. There's a silver lining to everything, I suppose.
I think I've got to split with Digby here. Although I understand why the ACLU supported Rush's position, the fact remains that there is credible reason to believe, based on the allegations made by his $370-a-week maid (the guy makes $30 million a year, talk about karmic justice) that Rush was doctor shopping. The only difference between him and the guy who's gonna get 20 years for buying crack on the street is that Big Pharma is rich, white and paying less money for better quality drugs.
As far as prosecutors are concerned, it's no different than getting a search warrant to search his house -- they didn't have the unilateral right to seize the records and begin picking through accounts of his erectile disfunction and anal warts. They had to go before a judge, present their case, and demonstrate that there was reasonable evidence to believe he'd committed a crime.
I just got one of those letters from my credit card company that they have to send you if you live in California telling me that my personal information had been stolen. But not to worry, you know, they have it all under control. Why do I remain something less than convinced.
I'm gonna save my breath about Rush's right to privacy and worry about ordinary people who are the victims of outrageous invasions happening every day by companies who have bought the law and written it for their own benefit, people who don't make $30 million a year and don't pal around with Smirky McChimpsuit.
Rush old bean, you're on your own.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
I with you on this Jane. The law had probable cause and went through all the right steps. I am a firm believer in the probable cause process and if there is no crime and you are not guilty and the law follows a fair and legal path to invade your privacy you should have no problem. It is only people who have something to hide that have a problem with due process.
I might have some sympathy for pigboy if he wasn’t so self righteous and always insisiting that the law is the law when applied to other people and it suits his purpose. Karma is a bitch.
Your last paragraph says it perfectly. Rush has the means to defend himself.
Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up.”
– Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
“What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we’re not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too.”
– Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
“It’s kind of like sentencing. A lot of people say that we have a heavy sentence for this crime and a light sentence for another crime, and what we ought to do is reduce the heavy sentence so it’s more in line with the other. Wrong. In most cases we ought to increase the light sentence and make it compatible with the heavy sentence, and be serious about punishment because we are becoming too tolerant as a society, folks, especially of crime, in too many parts of the country.”
– Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
“Did you know that the White House drug test is multiple choice?”
Rush Limbaugh
Hyk, hyuk, hyuk, you’se so funny Rush! Hell isn’t hot enough for these self-righteous hypocrite bigots. This asshole deserves payback for every ton of humiliation and intolerance he’s inflicted upon others over the years.
Ooohh, that’s an excellent collection o’ quotes, Goat Scorn. I’ll be using those one day, that’s for sure. Thanks much.
Nice site. Thank to work…
perfect site good information, very nice news and etc… tnx
I love this site. Good work…
Very Very nice information here… Thanks